Advertisement

Perception and Satisfaction of Medical Students towards Problem-Based Learning in Omdurman Islamic University-Sudan

Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2835-785X/070

Perception and Satisfaction of Medical Students towards Problem-Based Learning in Omdurman Islamic University-Sudan

  • Osman A E Mohammedzain ID 1*
  • Nasreldin Marhoum 2

1 Urology and Medical Integration Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Omdurman Islamic University, Sudan.

2 Department of Medical Education, College of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Science, Riyadh KSA.

*Corresponding Author: Osman A E Mohammedzain MD, MRCS, Department of Urology and Medical Integration, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Omdurman Islamic University, Sudan.

Citation: Osman A E Mohammedzain, Nasreldin Marhoum, (2024), Perception and Satisfaction of Medical Students towards Problem-Based Learning in Omdurman Islamic University-Sudan, International Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. 3(5); DOI:10.31579/2835-785X/070

Copyright: © 2024, Osman A E Mohammedzain. This is an open-access artic le distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Received: 08 October 2024 | Accepted: 23 October 2024 | Published: 31 October 2024

Keywords: perception, satisfaction, problem-based learning

Abstract

Background: Problem-based learning is an innovative approach to learning in medical education, which has many advantages, including increasing knowledge retention, a better understanding of basic sciences topics, integration of basic and clinical sciences, and improvement of problem-solving skills. 

Aim: To determine medical students’ perception towards implementing Problem-Based Learning as an instructional method in the medical curriculum in the College of Medicine at Omdurman Islamic University, 2021. 

Methods: This was a descriptive cross-sectional study. The study was taken place at Omdurman Islamic University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, male and female campus in Alfetihab, Omdurman. 188 second and third-year students participated in the study using an open-ended questionnaire. 

Results: Most of the students reported that PBL sessions helped them to understand basic science concepts. In addition, they agreed that PBL sessions increased their knowledge of basic sciences. Most students reported that PBL sessions encouraged self-directed learning, collaborative learning, and improved decision-making skills. Most students used the internet (26.1%), lecture notes (11.2%), and books (52.7%) as learning resources. 

Conclusion: the study highlighted the perception of medical students toward PBL sessions. The study highlighted the significant role of PBL in a medical curriculum and helped students improve their knowledge and different learning skills. Student and tutor training is an important component before introducing PBL.

Introduction

The transformation of the medical curriculum from traditional teacher-centered to integrated student-centered problem-based learning (PBL), has been adopted by many medical colleges around the globe [1] Problem-based learning is an innovative approach to learning in medical education, which has many advantages, including increasing knowledge retention, a better understanding of basic sciences topics, integration of basic and clinical sciences, and improvement of problem-solving skills [2,3]. In addition, it contributes to the development of interpersonal and communication skills, and presentation skills, promotes self-directed learning (SDL), enhances students’ enthusiasm, and motivation. However, a few studies reported that PBL as an instructional method is time-consuming, and does not impact knowledge acquisition [4].

Many previous studies investigated the perception of students toward the PBL method, emphasizing the importance of students’ feedback on adapting and advancing educational approaches and in turn improving the learning process [5-9]. 

Problem statement:

Omdurman Islamic University (OIU) faculty of medicine introduced a hybrid curriculum model in 2010. This model combines the PBL sessions with lectures, seminars, and tutorials in the second and third year on each block by dividing the students into small groups. Since the adoption of this model, no study explored the perception of the students toward PBL sessions. Furthermore, some previous studies are controversial in this regard [10]. Problem-based learning by evidence will not work alone; other educational methods are used parallel PBL. Some evidence in literature secured such type of curriculum. Others are talking about the hybrid type such as the one used in this college. How the students think about this problem is the issue of this study.

Justification:

The result of this study will help the faculty administration to enhance their PBLs session quality in order to improve the learning outcomes. In addition, other medical schools should perform similar studies to make use of their students’ feedback in developing their educational tools.

