Advertisement

The relationship between Vitamin D and obesity

Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2835-8147/69

The relationship between Vitamin D and obesity

  • Musafer H. Al-Ardi

General directorate for education in Al-Qadisiyah province. Ministry of education – Iraq

*Corresponding Author: Musafer H. Al-Ardi. General directorate for education in Al-Qadisiyah province. Ministry of education– Iraq.

Citation: All Musafer H. Al-Ardi, (2024), The relationship between Vitamin D and obesity, J Clinics in Nursing, 3(6); DOI:10.31579/2835-8147/69

Copyright: © 2024, Musafer H. Al-Ardi. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: 24 November 2024 | Accepted: 02 December 2024 | Published: 09 December 2024

Keywords: vitamin d, obesity, body mass index

Abstract

Introduction:

Approximately 1 billion people worldwide suffer from vitamin D deficiency, which may result from limited exposure to sunlight, long-term wearing of covering clothes, use of sunscreen, age as well as low consumption of food containing ergocalciferol, and malabsorption syndrome, Low 25(OH)D levels correlated with high body fat, glucose levels and decreased insulin sensitivity.

Objective:

Study the relationship between vitamin D deficiency and Obesity

Material and Method:

A descriptive, cross-sectional, and correlational design was used in this study. A convenience sampling method of 59 participants aged between (20-74) years from 1st of July 2024 to 1st of September 2024 participated in the study.

Collection of basic Information of the subjects included the volunteers’ basic information, past medical history, exercising activities.

Result:

The characteristics of the study population (n = 59) are shown in Table:1 The mean age of sample was between (20-74) years, vitamin D level was between (10-40) ng/ml, the average weight of the study group was between (50-125) Kg, height was between (151-194) cm, and BMI was between (19-37).

The P. Value was significant lower between (use sunblock, consumption of milk, bad mood, low immunity and good physical activity) (p. value <0.05). it was non-significant.

Conclusion:

In conclusion, there is no evidence of a relation between vitamin D level and the obesity; However, a statistically significant relationship was found between low immunity, bad mood, consumption of milk, use sunblock and vitamin D levels.

Introduction

Vitamin D3, or cholecalciferol, is essential for bone health, immune function, and overall well-being. A growing body of research shows a strong relationship between vitamin D3 levels and obesity. People with obesity often have lower levels of vitamin D3, which may be due to the vitamin being sequestered in fat tissue, reducing its availability in the bloodstream (1) This can lead to deficiency, even if vitamin D intake is sufficient. Obesity may also impair the conversion of vitamin D3 into its active form, further compounding deficiency. Low vitamin D3 levels in obese individuals have been linked to various metabolic disorders, such as insulin resistance and chronic inflammation, which are common in obesity (2) Although there is ongoing research into whether vitamin D3 supplementation can directly impact weight management, its importance in maintaining overall health in obese individuals is well recognized. Obesity and vitamin D deficiency are two major global health issues that significantly impact individual and public health. While obesity is considered a primary contributor to the rise of chronic diseases such as diabetes and cardiovascular conditions (3). vitamin D deficiency is a widespread concern, especially in regions with modern lifestyles. Studies suggest a complex relationship between obesity and vitamin D deficiency, with some proposing that obesity may lead to lower vitamin D levels, while others argue that vitamin D deficiency could contribute to increased weight gain and obesity. This research aims to explore the bidirectional relationship between obesity and vitamin D deficiency, focusing on their health implications and potential preventive and therapeutic strategies (4).

Patients and Methods:

A descriptive, cross-sectional, and correlational design was used in this study. A convenience sampling method of 59 participants aged between (20-74) years from 1st of July 2024 to 1st of September 2024 participated in the study. Collection of basic Information of the subjects included the volunteers’ basic information, past medical history, exercising activities and inquiries about symptoms.

Statistical Analysis:

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 24. The results are expressed categorically in counts and percentages, and the differences between groups were tested using the χ2 test.

The p value of <0>

 Ethical approval

A local ethics committee examined and approved the study protocol, subject information, and consent form in accordance with 1/6/2024 and the date of 1/8/2024 to obtain this approval.

