Advertisement

The role of Diastolic Blood Pressure on Myocardial Heart Patients

Editorial | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2834-796X/007

The role of Diastolic Blood Pressure on Myocardial Heart Patients

  • Ishita Saha 1
  • Rabindra Nath Das 2*

1 Department of Physiology, Calcutta Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, W.B., India

2 Department of Statistics, The University of Burdwan, Burdwan, West Bengal, India

*Corresponding Author: Rabindra Nath Das, Department of Statistics, The University of Burdwan, Burdwan, West Bengal, India.

Citation: Ishita Saha and Rabindra Nath Das (2022). The role of Diastolic Blood Pressure on Myocardial Heart Patients. International Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine, 1(2) DOI:10.31579/2834-796X/007

Copyright: © 2022 Rabindra Nath Das, This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: 08 November 2022 | Accepted: 22 November 2022 | Published: 29 November 2022

Keywords:

Abstract

Generally, hypertension (or equivalently high blood pressure (BP)) is directly correlated with ischaemic heart disease and stroke, and it highly affects of the adult individuals [1-3].  Practically cardiac risk factors namely ejection fraction, BP and heart rate are interrelated [3-5]. Generally, high BP is controlled by pharmacotherapy. Generally, many causal factors namely lifestyle, sleep apnoea, family history and some other biochemical factors are correlated with high BP [6, 7]. The following hypotheses are investigated in the present report.

  • For acute myocardial infarction patients (AMIPs), how do we determine the associations of diastolic BP (DBP) with other cardiac factors?
  • What are the relationships of DBP with other cardiac factors of AMIPs?
  •  What are the influences of DBP on the remaining cardiac factors of AMIPs?

The above mentioned hypotheses are surveyed with 500 individuals along with 21 variables, or factors. The data set was the Worcester Heart Attack Study, which had been surveyed by Dr. Robert J. Goldberg, Cardiology Department, The University of Massachusetts Medical School. The subjects population, data recording methods are well illustrated in [8], and the data can be obtained in the site: ftp//ftp.wiley.com/public/sci_tech_med/survival. For immediate application of the 21 study factors, they are reproduced as follows.

  • Age of the patient at the time of hospital admission, 
  • Sex  (0=male, 1=female),
  • At the time of hospital admission heart rate (HR),
  • At the time of hospital admission DBP,
  • At the time of hospital admission systolic blood pressure (SBP),
  • History of cardiovascular disease (CVD) (0 = no, 1 = yes),
  • Body mass index (BMI),
  • Atrial fibrillation  (AFB) (0 = no, 1 = yes),
  • Congestive heart complications (CHC) (0 = no, 1 = yes),
  • Fully heart block (AV3) (0 = no, 1 = yes), 
  • Cardiogenic shock (CSK) (0 = no, 1 = yes),
  • Myocardial infarction (MI) order (MIO) (0 = first, 1 = recurrent),
  • MI type (MIT) (0= non Q-wave, 1= Q-wave), 
  • Cohort year (CYR) (1=1997, 2=1999, 3=2001),
  • Date of hospital admission (DHA),
  • Leaving date from hospital (LDH),
  • Last follow up date (LFD),
  • Hospital staying  time from admission to leaving (HSA) (in days),
  • Leaving status from hospital (LSH) (0=alive, 1= dead),
  • Total treatment days from hospital admission to leaving  (THL),
  • Survival status at the time of leaving  hospital (SLH) (0= alive, 1= dead). 

The data set has 7 variables along with 14 attribute factors. The considered hypotheses are tested by probabilistic modeling of DBP on the rest independent factors. It is identified that DBP is a continuous positive non-constant variance and non-normally distributed dependent random variable. It can be modeled using joint generalized linear models (JGLMs) applying both the lognormal and gamma distributions [9-11], and it is noted that gamma fit gives better outcomes than lognormal fit. So, only the joint gamma fitted outcomes are displayed in Table 1, the data developed model fit verification plots are displayed in Figure 1. 

