Advertisement

Post Tuberculosis (TB) Bronchiectasis versus Non-TB Bronchiectasis in Northern Pakistan: A single centre retrospective cohort study on frequency, demographics, microbiology, and complications

Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/DOI:10.31579/2834-5142/033

Post Tuberculosis (TB) Bronchiectasis versus Non-TB Bronchiectasis in Northern Pakistan: A single centre retrospective cohort study on frequency, demographics, microbiology, and complications

  • Anbesan Samuel Hoole
  • Ahsan Ilyas
  • Sunaina Munawar
  • Matthew Can’t
  • Rizwan Hameed
  • Shahzad Gill
  • Joel Riaz
  • Issac Siddiq

Respiratory Unit, Bach Christian Hospital, Qalandarabad, Abbottabad District, KPK, Pakistan.

*Corresponding Author: Anbesan Samuel Hoole, Respiratory Unit, Bach Christian Hospital, Qalandarabad, Abbottabad District, KPK, Pakistan.

Citation: Anbesan Samuel Hoole, Ahsan Ilyas, Sunaina Munawar, Matthew Can’t, Rizwan Hameed, et al, (2025), Post Tuberculosis (TB) Bronchiectasis versus Non-TB Bronchiectasis in Northern Pakistan: A single centre retrospective cohort study on frequency, demographics, microbiology, and complications, International Journnal of Clinical Nephrology, 4(1); DOI:10.31579/2834-5142/033

Copyright: © 2025, Farah Naz Qamar. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Received: 27 December 2024 | Accepted: 02 January 2025 | Published: 10 January 2025

Keywords: bladder cancer, clinicopathology, early incidence, surgical oncology

Abstract

Introduction

While Post Tuberculous (TB) Bronchiectasis is the most common cause of Bronchiectasis in South Asia, there has been little research into its microbiology and clinical characteristics in Pakistan. This single centre retrospective cohort study at Bach Christian Hospital (BCH) in rural Northern Pakistan seeks to address this issue.

Methods

Demographic, Imaging, Aetiological and Microbiological data were obtained from 32 patients with Bronchiectasis at BCH from between January 2023 and December 2023(1–3).

Results

76% (25/32) of all cases of Bronchiectasis were Post TB. TB infection was seen in 5 cases of Post TB Bronchiectasis, TB with bacterial or fungal co infections in 4, and single bacterial infections in 4. In post TB Bronchiectasis 4 patients had growth of a single bacterium. Drug sensitivities were obtained for bacterial isolates.

One patient each with Post TB and Non-TB Bronchiectasis died from Type 2 Respiratory failure despite appropriate treatment. 2 patients with Post TB Bronchiectasis and destroyed lung syndrome improved but with ongoing significant respiratory impairment (4). All other patients improved with treatment.

Discussion

  • The frequency of Post TB Bronchiectasis is very high even for South Asia (5–8).
  • A significant number (8/24) of Post TB Bronchiectasis had re-infection or failure to improve despite appropriate drug treatment. TB PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) on Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was key in the management of these patients (9).
  • Among patients with Post TB Bronchiectasis, those with co-infection present a difficult treatment challenge.
  • Some patients with Post TB Bronchiectasis have significant complications such as destroyed lung syndrome which is difficult to manage.
  • Drug susceptible bacteria and NTM were less commonly isolated than in other studies (10–12).

Conclusion

Further research is needed particularly to manage Post TB Bronchiectasis patients with co-infections or complications such as significant structural lung disease

Key Messages

What is known about this topic: Tuberculosis (TB) is the most common cause of bronchiectasis in South Asia, but little is known about microbiology or clinical characteristics of post-TB Bronchiectasis. What this study adds: Post TB Bronchiectasis has a very high prevalence in our region, with TB PCR key for diagnosis of TB re-infection in some cases. Mycobacterial, Bacterial and Fungal co-infections form a treatment challenge, as does significant structural lung disease such as destroyed lung.

How this study might affect research, practice, or policy: TB PCR testing is a valuable tool in Post TB Bronchiectasis and further research and larger-scale studies are needed to determine optimal treatment for co-infections and significant structural lung disease.

