Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2835-785X/070
Perception and Satisfaction of Medical Students towards Problem-Based Learning in Omdurman Islamic University-Sudan
1 Urology and Medical Integration Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Omdurman Islamic University, Sudan.
2 Department of Medical Education, College of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Science, Riyadh KSA.
*Corresponding Author: Osman A E Mohammedzain MD, MRCS, Department of Urology and Medical Integration, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Omdurman Islamic University, Sudan.
Citation: Osman A E Mohammedzain, Nasreldin Marhoum, (2024), Perception and Satisfaction of Medical Students towards Problem-Based Learning in Omdurman Islamic University-Sudan, International Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. 3(5); DOI:10.31579/2835-785X/070
Copyright: © 2024, Osman A E Mohammedzain. This is an open-access artic le distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 08 October 2024 | Accepted: 23 October 2024 | Published: 31 October 2024
Keywords: perception, satisfaction, problem-based learning
Abstract
Background: Problem-based learning is an innovative approach to learning in medical education, which has many advantages, including increasing knowledge retention, a better understanding of basic sciences topics, integration of basic and clinical sciences, and improvement of problem-solving skills.
Aim: To determine medical students’ perception towards implementing Problem-Based Learning as an instructional method in the medical curriculum in the College of Medicine at Omdurman Islamic University, 2021.
Methods: This was a descriptive cross-sectional study. The study was taken place at Omdurman Islamic University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, male and female campus in Alfetihab, Omdurman. 188 second and third-year students participated in the study using an open-ended questionnaire.
Results: Most of the students reported that PBL sessions helped them to understand basic science concepts. In addition, they agreed that PBL sessions increased their knowledge of basic sciences. Most students reported that PBL sessions encouraged self-directed learning, collaborative learning, and improved decision-making skills. Most students used the internet (26.1%), lecture notes (11.2%), and books (52.7%) as learning resources.
Conclusion: the study highlighted the perception of medical students toward PBL sessions. The study highlighted the significant role of PBL in a medical curriculum and helped students improve their knowledge and different learning skills. Student and tutor training is an important component before introducing PBL.
Introduction
The transformation of the medical curriculum from traditional teacher-centered to integrated student-centered problem-based learning (PBL), has been adopted by many medical colleges around the globe [1] Problem-based learning is an innovative approach to learning in medical education, which has many advantages, including increasing knowledge retention, a better understanding of basic sciences topics, integration of basic and clinical sciences, and improvement of problem-solving skills [2,3]. In addition, it contributes to the development of interpersonal and communication skills, and presentation skills, promotes self-directed learning (SDL), enhances students’ enthusiasm, and motivation. However, a few studies reported that PBL as an instructional method is time-consuming, and does not impact knowledge acquisition [4].
Many previous studies investigated the perception of students toward the PBL method, emphasizing the importance of students’ feedback on adapting and advancing educational approaches and in turn improving the learning process [5-9].
Problem statement:
Omdurman Islamic University (OIU) faculty of medicine introduced a hybrid curriculum model in 2010. This model combines the PBL sessions with lectures, seminars, and tutorials in the second and third year on each block by dividing the students into small groups. Since the adoption of this model, no study explored the perception of the students toward PBL sessions. Furthermore, some previous studies are controversial in this regard [10]. Problem-based learning by evidence will not work alone; other educational methods are used parallel PBL. Some evidence in literature secured such type of curriculum. Others are talking about the hybrid type such as the one used in this college. How the students think about this problem is the issue of this study.
Justification:
The result of this study will help the faculty administration to enhance their PBLs session quality in order to improve the learning outcomes. In addition, other medical schools should perform similar studies to make use of their students’ feedback in developing their educational tools.
Research objectives:
General objective:
To study second and third-year medical students’ perception regarding problem-based learning (PBL) in the Faculty of Medicine at Omdurman Islamic University, 2021.
Specific objectives:
To determine students’ perception toward the benefits of problem-based learning (PBL) sessions.
To compare students’ perception toward the conduction and processes of problem-based learning (PBL) in the faculty of Medicine according to gender (males to females).
To evaluate students' perception toward tutors’ facilitation of the problem-based learning (PBL) sessions
To determine students’ self-directed learning.
