Advertisement

Sclerotherapy of Venous Malformations of the Airways: A Literature Review

Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2835-2882/076

Sclerotherapy of Venous Malformations of the Airways: A Literature Review

  • Lev Voznitsyn 1,2*

1Department of Pediatric Maxillofacial Surgery, I.A. Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry (MSMSU), Moscow, Russia.

2Russian Association for Vascular Anomalies Research (RAVAR), Mahachkala, Republic of Dagestan, Russia.

*Corresponding Author: Lev Voznitsyn, Department of Pediatric Maxillofacial Surgery, I.A. Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry (MSMSU), Moscow, Russia.

Citation: Lev Voznitsyn, (2025), Sclerotherapy of Venous Malformations of the Airways: A Literature Review, Clinical Research and Studies, 4(2); DOI:10.31579/2835-2882/076

Copyright: © 2025, Lev Voznitsyn. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: 17 March 2025 | Accepted: 27 February 2025 | Published: 14 March 2025

Keywords: venous malformations; sclerotherapy; maxillofacial surgery

Abstract

Venous malformation (VM) is a developmental defect of venous blood vessels caused by sporadic mutations in the TEK gene, locus 9p21.2 (short arm of chromosome 9). The most common mutation is L914F (Limaye N., Wouters V., Uebelhoer M. Somatic mutations in angiopoietin receptor gene TEK cause solitary and multiple sporadic venous malformations // Nature Genet. 2009

Introduction

Venous malformation (VM) is a developmental defect of venous blood vessels caused by sporadic mutations in the TEK gene, locus 9p21.2 (short arm of chromosome 9). The most common mutation is L914F (Limaye N., Wouters V., Uebelhoer M. Somatic mutations in angiopoietin receptor gene TEK cause solitary and multiple sporadic venous malformations // Nature Genet. 2009. Vol. 41. P. 118-124. Soblet J., Limaye N., Uebelhoer M., Boon L., Vikkula M. Variable somatic TIE2 mutations in half of sporadic venous malformations // Molecular syndromology. 2013. T.4. P. 179-183). The TEK gene encodes the endothelial receptor TIE2, whose activity is normally regulated by protein growth factors stimulating angiogenesis—angiopoietin-1 and angiopoietin-2. The PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway plays a crucial role in forming intercellular connections between the endothelium and smooth muscle layer during venous vessel development. Mutations associated with VM cause ligand-independent hyperphosphorylation and increased TIE2 kinase activity (Sato T.N., Tozawa Y., Deutsch U., et al. Distinct roles of the receptor tyrosine kinase TIE1 and TIE2 in blood vessel formation // Nature. 1995. Vol. 376. P. 70-74). Hyperexpression of TIE2 can result in structural and quantitative changes in vessels, leading to VM formation. Expression of TIE2 is more pronounced in vessels with a smooth muscle layer than in microcirculatory vessels and small veins lacking smooth muscle cells. It has been hypothesized that large vessels with a smooth muscle layer are partially protected from increased TIE2 activity, whereas the most significant effect of TIE2 hyperactivity, leading to VM formation, occurs in small veins and venules (Faschinger G., Deutsch U., Risau W. Functional interaction of vascular endothelial-protein-tyrosine phosphatase with the angiopoietin receptor TIE2 // Oncogene. 1999. Vol. 18. P. 5948-5953). Therefore, mutations in the TEK gene are the primary factor in abnormal venogenesis (Blind A.M., Vabres P., et al., 2017).

Venous malformations of the airways represent a rare but clinically significant pathology that can cause severe symptoms, including airway obstruction, pain, and bleeding. Sclerotherapy is one of the main treatments for such malformations due to its minimally invasive nature, high effectiveness, and applicability across various age groups. This study aims to analyze the use of different sclerosants in the treatment of venous malformations of the airways and assess their effectiveness and safety.

Materials and Methods

Data were analyzed from the following publications:

1.Oomen et al., 2015: Describes endoscopic sclerotherapy using bleomycin for treating airway malformations.

