Advertisement

Semaglutide: the First Anti-Obesity agent to be shown Decrease Cardiovascular Events

Review Article | DOI: https://doi.org/DOI:10.31579/2835-835X/047

Semaglutide: the First Anti-Obesity agent to be shown Decrease Cardiovascular Events

  • Nasser Mikhail
  • Soma Wali

Endocrinology Division1, Department of Medicine2, Olive View-UCLA Medical Center, David-Geffen UCLA Medical School, CA, USA. 

*Corresponding Author: Nasser Mikhail, Endocrinology Division1, Department of Medicine2, Olive View-UCLA Medical Center, David-Geffen UCLA Medical School, CA, USA.

Citation: Nasser Mikhail, Soma Wali, (2023), Semaglutide: the First Anti-Obesity Agent to be shown Decrease Cardiovascular Events, Clinical Trials and Case Studies, 3(1); DOI:10.31579/2835-835X/047

Copyright: © 2023, Nasser Mikhail. This is an open-access artic le distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Received: 08 December 2023 | Accepted: 23 December 2023 | Published: 05 January 2024

Keywords: obesity, mortality; cardiovascular; semaglutide; select trial

Abstract

The anti-obesity agent, semaglutide (2.4 mg/week) was evaluated in a large (n=17,604) multinational randomized trial called SELECT to examine its effects on cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in obese patients with overweight with preexisting CV disease and no diabetes. The primary outcome was a composite of CV death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), and nonfatal stroke. Over a mean duration of follow-up of 39.8 months, a primary CV outcome occurred in 6.5% in the semaglutide group and 8.0% in the placebo group; hazard ratio (HR) 0.80 (95% CI, 0.72 to 0.90; P<0.001). Mean change in body weight over 104 weeks was -9.4% and -0.9% with semaglutide and placebo, respectively; estimated treatment difference (ETT) -8.5% (95% CI, -8.5 to -8.3). There was significant amelioration in blood pressure and plasma levels of lipids, glycated hemoglobin, and C- reactive protein (CRP). The incidence diabetes and prediabetes were reduced by 73% and 67%, respectively with semaglutide.  16.6% of patients discontinued semaglutide due to adverse effects, mainly gastrointestinal (GI) compared with 8.2% who discontinued placebo. In conclusion, semaglutide is the first anti-obesity agent shown to decrease CV events in obese subjects with CV disease without diabetes. Further studies are needed to examine the impact of semaglutide on CV events in obese subjects without underlying CV disease.   

Introduction

The incidence of obesity is increasing worldwide and represents a major public health problem [1-4]. Although some studies have shown decreased mortality with higher degrees of obesity (the so-called obesity paradox), most investigations suggest increased all-cause mortality with greater values of body mass index (BMI) [2, 5-6]. Semaglutide is a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) approved for treatment of type 2 diabetes and obesity. In a subcutaneous dose of 1.0 mg/week, use of semaglutide was associated with reduction in CV events in patients with type 2 diabetes and prevalent CV disease [7]. In its highest approved doses of 2.4 mg/week, the drug was effective in decreasing weight in obese subjects with and without diabetes [8-9]. Moreover, the CV effects of semaglutide in obese subjects without diabetes were recently published in the SELECT trial [10]. Indeed, before the release of data from the SELECT trial, no agents from the obesity pharmacotherapy were shown to decrease CV events in obese subjects [11-12]. The purpose of this article is to provide an appraisal on semaglutide as the first anti-obesity drug shown to decrease CV events in subjects with obesity and prevalent CV disease without diabetes. 

Overview of the SELECT trial:

The SELECT trial is multinational, randomized, placebo-controlled, double blind megatrial (n=17,604) conducted in 41 countries across 6 continents [13]. The main objective of SELECT trial was to compare the effects of semaglutide versus placebo on the incidence of CV outcomes in patients with overweight (BMI ≥27-29.9 kg/m2) and obesity (BMI ≥30 kg/m2) [10,13]. All patients had to have pre-existing CV (67% with myocardial infarction, 17% with stroke, 4% with peripheral vascular disease, and 8% with more than 1 CV disease) [10]. Patients in the SELECT trial were randomized into 2 groups. The intervention in the first group (n=8,803) consisted of semaglutide 2.4 mg given subcutaneously once a week in a starting dose of 0.24 mg/week to be escalated to reach the target dose of 2.4 mg/week after 16 weeks. The second group of patients (n=8,801) received matching placebo.  Semaglutide or placebo was added to standard care with specific diets for weight loss. Follow-up lasted 104 weeks, with a mean follow-up of 39.8 months [10]. Overview of SELECT trial is summarized in table 1. 