Materials and Methods
Study design and setting:
This was a descriptive cross-sectional study. The study was taken place at Omdurman Islamic University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science male and female campus in Alfetihab, Omdurman.
The faculty of medicine OIU was established in 1989 and now 26 batches graduated of total number of 6365 doctor. Now faculty admit about 250-300 students per year.
The curriculum model in faculty of medicine OIU is competency-based curriculum, it comprised of organ system, community oriented, integrated syllabus. the curriculum applies the strategies of student-centered learning such as PBL, seminars, small group discussion and task-based learning.
Study population:
Inclusion criteria
Only second and third-year medical students
All students who attended 15 or more PBL session were included
Exclusion criteria
Those who attended less than 15 PBL sessions
Sample size and sampling technique: 188 students participated in this study. They were selected conveniently.
Data management:
Data collection tool:
Data was collected using a self-administered questionnaire. The questionnaire was designed from previous literature and reviewed by experts in the field. It collects information about the demographic characteristics of the participants (Gender, Academic level and GPA), and a set of items to determine the students’ perception toward PBL sessions in regards to its benefit, conduction and process, and tutor facilitation. Another domain assessed by the questionnaire is the students’ self-directed learning resources, duration and preferred places. These items were answered on a 5-point Likert scale as strongly agree (5), agree (4), neutral (3), disagree (2), and strongly disagree (1). The questions representing the self-directed learning (SDL) resources, duration (hours) was included as yes/no answers.
Data analysis:
Data entry and analysis were carried out using the Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 18. The 5-point Likert scale responses were combined into 3 different categorical variables ‘agree’ (strongly agree plus agree), ‘neutral’, and ‘disagree’ (strongly disagree plus disagree). Descriptive statistics were used to describe students’ demographic characteristics, perception and self-directed learning and variables were displayed using Mean ± SD and percentages. Chi-square test (X2) was used to explore associations between demographic characteristics (Gender, Academic level and GPA) and students’ perception and self-learning.
Ethical Considerations:
The integration department in the faculty of medicine, faculty dean, and research unit were informed by the study. The study and its purpose were explained to all students and verbal informed consent from those who accepted to participate was obtained.
Results:
Population characteristics:
188 students participated in the study. Of all study participants, 78 (41.5%) were males and 110 (58.5%) were females (Figure 1), 88 (46.8%) were second year and 100 (53.2%) were third year students (Figure 2). Regarding students GPA scores 7 (3.7 %) scored less than 2, 85 (45.2%) scored 2 and 96 (51.1%) scored more than 2 (Figure 3).
Figure 1: Gender distribution of a cohort of students from Omdurman Islamic University, Faculty of Medicine, 2021.
Figure 2:Academic level of a cohort of students from Omdurman Islamic University, Faculty of Medicine, 2021
Figure 3: GPA scores of a cohort of students from Omdurman Islamic University, Faculty of Medicine, 2021.
Students’ perception toward PBL sessions benefits according to gender:
A higher percentage of males in comparison to females agreed that the PBL method helps develop their leadership skills (67.9%, n=53. P<0 n=63, n=64, n=85,>
|