Research objectives:

General objective:

To study second and third-year medical students’ perception regarding problem-based learning (PBL) in the Faculty of Medicine at Omdurman Islamic University, 2021.

Specific objectives:

To determine students’ perception toward the benefits of problem-based learning (PBL) sessions.

To compare students’ perception toward the conduction and processes of problem-based learning (PBL) in the faculty of Medicine according to gender (males to females).

To evaluate students' perception toward tutors’ facilitation of the problem-based learning (PBL) sessions

To determine students’ self-directed learning.

Materials and Methods

Study design and setting:

This was a descriptive cross-sectional study. The study was taken place at Omdurman Islamic University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science male and female campus in Alfetihab, Omdurman.

The faculty of medicine OIU was established in 1989 and now 26 batches graduated of total number of 6365 doctor. Now faculty admit about 250-300 students per year.

The curriculum model in faculty of medicine OIU is competency-based curriculum, it comprised of organ system, community oriented, integrated syllabus. the curriculum applies the strategies of student-centered learning such as PBL, seminars, small group discussion and task-based learning.

Study population:

Inclusion criteria

Only second and third-year medical students

All students who attended 15 or more PBL session were included

Exclusion criteria

Those who attended less than 15 PBL sessions

Sample size and sampling technique: 188 students participated in this study. They were selected conveniently. 

Data management:

Data collection tool:

Data was collected using a self-administered questionnaire. The questionnaire was designed from previous literature and reviewed by experts in the field. It collects information about the demographic characteristics of the participants (Gender, Academic level and GPA), and a set of items to determine the students’ perception toward PBL sessions in regards to its benefit, conduction and process, and tutor facilitation. Another domain assessed by the questionnaire is the students’ self-directed learning resources, duration and preferred places. These items were answered on a 5-point Likert scale as strongly agree (5), agree (4), neutral (3), disagree (2), and strongly disagree (1). The questions representing the self-directed learning (SDL) resources, duration (hours) was included as yes/no answers.

Data analysis:

Data entry and analysis were carried out using the Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 18. The 5-point Likert scale responses were combined into 3 different categorical variables ‘agree’ (strongly agree plus agree), ‘neutral’, and ‘disagree’ (strongly disagree plus disagree). Descriptive statistics were used to describe students’ demographic characteristics, perception and self-directed learning and variables were displayed using Mean ± SD and percentages. Chi-square test (X2) was used to explore associations between demographic characteristics (Gender, Academic level and GPA) and students’ perception and self-learning.

Ethical Considerations:

The integration department in the faculty of medicine, faculty dean, and research unit were informed by the study. The study and its purpose were explained to all students and verbal informed consent from those who accepted to participate was obtained.

Results:

Population characteristics:

188 students participated in the study. Of all study participants, 78 (41.5%) were males and 110 (58.5%) were females (Figure 1), 88 (46.8%) were second year and 100 (53.2%) were third year students (Figure 2). Regarding students GPA scores 7 (3.7 %) scored less than 2, 85 (45.2%) scored 2 and 96 (51.1%) scored more than 2 (Figure 3).

Figure 1: Gender distribution of a cohort of students from Omdurman Islamic University, Faculty of Medicine, 2021.

Figure 2:Academic level of a cohort of students from Omdurman Islamic University, Faculty of Medicine, 2021

Figure 3GPA scores of a cohort of students from Omdurman Islamic University, Faculty of Medicine, 2021.

Students’ perception toward PBL sessions benefits according to gender:

A higher percentage of males in comparison to females agreed that the PBL method helps develop their leadership skills (67.9%, n=53. P<0 n=63, n=64, n=85,>

 

 

Males 

Females 

P value

PBL helps me to understand basic knowledge

Disagree 

3

4

0.87

PBL helps me to understand basic knowledge

PBL helps me to increase my basic sciences knowledge

Neutral 

8

14

 

Agree 

67

92

 

Disagree 

10

12

0.918

PBL helps me to increase my basic sciences knowledge

The knowledge gained is more thorough PBL than lectures.