Results:

The characteristics of the study population (n = 59) 29was female and 30 males are shown in (Table 1. table2) the mean of age was (40.76) years, vitamin D3 level was (15.90), weight was (73.78) Kg, height was (170.14) cm, and BMI was (25.26). Regarding to the use of protective equipment 20 was not used protective equipment and 39 was used a protective equipment (Table3). 27 of the sample was having back pain, 22 having muscle weakness,19 have pain in legs pelvic,20 have bad mood,11with low immunity and 33 was suffering from obesity. (Table 4). Regarding to consumption of milk, egg and fish 50.85% was having milk and 49.15was not 22.3% having more than 7 egg in week and 3.39 was noting egg, 59% was having fish once weekly and 1.6 was having fish 4 days in week. As shown in table 5, the relation between vitamin D3 and use of protective equipment was non-significant P. value <0 value = 0.032 and 0.04)>

 

Range

Minimum

Maximum

Mean

Std. Deviation

Age

54

20

74

40.76

13.36

Vitamin D3

30.11

10

40.11

15.90

5.98

weight

75

50

125

73.78

15.15

Hight

43

151

194

170.14

10.65

BMI

18.6

19

37.6

25.26

4.18

Table1: Characteristics of the study population

 

Frequency

Percent

Sex

Female

29

49.2

male

30

50.8

Total

59

100

Table.2: Sex distribution of the study group

 

No

Yes

Frequency

Percent

Frequency

Percent

use of protective equipment

20

33.9

39

66.1

use sunblock

38

64.4

21

35.6

consumption of milk

29

49.2

30

50.8

Table3: frequency of the use of protective equipment

 

No

Yes

Frequency

Percent

Frequency

Percent

back pain

27

45.8

32

54.2

muscle weakness

22

37.3

37

62.7

pain in legs pelvic

19

32.2

40

67.8

Bad mood

20

33.9

39

66.1

Low immunity

11

18.6

48

81.4

Good Physical activities

37

62.7

22

37.3

Obesity

33

55.9

26

44.1

Table 4: Symptoms of the study group

                                                                                                                                                 Vit D3 level

 

No

Yes

p value

Mean

Std. Deviation

Std. Error Mean

Mean

Std. Deviation

Std. Error Mean

use of protective equipment

16.71

5.89

1.32

15.49

6.05

0.97

0.462 NS

use sunblock

14.67

5.93

0.96

18.13

5.53

1.21

0.032*

consumption of milk

14.43

4.73

0.88

17.32

6.75

1.23

0.046*

Table 5: The relation between Vitamin D3 and the use of protective equipment

 

No

Yes

p value

Mean

Std. Deviation

Std. Error Mean

Mean

Std. Deviation

Std. Error Mean

back pain

17.14

4.67

0.90

14.86

6.79

1.20

0.146 NS

muscle weakness

16.70

4.27

0.91

15.43

6.81

1.12

0.436 NS

pain in legs pelvic

16.62

4.59

1.05

15.56

6.56

1.04

0.529 NS

Bad mood

20.41

6.39

1.43

13.59

4.24

0.68

<0>

Low immunity

15.67

7.06

2.13

15.95

5.79

0.84

0.889 NS

Good Physical activities

13.48

4.22

0.69

19.97

6.37

1.36

<0>

Obesity

15.96

4.68

0.82

15.82

7.40

1.45

0.930NS

Table 6: The relation between Vitamin D3 level and different factors

Discussion:

The World Health Organization defines overweight and obesity as abnormal or excessive accumulation of fat that may pose health risks. Overweight is classified as a body mass index (BMI) of 25 or higher, while obesity is defined as a BMI of 30 or higher. These two BMI thresholds are important references for assessing overweight and obesity in individuals (5). Obesity has numerous causes, and its development is influenced by a combination of biological and environmental factors. Maintaining a healthy body weight requires a balance between the energy consumed through food and the energy expended through physical activity (6). An increase in energy intake (food consumption) or a decrease in physical activity— or both—can lead to obesity. Additionally, a decline in physical activity results in reduced physical fitness. Conversely, decreased physical fitness can further contribute to obesity and decreased physical activity levels. Furthermore, weight gain and obesity can make individuals less active and more susceptible to physical inactivity (7). Obesity is caused by several factors, primarily an imbalance between the intake and expenditure of energy. Modern lifestyles contribute significantly to this issue, as many people spend long hours sitting in front of screens, whether for work, internet use, or video games (8). Although genetics can play a role in obesity, research has shown that diet and lifestyle choices are the main contributors to weight gain (9). Inactivity is often influenced by genetic factors, but it is crucial to recognise that obesity can lead to a variety of health problems, including type 2 diabetes, high blood pressure, increased body fat percentage, heart disease, early puberty, and psychological issues (10). Women between the ages of 18 and 50 need 1,000 milligrams of calcium a day. This daily amount increases to 1,200 milligrams when women turn 50 and men turn 70 (11). The increasing rate of obesity is contributing to the rising epidemic of vitamin D insufficiency. Obese individuals tend to have lower levels of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D. Variations in vitamin D levels can be attributed to several factors, including age, gender, geographic location, skin colour, traditional clothing, and exposure to sunlight. Key dietary sources of vitamin D include fish, egg yolk, and fortified milk (12).

Research has indicated a relationship between obesity and vitamin D levels. This connection is attributed to the retention and storage of vitamin D within adipose (fat) tissue (13). Studies have shown a significant inverse relationship between obesity and vitamin D, meaning that lower levels of vitamin D are associated with higher fat mass (14). Findings reveal that the concentration of 25-hydroxy vitamin D is lower in obese individuals compared to those who are not obese (15). Several potential mechanisms may explain the decrease in 25-hydroxy vitamin D levels in obese individuals. These include lower dietary intake of vitamin D among obese individuals, as well as reduced synthesis of the vitamin by the skin (16). This reduction in synthesis is likely due to the fact that obese individuals often cover more of their skin, limiting their exposure to sunlight (17). Also, reduced sunlight exposure, environmental factors, dietary conditions as calcium deficiencies (low calcium intake), and a lifelong lack of calcium plays a role in the development of bones pain. Low calcium intake contributes to diminished bone density, early bone loss and an increased risk of fractures, poor living habits (18,19). Good nutrition and regular exercise are essential for keeping bones healthy throughout life. Vitamin D improves the body's ability to absorb calcium and improves bone health. Maintaining a healthy lifestyle can reduce the degree of bone loss (20).

Conclusion:

In conclusion, there is no evidence of a relation between vitamin D level and the obesity; However, a statistically significant relationship was found between low immunity, bad mood, consumption of milk, use sunblock and vitamin D levels.

References

Clinical Trials and Clinical Research: I am delighted to provide a testimonial for the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and the exceptional quality of the journal for my article entitled “Effect of Traditional Moxibustion in Assisting the Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients.” The peer review process for my article was rigorous and thorough, ensuring that only high-quality research is published in the journal. The reviewers provided valuable feedback and constructive criticism that greatly improved the clarity and scientific rigor of my study. Their expertise and attention to detail helped me refine my research methodology and strengthen the overall impact of my findings. I would also like to express my gratitude for the exceptional support I received from the editorial office throughout the publication process. The editorial team was prompt, professional, and highly responsive to all my queries and concerns. Their guidance and assistance were instrumental in navigating the submission and revision process, making it a seamless and efficient experience. Furthermore, I am impressed by the outstanding quality of the journal itself. The journal’s commitment to publishing cutting-edge research in the field of stroke rehabilitation is evident in the diverse range of articles it features. The journal consistently upholds rigorous scientific standards, ensuring that only the most impactful and innovative studies are published. This commitment to excellence has undoubtedly contributed to the journal’s reputation as a leading platform for stroke rehabilitation research. In conclusion, I am extremely satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the overall quality of the journal for my article. I wholeheartedly recommend this journal to researchers and clinicians interested in stroke rehabilitation and related fields. The journal’s dedication to scientific rigor, coupled with the exceptional support provided by the editorial office, makes it an invaluable platform for disseminating research and advancing the field.

img

Dr Shiming Tang

Clinical Reviews and Case Reports, The comment form the peer-review were satisfactory. I will cements on the quality of the journal when I receive my hardback copy

img

Hameed khan