| Males | Females | P value |
PBL helps me to understand basic knowledge | Disagree | 3 | 4 | 0.87 |
PBL helps me to understand basic knowledge PBL helps me to increase my basic sciences knowledge | Neutral | 8 | 14 |
|
Agree | 67 | 92 |
| |
Disagree | 10 | 12 | 0.918 | |
PBL helps me to increase my basic sciences knowledge The knowledge gained is more thorough PBL than lectures. | Neutral | 8 | 12 |
|
Agree | 60 | 86 |
| |
Disagree | 13 | 21 | 0.508 | |
The knowledge gained is more thorough PBL than lectures. I feel that I learn better in PBL than lectures. | Neutral | 18 | 18 |
|
Agree | 47 | 71 |
| |
Disagree | 11 | 23 | 0.438 | |
I feel that I learn better in PBL than lectures. PBL motivates me to learn | Neutral | 20 | 23 |
|
Agree | 47 | 64 |
| |
Disagree | 3 | 5 | 0.693 | |
PBL motivates me to learn PBL provides better integration between basic and clinical sciences | Neutral | 7 | 14 |
|
Agree | 68 | 91 |
| |
Disagree | 2 | 5 | 0.363 | |
PBL provides better integration between basic and clinical sciences PBL tutorials makes me discuss information in a professional way | Neutral | 3 | 9 |
|
Agree | 73 | 96 |
| |
Disagree | 7 | 15 | 0.228 | |
PBL tutorials makes me discuss information in a professional way PBL encourages self-directed lifelong learning | Neutral | 9 | 20 |
|
Agree | 62 | 75 |
| |
Disagree | 5 | 8 | 0..514 | |
PBL encourages self-directed lifelong learning PBL method helps me improve my decision-making skills | Neutral | 6 | 14 |
|
Agree | 67 | 88 |
| |
Disagree | 4 | 10 | 0.532 | |
PBL method helps me improve my decision-making skills PBL method helps to develop my problem-solving skills. | Neutral | 10 | 11 |
|
Agree | 64 | 89 |
| |
Disagree | 3 | 8 | 0.255 | |
PBL method helps to develop my problem-solving skills. PBL method helps to develop my communication skills | Neutral | 5 | 13 |
|
Agree | 70 | 89 |
| |
Disagree | 3 | 10 | 0.377 | |
PBL method helps to develop my communication skills PBL method helps to develop my leadership skills | Neutral | 18 | 25 |
|
Agree | 57 | 76 |
| |
Disagree | 2 | 16 | 0.021 | |
PBL method helps to develop my leadership skills PBL method helps me to identify my strengths and weaknesses | Neutral | 23 | 26 |
|
Agree | 53 | 68 |
| |
Disagree | 2 | 15 | 0.033 | |
PBL method helps me to identify my strengths and weaknesses PBL made me more satisfied about my academic progression | Neutral | 13 | 17 |
|
Agree | 63 | 78 |
| |
Disagree | 3 | 18 | 0.019 | |
PBL made me more satisfied about my academic progression | Neutral | 11 | 18 |
|
Agree | 64 | 74 |
| |
|
|
|
|
Table 1: Students’ perception toward Problem Based Learning (PBL) sessions benefit.
Students’ perception toward the problem-based learning (PBL) conduction and processes:
Table 2 shows students’ perception toward Problem based Learning (PBL) conduction and process. A higher percentage of males agreed that PBL has an acceptable level of difficulty (88.5%, n=69, P<0 n=78, n=80,>
|
| Males | Females | P value | >2 | 2 | 3-4 | P value |
There is proper students’ training before starting the PBL session. | Disagree | 12 | 25 | 0.266 | 2 | 14 | 21 | 0.738 |
Neutral | 21 | 34 |
| 1 | 26 | 28 |
| |
Agree | 45 | 51 |
| 4 | 45 | 47 |
| |
PBL is effective without having lecture of same topic (i.e. PBL can substitute lectures) | Disagree | 30 | 44 | 0.396 | 3 | 29 | 42 | 0.445 |
Neutral | 18 | 17 |
| 1 | 14 | 20 |
| |
Agree | 30 | 49 |
| 3 | 42 | 34 |
| |
There is repetition between PBL and lectures. | Disagree | 11 | 16 | 0.981 | 1 | 13 | 13 | 0.867 |
Neutral | 23 | 31 |
| 2 | 21 | 31 |
| |
Agree | 44 | 63 |
| 4 | 51 | 52 |
| |
I feel comfortable with PBL tutorials | Disagree | 8 | 13 | 0.765 | 1 | 9 | 11 | 0.039 |
Neutral | 9 | 16 |
| 3 | 15 | 7 |
| |
Agree | 61 | 81 |
| 3 | 61 | 78 |
| |