Neutral 

8

12

 

Agree 

60

86

 

Disagree 

13

21

0.508

The knowledge gained is more thorough PBL than lectures.

I feel that I learn better in PBL than lectures.

Neutral 

18

18

 

Agree 

47

71

 

Disagree 

11

23

0.438

I feel that I learn better in PBL than lectures.

PBL motivates me to learn

Neutral 

20

23

 

Agree 

47

64

 

Disagree 

3

5

0.693

PBL motivates me to learn

PBL provides better integration between basic and clinical sciences

Neutral 

7

14

 

Agree 

68

91

 

Disagree 

2

5

0.363

PBL provides better integration between basic and clinical sciences

PBL tutorials makes me discuss information in a professional way

Neutral 

3

9

 

Agree 

73

96

 

Disagree 

7

15

0.228

PBL tutorials makes me discuss information in a professional way

PBL encourages self-directed lifelong learning

Neutral 

9

20

 

Agree 

62

75

 

Disagree 

5

8

0..514

PBL encourages self-directed lifelong learning

PBL method helps me improve my decision-making skills

Neutral 

6

14

 

Agree 

67

88

 

Disagree 

4

10

0.532

PBL method helps me improve my decision-making skills

PBL method helps to develop my problem-solving skills.

Neutral 

10

11

 

Agree 

64

89

 

Disagree 

3

8

0.255

PBL method helps to develop my problem-solving skills.

PBL method helps to develop my communication skills

Neutral 

5

13

 

Agree 

70

89

 

Disagree 

3

10

0.377

PBL method helps to develop my communication skills

PBL method helps to develop my leadership skills

Neutral 

18

25

 

Agree 

57

76

 

Disagree 

2

16

0.021

PBL method helps to develop my leadership skills

PBL method helps me to identify my strengths and weaknesses

Neutral 

23

26

 

Agree 

53

68

 

Disagree 

2

15

0.033

PBL method helps me to identify my strengths and weaknesses

PBL made me more satisfied about my academic progression

Neutral 

13

17

 

Agree 

63

78

 

Disagree 

3

18

0.019

PBL made me more satisfied about my academic progression

Neutral 

11

18

 

Agree 

64

74

 

 

 

 

 

Table 1: Students’ perception toward Problem Based Learning (PBL) sessions benefit.

Students’ perception toward the problem-based learning (PBL) conduction and processes:

Table 2 shows students’ perception toward Problem based Learning (PBL) conduction and process. A higher percentage of males agreed that PBL has an acceptable level of difficulty (88.5%, n=69, P<0 n=78, n=80,>

 

 

Males 

Females 

P value

>2

2

3-4

P value

There is proper students’ training before starting the PBL session.

Disagree 

12

25

0.266

2

14

21

0.738

Neutral 

21

34

 

1

26

28

 

Agree 

45

51

 

4

45

47

 

PBL is effective without having lecture of same topic (i.e. PBL can substitute lectures)

Disagree 

30

44

0.396

3

29

42

0.445

Neutral 

18

17

 

1

14

20

 

Agree 

30

49

 

3

42

34

 

There is repetition between PBL and lectures.

Disagree 

11

16

0.981

1

13

13

0.867

Neutral 

23

31

 

2

21

31

 

Agree 

44

63

 

4

51

52

 

I feel comfortable with PBL tutorials

Disagree 

8

13

0.765

1

9

11

0.039

Neutral 

9

16

 

3

15

7

 

Agree 

61

81

 

3

61

78

 

I usually contribute actively in group discussion

Disagree 

10

22

0.288

3

15

14

0.239

Neutral 

15

25

 

2

20

18

 

Agree 

53

63

 

2

50

64

 

Members of PBL know their roles

Students contribute equally in PBL session.

