Advertisement

Persistent Left Superior Vena Cava Draining into Left Atrium: A Brief Review

Review Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2834-5126/019

Persistent Left Superior Vena Cava Draining into Left Atrium: A Brief Review

  • Anuj Chaturvedi 1
  • Gajendra Agrawal 2*

1 (General Medicine), Senior Resident (Cardiology), JNMC, DMIHER.

2 (Cardiology), Professor and Head of the Department of Cardiology, JNMC, DMIHER.

*Corresponding Author: Gajendra Agrawal, MBBS, MD, DNB(Cardiology), Professor and Head of the Department of Cardiology, JNMC, DMIHER.

Citation: Anuj Chaturvedi, Gajendra Agrawal, (2023). Persistent Left superior Vena Cava Draining into Left Atrium: A Brief Review, Clinical Trials and Clinical Research, 2(2); DOI:10.31579/2834-5126/019

Copyright: © 2023, Gajendra Agrawal. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Received: 20 February 2023 | Accepted: 01 March 2023 | Published: 08 March 2023

Keywords: LSVC; UCSS; Heterotaxy; Surgical intervention; TAPVC

Abstract

Persistent left SVC (LSVC) is a relatively rare vena caval anomaly that can be seen in 0.3% of asymptomatic healthy individuals but increases in prevalence with presence of other congenital cardiac anomalies [1]. Association of other anomalies and symptomatic disease may require surgical intervention. Intracardiac and extracardiac approaches are adopted for rerouting the PLSVC flux. Knowledge of PLSVC is necessary for certain invasive procedures to avoid complications during such interventions. In this review article, we briefly discuss the current evidence with LSVC draining in to LA along with various surgical approaches.

Introduction

Superior vena cava (SVC) anomalies are detected incidentally while performing some cardiac procedures. Persistent left SVC (LSVC) is a relatively rare vena caval anomaly that can be seen in 0.3% of asymptomatic healthy individuals but increases in prevalence with presence of other congenital cardiac anomalies [1]. Draining of LSVC in left atrium (LA) in absence of coronary sinus (CS) can be seen in unroofed coronary sinus syndrome (UCSS) and heterotaxy syndrome [2,3]. Echocardiography aids in the diagnosis of LSVC with identification of LSVC along suprasternal axis without dilated coronary sinus [4]. Surgical management is necessary with adoption of intra- and extra-cardiac techniques depending on the anatomy, age, associated anomalies, and cardiomyopathies [5]. Here, we briefly discuss the current evidence with LSVC draining in to LA along with various surgical approaches.

The Persistent LVSC: UCSS and Heterotaxy syndrome

The UCSS is characterized by partial or complete absence of CS. It is categorized as type I, II and III as total absence, partial absence with one or more anomalies in midportion and partial form of outlet, respectively [4]. The complete absence of coronary sinus is a part of Raghib's syndrome with LSVC draining in to the upper left LA and coronary sinus type atrial septal defect (ASD) [6]. Majority of cases (80% - 90%) are associated with absence of innominate vein [7]. Other anomalies can be associated with UCSS such as tetralogy of Fallot, double outlet right ventricles, etc [6,7]. The heterotaxy syndrome (HS) is associated with abnormal distribution of internal thoracic and abdominal organs along the left to right axis of the body. Isomerism of atrial appendages seen in HS indicates same morphology of atrial appendages as either atrium. These abnormalities are frequently associated with persistent LSVC draining into LA [5]. Compared to left atrial appendage isomerism, extracardiac total anomalous pulmonary venous connection (TAPVC) is common in right atrial appendage isomerism with universal absence of coronary sinus. In left atrial appendage isomerism, the most common anomaly is discontinuation of intrahepatic inferior vena cava with continuation of azygous/hemiazygous vein. Thus, LSVC drains into the coronary sinus in these cases [3,8].  These differences are essential to understand for optimal surgical approaches in presence of other anomalies and cardiomyopathies. 

Diagnosis of LSVC

Echocardiography (ECHO) is the first diagnostic modality. Visualization of LSVC along suprasternal axis without dilated coronary sinus suggests persistent LSVC. In case of doubts, air-bubble ECHO study can detect bubble in LA before right atrium (RA) if LSVC is draining into LA. Furthermore, computed tomography with contrast and magnetic resonance imaging helps in delineation of cardiac anatomy along complete identification of other vascular and cardiac anomalies [9]. 

Current Evidence with persistent LSVC draining in LA

Table 1 [10-17] highlights the reports of LSVC draining in LA along with surgical approaches as described in the reports. Persistent LSVC (PLSVC) is detected incidentally. It can be commonly associated with atrial septal defect (ASD) as seen in majority of reports. PLSVC drainage is commonly in RA (nearly 80-90

Conclusion

Persistent left superior vena cava draining in to left atrium is a rare and incidental finding. Majority of cases remain asymptomatic. Association of other anomalies and symptomatic disease may require surgical intervention. Intracardiac and extracardiac approaches are adopted for rerouting the PLSVC flux. Knowledge of PLSVC is necessary for certain invasive procedures to avoid complications during such interventions. 

References

Clinical Trials and Clinical Research: I am delighted to provide a testimonial for the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and the exceptional quality of the journal for my article entitled “Effect of Traditional Moxibustion in Assisting the Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients.” The peer review process for my article was rigorous and thorough, ensuring that only high-quality research is published in the journal. The reviewers provided valuable feedback and constructive criticism that greatly improved the clarity and scientific rigor of my study. Their expertise and attention to detail helped me refine my research methodology and strengthen the overall impact of my findings. I would also like to express my gratitude for the exceptional support I received from the editorial office throughout the publication process. The editorial team was prompt, professional, and highly responsive to all my queries and concerns. Their guidance and assistance were instrumental in navigating the submission and revision process, making it a seamless and efficient experience. Furthermore, I am impressed by the outstanding quality of the journal itself. The journal’s commitment to publishing cutting-edge research in the field of stroke rehabilitation is evident in the diverse range of articles it features. The journal consistently upholds rigorous scientific standards, ensuring that only the most impactful and innovative studies are published. This commitment to excellence has undoubtedly contributed to the journal’s reputation as a leading platform for stroke rehabilitation research. In conclusion, I am extremely satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the overall quality of the journal for my article. I wholeheartedly recommend this journal to researchers and clinicians interested in stroke rehabilitation and related fields. The journal’s dedication to scientific rigor, coupled with the exceptional support provided by the editorial office, makes it an invaluable platform for disseminating research and advancing the field.

img

Dr Shiming Tang

Clinical Reviews and Case Reports, The comment form the peer-review were satisfactory. I will cements on the quality of the journal when I receive my hardback copy

img

Hameed khan