Advertisement

Petrochemical Industry Wastewaters Treatment with Sonication and With Some Chemicals and Toxicity Analysis

Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/DOI:10.31579/2834-5126/062

Petrochemical Industry Wastewaters Treatment with Sonication and With Some Chemicals and Toxicity Analysis

  • Rukiye Öztekin A
  • Delia Teresa Sponza A *

Delia Teresa Sponza, Dokuz Eylül University, Engineering Faculty, Department of Environmental Engineering, Tınaztepe Campus, 35160 Buca/Izmir, Turkey.

*Corresponding Author: Delia Teresa Sponza A, Delia Teresa Sponza, Dokuz Eylül University, Engineering Faculty, Department of Environmental Engineering, Tınaztepe Campus, 35160 Buca/Izmir, Turkey.

Citation: Rukiye Öztekin A, Delia Teresa Sponza A, (2024), Petrochemical Industry Wastewaters Treatment with Sonication and With Some Chemicals and Toxicity Analysis, Clinical Trials and Clinical Research, 3(2); DOI:10.31579/2834-5126/062

Copyright: © 2024, Delia Teresa Sponza A. This is an open access article distributed under the creative commons’ attribution license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: 01 March 2024 | Accepted: 29 March 2024 | Published: 22 April 2024

Keywords: daphnia magna acute toxicity assay; hydroxyl radicals concentration; microtox acute toxicity test; petrochemical; polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (pahs); sonication

Abstract

The petrochemical industry real wastewaters (PCI ww) cannot be easily treated due to its toxic and refractory organic contents. Therefore, this wastewater was treated by sonication alone and with the addition of some additives. The effects of 1 h aeration, increasing nitrogen gas N2(g) sparging (15 and 30 min), pH (4.0, 7.0, 10.0), dissolved oxygen (DO) (2, 4, 6 and 10 mg L-1), H2O2 (100, 500 and 2000 mg L-1), TiO2 (0.1, 0.5, 10 and 20 mg L-1), NaCl (1, 2.5 and 15 g L-1), ferrous iron (Fe+2) (from FeSO4.7H2O) (2, 8 and 20 mg L-1), ferric ions (Fe+3) (from FeCl3.6H2O) (10, 20 and 50 mg L-1), HCO3-1 ions (from NaHCO3) (0.5, 1 and 5 g L-1) and butanol (C4H9OH) (0.1, 0.5 and 2 g L-1) concentrations, was applied to this wastewater at increasing sonication times (60, 120 and 150 min), temperatures (25, 30 and 60oC), sonication frequencies (25, 35, 132 kHz), sonication powers (120, 350, 640 and 3000 W), and sonication intensities (12.73–16.63–22.64–32.60–50.93 and 90.54 W cm-2), respectively. Sonication alone provided 96.90% PAHs, 92.48% CODdis, 94.23% TOC in PCI ww after 150 min, at 60oC, at 640 W, at 35 kHz, at 90.54 W cm-2, respectively. The maximum removal efficiencies for PAHs, CODdis, TOC were 99.68%, 99.68%, 98.35% at NaCl=15 g L-1, at NaCl=15 g L-1 and at DO=10 mg L-1, respectively, in PCI ww. Higher than 90% acute toxicity removals in PCI ww was measured after sonication with Photobacterium phosphoreum and Daphnia magna organisms for the same operational conditions mentioned above. The results of this study showed that sonication alone ana with some additives can be used effectively to treat the toxic and refractory compounds in PCI ww. Microtox acute tocicity test was more sensitive than Daphnia magna acute toxicxity assay.

1. Introduction

In recent years, ultrasound irradiation has received increasing attention for the destruction of organic pollutants in waters and wastewaters [1-3]. The process comprises cyclic formation, growth and subsequent collapse of microbubbles occurring in extremely small intervals of time, and release of large quantities of energy over a small location. Sonochemical degradation in aqueous phase involves several reaction pathways and zones such as pyrolysis inside the bubble and/or at the bubble–liquid interface and hydroxyl radical (OH)-mediated reactions at the bubble–liquid interface and/or in the liquid bulk [3, 4]. The relative importance of the various mechanisms involved primarily depends on the physicochemical properties of the pollutants in question; the process is more selective towards hydrophobic and volatile species that can be degraded easily via pyrolytic reactions, while hydrophilic and less volatile compounds are degraded slowly via hydroxyl radical-induced reactions [1, 2].

Numerous works have demonstrated the efficiency of ultrasounds toward the degradation of a wide variety of organic compounds including estrogens [for instance, 17b-estradiol (b-E2), estrone (E1), 17a-ethynylestradiol (EE2)], endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) (such as bisphenol A), pharmaceuticals, vegetable oils, nitroorganics (NOCs), trihalomethanes (THMs), aliphatic hydrocarbons, naphthenic hydrocarbons, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) organochlorine pesticides (OCPs), sugars, tannins, pectin, lipids, polyphenols and polyalcohols, etc. present in relatively dilute aqueous solution and it appears that the applications of this novel means of reaction in environmental remediation and pollution prevention is unlimited [5-23]. 

The intensification of the organic matter solubilization induced by the ultrasonic action, can lead to an increase of the bioavailability of some micropollutants to the degrader consortium [24, 25]. Nevertheless, it is of great interest to study such ubiquitous compounds (PAHs, THMs, OCPs, EDCs, NOCs, etc.), because they are widespread in all parts of the environment; air, water, soils and sediments [6, 8, 26-29] 

An important refractory family compounds in petrochemical industry wastewater (PCI ww) are the PAHs, which have a hydrophobic character, a low water solubility and less volatile with increasing molecular weight that limit their biodegradation, their hazard potential can be relatively high, thus making their presence in the water cycle both an acute and a chronic risk to human health and environmental quality [30,31]. Most of the time, compounds studied are hydroxylated and/or halogenated substituted aromatics or hydrocarbons, having a water solubility in a mg/l range. Only a few works concern the degradation of compounds such as PAHs [anthracene (ANT), benzo[k]fluoranthene (BkF), pyrene (PY), benzo[a]pyrene (BaP), etc.] in PCI ww for which solubilities are in the ng/ml range [17, 31-37]. These compounds have been listed by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US. EPA) and the European Unions European Economic Community (EU EEC) since 1979 and 1980, respectively, as priority pollutants [31, 37-41]. Due to associated health concerns, some PAHs are possible or probable human carcinogen such as BaP and all PAHs having four condensed rings [42]. The distribution, fate and destruction of these pollutants are then of special significance, especially in water. PAHs are ubiquitous environmental pollutants with mutagenic properties, which have not been included in the Turkish guidelines for treated waste monitoring programs [43].

As a consequence of their strongly hydrophobic properties and their resistance to biodegradation, PAHs are not always quantitatively removed from wastewaters by activated sludge treatments, which very efficiently relocate them into treated effluents. In recent years, considerable interest has been shown in the application of ultrasound as an advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) for the treatment of hazardous contaminants, such as PAHs in water.34,44,45 The sonication process is capable of effectively degrading PAHs present in dilute solutions, typically in the micro and nano ranges. PAHs were decayed to less toxic and less carcinogenic products and by-products with addition some catalysts during ultrasonic treatment. However, it is notable that none of the studies report the use of ultrasound for the removal of more hydrophobic PAHs compounds typically found in effluents of PCI ww. 

In Izmir-Turkey, the petrochemical industry treatment plant wastewaters are treated with conventional activated sludge systems and approximately seventeen hydrophilic, less and more hydrophobic PAHs [naphthalene (NAP), acenaphthylene (ACL), acenaphthene (ACT), fluorene (FLN), phenantrene (PHE), anthracene (ANT), carbazole (CRB), fluoranthene (FL), pyrene (PY), benz[a]anthracene (BaA), chrysene (CHR), benz[b]fluoranthene (BbF), benz[k]fluoranthene (BkF), benz[a]pyrene (BaP), indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene (IcdP), dibenz[a,h]anthracene (DahA), benzo[g,h,i]perylene (BghiP)] are released into receiving bodies, since low COD (56%) and PAHs (39–42%) removal efficiencies are observed. Aerobic activated treatment systems are not equipped for PAHs removal efficiently. PAHs residues have been frequently detected in rivers and lakes that receive sewage and industrial effluents supplied by those surface waters [17].

In this study, the effects of sonication and the addition of some chemicals (1 h aeration, N2(g), pH, DO, H2O2, TiO2, NaCl, Fe,+2 Fe,+3 HCO3-1 and C4H9OH) on the removal efficiencies of PAHs, CODdis, TOC in PCI ww were investigated. The toxicity reduction was assayed with Photobacterium phosphoreum and Daphnia magna after sonication and chemical addition processes. Furhermore, the sensitivities of these toxicity organisms were evaluated. 

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Sonicator properties

A BANDELIN Electronic RK510 H sonicator was used for sonication of the wastewater samples (Figure 1). The sonication frequency and the sonication power were 35 kHz and 640 W, respectively. Glass serum bottles in a glass reactor were filled to volumes of 100 and 500 ml with wastewater and were placed in a water bath. They were then closed with teflon coated stoppers throughout the measurement of the wastewater. The evaporation losses of PAHs and other volatile compounds were estimated to be 0.01perecentage in the reactor and, therefore, assumed to be negligible. The serum bottles were filled with 0.10 mL methanol in order to prevent adsorption on the walls of the bottles and minimize evaporation.

Figure 1: The structural diagram of the sonicator used in this study: (1) glass reactor, (2) stirrer, (3) energy conversion device, (4) thermometer, (5) heater, (6) stainless steel bath, (7) water exit valve, (8) thermostate, (9) teflon cover.

The temperature in the sonicator was monitored continuously and was adjusted to ambient temperature (25oC), 30oC and 60oC with an automatic  heater. The stainless steel sonicator was equipped with a teflon holder to prevent temperature losses. The sonicator reactor was sealed with a water 

jacket to maintain a constant temperature and to minimize temperature loss. Cooling water was circulated through the jacket of the reactor throughout the experiment in order to remove the heat generated during sonication. This procedure maintains the temperature of the reaction medium almost constant. All experiments were in batch mode using an ultrasonic transducer (horn type), which has an active acoustical vibration area of 19.60 cm2, and a maximum input power of 640 W. Ultrasonic waves for 35 kHz frequency were emitted from the bottom of the reactor through a piezoelectric disc (4.00–cm diameter) fixed on a pyrex plate (5.00–cm diameter). The shematic configuration of the sonicator used in this study is shown in Fig. 1. Samples were taken after 60 min, 120 and 150 min of sonication and they were analyzed immediately.

2.2. Chemical oxygen demand (COD) measurements

COD was determined with Close Reflux Method following the Standard Methods 5220 D 46 using an Aquamate thermo electron corporation UV visible spectrophotometer (2007). First the samples were centrifuged for 10 min at 7000 rpm. Secondly, 2.50 ml volume samples were treated with 1.50 mL 10216 mg L-1K2Cr2O7 with 33.30 g L-1 HgSO4 and 3.50 ml 18.00 M H2SO4 which contains 0.55% (w/w) Ag2SO4. Thirdly the closed sample tubes were stored in a 148°C heater (thermoreactor, CR 4200 WTW, 2008) for 2 h. Finally, after cooling, the samples were measured at 600 nm with an Aquamate thermo electron corporation UV visible spectrophotometer (2007). The Close Reflux Method COD was used to measure the COD in PCI ww before and after sonication experiments. 0.45 μm membrane-filtered (Schleicher and Schuell ME 25, Germany) wastewater samples were used to measure the dissolved COD (CODdis) in PCI ww prior and after sonication experiments. 

2.3. Total organic carbon (TOC) measurements

TOC was measured following the Standard Methods 5310 [46] with a Rosemount Dohrmann DC-190 high-temperature total organic carbon (TOC) analyzer (1994).

2.4. Analysis of PAH samples

All extract to analyze for seventeen PAHs with a gas chromotography (Agilent 6890) combined with a mass selective detector (Agilent 5973 inert MSD) (Agilent GC-MS system). A capillary column (HP5-MS, 30.00 m, 0.25 mm, 0.25 μm) was used. The initial oven temperature to hold at 50oC for 1 min, to rise to 200oC at 25oC 1 min-1 and from 200oC to 300oC at 80oC 1 min-1 and was held for 5.50 min. The injector ion source and quadrupole temperatures were 295oC, 300oC and 180oC, respectively. High purity helium (He) was used as the carrier gas at constant flow mode (1.50 mL min-1, 45.00 cm s-1 linear velocity). The MSD to run in selected ion-monitoring mode. Compounds were identified on the basis of their retention times, target and qualifier ions. Qualification was based on the Internal Standard Calibration Procedure.

2.5. Operational conditions

PCI ww samples were examined for different sonication temperetaures (25oC, 30oC and 60oC), different sonication times (30, 60, 120 and 150 min), different sonication frequencies (25–35 and 132 kHz), different sonication powers (120, 350, 640 and 3000 W), different sonication intensities (16.63, 32.60, 50.93 and 90.54 W cm-2), different sonication densities (0.24–0.70–1.28 and 6 W mL-1), respectively. The maximum yields were found 60oC sonication temperature, 150 min sonication time, 35 kHz sonication frequency, 640 W sonication power, 90.54 W cm-2 sonication intensity and 6 W/ml sonication densities, respectively. Therefore, optimum sonication conditions were selected 60oC sonication temperature, 150 min sonication time, 35 kHz sonication frequency, 640 W sonication power, 90.54 W cm-2 sonication intensity and 6 W mL-1 sonication densities, respectively. 

Sonication experiments were applied for 1 h aeration, different DO concentrations (2, 4, 6 and 10 mg L-1), different pure N2(g) sparging (15 and 30 min), different pH values (4.0 – 7.0 and 10.0), different H2O2 concentrations (100 mg L-1, 500 and 2000 mg L-1), different TiO2 concentrations ( 0.10 mg L-1, 0.50 mg L-1, 10 and 20 mg L-1), different NaCl concentrations (1 g L-1, 2.5 and 15 g L-1), different Fe+2 ions (from FeSO4.7H2O) concentrations (2 mg L-1, 8 and 20 mg L-1), different Fe+3 ions (from FeCl3.6H2O) concentrations (10 mg L-1, 20 and 50 mg L-1), different HCO3-1 ions (from NaHCO3) concentrations (0.50 g L-1, 1 and 5 g L-1), different C4H9OH concentrations (0.10 g L-1, 0.50 and g L-1), different S2O8-2 concentrations (2 mg L-1, 4 mg L-1, 6 and 10 mg L-1), respectively. Experimental conditions were examined during at 35 kHz, at 640 W, at 60 min, at 120 min, at 150 min, at 30oC, at 60oC ant at 90.54 W cm-2, respectively.

2.6. Microtox acute toxicity assay 

Toxicity to the bioluminescent organism Vibrio fischeri was assayed using the Microtox measuring system according to DIN 38412 L34, L341 [47]. Microtox testing was performed according to the standard procedure recommended by the manufacturer [48]. A specific strain of the marine bacterium, Photobacterium phosphoreum Microtox LCK 491 Kit (Dr. LANGE industrial measurement technique in Germany, 2010) were used for Microtox acute toxicity assay. DRLANGE LUMIXmini type luminometer [49] was used for the microtox toxicity assay. Reductions in light intensity at 0., 5th, 15th and 30th min are chosen to measure the toxicity [48, 50]. All samples were serially diluted in 2percentage NaCI (w/v) and each assay was performed at pH=7.0 and a temperature of 15°C. NaCl (2percentage) was used as the control. Samples containing bacterial luminescence were measured for 0 min, 5 min, 15 and 30 min incubation times in a luminometer, respectively. Inhibition percentage (I percentage) values refer to decreasing activity in samples causing inhibitory effect of a test substances and/or a toxic wastewater during the light emission. Color correction was performed according to the DIN 38412 Instructions. The decrease in bioluminescence was indicated the toxic effect of the samples. Toxicity evaluation criteria for luminescent bacteria explained with the percent inhibition effect (H percentage) (Table 1).

Percent inhibitory effect (H percentage)Effect
0percentage< H>Non toxic
5percentage < H>Moderate toxic
20% < H>Toxic

Table 1: Effect of the samples on the inhibition of luminescent bacteria 48.

The decrease of bacterial luminescence due to the addition of toxic substances was calculated as follows in Eqs. (1), (2) and (3):

(1) where; fk: Temporary correction factor determined from the control measurements, I0: Initial values of luminescence of control and test sample (0.50 mL bacterial suspension), It: Values measured 0. 5th, 15th and 30th min after 0.5 mL of control or test sample was aded to 0.50 ml of bacterial suspension.

          

(2) where; Ict: I0 value adjusted by the correction factor, avg fk: The average values of fk.

          

(3) Toxicity evaluation criteria for luminescent bacteria are presented in Table 1. If the percent inhibitory effect (H percentage ) change between 0perecentage  and 5percentage, the effect is non-toxic. When H percentage  is between 5perecentage and 20perecentage , the effect is possibly toxic, and when H percentage is between 20percentage and 90percentage the effect is toxic [49].

2.7. Daphnia magna acute toxicity test

Toxicity to test using 24 h born Daphnia magna as described in Standard Methods (2005) [46] After preparing the test solution, experiments to carry out using 5 or 10 Daphnids introduced into the test vessel. These vessels to control with 100 mL of effective volume at 7.0-8.0 pH, providing a minimum DO concentration of 6 mg L-1 at an ambient temperature of 20-25oC. Young Daphnia magna to use in the test (in first start ≤ 24 h old). A 24 h exposure is generally accepted for a Daphnia acute toxicity test. Results to express as mortality percentage of the Daphnids. The immobile animals which do not able to move, to determine as dead Daphnids. The results of Daphnia magna acute toxicity test were determined EC (mg L-1) as following Eq. (4):

(4) where; EC50: The effective concentration at 50percentage of inhibition ratio (mg L-1or ng mL-1), DL: Inhibition ratio, [COD or PAH]: The COD or PAH concentrations of sonicated sample (mg L-1or ng mL-1).

2.8. Statistical analysis

Differences insensitivity scores between microorganisms were determined by a parametric t-test. The statistical package used for the analysis was SPSSWIN for Windows. The multiple regression analysis between y (dependent) and x (independent) variables was carried out using SPSSWIN for Windows Excel data analysis. The linear correlation was assessed with regression coefficient (R2). The ANOVA (analysis of variance) test was performed in order to determine the statistical significance between x and y variables [49].

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) between experimental data was performed to detect the F and p values. In other words, the ANOVA test was used to test the differences between dependent and independent groups [49]. The comparison between the actual variation of the experimental data averages and standard deviation was expressed in terms of F ratio. F was equal to “found variation of the data averages/expected variation of the data averages.” p reported the significance level. All results are reported at significance levels of p=0.01 and p=0.001. Regression analysis was applied to the experimental data in order to determine the regression coefficient (R2) [50].

 

Parameters

Removal efficiency (%)
CODdis (%)TOC (%)PAHs (%)
Raw ww, only sonication92.4894.2396.90
1 h aeration99.6895.27 (at 30oC)97.62
30 min N2(g)96.2796.6996.27
pH = 7.096.9095.27 (at 30oC)96.09
DO = 10 mg L-197.2398.3597.23
H2O2 = 2000 mg L-198.0495.8898.04
TiO2 = 20 mg L-193.8893.2093.88
NaCl = 15 g L-199.6898.3099.68
Fe+2 = 20 mg L-198.5695.7398.56
Fe+3 = 50 mg L-196.7692.4596.76
HCO3-1 = 5 g L-182.6283.09

81.69

(at HCO3-1 = 1 g L-1, 30oC)

C4H9OH = 2 g L-182.6282.7582.62

Table 2: The removal efficiencies in PCI ww during sonication process with only sonication and with the addition of some chemicals at 35 kHz, 640 W, at 60oC after 150 min sonication.

The maximum 93.88% CODdis, 93.20% TOC, 93.88% total PAHs yields in PCI ww were observed with TiO2=20 mg L-1 at 60oC after 150 min. The maximum 99.68% CODdis, 98.30% TOC, 99.68% total PAHs removals in PCI ww were measured with NaCl=15 g L-1at 60oC after 150 min. The maximum 98.56% CODdis, 95.73% TOC, 98.56% total PAHs yields in PCI ww were obtained with Fe+2=20 mg/l at 60oC after 150 min. The maximum 96.76% CODdis, 92.45% TOC, 96.76% total PAHs removals in PCI ww were observed with Fe+3=50 mg L-1 at 60oC after 150 min. The maximum 82.62% CODdis, 83.09% TOC yields in PCI ww were measured with HCO3-1=5 g L-1 at 60oC after 150 min. The maximum 81.69% total PAHs removal in PCI ww were observed with HCO3-1=1 g L-1 at 30oC after 150 min. The maximum 82.62% CODdis, 82.75% TOC, 82.62% total PAHs removals in PCI ww were found with C4H9OH=2 g L-1 at 60oC after 150 min (Table 2). 

The maximum CODdis removal yield was 99.68% in PCI ww at 1 h aeration and at NaCl=15 g L-1 and at 60oC after 150 min sonication (Table 2). The maximum TOC removal yield was 98.35% in PCI ww at DO=10 mg L-1 and at 60oC after 150 min sonication. The maximum PAHs removal yield was 99.68% in PCI ww at NaCl=15 mg L-1 and at 60oC after 150 min sonication (Table 2). 

3.2. Effect of DO concentrations on the removal of PAHs in PCI ww at increasing sonication times and temperatures.

The raw PCI ww samples were oxygenated with increasing DO concentrations (2 mg L-1, 4 mg L-1, 6 and 10 mg L-1) with pure O2 before the sonication experiments. 90.22%, 92.27%, 93.77% and 94.32% total PAHs removal efficiencies were measured in 2 mg L-1, 4 mg L-1, 6 and 10 mg L-1 DO concentrations, respectively, after 150 min at pH=7.0 and at 30oC (Table 2). Only 4 mg L-1, 6 and 10 mg L-1 DO concentrations increased the total PAHs removal efficiencies from 90.11% to 92.27-94.32% in comparison to the non-oxygenated samples (control, E=90.11% total PAHs at pH=7.0) at 30oC after 150 min. In other words, the effect of increasing DO concentrations on the total PAHs removals was found to be insignificant at 30oC after 150 min. The total PAHs yields also increased significantly (from 45.34% to 64.66% and from 62.40% to 80.34%) after 60 and 120 min, respectively, compared to the control at all DO concentrations for the same temperature. 

94.67%, 95.00%, 96.79% and 97.23% total PAHs removal efficiencies were obtained in 2 mg L-1, 4 mg L-1, 6 and 10 mg L-1 DO at pH=7.0 and at 60oC after 150 min. As shown, the total PAHs removal efficiencies increased as the sonication time increased. However, the PAHs yields did not show a significant increase at increasing DO concentrations compared to the control (DO=0 mg L-1 while E=96.90% total PAHs at pH=7.0 and at 60oC). The maximum total PAHs removal efficiency was 97.23?ter 150 min in DO=10 mg L-1 at 60oC. Increasing the temperature also did not increase the total PAHs removal efficiencies at increasing DO (ANOVA, F=2.51, p=0.001).

O2 mediates the rate of mineralization of PAHs. The higher DO content of PCI ww resulted in faster rates of PAHs degradation through sonication, supporting the hypothesis that increased oxygenation was largely responsible for the enhanced PAHs degradation. Although, O2 exposure is an important factor in PAHs degradation it was reported that saturating the solutions cause decreases in O2Hl production resulting in low PAHs yields. In the presence of O2, the reactive radicals (Ol , OHl, OOHl) will be produced by a series of reactions and thus contribute to the removal of the PAHs [31]. Although, O2 and air have similar ratios of specific heats and thermal conductivity, the highest formation rate of H2O2, which was induced from the recombination of reactive radicals (OHl and O2Hl) was observed under O2 [51]. In 

oxygenated solutions, the O2Hl formed by Eq. (5); 

(5)

will decay with generation of H2O2. However, the production of the O2Hl increases the oxidation process due to further formation of H2O2 by its recombination reaction Eq. (6) [51]:

(6)

The O2 dissolved in water contributes to the effective formation of many oxidants such as OHl and Ol by pyrolysis of O2. At the same time, these oxidants may further react to produce O2Hl [34, 44]. On the other hand, the maximum temperature produced in collapsing cavitation bubble was higher by sonication in Ar than O2, because of high specific heat ratio of Ar [51] and O2 [52] With the combination of O2 and Ar, it is considered that many oxidants such as O3 and Ol were produced by stronger pyrolytic effect arising from the presence of O2 in addition to OHl typically formed by thermal decomposition of H2O. Moreover, it is also considered that production of OHl was accelerated by the reaction of O2Hl and H2O with oxidants O3 and Ol [53]. Hence, it is assumed that more reactive species in Ar/O2 were formed compared with those in O2/N2 and in Ar. Lawton and Show [54] reported that the decomposition of dichlorinated groups in the Ar/O2 mixture was the highest due to the coupled effects of pyrolysis and radical reaction.

As aforementioned aqueous phase sonolysis is likely to result in the formation of H2O2 which may be formed through the recombination of OHl at the gas–liquid interface and/or in the solution bulk. Moreover, if the solution is saturated with O2, (H2O) and more OHl are formed in the bubble, the recombination of the former at the interface and/or in the solution bulk results in the formation of additional H2O2 [55]. It was found that PAHs mainly decomposed at the gas–liquid interface through both OHl oxidation and pyrolytic reactions (for instance, CH4 and CO2 were identified as the primary pyrolysis by-products) rather than in the solution bulk [56]. This was attributed to the fact that the PAHs, in this study, although less water soluble and non-volatile molecules, tended to accumulate at the gas–liquid interface. Furthermore, it was also found that the concentration of H2O2 formed during PAHs sonication experiments was substantially lower than that formed during water sonication in the absence of PAHs. 

3.3. Effect of aeration on the removal of PAHs in PCI ww at increasing sonication time and temperature.

PCI ww were aerated for 1 h with an air pump before the sonication experiments. 48.95%, 75.39% and 94.48% total PAHs yields were measured under 1 h aeration after 60 min, 120 and 150 min, respectively, at pH=7.0 and at 30oC (Table 2). The contribution of aeration were 3.61%, 12.99% and 4.37% to the total PAHs yields after 60 min, 120 and 150 min, respectively, at pH=7.0 and at 30oC, compared to the control (E=45.34%, 62.40% and 90.11% total PAHs after 60 min, 120 and 150 min, respectively, at pH=7.0 and at 30oC). 

54.21%, 80.16% and 97.62% total PAHs removals was obtained under 1 h aeration at 60oC after 60 min, 120 and 150 min, respectively, while the control has a yield of 96.90?ter 150 min. Aeration did not increase the total PAHs yields after 60 and 120 min compared to the control at 60oC. The maximum total PAHs yield was 97.62?ter 150 min under 1 h aeration at 60oC. The contribution of aeration to the total PAHs removal was not significant at 60oC (R2=0.45, F=4.56, p=0.01). 

The aeration contributed only to the removals of less hydrophobic PAHs. The yields in BbF, BkF and BaP increased from 62.15-67.21% to 93.94-97.99% with 1 h aeration after 150 min at 60oC. Air in the aqueous solution was reported to play a very important role in the generation of highly oxidative OHl enhancing the decomposition of less hydrophobic PAHs [51]. In the presence of air, reactive radicals such as O●, OH● and O2H● will be produced by a series of reactions and may participate in the decomposition reaction of the less hydrophobic PAHs. These PAHs are degraded with hydroxylation reactions since the OHl ions concentrations increased from 23x10-21 up to 8x10-7 ng mL-1after 120 min under 1 h aeration. However, aeration did not contribute to the yields of more hydrophobic PAHs. 

In this study, it was found that, under pyrolytic conditions, the H2O2 formation from the reactive radicals (OH● and O2H●) decreased trough sonication of more hydrophobic IcdP, DahA and BghiP. The studies including the H2O2 generation in deionized water showed that H2O2 accumulated in deionized water (pH=2.0) and increased up to 148 mg L-1 with 1 h aeration after 120 min at 30oC (Table 3).

 

 

PAHs

H2O2 Production (mg L-1)OHl Concentration (ng mL-1)

 

 

PAH *

  Deionized water  
BSBSAS-1BSAS-1BSAS-1
BbF4178514814823 x 10-218 x 10-792
BkF4178514814823 x 10-218 x 10-790
BaP5178514814823 x 10-218 x 10-789
IcdP5178514814823 x 10-214 x 10-2047
DahA5178514814823 x 10-215 x 10-1956
BghiP5178514814823 x 10-216 x 10-2056
*: PAH removal efficiency; BS: Before sonication; AS-1: After 120 min

Table 3: H2O2 production, OHl ion concentrations through sonication of BbF, BkF, BaP, IcdP, DahA and BghiP before and after 120 min at 30oC (640 W, 35 kHz, initial CODdis =1027.43 mg L-1, initial TOC=620.81 mg L-1, initial total PAHs=1378.77 ng mL-1, n=3, mean values).

The yield of H2O2 decreased to a value as low as 5 mg L-1 from 178 mg L-1 under sonication of less hydrophobic PAHs after 150 min, whereas it could only cause the destruction of some less hydrophobic PAHs (BbF, BkF and BaP) with a yield of 67-92% in comparison with the more hydrophobic PAHs removed (IcdP, DahA and BghiP) with a yield of (47-56%) (Table 3). The PAHs containing high benzene rings were removed with low efficiencies compared to the low benzene ring PAHs (BkF, BaP) since their solubilities, Henry’s law constant (5.84x10-7 and 4.57x10-7 atm m3 mol-1 at 25oC) and vapor pressures (9.70x10-10 and 5.49x10-9 mm Hg at 25oC) are low. The low removal efficiencies in more hydrophobic PAHs (IcdP, DahA) could probably be attributed to their non-hydroxylated sonication mechanism since the OHl ions produced through aeration are not favor for their sono-degradation [17, 57]. A non-hydroxylated pathway was observed in the work of Psillakis et al. [17] with aeration in the removal of some more hydrophobic PAHs (IcdP, DahA) at low frequency. In the presence of more hydrophobic PAHs (IcdP, DahA) more aeration inside the bubble dissolves into the medium during oscillations with a consequent rise in the intensity of collapse and radical production. Higher concentration at the bubble interface raises the partial pressure of the more hydrophobic PAHs (IcdP, DahA) which leads to entrapment of these PAHs into the cavitation bubble, resulting in pyrolytic sono-decomposition during the transient collapse of the bubble [58]. The less hydrophobic (BkF, BaP) PAHs could not be destroyed under aerated sonication process since it can not be removed in hydroxylated mediums containing OHl ions as high as 12x10-8 ng mL-1 [59]. The more hydrophobic BghiP could not be destroyed in hydroxylated mediums containing OHl ions as high as 23x10-21 and 8x10-7 ng mL-1 (Table 3). The destruction way of this PAH was mainly pyrolysis [59]. 

The effect of air on the removal of short chain, less hydrophobic, PAHs could be explained as follows: the hydroperoxyl radicals (O2H●) formed by Eq. (7) [59];

(7)

will decay with generation of H2O2 as follows in Eqs. (8), (9) and (10) [59]:

(8)

(9)

 

(10)

In the presence of air, reactive radicals such as O●, OH● and O2H● will be produced by a series of reactions and may participate in the decomposition reaction of the PAHs. In aerated solutions, the O2H● formed by Eq. (7) given in the section “effect of DO on the sonication of PAHs” and will decay with the generation of H2O2. Air in aqueous solution of less hydrophobic PAHs was reported to play a very important role in the generation of highly oxidative OHl, enhancing its decomposition [59]. The effect of air on the removal of short chain, less hydrophobic, PAHs could be explained as follows: In aerated solutions, O2H● formed by Eq. (8).

The production of the O2H● increases the oxidation process due to further formation of H2O2 by its recombination reaction [51, 57, 60-66]. This was attributed to increase OH entering to the bulk solution. It has been speculated that the rate of OH formation in the gas phase is higher in an oxygenated atmosphere. Since in this study it was studied at low frequency (35 kHz) longer collapse times for the bubbles OHl have more time to recombine before being ejected from inside the bubble into the bulk liquid than at higher frequencies [67]. This implies that OHl reacts with less hydrophobic PAHs primarily in the bulk solution and that the number of OHl capable of reaching the bulk at 35 kHz. It is clear that the destruction yields of less hydrophobic PAHs increases significantly up to 99% with an increase of aeration from 1 h up to 2 h [51]. This observation may be partially ascribed to the generation of OHl, resulted from dissociation of molecular O2 (in the air) in the bubble, which is likely to recombine to form H2O2 at the gas–liquid interface of the bubbles as given in Eqs. (8), (9) and (10).

3.4. Effect of N2(g) on the PAHs removal efficiencies in PCI ww versus sonication times and temperatures.

15 and 30 min N2(g) (3 and 6 mg L-1 N2) was sparged in PCI ww before sonication experiments. Maximum 92.46%, 94.16% and 88.33%, 96.27% total PAHs removal efficiencies were found under 15 and 30 min of N2(g) (3 and 6 mg L-1 N2) sparging at 30oC and 60oC, respectively, after 150 min at pH=7.0 (Table 4). An increase of 6.08-13.18% and 18.51-18.71% in total PAHs yields were obtained under 15 and 30 min N2(g) (3 and 6 mg L-1 N2) sparging after 60 and 120 min while no significant increase in PAHs removals were observed after 150 min at pH=7.0, compared to the control [without N2(g) E=90.11% for total PAHs after 150 min at pH=7.0 and at 30oC]. The contribution of 15 and 30 min N2(g) (3 and 6 mg L-1 N2) sparging on the PAHs removals are significant at low sonication times (60 and 120 min) and temperature (30oC) (R2=0.84, F=13.09, p=0.001). N2(g) sparging did not significantly affect the PAHs removals compared to the control (E=96.90% total PAHs at pH=7.0) at 60oC at all sonication times (R2=0.32, F=1.34, p=0.001).

ConditionsH2O2 Conc. (mg/l) (60oC)OHl ion Conc.(mg/l)
H2O2 concentration (mg L-1) in deionized water (60oC)1870
H2O2 concentration (mg L-1) for less hydrophobic PAHs (60oC) after 30 min19810x10-52
H2O2 concentration (mg L-1) for more hydrophobic PAHs (60oC) after 30 min410x10-62
H2O2 concentration (mg L-1) for less hydrophobic PAHs (60oC) after 120 min1082x10-22
H2O2 concentration (mg L-1) for more hydrophobic PAHs (60oC) after 120 min410x10-62
H2O2 concentration (mg L-1) for less hydrophobic PAHs (60oC) after 150 min943x10-7
H2O2 concentration (mg L-1) for more hydrophobic PAHs (60oC) after 150 min410x10-62

Table 4: Effect of 30 min N2(g) (6 mg L-1 N2) sparging on H2O2 production and OH ion concentrations in PCI ww at 60oC after 30 min, 120 and 150 min (640 W, 35 kHz, initial CODdis=1027.43 mg L-1, initial TOC=620.81 mg L-1, initial total PAHs=1378.77 ng mL-1, n=3, mean values).

Similar to the results of [52] 15 and 30 min N2(g) (3 and 6 mg L-1 N2) sparging did not contribute to the PAHs removals at 60 and 120 min at 60oC 

with the exception of 15 and 30 min N2(g) (3 and 6 mg L-1 N2) sparging after 120 min at 30oC8 (Table 4). This could be attributed to the benzene ring-opening reactions of PAHs and other intermediates as well as the degradation of by-products throughout N2(g) sparging at low temperature.

H2O2 which is preferentially formed by the recombination of OHl issue from the sonolysis of H2O can be used as a good indicator of the OHl production. The H2O2 measurement during acoustic cavitation, in absence and in the presence of PCI ww, is a suitable method to estimate the radical production rate for specific sonochemical conditions. The initial rate of H2O2 formation associated to the PAHs treatment by sonication in PCI ww decreases with increasing sonication time at 60oC. In the absence of PCI ww (in deionized water) the H2O2 was accumulated and its concentration was measured as 187 mg L-1, whereas this level was only 9 mg L-1in PCI ww after 150 min in samples containing N2 (Table 4). The OHl ion concentrations also increased from 10x10-62 to 43x10-7 mg L-1 after 150 min in PCI ww containing less hydrophobic FL, BaA and BbF. This showed that hydroxylation is the main mechanism for the removal of less hydrophobic PAHs. In other words, OHl is the major process for complete degradation of less hydrophobic PAHs.

In PCI ww the most sonogenerated OHl reacted with 89-97% less hydrophobic PAHs removals and radical recombination to produce H2O2 [68]. The OHl ion concentrations remained constant around 10x10-62 mg L-1 after 150 min in PCI ww containing more hydrophobic BaP, IcdP, DahA and BghiP. No increase in OHl ion concentrations was observed throughout sonication of more hydrophobic PAHs. This showed that hydroxylation is not the main mechanism for the removal of more hydrophobic PAHs. This indicates that the main process for the destruction of more hydrophobic PAHs is pyrolysis.

In other words, in this study, the contribution of OHl is minor for the ultimate sonodegradation of more hydrophobic PAHs. The formation of by-products (hydroxylated compounds namely phenanthrenediols) for possible OHl oxidation was not observed in HPLC. Similar results were obtained in the studies performed by Lindsey and Tarr [69], Wen et al. [70], Wu and Ondruschka [55]. Since the sonooxidation of less hydrophobic FL, BaA and BbF comprised 0.87% and 0.77% and 79% of the total sonodegradation process, OHl is the major process for complete degradation of these PAHs. The contribution of the pyrolysis to the destruction of these PAHs is not significant. 

Different suggestions were reported on the effect of N2(g) sparging on PAHs removals: Dissolved N2 present in aqueous solution might scavenge the free radical attacks to PAHs [56]. Some studies showed that the PAHs are degraded in a N2(g) sparged system with high concentrations of OHl scavenger through sonication [17]. Sparging of N2(g) could change the temperature within the cavitation site or other properties of the cavitation process. Gasses with lower thermal conductivity values such as N2 (18.70 mW mol-1. K-1) increase the temperature inside the cavitation bubble upon collapse because they will allow less heat to the surrounding [17]. The ratio of the specific heat at constant pressure and constant volume (Cp/Cv) plays a role in determining the maximum size of the cavitation bubble [17, 43]. Since the Cp/Cv ratio of N2(g) is high (1.543) the bubble diameter increase during cavitation process resulting in high OHl ions [36, 57]. In this study it was found that N2(g) increase the OHl ions through sonication of less hydrophobic PAHs by increasing the temperature and bubble diameter as reported by Sivasankar and Moholkar [58].

It was found that N2(g) bubbles produce the highest number of OHl in the sonication of less hydrophobic PAHs. Since the intensity of collapse of N2(g) bubbles indicated by the temperature peaks attained at the collapse of these bubbles as reported by Sivasankar and Moholkar [58]. Although, some researchers mentioned that the trend of N2(g) in production of OHl is low through hydroxylation reaction in a medium containing more hydrophobic PAHs the dissolved N2(g) slowly diffuses into the cavitation bubble during oscillations, as result of which the equilibrium of the bubble grows [17, 57]. This gas cushions the transient collapse of the bubble, the temperature and pressure peaks attained in the bubble reduce, resulting in the reduction of OHl production. This affects negatively the degradation of PAHs occurring through hydroxylation. In the presence of more hydrophobic PAHs more N2(g) inside the bubble dissolves into the medium during oscillations with consequent rise in the intensity of collapse and radical production. Higher concentration at the bubble interface raises the partial pressure of the pollutant that leads to higher evaporation and subsequent entrapment of the pollutant into the cavitation bubble, which under goes pyrolytic decomposition at the extreme conditions reached during the transient collapse of the bubble [71]. Sivasankar and Moholkar [58] mentioned that the presence of N2(g) has a negative effect on the formation of H2O2 and on the degradation of PAHs during sonication under air. The HNO2 formed may be the scavenger of OH, which eventually leads to the suppression in H2O2 production. 

3.5. Effect of H2O2 concentrations on the removal of PAHs in PCI ww at increasing sonication times and temperatures

100 mg L-1, 500 and 2000 mg L-1H2O2 were added in PCI ww before the sonication experiments. 89.63%, 93.28% and 96.46% total PAHs removals were observed in 100 mg L-1, 500 and 2000 mg L-1 H2O2, respectively, at pH=7.0 and at 30oC after 150 min. An increase of 3.17% and 6.35% in total PAHs removals were measured in 500 and 2000 mg L-1 H2O2, respectively, after 150 min at pH=7.0 and at 30oC, compared to the control (without H2O2 while E=90.11% total PAHs at pH=7.0 and at 30oC). Although, a correlation between PAHs removals and H2O2 concentrations is observed, this relationship is not significant at pH=7.0 and at 30oC after 60 and 120 min at 30oC (R2=0.80, F=2.87, p=0.001).

91.33%, 94.19% and 98.04% total PAHs removal efficiencies were obtained in 100 mg L-1, 500 and 2000 mg L-1 H2O2 at 60oC after 150 min at pH=7.0. No significant increase in total PAHs yields was obtained by increasing the H2O2 concentrations compared to the control (E=96.90% for total PAHs at pH=7.0) at 60oC (R2=0.40, F=3.87, p=0.001). The PAH yields in the samples containing H2O2 and non-containing (control) samples were around 52.61–57.90% and 77.22-82.19%, respectively, at 60oC after 60 and 120 min at pH=7.0. The maximum total PAHs removal efficiency was 98.04?ter 150 min in H2O2=2000 mg L-1 at pH=7.0 and at 60oC.

It was reported that this oxidant elevates the extent of PAHs removal through acustic cavitation [72]. The similar degradation degree in the control and in the presence of H2O2 at 60oC after 120 and 150 min may be attributed to the increased level of OH scavenging by the PAHs and by H2O2 itself. During the sonolysis of aqueous solutions, OH and H are generated by the thermolysis of water in the solution medium and can scavenge OH produced. As the concentration of H2O2 in the solution is increased, it’s OHl scavenging effect increases causing decrease in degradation of PAHs. It was reported that at very high H2O2 concentrations detrimental effects are observed, since the recombination reaction of OHl is more predominant and H2O2 acts as a scavenger for OHl [72]. The scavenging of free OH becomes the dominant process at high H2O2 concentrations in the system, thereby lowering the ability of OHl to degrade PAHs. A similar trend has been reported in the sonolytic destruction of 5,5–dimethyl–1–pyrroline–N–oxide and oxalic acid using H2O2 [73]. The removal yields of all seventeen PAHs were above 95%. 

H2O2 is an oxidizing agent. It was reported that this oxidant increases the extent of PAH removal through acustic cavitation [72]. During the sonolysis of H2O, OHl is produced and recombined into H2O2, if no organic compounds such as radical scavengers are present in the H2O. The formed H2O2 and its sonolytic decomposition products would have an effect on the degradation of organic compounds like PAHs during sonication. The H2O2 may be mainly present not inside the cavitation bubbles but in the bulk solution due to the high H2O solubility and low volatility [74]. In our study, no significant total PAHs yields were obtained by the addition of H2O2. The scavenging of free OHl becomes the dominant process at high H2O2 concentrations in the system, thereby lowering the ability of OH to degrade PAHs [72]. It is also possible that the presence of high H2O2 concentrations results in a lower intensity of cavitation, due to the fact that vaporous cavities will be generated in this case, as reported by Rae et al. [73]. This is not valid for our study since it was perfomed at high sonication intensity. 

Since less hydrophobic PAHs are considerably non-volatile with low Henry’s law constant and solubility, [75] sono-degradation inside the cavitation bubble is expected to be insignificant. Therefore, hydroxyl radical-induced reactions are likely to be the main degradation mechanism of less hydrophobic ones as follows in Eqs. (11) and (12):

(11)

(12)

It should be pointed out that OHl, formed via water sonolysis, can partly recombine yielding H2O2 which in turn reacts with H2 to regenerate OHl in Eqs. (13) and (14):

(13)

(14)

The formation of H2O2 during ultrasound irradiation was confirmed experimentally during sonication in the absence and presence of less and more hydrophobic PAHs. As the H2O2 concentration increased to 176 mg L-1 after 60 min the less hydrophobic PAHs removals increased to 96-98% while the removals of more hydrophobic PAHs remained around 60.24-62.32?ter 120 min (Table 5). This process ends with decreasing of H2O2 to 5 mg L-1 As BbF, BkF, BaP and its degradation metabolites scavenge OHl (Eqs. 13 and 14), the yield, defined as H2O2 formed in the presence of less hydrophobic PAHs over H2O2 formed in deionized water.

H2O2 Concentration (mg L-1)Less Hydrophobic PAHsMore Hydrophobic PAHs
in deionized waterAfter 60 min sonic.After 120 min sonic.BbFBkFBaPIcdPDahABghiP
131565      
Removal eff (%) after 30 min34.2132.4438.1019.4021.1220.28
Removal eff (%) after 120 min95.3596.7697.6576.3375.3577.32

Table 5: Effect of H2O2 production on the removals of less (BbF, BkF, BaP) and more (IcdP, DahA, BghiP) hydrophobic PAHs after 60 and 120 min at 30oC (640 W, 35 kHz, initial CODdis=1027.43 mg L-1, initial TOC=620.81 mg L-1, initial total PAHs=1378.77 ng mL-1, n=3, mean values).

3.6. Effect of TiO2 concentrations on the PAHs removal efficiencies in PCI ww at increasing sonication times and temperatures.

In order to optimize the addition of an amount of TiO2 catalyst for the highest sonocatalytic destruction of PAHs 0.1 mg L-1, 0.5 mg L-1, 10 and 20 mg L-1 TiO2 was added to the PCI ww before the sonication experiments. In general, the results of this study showed that as the sonication time increased the total PAHs yields also increased at pH=7.0 and at 30oC. All the TiO2 concentrations increased the total PAHs removals after 60 and 120 min, respectively, compared to the control reactor containing no TiO2. The increase of TiO2 concentrations from 0.1 mg L-1 up to 20 mg L-1increased the total PAHs removal after 60 and 120 min at pH=7.0 and at 30oC. It was found that the total PAHs yields were the same as the control reactor free of TiO2 and the reactor containing 20 mg L-1 TiO2 after 150 min at pH=7.0 and at 30 oC. The total PAHs removals were slightly lower in the reactors containing 0.1 and 0.5 mg L-1 TiO2 concentrations after 150 min, compared to the control.   

As the sonication time was increased from 60 min to 150 min the total PAHs removal increased in all reactors containing TiO2 and in the control reactor free of TiO2 at pH=7.0 and at a temperature of 60oC. No significant increase in total PAHs yield was obtained by increasing the TiO2 concentrations from 0.1 mg L-1 up to 20 mg L-1 at 60oC. The maximum total PAHs removal efficiency was 93.88?ter 150 min in TiO2=20 mg L-1 at pH=7.0 and at 60oC. The increase of TiO2 catalyst did not further decompose the PAHs in aqueous solution. Excessive TiO2 particles sometimes result in mutual screens among TiO2 particles, which not only protect the PAHs molecules, but also reduce the sonocatalytic activity of TiO2 powder, at 32 kHz and at 480 W after 150 min at 60oC as reported by Wen et al. [70]. In this study it was found that high temperature decreased the sonodegradation of total PAHs assisted by TiO2, as reported by Wang et al. [76]. Both sonocatalytic and ultrasonic destructions in the presence of TiO2 decreased gradually along with the increased temperatures [77].

In general, for most of the chemical reactions, the higher the temperature in the reaction system is, the quicker the reaction rate becomes and although, it is known that radical reactions do not depend very much on the systemic temperature. However, the acoustic cavitation which produces the holes on the surface of TiO2 particles or OH in aqueous solution depends on the change of systemic temperature. It is well known that both sonocatalytic and ultrasonic degradation of organic pollutants are related to the acoustic cavitation. The acoustic cavitation can give rise to holes with strong oxidability on the surface of TiO2 particles which either can directly decompose the organic pollutants adsorbed on the surface of TiO2 particles or indirectly remove the organic pollutants in the aqueous solution through the OH resulting from hole oxidation of H2O molecules. When the temperature in the aqueous solution becomes high, the vapor or gas bubbles escape rapidly from the reaction system and thus do not grow or collapse, which badly weakens the acoustic cavitation.

The results of this study showed that the PAHs removals were not dependent on the physicochemical properties of the PAHs mentioned above during sonication enhanced by 20 mg/l TiO2 (R2=0.45, P=4.67, p=0.001). High PAHs removals were also valid for the individual PAHs concentrations measured in a control containing no TiO2 after 150 min. It can be concluded that if PCI ww containing PAHs is sonicated for 150 min at 60oC, it could be removed efficiently without TiO2. As a result, the obtained removal for seventeen PAHs was nearly the same with 20 mg L-1 TiO2 and without TiO2 at 60oC after 150 min.

3.7. Effect of NaCl concentrations on the PAHs removal efficiencies in PCI ww at increasing sonication times and temperatures

Increasing NaCl concentrations (1 g L-1, 2.5 and 15 g L-1) were added in PCI ww before sonication experiments. At 30oC, 90.13%, 92.14% and 99.23% of total PAHs removals were observed in 1 g L-1, 2.5 and 15 g L-1 NaCl after 150 min at pH=7.0 and at 30oC. The total PAHs yields were increased by 2.03% and 9.12% in 2.5 and 15 g L-1 NaCl, respectively, after 150 min at pH=7.0 and at 30oC, compared to the control (without NaCl while E=90.11% total PAHs at pH=7.0 and at 30oC). A significant linear correlation between total PAHs yields and increasing NaCl concentration was not observed (R2=0.38, F=0.31, p=0.01). 

93.17%, 96.08% and 99.68% of total PAHs removals were obtained in 1 g L-1, 2.5 and 15 g L-1 NaCl, respectively, after 150 min at pH=7.0 and at 60oC. The contribution of NaCl to the PAHs removal was 2.78% in 15 g L-1 NaCl after 150 min at pH=7.0 and at 60oC, compared to the control (E=96.90% total PAHs at pH=7.0 and at 60oC). The maximum total PAHs removal efficiency was 99.68?ter 150 min in NaCl=15 g L-1 at pH=7.0 and at 60oC. A significant linear correlation between total PAHs yields and increasing NaCl concentration was not observed (R2=0.33, F=0.215, p=0.01). 

The contributions of the last two NaCl concentrations to the PAHs removals were only 2.80% and 3.20%, respectively. At NaCl concentrations > 12 g L-1 the partitioning of the PAHs molecules between interfacial and bulk region increases. Besides, addition of salt in the liquid medium reduces the DO concentration and hence, the scavenging of the radicals [78]. As a result, the probability of interaction between PAHs molecules and radicals decrease. The overall effect is reduction in the extent of degradation.

High NaCl concentrations (10-12 g L-1) increase the ionic strength of the aqueous phase, driving the PAHs to the bulk–bubble interface through sonication [79]. This increases the partitioning of the PAHs species upon cavitation implosion in a sonicator resulting in increased surface tension of the PAHs. The higher NaCl concentrations (10-12 g L-1) resulting in high removals can be explained by the fact that a higher amount of NaCl will create more salting out effect than the lower amount and thus increase the interfacial concentration of the PAHs. All of these factors help to collapse the bubbles more violently, causing high PAHs degradation. Since the Na+1 and Cl-1 concentrations in the sonicator were measured as 1.1 and 1.9 mg L-1, respectively, after sonication, it can be concluded that a large part of 12 g L-1 NaCl reach an non-equilibrium adsorption level at the bubble/solution interface under the sonication conditions used. On the basis of this conclusion, it can be mentioned that the nonequilibrium surface excess values for solutes do not fully equilibrate with the bubble/solution interface during sonication. For the case of hydrophobic compounds, in the presence of excess NaCl, an acoustic bubble in a multi bubble field has a finite lifetime, and that this lifetime increases with decreasing applied frequency. This resulting in a adsorption of excess salt to the bubble/solution interface during sonication as reported by Sunartio et al. [80]. Therefore, the NaCl remaining from the sonication did not cause serious pollution.

Depending on the nature of contaminants, addition of salt (NaCl) to the solution can decrease their solubility and consequently increase their hydrophobicity due to the salting-out effect. This is expected to enhance diffusion of solutes from the bulk solution to the bubble–liquid interface, thus leading to increased degradation rates. A possible explanation would be that adding salt to the reaction mixture results in reduced vapor pressure and increased surface tension, both of which tend to reduce the number of bubbles formed [17].

3.8. Effect of Fe+2 concentrations on the removal of PAHs in PCI ww at increasing sonication times and temperatures

2 mg L-1, 8 and 20 mg L-1 Fe+2 ions (from FeCl2.4H2O) were added to the PCI ww before the sonication experiments. 83.27%, 92.62% and 95.12% total PAHs removals were obtained in 2 mg L-1, 8 and 20 mg L-1 Fe+2, respectively, after 150 min at pH=7.0 and at 30oC. No significant increase in PAHs yields was obtained from 8 to 20 mg L-1 Fe+2 after 150 min at pH=7.0 and at 30oC, compared to the control (without Fe+2 while E=90.11% for total PAHs at pH=7.0 and at 30oC). A significant linear correlation between total PAHs yields and increasing sonication time was not observed (R2=0.30, F=0.28, p=0.01).

86.28%, 95.27% and 98.56% total PAHs yields were observed in 2 mg L-1, 8 and 20 mg L-1 Fe+2, respectively, after 150 min at pH=7.0 and at 60oC. No significant increase in total PAHs yields were obtained by increasing the Fe+2 concentrations compared to the control after 120 and 150 min at pH=7.0 and at 60oC. Sonication alone provided 96.90% total PAHs yield after 150 min at pH=7.0 and at 60oC The maximum total PAHs removal efficiency was 98.56?ter 150 min in Fe+2=20 mg L-1 at pH=7.0 and at 60oC. A significant linear correlation between total PAHs yields and increasing Fe+2 concentrations was not observed (R2=0.32, F=0.31, p=0.01).

These high removals in PAHs with high molecular weights could be attributed to effective sonication at 35 kHz with 20 mg L-1 Fe+2. The findings of the study demonstrate that sonication enhanced with 20 mg L-1 Fe+2 can be used to improve the mass transport of poorly soluble PAHs in PCI ww and alleviate limiting steps of removal of hydrophobic refractory PAHs after 150 min at 60oC. Furthermore, the reaction of Fe+2 with H2O2 was formed OH ion. This phenomenon leading to the destruction of benzene rings of hydrophobic and hydrophilic PAHs. Some of the recent studies showed that there is a highly significant relationship between the average removal percentages and the hydrophobicity of PAHs, indicated as the octanol water partition coefficient is shown [55, 81]. It becomes evident that a larger hydrophobicity resulted in smaller removal of the PAHs. However, in this study, the 4-ring, 5 and 6- ring PAHs, in contrast to the relationship mentioned above, exhibiting higher removals than expected from their log Kow at 60oC after 150 min. No significant correlation was observed between PAHs yields, water solubility, vapor pressure, C number in benzene rings, Henry’s law constant through sonication assisted 20 mg L-1 Fe+2 at 60oC after 150 min (R2=0.43, F=3.56, p=0.001).

As reported by Lindsey and Tarr [69] a possible explanation of the positive effect of Fe+2 on the sonication of PAHs could be the reaction of Fe+2 with H2O2 to form OHl at 34 kHz and at 450 W after 125 min at 60oC. As this reaction proceeds, the concentration of Fe+2 declines, and consequently the rate of H2O2 consumption and OHl formation decline. The loss of Fe+2 is eventually balanced by the formation of Fe+2 through reduction of Fe+3 by reaction with H2O2 or O2Hl, and a steady state Fe+2 concentration is reached. At this point (> 60 s), pseudo first order loss of H2O2 is observed. This explanation is also supported by evidence that the OHl formation rate is significantly higher in the first 60 s. Psillakis et al. [17] studied the sono-removal of 150 μg L-1 total initial concentration of PAHs mixture (NAP, ACT, PHE) in an aqueous solution. 92.20% of NAP, 96.25% of ACT and 89.80% of PHE removal efficiencies were found with Fe+2=14 mg L-1 concentration in a sonicator with at 150 W, at 80 kHz, at 20oC, after 150 min. In our study the removal efficiencies for the aforementioned PAHs were found to be higher (E, NAP=99%, E, ACT=98.25% and E, PHE=98.11%) at 35oC for the same sonication time. Beckett and Hua [82, 83] also found that the addition of 0.02-1 ng L-1 Fe+2 concentrations improved the 1,4–dioxane decomposition rate and mineralization efficiency at a 30 kHz and a power of 590 W after 115 min. During aqueous ultrasonic irradiation, OHl formed during the thermolytic reactions of H2O recombine to form H2O2 that tends to accumulate in the solution and does not usually play an important role in oxidizing organic species. However, the reaction between H2O2 and Fe+2 is known to produce OHl and is commonly referred to as the Fenton process [81].

3.9. Effect of Fe+3 concentrations on the removal of PAHs in PCI ww at increasing sonication times and temperatures

Increasing Fe+3 concentrations (10 mg L-1, 20 and 50 mg L-1) were added to the PCI ww before sonication process. 82.92%, 91.72% and 93.58% total PAHs removals were measured in 10 mg L-1, 20 and 50 mg L-1 Fe+3, respectively, after 150 min at pH=7.0 and at 30oC. An increase of 14.66-22.28% and 16.21-20.55% in total PAHs yields were measured for after 60 and 120 min, compared to the control (without Fe+3) at pH=7.0 and at 30oC. Although, a correlation between PAHs removal efficiencies and Fe+3 concentrations were obtained this relationship was not significant (R2=0.76, F=2.56, p=0.01). Control provided 90.11% total PAHs yield after 150 min at pH=7.0 and at 30oC.

84.61%, 93% and 96.76% total PAHs yields were observed in 10 mg L-1, 20 and 50 mg L-1 Fe+3, respectively, after 150 min at pH=7.0 and at 60oC. The contribution of increasing Fe+3 on the total PAHs removal was only 7.06-15.41% and 1.25-5.04% compared to the control after 60 and 120 min at pH=7.0 and at 60oC. The maximum total PAHs removal efficiency was 96.76?ter 150 min in Fe+3=50 mg L-1 at pH=7.0 and at 60oC. However this contribution of Fe+3 was no significant (R2=0.66, F=9.86, p=0.01). Similarly, increasing the Fe+3 concentrations did not significantly affect the PAHs yields compared to the control after 120 and 150 min at pH=7.0 and at 60oC (R2=0.52-0.56, F=8.34-9.91, p=0.01).

In the presence of Fe+3, the sonolytic degradation of less hydrophobic PAHs was enhanced by the increase in OH● induced from the decomposition of the recombined H2O2 [66]. Under these conditions, it can be expected that Fe–O2H+2 as an intermediate produced from the reaction of Fe+3 with H2O2 and it may be partitioned as Fe+2 and O2Hl by the ultrasonic irradiation in Eqs. (15) and (16) [67]. The regenerated Fe+2 also catalyze the decomposition of H2O2 in Eq. (16). These results suggest that in the presence of Fe+3, the sonolytic degradation of less hydrophobic PAHs was enhanced by the increase in OHl [67] in Eq. (17).

(15)

(16)

(17)

A large fraction of Fe+3 formed from the reaction Fe+2 with H2O2 would mainly exist in the form of Fe+3–O2H or Fe+3–OH complexes. Fe+3 / ultrasound it can be expected that Fe–O2H as an intermediate produced from the reaction of Fe+3 with H2O2 may be partitioned as Fe+2 and O2H● by the ultrasonic irradiation. It was found that the Fe+3/ ultrasound system under O2 is more effective for mineralization than the Fe+2/ ultrasound system and ultrasound only.69 For Fe+3, the overall degradation of organic compounds by oxidation is slower, but the mineralization process is successfully achieved. The degradation of organic compounds by the attack of OH● can be enhanced. 

3.10. Effect of HCO3-1 concentrations on the removal of PAHs in PCI ww at increasing sonication times and temperatures

Increasing HCO3-1 (0.5 g L-1, 1 and 5 g L-1) concentrations were added to the PCI ww before sonication process. 80.43%, 92.14% and 81.66% total PAHs yields were found in 0.5 g L-1, 1 and 5 g L-1 HCO3-1, respectively, after 150 min at pH=7.0 and at 30oC. Total PAHs yields were slightly increased in 1 g L-1 HCO3-1 (2%) compared to the control (without HCO3-1 while E=90.11% total PAHs) at pH=7.0 and at 30oC after 150 min. A significant linear correlation between total PAHs yields and increasing sonication time was not observed (R2=0.32, F=0.30, p=0.01). 

78.09%, 81.69% and 82.62% total PAHs removals were found in 0.5 g L-1, 1 and 5 g L-1 HCO3-1, after 150 min at pH=7.0 and at 60oC. Total PAHs yields did not change after 150 min compared to the control (E=96.90% total PAHs) at pH=7.0 and at 60oC. A significant linear correlation between total PAHs yields and increasing HCO3-1 concentrations was not observed (R2=0.34, F=0.40, p=0.01). 

In order to identify the contribution of OHl in the sonolytic degradation of PAHs, the role of OHl was examined in the absence and presence of HCO3-1. Therefore, one refractory non-volatile, more hydrophobic PAHs namely DahA (4.57 ng/ml) was taken into consideration among the other seventeen PAHs present in PCI ww. 

However, significant differences (ANOVA, F=2.67, p=0.001) were observed between the percent degradation values at the acceleration steps. Similar statistical results were obtained between the trials with HCO3-1 and without HCO3-1 after 60 min sonication time (ANOVA, F=1.98, p=0.001 and F=2.80, p=0.001) at the initiation steps. HCO3-1 is a well known OHl scavenger as shown in Eq. (18):

(18)

Since HCO3-1 is an ion, it will scavenge free radicals predominantly in the bulk water phase. Water-soluble compounds that are non volatile will be significantly affected by the HCO3-1 concentration [84, 85]. Since DahA is non-volatile, a refractory compound, the HCO3-1 can complete with DahA for available free radicals in the interfacial and bulk region and decrease the sonically destruction efficiency of the PAHs in question. It also shows the contribution of HCO3-1 in the role of OHl scavenger during sonolysis. The effect of radical scavenging by HCO3-1 mainly occurred during the acceleration step, and suggesting that the most OHl in the sonication is generated at the acceleration step. From the results in during the sonication it can be induced that the reaction between OHl and HCO3-1 mainly occurs at the acceleration step rather than at the initial step. As aforementioned OH are mainly produced at the acceleration step, which react with HCO3-1 to produce OHl ion, resulting in the increase in pH of the solution. However, at the initiation step, the production of OHl is insufficient for the reaction with HCO3-1, as shown in Eq. (18). Instead, the presence of 10 mg L-1 HCO3-1 may act as a buffer in the solution, resulting in almost no change of pH.

The sonication of DahA at the initiation step may proceed by a thermal reaction, while the degradation of DahA is dominated by OHl reaction at the acceleration step. Thermal degradation and chemical oxidation contributed approximately 25% and 34% to the degradation of 1,4–dioxane according to the result of the sonication without HCO3-1 as reported by Son et al. [86].

The sonic degradation of DahA in the PCI ww was found to be varied between zero and pseudo first order with respect to PAHs concentration in the initiation and acceleration steps with HCO3-1 and without HCO3-1 at 35 kHz and at 60oC in Eqs. (19) and (20):

(19)

(20)

The results of this part of this study showed that the degradation trend of the DahA at the acceleration step was also not significantly different between two conditions with and without HCO3-1 at the beginning of the sonication (0 min). However, the rapid decrease of DahA degradation was observed at the acceleration step in the presence of HCO3-1 after 60 min. The initiation step of the DahA degradation followed the zero order kinetic rate models, while the acceleration step followed the pseudo-first order. In the presence of HCO3-1 as a radical scavenger, the degradations of DahA were suppressed, indicating that OHl is an important factor in the sonication, especially at the acceleration step. Since DahA is hydrophobic, HCO3-1 can compete with DahA for available free radicals in the interfacial and bulk region and decrease its decomposition efficiency. Similar results was also found by Shaw and Lee [87]. HCO3-1 added in the concentration interval 10−3 to 185 mg L-1 acted as OHl scavenger and the expected effect was found to be inhibition of degradation of some dyes and hydrocarbons in pulp and paper industry wastewater. They reported that water soluble compounds that are less volatile will be significantly influenced by the HCO3-1 concentration.

3.11. Effect of iso-butanol (C4H9OH) concentrations on the removal of PAHs in PCI ww at increasing sonication times and temperatures

0.1 g L-1, 0.5 and 2 g L-1 C4H9OH concentrations were added to the PCI ww before sonication process. As the sonication time increased from 60 to 150 min the total PAHs removals increased from 14.41% to 60.14% and 92.14% in 0.1 g L-1, 0.5 and 2 g L-1 C4H9OH, respectively, at pH=7.0 and at 30oC. Sonication alone provided 45.34%, 62.40% and 90.11% total PAHs yields after 60, 120 and 150 min, respectively, at pH=7.0 and at 30oC. In this study, it was found that C4H9OH addition decreased the PAHs yields significantly for 60 and 120 min at pH=7.0 and at 30oC. A significant linear correlation between total PAHs yields and increasing C4H9OH concentrations was not observed (R2=0.32, F=0.43, p=0.01).

No significant contributions of C4H9OH to the total PAHs yields was observed at 60oC. Sonication alone provided 54.21%, 79.31% and 96.90% total PAHs removals after 60, 120 and 150 min, respectively, while the PAHs yields decreased to 15.24%, 60.56% and 82.62% for the sonication given above at 60oC in the samples containing 0.1 g L-1, 0.5 and 2 g L-1 C4H9OH, respectively, at pH=7.0. The maximum total PAHs removal efficiency was 82.62?ter 150 min in C4H9OH=2 g L-1 at pH=7.0 and at 60oC. A significant linear correlation between total PAHs yields and increasing C4H9OH concentrations was not observed (R2=0.34, F=0.38, p=0.01).

Iso-butanol is a known scavenger for the gaseous region and/or interfacial region of the collapsing bubble [88], whereas inorganic salts, such as potassium iodide or bromide reside on the bulk liquid region or possibly at the interfacial region of the cavitation bubble [89]. As the boiling point of iso-butanol (104oC) is only slightly higher than that of water, the addition should not greatly affect the temperature inside the bubble, which is known to depend on vapor pressure [30, 90]. Aqueous sonication occurs in three important regions. The first region is the interior of the collapsing cavitation bubbles; the second region is the interfacial boundary between the gaseous and liquid phases, and the third is the solution bulk [90]. It is possible to obtain information about the sonochemical reaction zones by controlling the type of radical scavenger in which the free radicals are located or produced. 

The volatile iso-butanol may scavenge the OHl inside and at the interfacial region of the cavitation bubble and may be partly pyrolyzed inside the cavitation bubble with sufficient ultrasonic irradiation. The cavitation reactions should be influenced by the volatile products formed during the sonication of iso-butanol due to decrease of the temperature inside the collapsing cavitation bubble with long period of irradiation [91-93]. Addition of iso-butanol (740 mg L-1) to the PAHs mixture (FL, BaP, BbF, BkF, BghiP and IcdP) leads to a partial inhibition of the PAHs degradation in agreement with Laughrey et al. [34] and Psillakis et al. [36].

3.12. Effect of pH on the removal of PAHs in PCI ww at increasing sonication times and temperatures

The pH was adjusted to 4.0–7.0 and 10.0 in the PCI ww before sonication process. 91.59%, 90.05% and 92.25% total PAHs removals were found at pH=4.0, pH=7.0 and pH=10.0, respectively, at 30oC after 150 min. Sonication alone provided 90.11% total PAHs removal at 30oC after 150 min at pH=6.98. At short sonication times (60 min and 120 min) the maximum PAHs yields were higher at pH=4.0 and pH=10.0 at 30oC. 63.11%-58.29% and 78.98%-75.70% total PAHs removals was obtained after 60 and 120 min at pH=4.0 and pH=10.0 at 30oC. A significant linear correlation between total PAHs yields and increasing sonication time was not observed (R2=0.31, F=0.33, p=0.01).

93.37%, 96.09% and 95.66% total PAHs removals were observed at pH=4.0, pH=7.0 and pH=10.0, respectively, at 60oC after 150 min. Total PAHs yields did not change after 150 min, compared to the control (at pH=6.98 while E=96.90% total PAHs) at 60oC. The increasing of pH from 4.0 to 10.0 did not significantly affect the total PAHs removals for 60 and 120 min at 60oC. The maximum total PAHs yield was 96.09?ter 150 min at pH=7.0 and at 60oC. A significant linear correlation between total PAHs yields and increasing sonication time was not observed (R2=0.81, F=11.20, p=0.01).   

In order to determine the effect of pH on the sonodestruction of PAHs, the pH of the PCI ww was adjusted to acidic (pH=4.0-5.0), neutral (pH=7.0) and alkaline (pH=10.0-11.0) conditions. Figure 2 shows the H2O2 production, OHl ion concentrations and PAHs yields at acidic, neutral and alkaline pH values. The ln OHl ion concentrations decreased in more hydrophobic PAHs (IcdP, DahA, BghiP) (ln -8, ln -23) while they increased in less hydrophobic PAHs (BbF, BkF, BaP) (ln -75, ln -100) at pH=7.0. The H2O2 concentration was high (35-48 mg L-1) through sonication of less hydrophobic PAHs while is low (2-10 mg L-1) through sonodegradation of more hydrophobic PAHs. The high H2O2 production through sonication of less hydrophobic PAHs verified the presence of high OHl ion concentrations as illustrated in Figure 2.

Figure 2: Effects of pH on the removals of PAHs, H2O2 production and OHl ion concentrations (640 W, 35 kHz, initial CODdis=1027.43 mg L-1, initial TOC=620.81 mg L-1, initial total PAHs=1378.77 ng mL-1).

   Figure 2: Effects of pH on the removals of PAHs, H2O2 production and OHl ion concentrations (640 W, 35 kHz, initial CODdis=1027.43

H2O2 Concentration (mg L-1)Less Hydrophobic PAHsMore Hydrophobic PAHs
in deionized water

After

60 min sonic.

After

120 min sonic.

BbFBkFBaPIcdPDahABghiP
131565      
Removal eff (%) after 30 min34.2132.4438.1019.4021.1220.28
Removal eff (%) after 120 min95.3596.7697.6576.3375.3577.32

Table 6: Effect of H2O2 production on the removals of less (BbF, BkF, BaP) and more (IcdP, DahA, BghiP) hydrophobic PAHs after 60 and 120 min at 30oC (640 W, 35 kHz, initial CODdis=1027.43 mg L-1, initial TOC=620.81 mg L-1, initial total PAHs=1378.77 ng mL-1, n=3, mean values).

The formation of H2O2 during ultrasound irradiation was confirmed experimentally during sonication in the absence and presence of less and more hydrophobic PAHs. As the 13 mg L-1 H2O2 increased to 156 mg L-1 after 60 min the less hydrophobic PAHs removals increased to 95.35-97.65% while the removals of more hydrophobic PAHs remained aroud 75.35-77.32?ter 120 min (Table 6). This process ends with decreasing of H2O2 concentration to 5 mg L-1 after 120 min. As BbF, BkF, BaP and its degradation metabolites scavenge OHl (Eqs. 13 and 14), the yield, defined as H2O2 formed in the presence of less hydrophobic PAHs over H2O2 formed in deionized water.

According to work performed by Goskonda et al. [59] the removal of some hydrophobic PAHs from an oil ww by toluene solvent would be significantly enhanced with a reduction of pH values. These PAHs are sonodegraded via pyrolytic reaction that occurs in the hot cavitation bubbles and/or at the gas–liquid interface of the bubbles. It was reported that the concenration of stronger hydrophobic PAHs increased at the gas–liquid interface of the bubbles with an increase of acidity of wastewater. Similarly, Chakinala et al. [72] reported that the sonochemical destruction of hydrophobic compounds like PAHs was enhanced by the addition of salicylic acid with pH < 7>

3.13. PCI ww toxicities, interspecies correlation and sensitivities 

The maximum Microtox acute toxicity removal yield was 66.67% in PCI ww after 150 min sonication, at 60oC only with sonication (Table 7). The maximum Microtox acute toxicity removal was 83.33% in PCI ww at 1 h aeration and at 60oC after 150 min sonication. The maximum Microtox acute toxicity removal yield was 83.33% in PCI ww at 30 min N2(g) (6 mg L-1 N2) sparging and at 60oC after 150 min sonication. The maximum Microtox acute toxicity removal yield was 66.67% in PCI ww at pH=7.0 and at 60oC after 150 min sonication. The maximum Microtox acute toxicity removal yield was 77.78% in PCI ww at DO=10 mg L-1 and at 60oC after 150 min sonication. The maximum Microtox acute toxicity removal yield was 94.44% in PCI ww at H2O2=500 mg L-1 and at 60oC after 150 min sonication. The maximum Microtox acute toxicity removal yield was 94.44% in PCI ww at TiO2=10 mg L-1 and at 60oC after 150 min sonication (Table 7). The maximum Microtox acute toxicity removal yield was 94.44% in PCI ww at NaCl=2.5 g L-1 and at 60oC after 150 min sonication. The maximum Microtox acute toxicity removal yield was 88.89% in PCI ww at Fe+2=8 mg L-1 and at 60oC after 150 min sonication. The maximum Microtox acute toxicity removal yield was 88.89% in PCI ww at Fe+3=20 mg L-1 and at 60oC after 150 min sonication. The maximum Microtox acute toxicity removal yield was 83.33% in PCI ww at HCO3-1=1 g L-1 and at 60oC after 150 min sonication. The maximum Microtox acute toxicity removal yield was 88.89% in PCI ww at C4H9OH=0.5 g L-1 and at 60oC after 150 min sonication (Table 7). The maximum Microtox acute toxicity removal yield was 94.44% in PCI ww at H2O2=500 mg L-1, at TiO2=10 mg L-1, at NaCl=2.5 g L-1 and at 60oC after 150 min sonication, respectively (Table 7).

Removal efficiencies (%)
Microtox acute toxicity (%)Daphnia magna acute toxicity (%)
Parameters30oC60oCParameters30oC60oC
150.min150.min150.min150.min
Raw ww, control55.5666.67Raw ww, control40.0050.00
1 h aeration77.7883.331 h aeration80.0090.00
30 min N2(g)72.2283.3330 min N2(g)70.0090.00
pH=7.055.5666.67pH=7.040.0050.00
DO=10 mg L-177.7877.78DO=10 mg/l70.0090.00
H2O2=500 mg L-188.8994.44H2O2=500 mg/l80.0090.00
TiO2=10 mg L-188.8994.44TiO2=10 mg/l80.0090.00
NaCl=2.5  g L-188.8994.44NaCl=2.5 g/l80.0090.00
Fe+2=8 mg L-183.3388.89Fe+2=8 mg/l70.0080.00
Fe+3=20 mg L-183.3388.89Fe+3=20 mg/l70.0080.00
HCO3-1=1 g L-177.7883.33HCO3-1=1 g/l60.0080.00
C4H9OH=0.5 g L-177.7888.89C4H9OH=0.5 g/l60.0080.00

Table 7: Acute toxicity removal efficiencies in PCI ww after 150 min sonication at 30oC and at 60oC with the addition of some chemicals for Microtox and Daphnia magna acute toxicity tests (640 W, 35 kHz, n=3, mean values).

The maximum Daphnia magna acute toxicity removal yield was 50% in PCI ww after 150 min sonication, at 60oC only with sonication (Table 7). The maximum Daphnia magna acute toxicity removal yield was 90% in PCI ww 

at 1 h aeration and at 60oC after 150 min sonication. The maximum Daphnia magna acute toxicity removal yield was 90% in PCI ww at 30 min N2(g) (6 mg L-1 N2) sparging and at 60oC after 150 min sonication. The maximum Daphnia magna acute toxicity removal yield was 50% in PCI ww at pH=7.0 and at 60oC after 150 min sonication. The maximum Daphnia magna acute toxicity removal yield was 90% in PCI ww at DO=10 mg L-1 and at 60oC after 150 min sonication (Table 7). The maximum Daphnia magna acute toxicity removal yield was 90% in PCI ww at H2O2=500 mg L-1 and at 60oC after 150 min sonication. The maximum Daphnia magna acute toxicity removal yield was 90% in PCI ww at TiO2=10 mg L-1 and at 60oC after 150 min sonication. The maximum Daphnia magna acute toxicity removal yield was 90% in PCI ww at NaCl=2.5 g L-1 and at 60oC after 150 min sonication. The maximum Daphnia magna acute toxicity removal yield was 80% in PCI ww at Fe+2=8 mg L-1 and at 60oC after 150 min sonication. The maximum Daphnia magna acute toxicity removal yield was 80% in PCI ww at Fe+3=20 mg L-1 and at 60oC after 150 min sonication. The maximum Daphnia magna acute toxicity removal yield was 80% in PCI ww at HCO3-1=1 g L-1 and at 60oC after 150 min sonication. The maximum Daphnia magna acute toxicity removal yield was 80% in PCI ww at C4H9OH=0.5 g L-1 and at 60oC after 150 min sonication (Table 7).

The maximum Daphnia magna acute toxicity removal yield was 90% in PCI ww at 1 h aeration, at 30 min N2(g) sparging, at DO=10 mg L-1, at H2O2=500 mg L-1, at TiO2=10 mg L-1, at NaCl=2.5 g L-1 and at 60oC after 150 min sonication, respectively (Table 7).

In order to determine the sensitivity of Daphnia magna (water flea) for the acute toxicity tests described and to show the responses of two different organisms, to sonicated and non-sonicated wastewater samples the acute toxicity test was also performed with Vibrio fischeri bacteria (Table 8). Sensitivity ranking indicates the sum of toxicity responses of every organism used in acute toxicity tests [95-101]. To explain the sensitivity of acute toxicity test results based on Daphnia magna and Photobacterium phosphoreum a table was constructed ranking the samples in order of acute toxicity [95-101]. A score of “1” was assigned to the most sensitive test for each sample down to 2 for the least sensitive organism representing two trophic levels which were classified according to the test results [95-101]. The comparison of toxicity response and sensitivity ranking was assessed in PCI ww before sonication process (Table 8).

 

Parameters

Photobacterium phosphoreum

Daphnia magna

EC50 value and 95% Confidence Limits (mg L-1) 48 h

Sensitivity Ranking

EC50 value and 95% Confidence Limits (mg L-1) 48 h

Sensitivity

Ranking

Raw ww, only sonication

16.67 (16.43 – 16.91)

1

25 (24.71 – 25.29)

2

1 h aeration

4.33 (4.21 – 4.45)

1

5 (4.87 – 5.13)

2

30 min N2(g)

4.33 (4.21 – 4.45)

1

5 (4.87 – 5.13)

2

pH=7.0

16.67 (16.43 – 16.91)

1

25 (24.71 – 25.29)

2

DO=10 mg L-1

4.11 (3.99 – 4.23)

1

5 (4.87 – 5.13)

2

H2O2=500 mg L-1

2.78 (2.67 – 2.89)

1

5 (4.87 – 5.13)

2

TiO2=10 mg L-1

2.78 (2.67 – 2.89)

1

5 (4.87 – 5.13)

2

NaCl=2.5 g L-1

2.78 (2.67 – 2.89)

1

5 (4.87 – 5.13)

2

Fe+2=8 mg L-1

5.56 (5.42 – 5.70)

1

10 (9.82 – 10.18)

2

Fe+3=20  mg L-1

5.56 (5.42 – 5.70)

1

10 (9.82 – 10.18)

2

HCO3-1=1 g L-1

8.33 (8.16 – 8.50)

1

10 (9.82 – 10.18)

2

C4H9OH=0.5  mg L-1

5.56 (5.42 – 5.70)

1

10 (9.82 – 10.18)

2

Table 8: Sensitivity ranking and EC50 values of PCI ww in Photobacterium phosphoreum and Daphnia magna in sonicated samples containing some additives after 150 min at 60oC (640 W, 35 kHz, n=3, mean values).

The acute toxicity classification of an effluent should always be based on the results of testing all trophic levels at least once. The EC50 value of PCI ww increased from EC50=333.33 mg L-1 (converted from EC90=600 mg L-1 in PCI ww for Microtox acute toxicity assay before sonication) to EC50=618 mg L-1 as the trophic level increased from bacteria in Microtox test to water flea in Daphnia magna test in the influent samples (Table 9). The mean sensitivity scores were 7 and 12 in Vibrio fischeri and Daphnia magna, respectively, after 150 min at 30oC during triplicate sampling for six PAHs. The EC50 values measured for Daphnia magna differed significantly from Photobacterium phosphoreum in the decline of sensitivity scores and exhibited lower mortalities in the influents (t test statistic 3.72, p ≤ 0.05). The t statistics showed that Daphnia magna had higher EC50 values and lower sensitivity scores than Photobacterium phosphoreum. The Photobacterium phosphoreum and Daphnia magna had different responses to toxicity and mortalities (t-test statistic=3.88, p=0.10) and this difference was significant (t test statistic=11.99, p=0.05). The Photobacterium phosphoreum bacteria 

had lower EC50 values than Daphnia magna and these differences were significant (t-test statistics=14.42, p < 0 statistic=11.50,>

Parameters

Microtox acute toxicity values, * EC (mg L-1)

Daphnia magna acute toxicity values, * EC (mg L-1)

 

30oC

60oC

 

30oC

60oC

0. min

150. min

150. min

0. min

150. min

150. min

*EC90

*EC

*EC

*EC50

*EC

*EC

Raw ww, control

6000

EC40=680

EC30=410

1180

EC30=850

EC25=320

1 h aeration

6000

EC20=563

EC15=358

1180

EC10=197

EC5=119

15 min N2(g)

6000

EC25=456

EC20=456

1180

EC20=164

EC10=148

30 min N2(g)

6000

EC25=445

EC15=442

1180

EC15=142

EC5=120

pH=4.0

6000

EC40=755

EC30=466

1180

EC35=167

EC30=151

pH=7.0

6000

EC40=680

EC30=410

1180

EC30=149

EC25=124

pH=10.0

6000

EC40=653

EC30=465

1180

EC35=210

EC30=182

DO=2 mg L-1

6000

EC35=653

EC25=365

1180

EC20=175

EC15=147

DO=4 mg L-1

6000

EC30=652

EC25=365

1180

EC20=225

EC15=160

DO=6 mg L-1

6000

EC25=652

EC25=364

1180

EC15=190

EC10=132

DO=10 mg L-1

6000

EC20=663

EC20=358

1180

EC15=197

EC5=119

H2O2=100 mg L-1

6000

EC20=653

EC15=664

1180

EC15=170

EC10=135

H2O2=500 mg L-1

6000

EC10=629

EC5=680

1180

EC10=180

EC5=135

H2O2=2000 mg L-1

6000

EC25=650

EC20=664

1180

EC20=123

EC10=113

TiO2=0.1 mg L-1

6000

EC20=655

EC20=738

1180

EC15=200

EC10=260

TiO2=0.5 mg L-1

6000

EC15=652

EC15=665

1180

EC10=115

EC5=105

TiO2=10 mg L-1

6000

EC10=652

EC5=520

1180

EC10=122

EC5=95

TiO2=20 mg L-1

6000

EC25=649

EC20=663

1180

EC20=87

EC15=80

NaCl=1 g L-1

6000

EC15=354

EC10=454

1180

EC15=190

EC10=135

NaCl=2.5 g L-1

6000

EC10=350

EC5=357

1180

EC10=170

EC5=89

NaCl=15 g L-1

6000

EC25=327

EC20=452

1180

EC20=165

EC15=83

Fe+2=2 mg L-1

6000

EC20=353

EC15=354

1180

EC20=125

EC15=110

Fe+2=8 mg L-1

6000

EC15=350

EC10=349

1180

EC15=105

EC10=97

Fe+2=20 mg L-1

6000

EC20=346

EC20=342

1180

EC25=90

EC20=85

Fe+3=10 mg L-1

6000

EC20=353

EC15=354

1180

EC20=160

EC15=130

Fe+3=20 mg L-1

6000

EC15=351

EC10=353

1180

EC15=107

EC10=106

Fe+3=50 mg L-1

6000

EC25=348

EC20=346

1180

EC25=105

EC20=103

HCO3-1=0.5  g L-1

6000

EC25=312

EC20=353

1180

EC25=375

EC15=350

HCO3-1=1  g L-1

6000

EC20=311

EC15=309

1180

EC20=140

EC10=160

HCO3-1=5. g L-1

6000

EC30=308

EC25=308

1180

EC30=170

EC20=162

C4H9OH=0.1  g L-1

6000

EC25=311

EC15=310

1180

EC25=400

EC15=375

C4H9OH=0.5  g L-1

6000

EC20=211

EC10=254

1180

EC20=350

EC10=370

C4H9OH=2 g L-1

6000

EC30=353

EC20=409

1180

EC25=108

EC20=118

* EC values were calculated based on CODdis (mg L-1).

Table 9: Acute toxicity tests (Microtox toxicity and Daphnia magna toxicity) values (EC, mg L-1) of PCI ww before and after sonication process.

Table 9 shows the sensitivity ranking and the EC50 values of PCI ww in Photobacterium phosphoreum and Daphnia magna in sonicated samples containing some additives after 150 min at 60oC. The EC50 value of PCI ww increased from 2.78 mg L-1 (converted from 5 mg L-1 at original EC values in PCI ww for Microtox acute toxicity assay after 150 min) to 25 mg L-1 as the trophic level increased from bacteria in Microtox test to water flea in Daphnia magna test in the sonicated PCI ww samples containing some additives after 150 min at 60oC (Table 9). To verify the relationships between the acute toxicity data of two organisms the EC50 values of Photobacterium phosphoreum were correlated to those of Daphnia magna by statistical analysis using their EC50 values in the effluent of PCI ww. It was found that the EC50 values differed in both test organisms for the sonicated samples containing some additives after 150 min at 60oC. The coefficient of correlation and t-test statistics (R2=0.88, p=0.01, t-test statistics=9.15) show a significant linear relationship between the acute toxicities of PCI ww to Photobacterium phosphoreum and to Daphnia magna in the after 150 min sonication samples The linear corolation was not found between Photobacterium phosphoreum acute toxicity test and Daphnia magna acute toxicity assay (Table 9). This indicated that the water fleas exhibited less acute toxicity to PCI ww. The differences in test sensitivities can be attributed to the differences in the responses of the two different trophic organisms in PCI ww. 

The maximum Microtox acute toxicity value decreased from EC90=6000 mg/l to EC10=254 mg L-1 in PCI ww at C4H9OH=0.5 g L-1 and at 60oC after 150 min sonication. The maximum Microtox acute toxicity removal yield was 95.76% in PCI ww at C4H9OH=0.5 g L-1 and at 60oC after 150 min sonication. The maximum Daphnia magna acute toxicity value decreased from EC90=618 mg L-1 to EC15= 80 mg L-1, at TiO2=20 mg L-1 and at 60oC after 150 min sonication. The maximum Daphnia magna acute toxicity removal yield was 93.22% in PCI ww at TiO2=20 mg L-1 and at 60oC after 150 min sonication. As a conclusion, this study showed that the Microtox acute toxicity test is more sensitive than that Daphnia magna in the sonicated PCI ww samples containing some additives after 150 min at 60oC (Table 9).                                                                                                                                                

4.Conclusions

The results of this study showed although sonication alone can be remove the pollutant parameters from PCI industry wastewater, the addition of N2(g), pH, DO, H2O2, TiO2, NaCl, Fe+2, Fe+3 , HCO3-1 and C4H9OH improved the CODdis, TOC and PAHs yields. The maximum CODdis removal yield was 99.68% in PCI ww at 1 h aeration and at NaCl=15 g L-1 and at 60oC after 150 min sonication. The maximum TOC removal yield was 98.35% in PCI ww at DO=10 g L-1 and at 60oC after 150 min sonication. The maximum PAHs removal yield was 99.68% in PCI ww at NaCl=15 g L-1 and at 60oC after 150 min sonication. 

This was attributed to the fact that the PAHs, in this study, although less water soluble and non-volatile molecules, tended to accumulate at the gas–liquid interface. Furthermore, it was also found that the concentration of H2O2 formed during PAHs sonication experiments was substantially lower than that formed during water sonication in the absence of PAHs. These PAHs are sonodegraded via pyrolytic reaction that occurs in the hot cavitation bubbles and/or at the gas–liquid interface of the bubbles. The concenration of stronger hydrophobic PAHs increased at the gas–liquid interface of the bubbles with an increase of acidity of wastewater.

The maximum Microtox acute toxicity removal yield was 94.44% in PCI ww at H2O2=500 mg L-1, at TiO2=10 mg L-1, at NaCl=2.5 g L-1 and at 60oC after 150 min sonication, respectively. This study showed that the Microtox acute toxicity test is more sensitive than that Daphnia magna in the sonicated PCI ww samples containing some additives after 150 min at 60oC. The linear corolation was not found between Photobacterium phosphoreum acute toxicity test and Daphnia magna acute toxicity assay.

Acknowledgements

Experimental analyzes in this study were performed at the Laboratories of the Canada Research Center, Ottawa, Canada. The authors would like to thank this body for providing financial support.

References

Clinical Trials and Clinical Research: I am delighted to provide a testimonial for the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and the exceptional quality of the journal for my article entitled “Effect of Traditional Moxibustion in Assisting the Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients.” The peer review process for my article was rigorous and thorough, ensuring that only high-quality research is published in the journal. The reviewers provided valuable feedback and constructive criticism that greatly improved the clarity and scientific rigor of my study. Their expertise and attention to detail helped me refine my research methodology and strengthen the overall impact of my findings. I would also like to express my gratitude for the exceptional support I received from the editorial office throughout the publication process. The editorial team was prompt, professional, and highly responsive to all my queries and concerns. Their guidance and assistance were instrumental in navigating the submission and revision process, making it a seamless and efficient experience. Furthermore, I am impressed by the outstanding quality of the journal itself. The journal’s commitment to publishing cutting-edge research in the field of stroke rehabilitation is evident in the diverse range of articles it features. The journal consistently upholds rigorous scientific standards, ensuring that only the most impactful and innovative studies are published. This commitment to excellence has undoubtedly contributed to the journal’s reputation as a leading platform for stroke rehabilitation research. In conclusion, I am extremely satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the overall quality of the journal for my article. I wholeheartedly recommend this journal to researchers and clinicians interested in stroke rehabilitation and related fields. The journal’s dedication to scientific rigor, coupled with the exceptional support provided by the editorial office, makes it an invaluable platform for disseminating research and advancing the field.

img

Dr Shiming Tang

Clinical Reviews and Case Reports, The comment form the peer-review were satisfactory. I will cements on the quality of the journal when I receive my hardback copy

img

Hameed khan