Disagree 

10

26

0.105

2

16

18

0.909

Neutral 

19

30

 

1

24

24

 

Agree 

49

54

 

4

45

54

 

I usually attend PBL sessions on time.

Disagree 

4

12

0.315

1

8

7

0.549

Neutral 

9

15

 

2

12

10

 

Agree 

65

83

 

4

65

79

 

Duration of the PBL session is enough to get the benefits that I need

Disagree 

15

35

0.094

2

22

26

0.256

Neutral 

10

17

 

3

11

13

 

Agree 

53

58

 

2

52

57

 

PBL cases are well written and understandable

Disagree 

5

5

0.831

1

5

4

0.767

Neutral 

7

9

 

1

7

8

 

Agree 

66

96

 

5

73

84

 

PBL cases have a realistic and interesting clinical trigger.

Disagree 

2

2

0.274

0

3

1

0.685

Neutral 

3

11

 

1

7

6

 

Agree 

73

97

 

6

75

89

 

PBL cases have an appropriate level of difficulty/challenge

Disagree 

3

10

0.045

3

4

6

0.001

Neutral 

6

19

 

2

13

10

 

Agree 

69

81

 

2

68

80

 

Table 2: students’ perception toward Problem based Learning (PBL) conduction and process

Students’ perception toward tutors’ facilitation of the problem-based learning (PBL) sessions and their fairness on students’ evaluation:

Table 3 shows students' perception towards tutors’ facilitation of the problem-based learning (PBL) sessions and their fairness on students’ evaluation. Male gender is significantly associated with the students’ belief that tutors are prepared and qualified to run the session.

 

 

Males

Females

P value

Tutors are prepared and qualified to run the session

Disagree 

2

9

0.006

Neutral 

10

31

 

Agree 

66

70

 

Tutors evaluate students in fair way.

Disagree 

8

24

0.097

Neutral 

20

21

 

Agree 

50

56

 

Tutor feedbacks were helpful to improve students’ performance

Disagree 

1

7

0.227

Neutral 

8

21

 

Agree 

69

91

 

Table 3: Students’ perception toward tutors’ facilitation of the problem-based learning (PBL) sessions and their fairness on students’ evaluation:

Student self-directed learning

Table 4 shows students’ self-directed learning resources, duration, and preferred places. Gender and GPA scores have no significant effect on these domains.

 

 

Male 

Female 

P value

<2>

2

3-4

P value

Learning resources 

 

Internet 

17

32

0.781

2

24

23

0.307

Books

44

55

 

2

45

52

 

Lecture notes

8

13

 

2

11

8

 

Medical journals

3

4

 

1

2

4

 

Others 

6

6

 

0

3

9

 

Duration

 

 

Less than 1 hour 

18

22

0.871

2

15

23

0.831

2 hours

30

43

 

2

35

36

 

More than 3 hours

30

45

 

3

35

37

 

Preferred 

place 

Library 

8

13

0.420

1

10

10

0.224

Home 

23

42

 

1

26

38

 

Library and home 

40

50

 

3

44

43

 

Others 

7

5

 

2

5

5

 

Table 4: Students' self-directed learning resources, duration and preferred places.

Results:

Population characteristics:

188 students participated in the study. Of all study participants, 78 (41.5%) were males and 110 (58.5%) were females (Figure 1), 88 (46.8%) were second year and 100 (53.2%) were third year students (Figure 2). Regarding students GPA scores 7 (3.7 %) scored less than 2, 85 (45.2%) scored 2 and 96 (51.1%) scored more than 2 (Figure 3).

Figure 1: Gender distribution of a cohort of students from Omdurman Islamic University, Faculty of Medicine, 2021.

Figure 2:Academic level of a cohort of students from Omdurman Islamic University, Faculty of Medicine, 2021

Figure 3GPA scores of a cohort of students from Omdurman Islamic University, Faculty of Medicine, 2021.