Introduction

Pakistan has the 5 highest burden of Tuberculosis (TB) world-wide and accounts for 61% of new TB cases in the WHO Eastern Mediterranean Region (13). While a national TB control programme has long existed, there are delays in diagnosis and treatment resulting in a relatively static high incidence of TB (14–17) and increased complications of TB such as bronchiectasis (18). TB is known to be the most common cause of Bronchiectasis in South Asia (7,19) and patients with Post TB Bronchiectasis are known to have more severe disease compared with Non-TB Bronchiectasis (5,20–23). However, there has been little research into its prevalence, microbiology, or complications in Pakistan (8,18). In this single-centre retrospective cohort study at Bach Christian Hospital (BCH) in rural Northern Pakistan, we seek to explore the frequency of TB as a cause of Bronchiectasis, demographics, as well as the microbiology and associated complications in TB versus Non-TB Bronchiectasis.

Methods

Demographic, Imaging, Aetiological and Microbiological data were obtained from patients with Bronchiectasis at BCH between January 2023 and December 2023. Patients established on TB treatment based on sputum results and improving after two months were not included (1,24). Bronchiectasis was defined according to BTS guidelines based on CT Thorax imaging (3). Aetiology was determined by clinical history, imaging findings and further investigations where feasible. Microbiology was based on Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) for all but one patient.

Ethical approval was obtained from BCH ethics committee.

Results

32 patients with Bronchiectasis were included, out of which 25 (78%) had post TB Bronchiectasis (figure 1).

 

Figure 1 A. Sex distribution in Post TB vs Non-TB Bronchiectasis B. Aetiology distribution of Bronchiectasis C. Microbiology of Post TB Bronchiectasis D Microbiology of Non-TB Bronchiectasis

Non-TB Bronchiectasis aetiologies included Post childhood infection (n = 2), COPD (n =1), Kartagener’s (n = 1), Rheumatoid Arthritis (n = 1) and Idiopathic (n = 2). The median age in Post TB Bronchiectasis was 65 years (Range 17 – 81), while the median age in Non-TB Bronchiectasis was 45 (Range 14 – 73). There were 15 females and 10 males in the Post TB Bronchiectasis group, and 4 females and 3 males in the Non-TB Bronchiectasis group.

In Post TB Bronchiectasis, 9 patients had Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tb) on BAL based on Gene Xpert MTB/Rif PCR despite negative sputum Acid Alcohol Fast Bacilli (AAFB). Only one of these patients had AAFB on BAL. No TB patient had Rifampicin Resistance (surrogate for Multi Drug Resistant [MDR] TB). Full drug sensitivities were obtained in two patients which revealed fully drug sensitive (DS) TB.

Four patients with positive TB PCR on BAL had bacterial or fungal co-infections. In addition to M tb, one patient each had Burkholderia Cepacia (B. Cepacia), Achromobacter denitrificans, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Aspergillus (BAL Galactomannan positive and imaging suggestive of Pulmonary aspergillosis).

One patient had co-infection with B. cepacia and Aspergillus. Two patients each had Klebsiella and Pseudomonas. In 11 patients with Post TB Bronchiectasis no organism was identified.

In Non-TB Bronchiectasis, one patient each had Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Carbapenemase Resistant Acinetobacter Baumannii (CRAB) and Haemophilus Influenzae (H. Influenzae). Three patients had no identifiable organism.Drug sensitivities were obtained for bacterial isolates (figure 2)

 

Figure 2 Drug sensitivities of bacterial isolates from Post TB Bronchiectasis (A) and Non-TB Bronchiectasis (B)

In terms of complications, the patient with TB and B. cepacia co-infection as well the patient with CRAB died during inpatient admission despite sensitivity directed antibiotic treatment alongside bronchodilators and chest physiotherapy for mucous clearance, as well as eventually NIV for type 2 respiratory failure (T2RF). Two patients with Post TB Bronchiectasis, one with TB infection and the other with B. cepacia and Pulmonary Aspergillosis, both presented with destroyed lung syndrome (4) affecting the left lung causing significant functional impairment but have improved with treatment. Even so, both have significant residual respiratory impairment. All other patients have improved with treatment.

Discussion

Firstly, the frequency of Post TB Bronchiectasis (76% of all Bronchiectasis cases) is very high compared with other studies, even for South Asia. Notably a previous study from Southern Pakistan reported 58% and an Indian study reported 50%(7,8). This is higher than other areas of the world, even in Asia (Saudi Arabia 43%, Korea 20%) (5,6).

Secondly, a significant number (8/24) of Post TB Bronchiectasis patients had re-infection with TB or failure to clinically improve despite an adequate period of appropriate TB treatment (Range: 2 months – 1 year). Notably none 

of these patients were sputum AAFB positive, highlighting the diagnostic challenge of paucibacillary TB. This is an important clinical problem in cases of TB reinfection, where the diagnosis may be missed in rural TB centres utilising only sputum AAFB. This can be largely overcome by sputum MTB/Rif PCR available in some of the secondary care centres(9), however one 14-year-old male diagnosed with TB reinfection from BAL PCR had previous negative sputum and gastric lavage PCRs.