I usually contribute actively in group discussion | Disagree | 10 | 22 | 0.288 | 3 | 15 | 14 | 0.239 |
Neutral | 15 | 25 |
| 2 | 20 | 18 |
| |
Agree | 53 | 63 |
| 2 | 50 | 64 |
| |
Members of PBL know their roles Students contribute equally in PBL session. | Disagree | 10 | 26 | 0.105 | 2 | 16 | 18 | 0.909 |
Neutral | 19 | 30 |
| 1 | 24 | 24 |
| |
Agree | 49 | 54 |
| 4 | 45 | 54 |
| |
I usually attend PBL sessions on time. | Disagree | 4 | 12 | 0.315 | 1 | 8 | 7 | 0.549 |
Neutral | 9 | 15 |
| 2 | 12 | 10 |
| |
Agree | 65 | 83 |
| 4 | 65 | 79 |
| |
Duration of the PBL session is enough to get the benefits that I need | Disagree | 15 | 35 | 0.094 | 2 | 22 | 26 | 0.256 |
Neutral | 10 | 17 |
| 3 | 11 | 13 |
| |
Agree | 53 | 58 |
| 2 | 52 | 57 |
| |
PBL cases are well written and understandable | Disagree | 5 | 5 | 0.831 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 0.767 |
Neutral | 7 | 9 |
| 1 | 7 | 8 |
| |
Agree | 66 | 96 |
| 5 | 73 | 84 |
| |
PBL cases have a realistic and interesting clinical trigger. | Disagree | 2 | 2 | 0.274 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0.685 |
Neutral | 3 | 11 |
| 1 | 7 | 6 |
| |
Agree | 73 | 97 |
| 6 | 75 | 89 |
| |
PBL cases have an appropriate level of difficulty/challenge | Disagree | 3 | 10 | 0.045 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 0.001 |
Neutral | 6 | 19 |
| 2 | 13 | 10 |
| |
Agree | 69 | 81 |
| 2 | 68 | 80 |
|
Table 2: students’ perception toward Problem based Learning (PBL) conduction and process
Students’ perception toward tutors’ facilitation of the problem-based learning (PBL) sessions and their fairness on students’ evaluation:
Table 3 shows students' perception towards tutors’ facilitation of the problem-based learning (PBL) sessions and their fairness on students’ evaluation. Male gender is significantly associated with the students’ belief that tutors are prepared and qualified to run the session.
|
| Males | Females | P value |
Tutors are prepared and qualified to run the session | Disagree | 2 | 9 | 0.006 |
Neutral | 10 | 31 |
| |
Agree | 66 | 70 |
| |
Tutors evaluate students in fair way. | Disagree | 8 | 24 | 0.097 |
Neutral | 20 | 21 |
| |
Agree | 50 | 56 |
| |
Tutor feedbacks were helpful to improve students’ performance | Disagree | 1 | 7 | 0.227 |
Neutral | 8 | 21 |
| |
Agree | 69 | 91 |
|
Table 3: Students’ perception toward tutors’ facilitation of the problem-based learning (PBL) sessions and their fairness on students’ evaluation:
Student self-directed learning
Table 4 shows students’ self-directed learning resources, duration, and preferred places. Gender and GPA scores have no significant effect on these domains.
|
| Male | Female | P value | <2> | 2 | 3-4 | P value |
Learning resources
| Internet | 17 | 32 | 0.781 | 2 | 24 | 23 | 0.307 |
Books | 44 | 55 |
| 2 | 45 | 52 |
| |
Lecture notes | 8 | 13 |
| 2 | 11 | 8 |
| |
Medical journals | 3 | 4 |
| 1 | 2 | 4 |
| |
Others | 6 | 6 |
| 0 | 3 | 9 |
| |
Duration
| Less than 1 hour | 18 | 22 | 0.871 | 2 | 15 | 23 | 0.831 |
2 hours | 30 | 43 |
| 2 | 35 | 36 |
| |
More than 3 hours | 30 | 45 |
| 3 | 35 | 37 |
| |
Preferred place | Library | 8 | 13 | 0.420 | 1 | 10 | 10 | 0.224 |
Home | 23 | 42 |
| 1 | 26 | 38 |
| |
Library and home | 40 | 50 |
| 3 | 44 | 43 |
| |
Others | 7 | 5 |
| 2 | 5 | 5 |
|
Table 4: Students' self-directed learning resources, duration and preferred places.
Results:
Population characteristics:
188 students participated in the study. Of all study participants, 78 (41.5%) were males and 110 (58.5%) were females (Figure 1), 88 (46.8%) were second year and 100 (53.2%) were third year students (Figure 2). Regarding students GPA scores 7 (3.7 %) scored less than 2, 85 (45.2%) scored 2 and 96 (51.1%) scored more than 2 (Figure 3).