Students’ perception toward PBL sessions benefits according to gender:

A higher percentage of males in comparison to females agreed that the PBL method helps develop their leadership skills (67.9%, n=53. P<0 n=63, n=64, n=85,>

 

 

Males 

Females 

P value

PBL helps me to understand basic knowledge

Disagree 

3

4

0.87

PBL helps me to understand basic knowledge

PBL helps me to increase my basic sciences knowledge

Neutral 

8

14

 

Agree 

67

92

 

Disagree 

10

12

0.918

PBL helps me to increase my basic sciences knowledge

The knowledge gained is more thorough PBL than lectures.

Neutral 

8

12

 

Agree 

60

86

 

Disagree 

13

21

0.508

The knowledge gained is more thorough PBL than lectures.

I feel that I learn better in PBL than lectures.

Neutral 

18

18

 

Agree 

47

71

 

Disagree 

11

23

0.438

I feel that I learn better in PBL than lectures.

PBL motivates me to learn

Neutral 

20

23

 

Agree 

47

64

 

Disagree 

3

5

0.693

PBL motivates me to learn

PBL provides better integration between basic and clinical sciences

Neutral 

7

14

 

Agree 

68

91

 

Disagree 

2

5

0.363

PBL provides better integration between basic and clinical sciences

PBL tutorials makes me discuss information in a professional way

Neutral 

3

9

 

Agree 

73

96

 

Disagree 

7

15

0.228

PBL tutorials makes me discuss information in a professional way

PBL encourages self-directed lifelong learning

Neutral 

9

20

 

Agree 

62

75

 

Disagree 

5

8

0..514

PBL encourages self-directed lifelong learning

PBL method helps me improve my decision-making skills

Neutral 

6

14

 

Agree 

67

88

 

Disagree 

4

10

0.532

PBL method helps me improve my decision-making skills

PBL method helps to develop my problem-solving skills.

Neutral 

10

11

 

Agree 

64

89

 

Disagree 

3

8

0.255

PBL method helps to develop my problem-solving skills.

PBL method helps to develop my communication skills

Neutral 

5

13

 

Agree 

70

89

 

Disagree 

3

10

0.377

PBL method helps to develop my communication skills

PBL method helps to develop my leadership skills

Neutral 

18

25

 

Agree 

57

76

 

Disagree 

2

16

0.021

PBL method helps to develop my leadership skills

PBL method helps me to identify my strengths and weaknesses

Neutral 

23

26

 

Agree 

53

68

 

Disagree 

2

15

0.033

PBL method helps me to identify my strengths and weaknesses

PBL made me more satisfied about my academic progression

Neutral 

13

17

 

Agree 

63

78

 

Disagree 

3

18

0.019

PBL made me more satisfied about my academic progression

Neutral 

11

18

 

Agree 

64

74

 

 

 

 

 

Table 1: Students’ perception toward Problem Based Learning (PBL) sessions benefit.

Students’ perception toward the problem-based learning (PBL) conduction and processes:

Table 2 shows students’ perception toward Problem based Learning (PBL) conduction and process. A higher percentage of males agreed that PBL has an acceptable level of difficulty (88.5%, n=69, P<0 n=78, n=80,>

 

 

Males 

Females 

P value

>2

2

3-4

P value

There is proper students’ training before starting the PBL session.

Disagree 

12

25

0.266

2

14

21

0.738

Neutral 

21

34

 

1

26

28

 

Agree 

45

51

 

4

45

47

 

PBL is effective without having lecture of same topic (i.e. PBL can substitute lectures)

Disagree 

30

44

0.396

3

29

42

0.445

Neutral 

18

17

 

1

14

20

 

Agree 

30

49

 

3

42

34

 

There is repetition between PBL and lectures.