Thirdly among patients with Post TB Bronchiectasis, those with co-infection present a difficult treatment challenge. The clinical significance of the bacterial and co-infections is uncertain and interactions between M tb and other bacteria and fungi within the microbial interactome are poorly understood (25). In addition, appropriate treatment regimens can be challenging, particularly for drug resistant bacteria such as B. cepacia. Treatment for pulmonary aspergillosis co-infection with TB is also challenging in our setting, due to the drug interactions between rifampicin for TB and antifungal azole drugs. This is compounded by limited access to anti-TB drugs other than the combined fixed dose tablets of either Isoniazid, Rifampicin, Pyrazinamide and Ethambutol (HRZE) or Isoniazid and Rifampicin (HR) (24).

Fourthly, three out of the 25 Post TB patients had significant complications including destroyed lung (n = 2) and death due to T2RF despite NIV. One patient with non-TB Bronchiectasis with CRAB also died due to T2RF despite NIV. Although other studies have highlighted greater disease severity in Post TB Bronchiectasis compared with Non-TB Bronchiectasis, it is difficult to reach any conclusions in this cohort due to small sample size. Significant structural lung disease such as destroyed lung syndrome with large lung cavities is challenging, particularly within our resource-poor context where there is limited recourse to cardiothoracic surgery such as Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery (VATS) due to cost and availability. Here Endobronchial valve insertion may be an option and has already been trialled in patients with tuberculous cavities (26).

While early detection and diagnosis remains key to the reduction of Post TB Bronchiectasis and its complications, further research and resources are also necessary to reduce morbidity and mortality in those who have already developed advanced disease.

Fifthly, organisms such as H. influenzae more commonly isolated in other studies were less frequent (10,11). But this likely reflects prior antibiotic treatment eradicating more drug susceptible organisms. Interestingly Non-TB Mycobacteria (NTM) were not isolated in this study either, but this may reflect challenges in diagnostics in Pakistan (12).

Significant limitations of this study include its small sample size and single centre. Statistical tests to determine the significance of differences in terms of microbiology and complications between Post TB and Non-TB Bronchiectasis were not performed due to small sample size. This study could be improved by addition of spirometry and functional status data to complete validated severity scoring systems such as the Bronchiectasis severity index (BSI) (27). A multicentre study for Bronchiectasis in Pakistan could be implemented, like the European Multicentre Bronchiectasis Audit and Research Collaboration (EMBARC) and Respiratory Research Network of India (EMBARC – India) which was recently published (28). This would not only improve understanding of the disease and outcomes for patients in Pakistan, but in a global era also help keep track of pathogens that could spread world-wide.

References

Clinical Trials and Clinical Research: I am delighted to provide a testimonial for the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and the exceptional quality of the journal for my article entitled “Effect of Traditional Moxibustion in Assisting the Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients.” The peer review process for my article was rigorous and thorough, ensuring that only high-quality research is published in the journal. The reviewers provided valuable feedback and constructive criticism that greatly improved the clarity and scientific rigor of my study. Their expertise and attention to detail helped me refine my research methodology and strengthen the overall impact of my findings. I would also like to express my gratitude for the exceptional support I received from the editorial office throughout the publication process. The editorial team was prompt, professional, and highly responsive to all my queries and concerns. Their guidance and assistance were instrumental in navigating the submission and revision process, making it a seamless and efficient experience. Furthermore, I am impressed by the outstanding quality of the journal itself. The journal’s commitment to publishing cutting-edge research in the field of stroke rehabilitation is evident in the diverse range of articles it features. The journal consistently upholds rigorous scientific standards, ensuring that only the most impactful and innovative studies are published. This commitment to excellence has undoubtedly contributed to the journal’s reputation as a leading platform for stroke rehabilitation research. In conclusion, I am extremely satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the overall quality of the journal for my article. I wholeheartedly recommend this journal to researchers and clinicians interested in stroke rehabilitation and related fields. The journal’s dedication to scientific rigor, coupled with the exceptional support provided by the editorial office, makes it an invaluable platform for disseminating research and advancing the field.

img

Dr Shiming Tang

Clinical Reviews and Case Reports, The comment form the peer-review were satisfactory. I will cements on the quality of the journal when I receive my hardback copy

img

Hameed khan