ModelCovariateEstimate  Standard errort-value

P-value

Mean

 

Constant3.5000.09536.91<0>
Age-0.0030.001-4.16<0>
Sex-0.0240.018-1.330.183
HR0.0020.0015.30<0>
SBP0.0060.001 19.64 <0>
BMI0.0020.0021.240.217
Atrial Fibrillation (AFB)0.0380.0211.800.072
Cardiogenic Shock (CSK)0.0710.0342.100.036
Congestive Heart Complications (CHC)-0.0540.020-2.710.007
MIO-0.0420.022-1.930.054
MI Type 0.1060.0205.37 <0>

Dispersion

 

Constant-5.5560.406-13.68<0>
SBP0.0070.0023.320.001
BMI0.0420.0133.350.001
AFB-0.4960.182-2.720.007
Complete heart block (AV3)-1.3340.474-2.810.005
MIO0.4600.1393.300.001
Cohort year (CYR)20.4800.1672.870.004
Cohort year (CYR)30.4530.1822.500.013

Table 1:  Results for mean and dispersion models of DBP from Gamma fit

Figure 1(a) shows the absolute residuals plot against the DBP predicted values, which is nearly a flat straight line, interpreting that variance is constant with the running means. Figure 1(b) presents the normal probability plot of the mean DBP gamma fitted model in Table 1, which does not show any lack of fit. Both the plots prove that the gamma fitted DBP model (Table 1) is nearly its true model. 

Figure 1: For the gamma fitted DBP models (Table 1) the (a) absolute residuals plot with respect to its fitted values, and (b) normal probability plot for the mean DBP model

The gamma fitted DBP mean & dispersion models are as follows. 

From the above mean & dispersion models of DBP, and Table 1 the following relationships of DBP with the rest cardiac and biological factors can be focused as follows. 

  • Mean DBP value is inversely related with age (Pr<0>
  • Mean DBP value is partially inversely related with sex (Pr =0.183), concluding that DBP value  is higher for male than female AMIPs.
  • Mean DBP value is significantly positively related with HR (Pr <0>
  • Mean DBP value is positively related with SBP (Pr<0>
  • Mean DBP value is partially positively related with atrial fibrillation (AFB) (Pr =0.072), interpreting that it is higher for AMIPs with AFB than others.
  • Mean DBP value is positively related with cardiogenic shock (CSK) (Pr =0.036),  implying that it is higher for AMIPs with CSK than others.
  • Mean DBP value is significantly inversely related with congestive heart complications (CHC) (Pr=0.007), concluding that it is higher for AMIPs without CHC than others.

References

Clinical Trials and Clinical Research: I am delighted to provide a testimonial for the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and the exceptional quality of the journal for my article entitled “Effect of Traditional Moxibustion in Assisting the Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients.” The peer review process for my article was rigorous and thorough, ensuring that only high-quality research is published in the journal. The reviewers provided valuable feedback and constructive criticism that greatly improved the clarity and scientific rigor of my study. Their expertise and attention to detail helped me refine my research methodology and strengthen the overall impact of my findings. I would also like to express my gratitude for the exceptional support I received from the editorial office throughout the publication process. The editorial team was prompt, professional, and highly responsive to all my queries and concerns. Their guidance and assistance were instrumental in navigating the submission and revision process, making it a seamless and efficient experience. Furthermore, I am impressed by the outstanding quality of the journal itself. The journal’s commitment to publishing cutting-edge research in the field of stroke rehabilitation is evident in the diverse range of articles it features. The journal consistently upholds rigorous scientific standards, ensuring that only the most impactful and innovative studies are published. This commitment to excellence has undoubtedly contributed to the journal’s reputation as a leading platform for stroke rehabilitation research. In conclusion, I am extremely satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the overall quality of the journal for my article. I wholeheartedly recommend this journal to researchers and clinicians interested in stroke rehabilitation and related fields. The journal’s dedication to scientific rigor, coupled with the exceptional support provided by the editorial office, makes it an invaluable platform for disseminating research and advancing the field.

img

Dr Shiming Tang

Clinical Reviews and Case Reports, The comment form the peer-review were satisfactory. I will cements on the quality of the journal when I receive my hardback copy

img

Hameed khan