Disagree 

11

16

0.981

1

13

13

0.867

Neutral 

23

31

 

2

21

31

 

Agree 

44

63

 

4

51

52

 

I feel comfortable with PBL tutorials

Disagree 

8

13

0.765

1

9

11

0.039

Neutral 

9

16

 

3

15

7

 

Agree 

61

81

 

3

61

78

 

I usually contribute actively in group discussion

Disagree 

10

22

0.288

3

15

14

0.239

Neutral 

15

25

 

2

20

18

 

Agree 

53

63

 

2

50

64

 

Members of PBL know their roles

Students contribute equally in PBL session.

Disagree 

10

26

0.105

2

16

18

0.909

Neutral 

19

30

 

1

24

24

 

Agree 

49

54

 

4

45

54

 

I usually attend PBL sessions on time.

Disagree 

4

12

0.315

1

8

7

0.549

Neutral 

9

15

 

2

12

10

 

Agree 

65

83

 

4

65

79

 

Duration of the PBL session is enough to get the benefits that I need

Disagree 

15

35

0.094

2

22

26

0.256

Neutral 

10

17

 

3

11

13

 

Agree 

53

58

 

2

52

57

 

PBL cases are well written and understandable

Disagree 

5

5

0.831

1

5

4

0.767

Neutral 

7

9

 

1

7

8

 

Agree 

66

96

 

5

73

84

 

PBL cases have a realistic and interesting clinical trigger.

Disagree 

2

2

0.274

0

3

1

0.685

Neutral 

3

11

 

1

7

6

 

Agree 

73

97

 

6

75

89

 

PBL cases have an appropriate level of difficulty/challenge

Disagree 

3

10

0.045

3

4

6

0.001

Neutral 

6

19

 

2

13

10

 

Agree 

69

81

 

2

68

80

 

Table 2: students’ perception toward Problem based Learning (PBL) conduction and process

Students’ perception toward tutors’ facilitation of the problem-based learning (PBL) sessions and their fairness on students’ evaluation:

Table 3 shows students' perception towards tutors’ facilitation of the problem-based learning (PBL) sessions and their fairness on students’ evaluation. Male gender is significantly associated with the students’ belief that tutors are prepared and qualified to run the session.

 

 

Males

Females

P value

Tutors are prepared and qualified to run the session

Disagree 

2

9

0.006

Neutral 

10

31

 

Agree 

66

70

 

Tutors evaluate students in fair way.

Disagree 

8

24

0.097

Neutral 

20

21

 

Agree 

50

56

 

Tutor feedbacks were helpful to improve students’ performance

Disagree 

1

7

0.227

Neutral 

8

21

 

Agree 

69

91

 

Table 3: Students’ perception toward tutors’ facilitation of the problem-based learning (PBL) sessions and their fairness on students’ evaluation:

Student self-directed learning

Table 4 shows students’ self-directed learning resources, duration, and preferred places. Gender and GPA scores have no significant effect on these domains.

 

 

Male 

Female 

P value

<2>

2

3-4

P value

Learning resources 

 

Internet 

17

32

0.781

2

24

23

0.307

Books

44

55

 

2

45

52

 

Lecture notes

8

13

 

2

11

8

 

Medical journals

3

4

 

1

2

4

 

Others 

6

6

 

0

3

9

 

Duration

 

 

Less than 1 hour 

18

22

0.871

2

15

23

0.831

2 hours

30

43

 

2

35

36

 

More than 3 hours

30

45

 

3

35

37

 

Preferred 

place 

Library 

8

13

0.420

1

10

10

0.224

Home 

23

42

 

1

26

38

 

Library and home 

40

50

 

3

44

43

 

Others 

7

5

 

2

5

5

 

Table 4: Students' self-directed learning resources, duration and preferred places.

Discussion:

Medical education in Sudan requires ongoing improvement to keep cadence with the changing demands of the 21st century, especially in medical practice. Many medical colleges worldwide adopted PBL into their curriculum after conducting some research in their own environment. This study aimed at studying student’s perception toward Problem based learning (PBL) method in a trial to incorporate students’ feedback in the evaluation of the educational approaches for continuous advancement and improvement.

Most of the students in our study reported that PBL is better than lectures and perceived it as a useful tool in acquiring basic science and clinical knowledge and developing their decision making, problem solving, communication and leadership skills. This result is supported by other studies which showed that PBL leads substantial increase in students’ knowledge and skills [10,11]. Contrarily, it has been reported that the PBL does not have an impact on the acquisition of knowledge [12].

Students reported a proper students’ training before starting PBL session, a result which contradict a similar study that reported lack of proper orientation and training before starting the PBL sessions. The PBL literature states that students need proper initial training before running the PBL sessions [13]. Most of the students contribute actively and equally in PBL group discussion.

Tutors play an important role in facilitating learning in PBL sessions. It has been documented in the literature that proper tutor training is an essential step for the success of PBL sessions [14]. Inadequate tutor skills have been reported as a barrier to effective feedback. In addition, tutor feedback is an essential element in the process of student’s learning and development [15]. In the present study, majority of students agreed that the tutor feedback was helpful in improving their performance and they fairly evaluated them in the PBL session. Therefore, these findings indicate that further tutor training is required. The tutor training should include introduction to the PBL process, role of students and tutor with emphasis on methods of encouraging the students to contribute during the PBL sessions, giving effective feedback, and objective evaluation. Similarly, Al-Shawwa recommended the same tutor training program.

Regarding self-directed learning, our study showed that students mostly use books and internet as the sources of their knowledge. The majority spends more than 3 hours studying and prefers both home and library as a place for learning. Student training before starting PBL should include information on utilizing the different available resources for seeking information, prioritizing, planning their approach, making decisions, assessing, interpreting, evaluating, comparing, weighing evidence, and using resources [16].

Conclusion:

Students reported better acquisition of basic science and clinical knowledge improving problem solving, communication, leadership, and decision-making skills. Student and tutor training is an important component before introducing PBL. Students generally perceive positively and express high level of satisfaction to PBL.

Study Limitations:

No generalization can be done from these study results, as the sample was taken conveniently and is not representative of the population. In addition, sample size was not calculated properly. Despite those limitations our study provides a basis for making use of students’ feedback in educational systems evaluation. It provides a clue on how students perceive their learning approaches and how this perception could affect the whole learning process.

References

Clinical Trials and Clinical Research: I am delighted to provide a testimonial for the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and the exceptional quality of the journal for my article entitled “Effect of Traditional Moxibustion in Assisting the Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients.” The peer review process for my article was rigorous and thorough, ensuring that only high-quality research is published in the journal. The reviewers provided valuable feedback and constructive criticism that greatly improved the clarity and scientific rigor of my study. Their expertise and attention to detail helped me refine my research methodology and strengthen the overall impact of my findings. I would also like to express my gratitude for the exceptional support I received from the editorial office throughout the publication process. The editorial team was prompt, professional, and highly responsive to all my queries and concerns. Their guidance and assistance were instrumental in navigating the submission and revision process, making it a seamless and efficient experience. Furthermore, I am impressed by the outstanding quality of the journal itself. The journal’s commitment to publishing cutting-edge research in the field of stroke rehabilitation is evident in the diverse range of articles it features. The journal consistently upholds rigorous scientific standards, ensuring that only the most impactful and innovative studies are published. This commitment to excellence has undoubtedly contributed to the journal’s reputation as a leading platform for stroke rehabilitation research. In conclusion, I am extremely satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the overall quality of the journal for my article. I wholeheartedly recommend this journal to researchers and clinicians interested in stroke rehabilitation and related fields. The journal’s dedication to scientific rigor, coupled with the exceptional support provided by the editorial office, makes it an invaluable platform for disseminating research and advancing the field.

img

Dr Shiming Tang

Clinical Reviews and Case Reports, The comment form the peer-review were satisfactory. I will cements on the quality of the journal when I receive my hardback copy

img

Hameed khan