Advertisement

Orforglipron: A Promising Agent for Treatment of Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes

Review Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2835-835X/031

Orforglipron: A Promising Agent for Treatment of Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes

  • Nasser Mikhail *

Endocrinology Division, Department of Medicine, Olive View-UCLA Medical Center, David-Geffen UCLA Medical School, CA, USA 

*Corresponding Author: Nasser Mikhail, Department of Medicine, Olive View-UCLA Medical Center, David-Geffen UCLA Medical School, CA, USA.

Citation: Nasser Mikhail (2023), Orforglipron: A Promising Agent for Treatment of Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes, Clinical Trials and Case Studies, 2(4); DOI:10.31579/2835-835X/031

Copyright: © 2023, Nasser Mikhail. This is an open-access artic le distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Received: 10 June 2023 | Accepted: 30 June 2023 | Published: 07 July 2023

Keywords: GLP-1 receptor agonists; orforglipron, semaglutide; safety; efficacy; weight; glycated hemoglobin

Abstract

Orforglipron is a non-peptide glucagon-like receptor-1 (GLP-1R) agonist that can be orally administered once daily irrespective of food intake. Different doses of oeforglipron were evaluated in two phase 2 clinical trials including subjects with obesity and type 2 diabetes, respectively. In the obesity trial, subjects with mean baseline weight of 108.7 kg and body mass index (BMI) of 37.9 kg/m2 had 9.4% to 14.7% of weight loss at 36 weeks compared with 2.3% loss with placebo. In the diabetes study, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels (baseline 8.1%) decreased from 1.2% to 2.1% in the orforglipron groups, 1.1% with dulaglutide (1.5 mg/week), and 0.5% with placebo at 26 weeks. In the latter trial, mean weight loss at week 26 was 3.7% to 9.6% with orforglipron, 4.0% with dulaglutide, and 2.2% with placebo. While HbA1c reduction seemed to reach a plateau at 20 weeks, weight loss continued to progress up to the end of follow-up at 36 weeks. In general, safety profile of orforglipron resembles that of GLP-1R agonists with gastrointestinal (GI) adverse effects being the most common. Yet, premature discontinuation rates were high; 19.1-21.1% across the orforglipron groups compared with 4% with dulaglutide and 2.0-5.5% with placebo. In addition, there was a pronounced increase in heart rate with the use of orforglipron; placebo-adjusted increase being 7.7-9.2 beats per minute (bpm). Overall, orforglipron is a promising oral GLP-1R agonist for treatment of obesity and type 2 diabetes. Phase 3 trials are urgently needed to clarify its long-term efficacy and safety.   

Introduction

Currently, the peptide semaglutide (Rybelsus) is the only oral GLP-1R approved for treatment of type 2 diabetes [1]. However, oral semaglutide is limited by strict criteria of intake that may potentially limit compliance. Thus, it must be taken in the fasting state with no more than 4 ounces (120 cc) of plain water at least 30 minutes before the first food, beverage, or other oral medications [1]. Several orally administered non-peptide GLP-1R agonists are under development for treatment of obesity and type 2 diabetes, orforglipron being the most studied so far [2,3]. Contrary to oral semaglutide, orforglipron may be taken orally once a day irrespective of food or water intake. Results of phase 2 clinical trials suggest that orforglipron may be an effective anti-obesity and anti-diabetic agent [2,3]. The main purpose of this review is to provide an appraisal on orforglipron with respect to its efficacy and safety profile.

Orforglipron for treatment of obesity: 

Orforglipron was evaluated in various doses [12, 24, 36, 45 mg/d]. in a randomized phase 2 double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 272 obese subjects (59% women, mean age 54.2 years, mean weight 108.7 kg, mean BMI 37.9 kg/m2) [2]. The starting dose and titration schedule varied between groups. Throughout the trial, education regarding healthy eating and exercise was provided to all enrolled individuals [2]. The primary and secondary endpoints of the trial were the percentage change from baseline in weight after 26 weeks and 36 weeks respectively [2]. At week 26, the mean change from baseline ranged from -8.6% to -12.6

Conclusions and future needs

Orforglipron represents a new class of non-peptide GLP-1R agonists that can be taken orally once a day without food or water restrictions. Other non-peptide GLP-1R agonists, such as danuglipron, are under development [9]. Phase 2 trials lasting 26-36 weeks show that orforglipron cause an average placebo-adjusted substantial weight loss of up to 12.4% and 9.6% in subjects with obesity and type 2 diabetes, respectively [2,3]. A second phase 2 trial suggest that orforglipron is effective as antihyperglycemic agent causing an average reduction of HbA1c levels of up 1.7% [3]. The magnitude of decrease in weight and HbA1c values are close to those achieved by the highest dose of oral semaglutide (50 mg/d) shown in phase 3 clinical trials (table 1). In general, safety profile of orforglipron is comparable to that of the class of GLP-1 agonists. Yet, the incidence of GI adverse effects may be higher with orforglipron compared with other GLP-1R agonists, in part due to patterns of dose initiation and escalation. The latter observation may explain the high rates of orforgliflozin discontinuation due to adverse effects reaching up to 21% (versus 5.5% with placebo) (table 1).

