Advertisement

Relationship between the nature of the symptomatology in schizophrenia and the type of manual dominance

Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2835-2882/047

Relationship between the nature of the symptomatology in schizophrenia and the type of manual dominance

  • Zhivko Apostolov *

Varna University of Medicine, Bulgaria.

*Corresponding Author: Zhivko Apostolov, Varna University of Medicine, Bulgaria.

Citation: Zhivko Apostolov., (2024), Relationship between the nature of the symptomatology in schizophrenia and the type of manual dominance, Clinical Research and Studies, 3(3); DOI:10.31579/2835-2882/047

Copyright: © 2024, Zhivko Apostolov. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: 22 March 2024 | Accepted: 08 April 2024 | Published: 24 May 2024

Keywords: schizophrenia; laterality

Abstract

Background and objectives: Despite years of research, there is still no definitive evidence of a link between the clinical manifestations of schizophrenia and atypical asymmetry, and a consistent model of association is lacking.

Methods: We examined 70 men diagnosed with schizophrenia according to the criteria of ICD-10 and DSM-IV, using the "Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale" (BPRS).

Results: Our analysis revealed several statistically significant correlations between the coefficient of right-hand dominance and symptoms from the BPRS.

Conclusion: Positive symptoms are associated with right-handedness and more severe exacerbations of the illness, while affective symptoms in non-right-handed patients may be associated with a more favorable course.

Introduction

Schizophrenic disorders are characterized by fundamental deviations in thinking and perceptions, as well as inappropriate or blunted affect. While clarity of consciousness and intellectual capacity are usually retained, cognitive deficits may develop over time. These disorders affect fundamental functions that contribute to a sense of individuality, uniqueness, and independence in healthy individuals. Common symptoms of schizophrenia include echo of thought, delusions, hallucinations, disorganized speech, and catatonic behavior, among others [1].

To aid in the understanding of this complex disease, clinicians often categorize symptoms into two groups: positive and negative symptoms. Positive symptoms encompass delusions, hallucinations, disorganized speech, and bizarre behavior, representing distortions or intensifications of normal cognitive or emotional functions. Negative symptoms, on the other hand, reflect the loss or decline of normal mental functions and include alogia, blunted affect, and avolition [2].

Kurt Schneider's concept of "first-rank symptoms" has significantly influenced the conceptualization of schizophrenia, defining specific types of delusions and hallucinations, such as thought insertion or withdrawal, delusions of control, and commentary voices [2, 3]. Despite years of research, a definitive link between the clinical manifestations of schizophrenia and atypical asymmetry has yet to be established, and a consistent model of association is lacking. Some studies have explored the relationship between formal thought disorder and atypical manual dominance in schizophrenic patients [4-11]. However, the findings have been inconsistent.

Materials and Methods

We examined 70 men diagnosed with schizophrenia according to the criteria of ICD-10 and DSM-IV, excluding those with a history of specific medical conditions or personality disorders. The participants were between 19 and 60 years of age and were hospitalized in the psychiatric clinics of the University Multi-Profile Hospital for Active Treatment St. Marina - Varna. The assessment was conducted using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), a scale for general psychopathology that includes 24 items [12].

Results

Our analysis revealed several statistically significant correlations between the coefficient of right-hand dominance and symptoms from the BPRS (Table 1). As the coefficient of right-hand dominance decreases (indicating a tendency toward non-right-handedness and left-handedness), levels of anxiety and depression increase. The symptoms "anxiety" and "depressive mood" were significantly higher in non-right-handed patients. Additionally, right-handed patients showed higher scores on the uncooperativeness scale, positive subscale, and hostility scales. Moreover, the values for "hallucinations" were significantly higher in right-handed patients.

