Advertisement

Obtaining Semi-Thin Sections for Electron Microscopic Examination of The Brain

Review Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2835-9232/038

Obtaining Semi-Thin Sections for Electron Microscopic Examination of The Brain

  • Lizaveta I. Bon 1*
  • N.Ye. Maksimovich 1
  • S.M. Zimatkin 1
  • O.B. Ostrovskaya 1
  • A.V. Malykhina 1

1Candidate of biological science, assistant professor of pathophysiology department named D.A. Maslakov, Grodno State Medical University, 80, Gorky St., 230009, Grodno, Belarus.

*Corresponding Author: Lizaveta I. Bon, Candidate of biological science, assistant professor of pathophysiology department named D.A. Maslakov, Grodno State Medical University.

Citation: E.I. Bon, N.Ye. Maksimovich, S.M. Zimatkin, O.B. Ostrovskaya, A.V. Malykhina, (2023), Obtaining Semi-Thin Sections for Electron Microscopic Examination of The Brain, International Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2(5); DOI:10.31579/2835-9232/038

Copyright: © 2023, Lizaveta I. Bon. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Received: 06 October 2023 | Accepted: 16 October 2023 | Published: 25 October 2023

Keywords: semi-thin sections; electron microscopic; brain

Abstract

The study of neuronal ultrastructure is an important and current area of modern science. However, to obtain proper results, it is necessary to strictly follow the methodological rules for making not only ultrathin, but also semi-thin sections.

For the description and morphometry of mitochondria, we selected neurons that had a pyramidal shape with a clearly defined apical dendrite and a maximum transverse width of the perikaryon (usually the width at the base of a pyramidal-shaped perikaryon) of at least 15 am, as well as a nuclear shape close to round or oval. Thus, neurons captured on one grid could not be counted again on adjacent grids.

Summery

The study of neuronal ultrastructure is an important and current area of modern science. However, to obtain proper results, it is necessary to strictly follow the methodological rules for making not only ultrathin, but also semi-thin sections.

For electron microscopic examination fragments of the cortex measuring about 1.0x1.0x2.0 mm, prismatic in shape were taken so that the long axis of the prism was perpendicular to the surface of the cortex and included all layers of gray matter, as well as the thin layer of white matter adjacent to the latter (Figure. 1). When pouring, the samples were oriented in such a way as to obtain sections in a plane perpendicular to the surface of the cortex. Semi-thin (0.35 µm thick) and ultra-thin (40 nm) sections were obtained on a Leica EM UC7 ultramicrotome (Leica, Germany) using glass knives. The first 

sections were stained with methylene blue and used to select the area containing cells of the inner pyramidal layer of the cortex. In this case, to obtain ultrathin sections, we selected the area containing the largest (compared to other neurons in the section) pyramidal-shaped neurons along with dendritic profiles of the greatest thickness running perpendicular to the surface of the cortex (Fig. 2). Since the central region of the sample was usually insufficiently fixed, only the lateral areas containing the described neurons and characterized by satisfactory fixation were selected to obtain ultrathin sections (Fig. 1-4). Moreover, in this area no more than 3 pyramidal neurons corresponding to the requirements could be found at the same time (Figure. 4).

Figure 1. Semi-thin section (350 nm thickness) of a rat cortex sample stained with methylene blue. The surface of the cortex (above) is covered with the pia mater (arrows), below - white matter (arrow head). The central region of the sample has a darker color; individual structures in it are not determined as a result of poor fixation. The rectangle shows the area selected for ultrathin sectioning.

Figure 2. The area indicated in Figure 1 at higher magnification.

Figure 3. The area indicated in Figure 2 at higher magnification.

Figure 4. The area indicated in Figure 3 at higher magnification. Arrows indicate neurons that have a pyramidal shape, an apical dendrite, and a maximum perikaryon width of 15-20 µm.

Therefore, to visualize a sufficient number of neurons from the area selected in the described manner, sharpened by a “pyramid,” 5-6 series of ultrathin sections were obtained with an interval of 15 am. Ultrathin sections were prepared with the microtome feed set at 40 nm (occasionally 35 nm) and were always gray or silver in color. Each series (6-8 adjacent sections) was mounted on a copper grid, contrasted with uranyl acetate and lead citrate, and examined in a JEM-1011 electron microscope (JEOL, Japan). To obtain images, a complex consisting of an Olympus Mega View III digital camera (Japan) and the item program (Version 5.0 (Build 1224); Serial Number A3766900-7E852FAB) was used. For the description and morphometry of mitochondria, we selected neurons that had a pyramidal shape with a clearly defined apical dendrite and a maximum transverse width of the perikaryon (usually the width at the base of a pyramidal-shaped perikaryon) of at least 15 am, as well as a nuclear shape close to round or oval. Thus, neurons captured on one grid could not be counted again on adjacent grids.

References

Clinical Trials and Clinical Research: I am delighted to provide a testimonial for the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and the exceptional quality of the journal for my article entitled “Effect of Traditional Moxibustion in Assisting the Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients.” The peer review process for my article was rigorous and thorough, ensuring that only high-quality research is published in the journal. The reviewers provided valuable feedback and constructive criticism that greatly improved the clarity and scientific rigor of my study. Their expertise and attention to detail helped me refine my research methodology and strengthen the overall impact of my findings. I would also like to express my gratitude for the exceptional support I received from the editorial office throughout the publication process. The editorial team was prompt, professional, and highly responsive to all my queries and concerns. Their guidance and assistance were instrumental in navigating the submission and revision process, making it a seamless and efficient experience. Furthermore, I am impressed by the outstanding quality of the journal itself. The journal’s commitment to publishing cutting-edge research in the field of stroke rehabilitation is evident in the diverse range of articles it features. The journal consistently upholds rigorous scientific standards, ensuring that only the most impactful and innovative studies are published. This commitment to excellence has undoubtedly contributed to the journal’s reputation as a leading platform for stroke rehabilitation research. In conclusion, I am extremely satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the overall quality of the journal for my article. I wholeheartedly recommend this journal to researchers and clinicians interested in stroke rehabilitation and related fields. The journal’s dedication to scientific rigor, coupled with the exceptional support provided by the editorial office, makes it an invaluable platform for disseminating research and advancing the field.

img

Dr Shiming Tang

Clinical Reviews and Case Reports, The comment form the peer-review were satisfactory. I will cements on the quality of the journal when I receive my hardback copy

img

Hameed khan