Figure 1: Gender distribution of a cohort of students from Omdurman Islamic University, Faculty of Medicine, 2021.
Figure 2:Academic level of a cohort of students from Omdurman Islamic University, Faculty of Medicine, 2021
Figure 3: GPA scores of a cohort of students from Omdurman Islamic University, Faculty of Medicine, 2021.
Students’ perception toward PBL sessions benefits according to gender:
A higher percentage of males in comparison to females agreed that the PBL method helps develop their leadership skills (67.9%, n=53. P<0 n=63, n=64, n=85,>
|
| Males | Females | P value |
PBL helps me to understand basic knowledge | Disagree | 3 | 4 | 0.87 |
PBL helps me to understand basic knowledge PBL helps me to increase my basic sciences knowledge | Neutral | 8 | 14 |
|
Agree | 67 | 92 |
| |
Disagree | 10 | 12 | 0.918 | |
PBL helps me to increase my basic sciences knowledge The knowledge gained is more thorough PBL than lectures. | Neutral | 8 | 12 |
|
Agree | 60 | 86 |
| |
Disagree | 13 | 21 | 0.508 | |
The knowledge gained is more thorough PBL than lectures. I feel that I learn better in PBL than lectures. | Neutral | 18 | 18 |
|
Agree | 47 | 71 |
| |
Disagree | 11 | 23 | 0.438 | |
I feel that I learn better in PBL than lectures. PBL motivates me to learn | Neutral | 20 | 23 |
|
Agree | 47 | 64 |
| |
Disagree | 3 | 5 | 0.693 | |
PBL motivates me to learn PBL provides better integration between basic and clinical sciences | Neutral | 7 | 14 |
|
Agree | 68 | 91 |
| |
Disagree | 2 | 5 | 0.363 | |
PBL provides better integration between basic and clinical sciences PBL tutorials makes me discuss information in a professional way | Neutral | 3 | 9 |
|
Agree | 73 | 96 |
| |
Disagree | 7 | 15 | 0.228 | |
PBL tutorials makes me discuss information in a professional way PBL encourages self-directed lifelong learning | Neutral | 9 | 20 |
|
Agree | 62 | 75 |
| |
Disagree | 5 | 8 | 0..514 | |
PBL encourages self-directed lifelong learning PBL method helps me improve my decision-making skills | Neutral | 6 | 14 |
|
Agree | 67 | 88 |
| |
Disagree | 4 | 10 | 0.532 | |
PBL method helps me improve my decision-making skills PBL method helps to develop my problem-solving skills. | Neutral | 10 | 11 |
|
Agree | 64 | 89 |
| |
Disagree | 3 | 8 | 0.255 | |
PBL method helps to develop my problem-solving skills. PBL method helps to develop my communication skills | Neutral | 5 | 13 |
|
Agree | 70 | 89 |
| |
Disagree | 3 | 10 | 0.377 | |
PBL method helps to develop my communication skills PBL method helps to develop my leadership skills | Neutral | 18 | 25 |
|
Agree | 57 | 76 |
| |
Disagree | 2 | 16 | 0.021 | |
PBL method helps to develop my leadership skills PBL method helps me to identify my strengths and weaknesses | Neutral | 23 | 26 |
|
Agree | 53 | 68 |
| |
Disagree | 2 | 15 | 0.033 | |
PBL method helps me to identify my strengths and weaknesses PBL made me more satisfied about my academic progression | Neutral | 13 | 17 |
|
Agree | 63 | 78 |
| |
Disagree | 3 | 18 | 0.019 | |
PBL made me more satisfied about my academic progression | Neutral | 11 | 18 |
|
Agree | 64 | 74 |
| |
|
|
|
|
Table 1: Students’ perception toward Problem Based Learning (PBL) sessions benefit.