Symptom

Values of the correlation coefficient (r)

Probability Value (p-value)

“Anxiety”

r = –0.317

p = 0.03

“Depressive mood”

r = –0.416

p = 0.004

“Uncooperativeness”

r = 0.315

p = 0.035

“Positive subscale”

r = 0.317

p = 0.034

“Hostility”

r = 0.258

p = 0.027

Table 1: Correlations between the coefficient of right-hand dominance and symptoms from the BPRS

Figure 1: Correlation between the coefficient of right-hand dominance and anxiety

Figure 2: Correlation between the coefficient of right-hand dominance and depressive mood

 

Figure 3: Correlation between the coefficient of right-hand dominance and uncooperativeness

 

Figure 4: Correlation between the coefficient of right-hand dominance and positive subscale

 

Figure 5: Correlation between the coefficient of right-hand dominance and hostility

Discussion

Two hypothetical explanations can be proposed for these observations. First, disturbances in the normal interaction between brain hemispheres may play a role. Studies have shown that left-sided administration of sodium amytal (resulting in transient anesthesia of the left hemisphere) leads to pessimistic experiences and negative emotions, while right-sided administration (resulting in right hemispheric inactivation) leads to euphoric reactions and positive emotions. These mood changes are considered manifestations of the release of one hemisphere from contralateral inhibitory effects, which can also be observed in patients with unilateral brain damage.

The second explanation suggests that the findings in non-right-handed individuals may reflect the characteristics of their premorbid personality. Previous studies have shown that healthy left-handed individuals exhibit higher levels of depression, anxiety, and neuroticism. They also tend to display greater emotional instability and increased behavioral inhibition system (BIS) activity, which predisposes them to anxiety [13-18].

Conclusion

our findings indicate that positive symptoms in schizophrenia are associated with right-handedness and more severe exacerbations of the illness. On the other hand, affective symptoms observed more frequently and pronouncedly in non-right-handed patients may be linked to a more favorable course of the illness. These results contribute to the understanding of the relationship between the nature of symptomatology in schizophrenia and manual dominance, highlighting the potential influence of brain hemispheric interactions and premorbid personality traits.

Further research is warranted to validate and expand upon these findings, considering larger sample sizes, diverse populations, and additional assessment measures. Understanding the underlying mechanisms behind the observed associations can provide valuable insights into the etiology and progression of schizophrenia, leading to improved diagnostic and therapeutic approaches.

 

Acknowledgments:

We would like to acknowledge the participants of this study for their cooperation and the University Multi-Profile Hospital for Active Treatment St. Marina - Varna for providing the necessary facilities and support.

Conflict of Interest:

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Funding details:

none

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate:

Approved by the Commission for Scientific Research Ethics at Medical University – Varna “Prof. Dr. Paraskev Stoyanov”.

Helsinki Declaration has been followed for involving human subjects in the study and written inform consent has been taken from the patients.

References

Clinical Trials and Clinical Research: I am delighted to provide a testimonial for the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and the exceptional quality of the journal for my article entitled “Effect of Traditional Moxibustion in Assisting the Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients.” The peer review process for my article was rigorous and thorough, ensuring that only high-quality research is published in the journal. The reviewers provided valuable feedback and constructive criticism that greatly improved the clarity and scientific rigor of my study. Their expertise and attention to detail helped me refine my research methodology and strengthen the overall impact of my findings. I would also like to express my gratitude for the exceptional support I received from the editorial office throughout the publication process. The editorial team was prompt, professional, and highly responsive to all my queries and concerns. Their guidance and assistance were instrumental in navigating the submission and revision process, making it a seamless and efficient experience. Furthermore, I am impressed by the outstanding quality of the journal itself. The journal’s commitment to publishing cutting-edge research in the field of stroke rehabilitation is evident in the diverse range of articles it features. The journal consistently upholds rigorous scientific standards, ensuring that only the most impactful and innovative studies are published. This commitment to excellence has undoubtedly contributed to the journal’s reputation as a leading platform for stroke rehabilitation research. In conclusion, I am extremely satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the overall quality of the journal for my article. I wholeheartedly recommend this journal to researchers and clinicians interested in stroke rehabilitation and related fields. The journal’s dedication to scientific rigor, coupled with the exceptional support provided by the editorial office, makes it an invaluable platform for disseminating research and advancing the field.

img

Dr Shiming Tang

Clinical Reviews and Case Reports, The comment form the peer-review were satisfactory. I will cements on the quality of the journal when I receive my hardback copy

img

Hameed khan