2.Kamijo et al., 2013: Investigates the successful application of monoethanolamine oleate in treating laryngeal venous malformations.

3.Azene et al., 2016: Evaluates the role of foamed bleomycin in a multidisciplinary approach to treating malformations.

4.Gurgacz et al., 2014: Conducts a systematic review of percutaneous sclerotherapy for vascular malformations.

Diagnostic methods used in these studies include:

•  MRI and CT angiography: For precise localization and sizing of malformations.

•  Endoscopy: For visual assessment of airway conditions.

•  Ultrasound: For guidance during percutaneous sclerotherapy.

Sclerotherapy agents (bleomycin, ethanol, monoethanolamine oleate) were evaluated based on effectiveness, complication rates, and clinical improvement.

Results

Localization and Clinical Presentation

Studies most frequently described the following:

•  Malformation localization:

o Airways: 94 cases.

o Larynx: 8 cases.

o Oropharynx: 12 cases.

•  Symptoms:

o Swelling: 36 cases.

o Pain: 20 cases.

o Bleeding: 13 cases.

o Hoarseness: 5 cases.

Comparison of Sclerosants

SclerosantNumber of PatientsEffectivenessComplications
Bleomycin94>90% reduction in symptoms and VM size<1% swelling, minimal inflammation
Ethanol87Successful in 87% of cases87% swelling, intubation sometimes needed
Monoethanolamine Oleate5100% resolution of VMMinor complications

1.             Bleomycin:

o              Reduced VM size in >90% of patients.

o              Complications occurred in <1% of cases (minimal swelling and inflammation).

2.             Ethanol:

o              Successful in 87% of cases.

o              High complication rate (87% swelling, sometimes requiring intubation).

3.             Monoethanolamine Oleate:

o              Achieved VM resolution in 100% of cases after one or two procedures.

o              Minor complications.

Conclusions

•               Bleomycin is the most effective and safest sclerosant, offering >90?fectiveness and a complication rate of <1%.

•               Ethanol is effective but associated with a high risk of complications, including significant swelling, limiting its use in the airways.

•               Monoethanolamine Oleate showed excellent results in small cohorts, but further studies are required.

•               Successful treatment requires:

o              Endoscopic guidance.

o              A multidisciplinary approach involving otolaryngologists, radiologists, and anesthesiologists.

References

Clinical Trials and Clinical Research: I am delighted to provide a testimonial for the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and the exceptional quality of the journal for my article entitled “Effect of Traditional Moxibustion in Assisting the Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients.” The peer review process for my article was rigorous and thorough, ensuring that only high-quality research is published in the journal. The reviewers provided valuable feedback and constructive criticism that greatly improved the clarity and scientific rigor of my study. Their expertise and attention to detail helped me refine my research methodology and strengthen the overall impact of my findings. I would also like to express my gratitude for the exceptional support I received from the editorial office throughout the publication process. The editorial team was prompt, professional, and highly responsive to all my queries and concerns. Their guidance and assistance were instrumental in navigating the submission and revision process, making it a seamless and efficient experience. Furthermore, I am impressed by the outstanding quality of the journal itself. The journal’s commitment to publishing cutting-edge research in the field of stroke rehabilitation is evident in the diverse range of articles it features. The journal consistently upholds rigorous scientific standards, ensuring that only the most impactful and innovative studies are published. This commitment to excellence has undoubtedly contributed to the journal’s reputation as a leading platform for stroke rehabilitation research. In conclusion, I am extremely satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the overall quality of the journal for my article. I wholeheartedly recommend this journal to researchers and clinicians interested in stroke rehabilitation and related fields. The journal’s dedication to scientific rigor, coupled with the exceptional support provided by the editorial office, makes it an invaluable platform for disseminating research and advancing the field.

img

Dr Shiming Tang

Clinical Reviews and Case Reports, The comment form the peer-review were satisfactory. I will cements on the quality of the journal when I receive my hardback copy

img

Hameed khan