Design

 

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multinational, 2 groups

Patients

 

72.3% males, age 61.6 years, with pre-existing CV disease and BMI ≥27 kg/m2, and no history of diabetes

Baseline weight (kg) and BMI (kg/m2) 

96.6 kg and 33.3 kg/m2

Intervention 

Semaglutide 2.4 mg subcutaneously once-weekly (n=8,803) versus placebo (n=8,801)

Primary outcome 

Composite of CV death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or non-fatal stroke

Follow-up

39.8 months

Effect of semaglutide on primary outcome 

Primary outcome CV event occurred in 6.5% with semaglutide vs 8.0% with placebo; HR 0.85 (95% CI: 0.72 to 0.90; P<0>

Effect of semaglutide on weight

-9.4% with semaglutide vs -0.9% with placebo, ETD -8.5% (95% CI, -8.7 to -8.2)

Proportions of patients who discontinued trial product due to adverse effects 

16.6% with semaglutide vs 8.2% with placebo; P<0>

                                                                               Table 1: Overview of SELECT trial [10,13]

Effects of semaglutide on cardiovascular outcomes in SELECT trial:

The primary outcome of the SELECT trial, a composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction or nonfatal stroke occurred in 6.5% of patients and 8.0% of patients in the placebo group; HR 0.80 (95% CI, 0.72 to 0.90; P<0>

With the respect to the timing of occurrence CV events, the separation between the semaglutide and placebo curves of the primary outcome started approximately 6 months after randomization and continued to widen with follow-up [10]. In addition, the effects of semaglutide on the primary end point were similar in different subgroups of subjects classified by age, gender, BMI, and type of CV disease [10]. 

Effect of semaglutide on renal function:

In the Select trial, effects of semaglutide on renal function was evaluated in a five-component composite secondary end point that included death from renal causes, initiation of long-term renal replacement therapy, onset of a persistent estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <15> 300 mg/g [10].  During follow-up, 1.8% of patients receiving semaglutide reached this endpoint compared with 2.2% among patients receiving placebo, HR 0.78 (95% CI, 0.63 to 0.96) [10]. 

Effect of semaglutide on body weight and waist circumference:

From randomization to 104 weeks, mean change in BMI was -9.3% in the semaglutide group compared with -0.8% in the placebo group; ETT -8.5% (95% CI, -8.7 to -8.3) [10]. Maximum weight reduction was achieved after approximately 15 months of intervention, then reached a plateau without evidence of rebound up to the end of follow-up [10]. Waist circumference (WC), an indicator of abdominal fat, was decreased in the semaglutide and placebo groups by -7.5 and -1.0 cm, respectively; ETT -6.5 cm (95% CI, -6.8 to -6.3) [10]. 

Effects of semaglutide on cardiovascular risk factors:

The placebo-corrected reduction in systolic blood pressure (SBP) by semaglutide was 3.1 mmHg (95% CI, 3.75 to 2.9), in diastolic blood pressure (DBP) was 0.5 mmHg (95% CI, 0.8 to 0.3), and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) by 0.32 percentage points [10]. Regarding lipid profile, there were modest but significant placebo-corrected reductions in plasma levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) by 2.1%, total cholesterol by 2.8%, triglycerides by 15.6%, and an increase in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) by 4.2% [10].  Moreover, there was significant placebo-corrected reduction in C-reactive protein (CRP), a marker of systemic inflammation, by 37.8% [10]. 

Effects of semaglutide on incidence of diabetes and pre-diabetes:

During follow-up of the SELECT study, new-onset type 2 diabetes [defined as reaching glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels ≥6.5%] was diagnosed in 3.5% and 12.0% of subjects in the semaglutide and placebo groups, respectively, i.e. 73% reduction, HR 0.27 (95% 0.24 to 0.31) [10]. Furthermore, pre-diabetes (defined as HbA1c ≥5.7%) was diagnosed in 21.3% and 50.4% among subjects randomized to semaglutide and placebo, respectively, i.e. 67% reduction, HR 0.33 (95% CI, 0.30 to 0.36) [10]. 

Mechanisms of CV benefits of semaglutide: 

The mechanisms whereby semaglutide decreased CV outcomes are likely multifactorial. The weight loss-inducing effect of semaglutide is a major cause leading to amelioration in CV risk factors such as blood pressure, dyslipidemia and blood glucose levels. In a large pooled analysis of 97 cohort studies, 46% of excess risk of coronary heart disease and 76% of excess risk for stroke that was attributed to high BMI were mediated through high blood pressure, total serum cholesterol and glucose, with high blood pressure being the most important contributor [6]. A decrease in systemic inflammation as reflected by the significant decrease in CRP levels by semaglutide is another contributing factor [10].  Other potential mechanisms include improvement in exercise tolerance as recently demonstrated by Kosibord et al [14] in obese patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction. In addition, direct beneficial effects of semaglutide on CV and renal systems cannot be excluded but require further studies. 

Safety of semaglutide:

Overall, no increase in serious adverse effects occurred with semaglutide [10]. However, the proportions of subjects who discontinued semaglutide due to adverse effects was significantly higher than those who discontinued placebo, 16.6% and 8.2% respectively (P<0>

Advantages of semaglutide:

In the SELECT trial, the significant improvements in weight, WC, CV risk factors (blood pressure, plasma lipids, hyperglycemia, and CRP translated into a clinically meaningful 20% reduction in CV outcomes in overweight/obese patient with underlying CV disease [10]. These results were long-waited in view of the progressive tendency towards increased CV deaths related to obesity across racial groups, with an overall 3-fold increase in age-adjusted mortality between 1999 and 2020 [1].  Interestingly, the significant relative reduction of 20% in CV outcomes by semaglutide (2.4 mg/week) occurred above the established CV benefits achieved by the standard of care in this population. In fact, 90% of subjects in the SELECT trial were already receiving statins, 75% angiotensin -converting-enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin-receptor blockers [10,13]. These proportions were similar in the semaglutide and placebo groups [10,13]. 

Limitations of semaglutide:

Suboptimal tolerance to semaglutide, mainly due to the high frequency of GI adverse effects, represents the most important limitation of this drug.  To minimize such effects, the SELECT investigators used small starting dose of 0.24 mg/week followed by slow dose up-titration to reach the target dose of 2.4 mg/week after 16 weeks [10]. In addition, the dose escalation intervals were allowed to be prolonged, treatment may be temporarily suspended, or using small maintenance doses [10]. Despite these precautions, 16.6% of subjects could not continue semaglutide as opposed to 8.2% in the placebo group [10]. Another important limitation is that patients in the SELECT trial were relatively “healthy” without significant co-morbidities. For instance, renal function at baseline was close to normal (mean eGFR±SD was 82.4±17.5 ml/min/1.73 m2) with only 11% of patients having eGFR < 60>

Conclusions and current needs:

Strong data derived from the large and adequately powered SELECT trial suggest that semaglutide 2.4 mg/week decreases CV events in obese subjects without diabetes by 20% over a mean follow-up of 39.8 months [10]. This significant reduction was likely attributed to the placebo-adjusted weight loss of 8.5% that led to improvement of CV risk factors, namely hypertension and dyslipidemia and decrease incidence of type 2 diabetes and pre-diabetes [10].  Randomized trials are required to see the effects of semaglutide and other incretin-based therapy on CV events and mortality in a wider obese population to include higher proportions of minorities, subjects who do not have pre-existing CV disease, patients with advanced stages of severe kidney disease, and patients with more severe degrees of obesity (e.g. BMI close to 40 kg/m2). In addition, longer duration of follow-up of 4-5 year-duration is necessary to see whether CV benefits of semaglutide would persist or even increase with time. 

Conflict of interest:

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Values are means. 

Abbreviations: CV: cardiovascular, BMI: body mass index, ETD: estimated treatment difference, HR: hazard ratio

References

Clinical Trials and Clinical Research: I am delighted to provide a testimonial for the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and the exceptional quality of the journal for my article entitled “Effect of Traditional Moxibustion in Assisting the Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients.” The peer review process for my article was rigorous and thorough, ensuring that only high-quality research is published in the journal. The reviewers provided valuable feedback and constructive criticism that greatly improved the clarity and scientific rigor of my study. Their expertise and attention to detail helped me refine my research methodology and strengthen the overall impact of my findings. I would also like to express my gratitude for the exceptional support I received from the editorial office throughout the publication process. The editorial team was prompt, professional, and highly responsive to all my queries and concerns. Their guidance and assistance were instrumental in navigating the submission and revision process, making it a seamless and efficient experience. Furthermore, I am impressed by the outstanding quality of the journal itself. The journal’s commitment to publishing cutting-edge research in the field of stroke rehabilitation is evident in the diverse range of articles it features. The journal consistently upholds rigorous scientific standards, ensuring that only the most impactful and innovative studies are published. This commitment to excellence has undoubtedly contributed to the journal’s reputation as a leading platform for stroke rehabilitation research. In conclusion, I am extremely satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the overall quality of the journal for my article. I wholeheartedly recommend this journal to researchers and clinicians interested in stroke rehabilitation and related fields. The journal’s dedication to scientific rigor, coupled with the exceptional support provided by the editorial office, makes it an invaluable platform for disseminating research and advancing the field.

img

Dr Shiming Tang

Clinical Reviews and Case Reports, The comment form the peer-review were satisfactory. I will cements on the quality of the journal when I receive my hardback copy

img

Hameed khan