 

 

Orforglipron [2,3]

Oral semaglutide [7,8]

Structure

 

Non-peptide GLP-1R agonist

Peptide GLP-1R agonist 

Method of administration

Orally once daily irrespective of food intake

Once daily in AM with no more than 120 ml of water and 30 min before any food items or other medications

Doses 

3,12,24, 36, 45 mg 

7,14, 25,50 mg

Phases of development

Phase 2 trials of 36 week-duration

Phase 3 trials of 52-68 week-duration. 

Approval by FDA

Not yet approved

Approved for treatment of type 2 diabetes 7-14 mg doses 

Percentage reduction in weight vs baseline with the highest dose in subjects with obesity

-14.7% (-12.4% vs placebo)

-15.1% (-12.7% vs placebo)

Percentage reduction in weight vs baseline with the highest dose in patients with type 2 diabetes

-9.6% (-7.4% vs placebo)

-8.5% (no placebo was used) 

HbA1c reduction vs baseline with the highest dose 

-2.1% (-1.7% vs placebo)

-2.0% (no placebo was used)

Adverse effects (proportions of subjects using highest dose)

Mainly GI (70.4% vs 18.2% with placebo)

Mainly GI (80% vs 46% with placebo)

Proportions of subjects who discontinued drug due to adverse effects using highest dose

19.1-21.1% vs 2.0-5.5% placebo

6-13% vs 4% placebo

Safety concerns

↑ heart rate (7.7 to 9.2 bpm vs placebo), atrial fibrillation (2 cases)

↑ heart rate (4.5 bpm vs placebo)

Abbreviations in the table: GLP-1R: glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor, FDA: Federal Drug Administration, HbA1c: glycated hemoglobin, bpm: beats per minute. 

Table 1: Comparison between orforglipron and oral semaglutide

Furthermore, the increase in placebo-adjusted heart rate of 7.7 to 9.2 bpm with orforglipron appears to be more pronounced than other GLP-1R agonists.  Phase 3 clinical trials are underway to clarify efficacy and safety of orforglipron in larger patient population of obesity and type 2 diabetes from different ethnic backgrounds. The changes in heart rate and any types of arrhythmias should be included as pre-specified adverse effects in these trials. More importantly, the effects of orforglipron on cardiovascular events and mortality should be evaluated in adequately powered long-term trials. In addition, direct comparison of orforglipron with oral semaglutide should be studied in the setting of double-blind trials. 

Conflict of interest:

The author has no conflict of interest to declare. 

References

Clinical Trials and Clinical Research: I am delighted to provide a testimonial for the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and the exceptional quality of the journal for my article entitled “Effect of Traditional Moxibustion in Assisting the Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients.” The peer review process for my article was rigorous and thorough, ensuring that only high-quality research is published in the journal. The reviewers provided valuable feedback and constructive criticism that greatly improved the clarity and scientific rigor of my study. Their expertise and attention to detail helped me refine my research methodology and strengthen the overall impact of my findings. I would also like to express my gratitude for the exceptional support I received from the editorial office throughout the publication process. The editorial team was prompt, professional, and highly responsive to all my queries and concerns. Their guidance and assistance were instrumental in navigating the submission and revision process, making it a seamless and efficient experience. Furthermore, I am impressed by the outstanding quality of the journal itself. The journal’s commitment to publishing cutting-edge research in the field of stroke rehabilitation is evident in the diverse range of articles it features. The journal consistently upholds rigorous scientific standards, ensuring that only the most impactful and innovative studies are published. This commitment to excellence has undoubtedly contributed to the journal’s reputation as a leading platform for stroke rehabilitation research. In conclusion, I am extremely satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the overall quality of the journal for my article. I wholeheartedly recommend this journal to researchers and clinicians interested in stroke rehabilitation and related fields. The journal’s dedication to scientific rigor, coupled with the exceptional support provided by the editorial office, makes it an invaluable platform for disseminating research and advancing the field.

img

Dr Shiming Tang

Clinical Reviews and Case Reports, The comment form the peer-review were satisfactory. I will cements on the quality of the journal when I receive my hardback copy

img

Hameed khan