Students’ perception toward the problem-based learning (PBL) conduction and processes:
Table 2 shows students’ perception toward Problem based Learning (PBL) conduction and process. A higher percentage of males agreed that PBL has an acceptable level of difficulty (88.5%, n=69, P<0 n=78, n=80,>
|
| Males | Females | P value | >2 | 2 | 3-4 | P value |
There is proper students’ training before starting the PBL session. | Disagree | 12 | 25 | 0.266 | 2 | 14 | 21 | 0.738 |
Neutral | 21 | 34 |
| 1 | 26 | 28 |
| |
Agree | 45 | 51 |
| 4 | 45 | 47 |
| |
PBL is effective without having lecture of same topic (i.e. PBL can substitute lectures) | Disagree | 30 | 44 | 0.396 | 3 | 29 | 42 | 0.445 |
Neutral | 18 | 17 |
| 1 | 14 | 20 |
| |
Agree | 30 | 49 |
| 3 | 42 | 34 |
| |
There is repetition between PBL and lectures. | Disagree | 11 | 16 | 0.981 | 1 | 13 | 13 | 0.867 |
Neutral | 23 | 31 |
| 2 | 21 | 31 |
| |
Agree | 44 | 63 |
| 4 | 51 | 52 |
| |
I feel comfortable with PBL tutorials | Disagree | 8 | 13 | 0.765 | 1 | 9 | 11 | 0.039 |
Neutral | 9 | 16 |
| 3 | 15 | 7 |
| |
Agree | 61 | 81 |
| 3 | 61 | 78 |
| |
I usually contribute actively in group discussion | Disagree | 10 | 22 | 0.288 | 3 | 15 | 14 | 0.239 |
Neutral | 15 | 25 |
| 2 | 20 | 18 |
| |
Agree | 53 | 63 |
| 2 | 50 | 64 |
| |
Members of PBL know their roles Students contribute equally in PBL session. | Disagree | 10 | 26 | 0.105 | 2 | 16 | 18 | 0.909 |
Neutral | 19 | 30 |
| 1 | 24 | 24 |
| |
Agree | 49 | 54 |
| 4 | 45 | 54 |
| |
I usually attend PBL sessions on time. | Disagree | 4 | 12 | 0.315 | 1 | 8 | 7 | 0.549 |
Neutral | 9 | 15 |
| 2 | 12 | 10 |
| |
Agree | 65 | 83 |
| 4 | 65 | 79 |
| |
Duration of the PBL session is enough to get the benefits that I need | Disagree | 15 | 35 | 0.094 | 2 | 22 | 26 | 0.256 |
Neutral | 10 | 17 |
| 3 | 11 | 13 |
| |
Agree | 53 | 58 |
| 2 | 52 | 57 |
| |
PBL cases are well written and understandable | Disagree | 5 | 5 | 0.831 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 0.767 |
Neutral | 7 | 9 |
| 1 | 7 | 8 |
| |
Agree | 66 | 96 |
| 5 | 73 | 84 |
| |
PBL cases have a realistic and interesting clinical trigger. | Disagree | 2 | 2 | 0.274 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0.685 |
Neutral | 3 | 11 |
| 1 | 7 | 6 |
| |
Agree | 73 | 97 |
| 6 | 75 | 89 |
| |
PBL cases have an appropriate level of difficulty/challenge | Disagree | 3 | 10 | 0.045 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 0.001 |
Neutral | 6 | 19 |
| 2 | 13 | 10 |
| |
Agree | 69 | 81 |
| 2 | 68 | 80 |
|
Table 2: students’ perception toward Problem based Learning (PBL) conduction and process
Students’ perception toward tutors’ facilitation of the problem-based learning (PBL) sessions and their fairness on students’ evaluation:
Table 3 shows students' perception towards tutors’ facilitation of the problem-based learning (PBL) sessions and their fairness on students’ evaluation. Male gender is significantly associated with the students’ belief that tutors are prepared and qualified to run the session.
|
| Males | Females | P value |
Tutors are prepared and qualified to run the session | Disagree | 2 | 9 | 0.006 |
Neutral | 10 | 31 |
| |
Agree | 66 | 70 |
| |
Tutors evaluate students in fair way. | Disagree | 8 | 24 | 0.097 |
Neutral | 20 | 21 |
| |
Agree | 50 | 56 |
| |
Tutor feedbacks were helpful to improve students’ performance | Disagree | 1 | 7 | 0.227 |
Neutral | 8 | 21 |
| |
Agree | 69 | 91 |
|
Table 3: Students’ perception toward tutors’ facilitation of the problem-based learning (PBL) sessions and their fairness on students’ evaluation:
Student self-directed learning
Table 4 shows students’ self-directed learning resources, duration, and preferred places. Gender and GPA scores have no significant effect on these domains.
