Advertisement

Stress Biomarkers and Child Development in Young Children in Bangladesh

Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2834-5118/045

Stress Biomarkers and Child Development in Young Children in Bangladesh

  • Zachary Butzin-Dozier 1*
  • Andrew N. Mertens 1
  • Sophia T. Tan 2
  • Douglas A. Granger 3,4
  • Helen O. Pitchik 1
  • Dora Il'yasova 1

1 School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA USA
2 Division of HIV, Infectious Diseases, and Global Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
3 Institute for Interdisciplinary Salivary Bioscience Research, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA USA
4 Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD USA
5 Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC USA 

*Corresponding Author: Zachary Butzin-Dozier, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA USA.

Citation: Zachary Butzin-Dozier, Andrew N. Mertens, Sophia T. Tan, Douglas A. Granger, Helen O. Pitchik, Dora Il'yasova, International Journal of Clinical Surgery, 3(1); DOI:10.31579/2834-5118/045

Copyright: © 2024, Zachary Butzin-Dozier. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: 26 December 2023 | Accepted: 09 January 2024 | Published: 11 January 2024

Keywords: BDSH; breastfeeding; factors; exclusive breastfeeding; feeding practices

Abstract

Background: Hundreds of millions of children in low- and middle-income countries are exposed to chronic stressors, such as poverty, poor sanitation and hygiene, and sub-optimal nutrition.

These stressors can have physiological consequences for children and may ultimately have detrimental effects on child development. This study explores associations between biological measures of chronic stress in early life and developmental outcomes in a large cohort of young children living in rural Bangladesh.

Methods: We assessed physiologic measures of stress in the first two years of life using measures of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis (salivary cortisol and glucocorticoid receptor gene methylation), the sympathetic-adrenal-medullary (SAM) system (salivary alpha- amylase, heart rate, and blood pressure), and oxidative status (F2-isoprostanes). We assessed child development in the first two years of life with the MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories (CDI), the WHO gross motor milestones, and the Extended Ages and Stages Questionnaire (EASQ). We compared development outcomes of children at the 75th and 25th percentiles of stress biomarker distributions while adjusting for potential confounders (hereafter referred to as contrasts) using generalized additive models, which are statistical models where the outcome is predicted by a potentially non-linear function of predictor variables.

Results: We analyzed data from 684 children (49% female) at both 14 and 28 months of age; we included an additional 765 children at 28 months of age. We observed 135 primary contrasts of the differences in child development outcomes at the 75th and 25th percentiles of stress biomarkers, where we detected significant relationships in 5 out of 30 contrasts (17%) of HPA axis activity, 1 out of 30 contrasts (3%) of SAM activity, and 3 out of 75 contrasts (4%) of oxidative status. These findings revealed that measures of HPA axis activity were associated with poor development outcomes. We did not find consistent evidence that markers of SAM system activity or oxidative status were associated with developmental status.

Conclusions: Our observations reveal associations between the physiological evidence of stress in the HPA axis with developmental status in early childhood. These findings add to the existing evidence exploring the developmental consequences of early life stress.

Introduction

There are more than 250 million children in low and middle-income countries who are at risk of failing to reach their developmental potential (Black et al., 2017). Chronic stress experienced in early childhood can increase risk for poor developmental outcomes later in life (Franke, 2014; Grantham-McGregor et al., 2007; McEwen, 2011). Chronic early-life stress has the potential to negatively affect multiple biological systems and interfere with learning and memory, dysregulate metabolism and sleep, and negatively affect mental health (Lu et al., 2016; National Scientific Council on the Developing Child, 2014). Many children are exposed to stressors, such as iodine deficiency, inadequate cognitive stimulation, and infectious disease (e.g., malaria, diarrhea), that are associated with developmental delay (Rana et al., 2022; Walker et al., 2011, 2007). Stress biomarkers may reflect a mechanism by which stressors contribute to subsequent developmental status. An improved understanding of how specific biomarkers are related to development may have implications on pediatrics as well as policy (Shonkoff et al., 2022). Evaluating these associations in early childhood is particularly important, as this is an effective time to intervene on developmental outcomes (Engle et al., 2011).

Children in low-income, rural communities face many biological and psychosocial stressors (Walker et al., 2007). Social and economic factors can lead to developmental differences in children, and developmental neuroscience demonstrates how early experiences can influence development (Engle et al., 2011). Poverty and other sociocultural factors can alter neurological functioning, brain structure, and child behavior, which can in turn affect developmental status (Walker et al., 2007). Inadequate cognitive stimulation is a major risk factor for poor developmental outcomes, and children from low-income homes are less likely to have high quality stimulation at home (Engle et al., 2011; Walker et al., 2007). Although cumulative exposure to stressors leads to an increased risk of poor developmental outcomes, the impact of these exposures depends on their timing, co-occurrence, and an individual’s reactivity (physiologic response) to these stressors (Walker et al., 2011). These cumulative stressors are often measured through stress hormones (Engle et al., 2007).

Stress can be an adaptive or maladaptive response to challenging stimuli. Primary stress biochemical pathways include the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) and sympathetic adreno-medullary (SAM) axes (Condon, 2018; Johnson et al., 2013). The first major component of the stress responses is the HPA axis which is controlled by a negative feedback loop in which pro-inflammatory cytokines stimulate HPA activation, triggering the release of anti-inflammatory cortisol, a glucocorticoid, which in turn dampens HPA axis activity (Johnson et al., 2013). The cortisol response enables individuals to respond to challenging circumstances, and cortisol is involved in mobilizing biological resources for metabolic, sensory, and learning processes (Booth et al., 2000). The NR3C1 gene encodes glucocorticoid receptors, and early life stress is associated with NR3C1 methylation (van der Knaap et al., 2014). Prolonged activation of the HPA axis and excess cortisol can lead to oxidative stress, which is an excess of reactive oxygen species relative to antioxidants (Aschbacher et al., 2013). Urinary F2-isoprostanes are the biomarkers most frequently used to measure oxidative status (Il’yasova et al., 2010; Montuschi et al., 2004; Pizzino et al., 2017). While oxidative stress can be harmful, reactive oxygen species play a critical role in the human body and immune function (Pizzino et al., 2017).

The second major component of the psychobiology of the stress response is activation of the SAM axis, which increases blood pressure and heart rate through the release of epinephrine and norepinephrine (Brietzke et al., 2012; McEwen, 2000). Whereas the HPA response to stress is linked with negative affect, distress, withdrawal, and being overwhelmed, the SAM response to stress is associated with increased engagement, cognitive effort, attentional focus, work, and arousal (Brietzke et al., 2012; McEwen, 2000). This axis also triggers the secretion of salivary alpha-amylase, a carbohydrate digestion enzyme that has been recently used as a salivary stress biomarker (Condon, 2018).

Researchers have evaluated individual differences in the psychobiology of the stress response and the consequences of these differences on early child development (Coe et al., 2003; Gunnar and Fisher, 2006; Kagan et al., 1987; Loman et al., 2010). Investigators have extended these research questions to assess the impact of various potential sources of stress including rural poverty (Fernald and Gunnar, 2009), maternal experience of intimate partner violence (Huth- Bocks et al., 2002; Levendosky et al., 2013), extreme neglect (Gunnar and Fisher, 2006; Reilly and Gunnar, 2019), parental divorce (Afifi et al., 2009), poor nutrition (Fernald et al., 2003; Fernald and Grantham-McGregor, 1998), and maternal substance use (Labella et al., 2021) on developmental outcomes in early childhood, although further research is needed to understand the mechanistic pathways through which these stressors can lead to developmental consequences. Correlational studies have indicated that poverty is associated with increased child cortisol, and a 2009 quasi-experimental study found that children from families who participated in a cash transfer program had lower cortisol compared to children from families who did not participate (Fernald and Gunnar, 2009; Schmidt et al., 2021). A 2003 study in Nepal as well as a 1998 study in Jamaica found that stress reactivity (salivary cortisol and heart rate) was associated with growth impairment (Fernald et al., 2003; Fernald and Grantham-McGregor, 1998).

Throughout decades of research on stress and development, several themes have emerged. First, the biobehavioral manifestations of chronic stress are heterogenous based on individual, familial, and community-level factors (Godoy et al., 2018). Second, differences in biological responses to stress (i.e. reactivity) are largely responsible for translating experiences into differential outcomes (Amstadter et al., 2016; Jiang et al., 2019; Schmidt et al., 2021; Wolf et al., 2018). Third, the social context of the family and quality of family care, including stimulating and nurturing behaviors, moderate the effects of exposures on development (Asok et al., 2013; Bernard et al., 2015; Booth et al., 2000; Fisher et al., 2007). Further evaluation of these associations in the context of low- and middle-income countries, where there is a large burden of both early-life chronic stress and poor developmental outcomes, as well as frequent exposure to inflammation and infection, may provide important insights in a high-risk population (Black et al., 2017).

This study aims to evaluate the associations between markers of HPA axis activity, SAM axis activity, oxidative stress, and child development outcomes in a cohort of young children (assessed at median ages 14 and 28 months) in rural Bangladesh. We hypothesized that decreased oxidative status and decreased salivary alpha-amylase would be associated with higher child development scores, while higher salivary cortisol, higher glucocorticoid receptor methylation, and higher heart rate and blood pressure would be associated with higher child development scores.

Methods and Materials

These analyses utilize data from the WASH Benefits study, described in detail previously (Luby et al., 2018; Tofail et al., 2018). The trial enrolled pregnant mothers in Bangladesh in their first or second trimester of pregnancy in rural subdistricts in Gazipur, Mymensingh, Tangail, and Kishoreganj and followed the cohort of children from birth until 2.5 years of age. Here, we describe observational analyses of the associations between child stress biomarkers and concurrent and subsequent child development in a subsample of children from the trial. Sample household enrollment characteristics remained similar to the main trial (Lin et al., 2020). This sample included 684 children aged 14 months (median age, Year 1) and 1,449 children (49

Results

We analyzed data from 684 children at Year 1 (median age 14 months) and 1,449 children at Year 2 (median age 28 months) for this study (Figure 1). The children had a median length-for-age z-score (LAZ) of -1.42 (IQR -2.07, -0.76) and a diarrhea prevalence of 13% at Year 1 and a median LAZ of -1.56 (IQR -2.28, -0.95) and a diarrhea prevalence of 7% at Year 2 . Mothers of children in the sample had a median educational attainment of 7 years (IQR 4, 9) and a 57% prevalence of having experienced any type of intimate partner violence at some point in their lifetime. The children had a median cortisol reactivity of 0 (IQR 0.00, 0.01) ug/dl/min and a median salivary alpha-amylase reactivity of 1.41 (IQR -0.08, 4.41) U/ml/min .

We observed 135 contrasts (excluding subgroup analyses) of the differences in child development outcomes at the 75th and 25th percentiles of stress biomarkers across three domains of stress (HPA axis, SAM axis, and oxidative status). We found that markers of HPA axis activity (cortisol and glucocorticoid receptor methylation) were associated with child development in five out of 30 contrasts (17%, markers of SAM activity (salivary alpha- amylase, heart rate, and blood pressure) were associated with child development in 1 out of 30 contrasts (3%, and markers of oxidative status (F2-isoprostanes) were associated with child development in 3 out of 75 contrasts. The proportion of significant results for HPA axis biomarkers was greater than we could expect due to random variation alone (5%;  = 0.05), but the proportion of significant results for SAM axis and oxidative status biomarkers were less than we would expect due to random variation, leading us to believe that significant associations with SAM axis and oxidative status biomarkers may be spurious due to repeated testing. No observed individual associations were statistically significant following false discovery rate correction for multiple testing.

HPA axis biomarkers

We found that increased salivary cortisol production and glucocorticoid receptor methylation were associated with worse child development outcomes. These analyses indicated that increased concurrent cortisol reactivity was associated with a lower CDI comprehension score (adjusted difference -0.15 standard deviations (SD), 95% CI (- 0.29, -0.01)) and a lower CDI expression score (adjusted difference -0.23 SD, 95% CI (-0.45, 0.00)) at Year 2. In addition, we found that higher post-stressor cortisol was associated with lower combined EASQ score (adjusted difference -0.22 SD, 95% CI (-0.41, -0.04)) and lower CDI comprehension score (adjusted difference -0.12 SD, 95% CI (-0.24, -0.01)). Greater mean overall glucocorticoid receptor methylation was correlated with lower concurrent CDI expressive language score (adjusted difference -0.09 SD, 95% CI (-0.17, -0.01)), and there was a consistently negative association between overall glucocorticoid receptor methylation and concurrent measures of child development. A greater percent methylation of transcriptor NGFI-A binding site was associated with higher EASQ gross motor score (adjusted difference 0.18 SD, 95% CI (0.00, 0.37)), but this association was not consistent across other measures of child development.

SAM system biomarkers

We observed that greater pre-stressor salivary alpha-amylase was associated with worse child development outcomes. There was a significant association between pre-stressor salivary alpha-amylase and EASQ gross motor score (adjusted difference - 0.18 SD, 95% CI (-0.35, 0.00)), and the direction of this association was consistent across communication, personal social, and combined EASQ scores. We did not detect significant associations between post-stressor salivary alpha-amylase or salivary alpha-amylase reactivity and measures of development. Furthermore, we did not detect a significant association between mean arterial pressure or mean resting heart rate and any measures of concurrent development. Oxidative status

We found limited evidence of an association between concurrent oxidative status and child development at Year 1. Increased concurrent 2,3-dinor- iPF(2a)-III (ng/mg creatinine) was associated with greater WHO motor milestones sum score (adjusted difference 0.27, 95% CI (0.04, 0.51)) as well as 8,12-iso-iPF(2a)-VI (ng/mg creatinine) and greater CDI comprehension Z-score (adjusted difference 0.15, 95% CI (0.04 SD, 0.27)). We assessed the possibility of a curvilinear association between concurrent oxidative status and child development by plotting the spline curves of these associations (Figure 5). The association between concurrent oxidative stress and CDI comprehension score largely indicated a positive correlation, while correlations of concurrent oxidative status and CDI expression and WHO sum score often depicted nonlinear associations, in which the second and third quartiles (moderate levels) of F2-isoprostanes were associated with better development outcomes relative to the first quartile.

We did not find evidence of a consistent association between measures of oxidative status at Year 1 and subsequent child development at Year 2. Higher levels of iPF(2a)-VI (ng/mg creatinine) were associated with lower EASQ personal-social score (adjusted difference -0.14 , 95% CI (-0.25, -0.03)), but this inverse correlation was not consistent across other urinary F2-isoprostanes or measures of child development. We did not detect a significant association between any measure of oxidative status and time to attainment of any WHO motor milestone.

Modification by family care indicators

We analyzed potential modification of the association between stress biomarker and development outcome by family care indicators (FCI) score at Year 1 and Year 2. The contrasted FCI scores (75th and 25th percentiles) were 9 and 5 at Year 1, and 11 and 6 at Year 2. Although we found some evidence of effect measure modification in specific exposure-outcome associations at specific timepoints, these associations were not consistent over time (e.g., FCI at Year 1 and Year 2) or across related exposure-outcome domains.

Discussion

Our observations reveal some consistent associations between multi-level and multi- system biological signatures of exposure to chronic stress and early child development. Results suggest that individual differences in the biology of the stress response may be associated with the translation of experience and exposure into developmental consequences in early life. Yet, in this high risk (low-income, rural) developmental context in Bangladesh, using a large sample size, the magnitude of the effect was small to modest.

HPA Axis

These findings indicate that HPA axis biomarkers, namely cortisol reactivity and overall glucocorticoid receptor methylation, are associated with developmental status, although the sensitivity of these measures is limited. This indicates that HPA axis activity may be a mechanism by which early-life adversity contributes to developmental impairment, although future studies such as mediation analyses should explore this hypothesis. While pre-stressor salivary alpha-amylase as well as moderate oxidative status showed some evidence of associations with developmental status, associations were most consistent and strongest for markers of HPA axis activity. These findings suggest that higher cortisol reactivity is associated with worse concurrent child development. This is consistent with previous studies’ findings that HPA axis hyperactivity may be related to delays in learning, memory, and neurological development (Booth et al., 2000; Franke, 2014; Grantham-McGregor et al., 2007; Lu et al., 2016; McEwen, 2011; National Scientific Council on the Developing Child, 2014). The age of the sample population has considerable implications, as early childhood is a particularly sensitive period to stress (Walker et al., 2011). In school-aged children, low or blunted (little change throughout the day) cortisol production is associated with poor developmental outcomes, and investigators have hypothesized that HPA axis hypoactivity through childhood and adulthood may be the result of early-life HPA axis hyperactivity (Gunnar and Vazquez, 2001). Follow-up evaluation of HPA axis activity in this cohort once they have reached school age may provide insights on the longer-term developmental correlates of early-life HPA axis activity.

We found that greater glucocorticoid receptor methylation was associated with worse child development outcomes. This indicates that glucocorticoid receptor hypermethylation, which is an indicator of early-life stress, may be associated with poor developmental outcomes for high-risk children in rural Bangladesh (van der Knaap et al., 2014). This is consistent with previous findings that glucocorticoid receptor methylation is positively associated with externalizing behavior and depressive symptoms in school-aged children (Cicchetti and Handley, 2017). In a previous analysis of this sample evaluating the impact of randomized assignment to interventions on child stress, we found that the control group had greater glucocorticoid receptor methylation relative to the combined nutrition, water, sanitation, and hygiene intervention group (Lin et al., 2021c). These cumulative findings indicate that glucocorticoid receptor methylation may be a pathway or marker of environmental stressors’ contribution to developmental status, but this hypothesis should be investigated further by future studies.

SAM Axis and Oxidative Status

Although we detected a positive correlation between pre-stressor salivary alpha-amylase and child development, the lack of consistency of relationships (in terms of direction and significance) across measures of SAM axis activity and child development (3% of contrasts were significant) indicates that this association may be spurious. Similarly, although we found limited evidence that moderate oxidative status was associated with child development, the inconsistency of these correlations across measures of oxidative status and child development (4% of contrasts were significant) are quite consistent with random variation.

strengths and limitations

Our study evaluated the association between stress and child development using a comprehensive set of biomarkers representing the HPA axis, SAM system, and oxidative status. As each of these biomarkers reflects a unique stress response, analysis of these individual correlations between each stress biomarker and measure of child development allows for evaluation of these associations at multiple levels and multiple biological systems.

The majority of the analyses conducted were with concurrent exposure and outcome data, which does not readily enable causal inference regarding the impact of child stress on child development. We conducted observational analyses with multivariate adjustment to control for potential confounders and covariates of interest, although residual confounding may still be present. Future analyses should include a greater number of time points for observations with additional temporal separation. Our interpretations for concurrent analyses are based on the assumption that stress biomarker exposures may cause a change in child development, although it is possible that child development outcomes lead to changes in child stress neurobiology (i.e., reverse causation). In addition, assessment of child development measures for children greater than 3 years of age, such as school attendance, executive functioning, and intelligence, would enable inference of the impact of early stress on longer-term development.

The inclusion of multiple measures of both stress and development is both a strength of this study and a limitation, as multiple comparisons lead to an increased risk of Type 1 error. We aimed to account for this risk by assessing the consistency of the direction (positive vs. negative) of point estimates in each domain of exposure-outcome assessments, in addition to evaluation of each contrast’s statistical significance, although the possibility of Type 1 errors remains plausible. Furthermore, the use of corrections for false discovery, such as Benjamini-Hochberg, may be overly conservative (i.e. low power) for correlational studies of stress biomarkers and child development, where we would expect to see small to modest effect sizes. Therefore, we recommend that these inferences inform futures studies that can deliberately target and evaluate potential associations of interest.

Conclusions

Our findings indicate a relationship between HPA axis biomarkers (cortisol and glucocorticoid receptor methylation) and developmental status of young children in Bangladesh. This indicates that HPA axis biomarkers may represent a mechanistic pathway by which early life stressors lead to subsequent development, although this hypothesis should be investigated by future studies such as mediation analyses. These associations contribute to the body of evidence that supports interventions that aim to improve child development by intervening on early-life stress, such as family-based interventions that target multiple stressors (Fisher, 2016; Pitchik et al., 2021).

Acknowledgments

We thank the families who participated in the WASH Benefits study and the incredible icddr,b staff for their valuable contributions. This work was supported by Global Development grant [OPPGD759] from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation to the University of California, Berkeley and by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health [grant number K01AI136885 to AL]. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. icddr,b is grateful to the Governments of Bangladesh, Canada, Sweden

References

Clinical Trials and Clinical Research: I am delighted to provide a testimonial for the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and the exceptional quality of the journal for my article entitled “Effect of Traditional Moxibustion in Assisting the Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients.” The peer review process for my article was rigorous and thorough, ensuring that only high-quality research is published in the journal. The reviewers provided valuable feedback and constructive criticism that greatly improved the clarity and scientific rigor of my study. Their expertise and attention to detail helped me refine my research methodology and strengthen the overall impact of my findings. I would also like to express my gratitude for the exceptional support I received from the editorial office throughout the publication process. The editorial team was prompt, professional, and highly responsive to all my queries and concerns. Their guidance and assistance were instrumental in navigating the submission and revision process, making it a seamless and efficient experience. Furthermore, I am impressed by the outstanding quality of the journal itself. The journal’s commitment to publishing cutting-edge research in the field of stroke rehabilitation is evident in the diverse range of articles it features. The journal consistently upholds rigorous scientific standards, ensuring that only the most impactful and innovative studies are published. This commitment to excellence has undoubtedly contributed to the journal’s reputation as a leading platform for stroke rehabilitation research. In conclusion, I am extremely satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the overall quality of the journal for my article. I wholeheartedly recommend this journal to researchers and clinicians interested in stroke rehabilitation and related fields. The journal’s dedication to scientific rigor, coupled with the exceptional support provided by the editorial office, makes it an invaluable platform for disseminating research and advancing the field.

img

Dr Shiming Tang

Clinical Reviews and Case Reports, The comment form the peer-review were satisfactory. I will cements on the quality of the journal when I receive my hardback copy

img

Hameed khan