|
| Male | Female | P value | <2> | 2 | 3-4 | P value |
Learning resources
| Internet | 17 | 32 | 0.781 | 2 | 24 | 23 | 0.307 |
Books | 44 | 55 |
| 2 | 45 | 52 |
| |
Lecture notes | 8 | 13 |
| 2 | 11 | 8 |
| |
Medical journals | 3 | 4 |
| 1 | 2 | 4 |
| |
Others | 6 | 6 |
| 0 | 3 | 9 |
| |
Duration
| Less than 1 hour | 18 | 22 | 0.871 | 2 | 15 | 23 | 0.831 |
2 hours | 30 | 43 |
| 2 | 35 | 36 |
| |
More than 3 hours | 30 | 45 |
| 3 | 35 | 37 |
| |
Preferred place | Library | 8 | 13 | 0.420 | 1 | 10 | 10 | 0.224 |
Home | 23 | 42 |
| 1 | 26 | 38 |
| |
Library and home | 40 | 50 |
| 3 | 44 | 43 |
| |
Others | 7 | 5 |
| 2 | 5 | 5 |
|
Table 4: Students' self-directed learning resources, duration and preferred places.
Discussion:
Medical education in Sudan requires ongoing improvement to keep cadence with the changing demands of the 21st century, especially in medical practice. Many medical colleges worldwide adopted PBL into their curriculum after conducting some research in their own environment. This study aimed at studying student’s perception toward Problem based learning (PBL) method in a trial to incorporate students’ feedback in the evaluation of the educational approaches for continuous advancement and improvement.
Most of the students in our study reported that PBL is better than lectures and perceived it as a useful tool in acquiring basic science and clinical knowledge and developing their decision making, problem solving, communication and leadership skills. This result is supported by other studies which showed that PBL leads substantial increase in students’ knowledge and skills [10,11]. Contrarily, it has been reported that the PBL does not have an impact on the acquisition of knowledge [12].
Students reported a proper students’ training before starting PBL session, a result which contradict a similar study that reported lack of proper orientation and training before starting the PBL sessions. The PBL literature states that students need proper initial training before running the PBL sessions [13]. Most of the students contribute actively and equally in PBL group discussion.
Tutors play an important role in facilitating learning in PBL sessions. It has been documented in the literature that proper tutor training is an essential step for the success of PBL sessions [14]. Inadequate tutor skills have been reported as a barrier to effective feedback. In addition, tutor feedback is an essential element in the process of student’s learning and development [15]. In the present study, majority of students agreed that the tutor feedback was helpful in improving their performance and they fairly evaluated them in the PBL session. Therefore, these findings indicate that further tutor training is required. The tutor training should include introduction to the PBL process, role of students and tutor with emphasis on methods of encouraging the students to contribute during the PBL sessions, giving effective feedback, and objective evaluation. Similarly, Al-Shawwa recommended the same tutor training program.
Regarding self-directed learning, our study showed that students mostly use books and internet as the sources of their knowledge. The majority spends more than 3 hours studying and prefers both home and library as a place for learning. Student training before starting PBL should include information on utilizing the different available resources for seeking information, prioritizing, planning their approach, making decisions, assessing, interpreting, evaluating, comparing, weighing evidence, and using resources [16].
Conclusion:
Students reported better acquisition of basic science and clinical knowledge improving problem solving, communication, leadership, and decision-making skills. Student and tutor training is an important component before introducing PBL. Students generally perceive positively and express high level of satisfaction to PBL.
Study Limitations:
No generalization can be done from these study results, as the sample was taken conveniently and is not representative of the population. In addition, sample size was not calculated properly. Despite those limitations our study provides a basis for making use of students’ feedback in educational systems evaluation. It provides a clue on how students perceive their learning approaches and how this perception could affect the whole learning process.
References
- References
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar