Advertisement

Multiple Splanchnic Venous Thromboses: A Fatal Complication of Recurrent Pancreatitis

Case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2834-5010/004

Multiple Splanchnic Venous Thromboses: A Fatal Complication of Recurrent Pancreatitis

  • Richmond R Gomes *

* Richmond R Gomes. Associate Professor, Medicine, Ad-Din Women's Medical College Hospital, Dhaka.

*Corresponding Author: Richmond R Gomes. Associate Professor, Medicine, Ad-Din Women's Medical College Hospital, Dhaka.

Citation: Richmond R Gomes (2022). Multiple Splanchnic Venous Thromboses: A Fatal Complication of Recurrent Pancreatitis. International Journal of Clinical Therapeutics. 1(1); DOI:10.31579/2834-5010/004

Copyright: © 2022 Richmond R Gomes, This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: 10 August 2022 | Accepted: 13 September 2022 | Published: 22 December 2022

Keywords: splanchnic venous thrombosis; pancreatitis; low molecular weight heparin; apixaban

Abstract

Splanchnic Venous Thrombosis (SVT) is a condition associated with high morbidity. The etiologies of SVT include intra-abdominal inflammation or infection, surgical intervention, abdominal malignancies such as hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and pancreatic carcinoma, or abnormality in coagulation caused by various reasons such as liver cirrhosis. Most cases of pancreatitis are mild and self limited. On the other hand, approximately one quarter of patients with pancreatitis may develop vascular complications such as venous thrombosis. Pancreatitis in combination with vascular complications is dangerous and potentially lethal. The survival of patients with pancreatitis and vascular complications depends on the early diagnosis of these complications. We report a case of a middle aged male who had recurrent pancreatitis. On radiological imaging, patient was found have portal vein, splenic vein and superior mesenteric vein thrombosis. The etiology of thrombosis was considered to be inflammation around the main portal trunk caused by pancreatitis Patient recovered after emergent and timely management with initially low molecular weight heparin and bridged by oral apixaban therapy. The article focuses on the aspects of etiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis and management of acute pancreatitis with venous thrombosis.

Introduction:

Acute pancreatitis is a sudden inflammation of the pancreas. It can have severe complications and high mortality despite treatment. While mild cases are often successfully treated with conservative measures, severe cases may require admission to the intensive care unit or even surgery to deal with impending complications. Isolated Splanchnic vein thrombosis is a rare complication of acute pancreatitis as well as chronic pancreatitis [1,2,3]. [1] It involves the portal vein  (PV), splenic vein (SV) and superior mesenteric vein (SMV), either in combination or separately. Splanchnic vein thrombosis is often an incidental finding on radiological imaging performed to assess the severity of an attack of acute pancreatitis; however, its clinical manifestations may include signs and symptoms that overlap with those of the pancreatitis [2] Splanchnic vein thrombosis are associated with prothrombotic or hypercoagulable disorders, but in the context of acute pancreatitis a more direct inflammatory process has been implicated [3] Although the natural history of splanchnic vein thrombosis in AP is unclear, severe hemorrhage, bowel ischemia, portal hypertension and liver failure have been reported.

Case Report:

A 45 year male patient, a chronic smoker and non alcoholic, presented with the complaints of epigastric pain since 3 days. The pain was severe, squeezing in character, radiating to back, increased on exertion, not responding to NSAIDs and anti spasmodics. Patient had recurrent vomiting episodes containing food particles, non projectile, non bilious and non blood stained. There was no history of abdominal distention, fever, jaundice, decreased urine output, respiratory discomfort or altered behavior. There was no past history of diabetes, hypertension, tuberculosis or any other chronic illness but had similar attacks in last 3 years. On general examination, patient was conscious and well oriented. His pulse rate was 96/minute and blood pressure was 130/80 mm of Hg. There was no pallor, icterus, cyanosis, clubbing or lymphadenopathy. Patient had average built with BMI of 28 kg/m2. On systemic examination, tenderness was elicited at epigastric region on superficial palpation. Bowel sounds were absent. Rest of the per abdominal examination was normal. Cardiovascular, respiratory and central nervous system examination was normal. On the day of admission, the laboratory examination revealed; hemoglobin of 12.5 g/dL, total leucocyte count of 21500/ mm3 with predominant polymorphonuclear cells, platelet count of 450×103/µL. CRP was raised(211.8mg/dl). Renal and liver functions were normal with blood urea of 27 mg/dL, serum creatinine of 1.1 mg/dL, serum uric  acid of 2.6 mg/dL, corrected serum calcium of 9.3 mg/dL, serum phosphate of 2.1 mg/dL, aspartate aminotransferase of 63 U/L, alanine aminotransferase, of  26 U/L, serum alkaline phosphatase of 87 U/L, total serum protein of 5.8 g/dL, total serum bilirubin of 0.8 mg/ dL, serum triglycerides of 190 mg/dL, total serum cholesterol of 107 mg/dL, high density lipoprotein of 27mg/ dL, low density lipoprotein of 62 mg/d. The evidence of pancreatitis was evident with serum amylase of 3568 U/L, serum lipase of 1206 U/L. Fasting blood sugar of the patient was 92 mg/dL and HbA1c was 5.5%. Urine complete examination was within normal limits. Arterial blood gas analysis was normal. Tests for HbsAg and Anti-HCV were negative. Serum anti nuclear antibody by immune-fluorescence technique was negative. Thrombophilia profile (including protein C level, protein S level, Anti thrombin 3 level, Anti-phospholipid antibodies) was normal. Chest X-ray and ECG  was normal. Ultrasound abdomen revealed hypoechoic and non homogenous pancreatic parencgyma compatible with acute pancreatitis. CT abdomen showed pancreatitis with dilated portal vein suggestive of thrombosis extending to splenic vein and superior mesenteric vein and splenomegaly (Figure 1). Upper gastrointestinal endoscopic study showed grade 1-2 varices (figure 2).

WJG-18-6168-g001.jpg
8350209392_e9231e9c25.jpg

Figure 1 and Figure 2: Ct abdomen showing acute pancreatitis with portal vein thrombosis and endoscopy of UGIT showing grade 1-2 esophageal varices.

After the exclusion of secondary causes for the venous thrombi, the cause was attributed to acute pancreatitis. Patient was managed timely with analgesics, parenteral nutrition and antibiotics. He was also started subcutaneous low molecular weight heparin which was later bridged with oral apixaban. With treatment his condition improved. He was discharged with propanolol and oral apixaban.On discharge his CRP was 37.9 mg/dl, serum amylase of 168 U/L, serum lipase of 96 U/L. There is a plan to continue apixaban for 3 months and follow up the patient at outpatient door with repeat CT abdomen.

Discussion:

Most cases of pancreatitis are mild and self-limiting. However, around one fourth of the cases may develop various complications and can lead to mortality. Among the major complications occurring, vascular complications are well recognized and seek emergency care. In the literature, major vascular complications of pancreatitis occur with a frequency of 1.2-14%, with a greater incidence seen in chronic pancreatitis (7-10%) than acute pancreatitis (1-6%). The overall mortality rate due to hemorrhage in acute pancreatitis has been reported to reach ranges as high as 34-52%, and is significantly higher than in cases of patients without bleeding4. Isolated splenic vein thrombosis is relatively uncommon in patients with pancreatitis, occurring in about 1-2% of cases5.  Although much less common, portal and superior mesenteric vein thrombosis can also occur as a result of pancreatitis [6] Pulmonary thromboembolism is also a known complication following venous thrombosis after pancreatitis [7,8].

Various mechanisms are postulated to cause these splanchnic and extrasplanchnic venous thromboses. The splanchnic veins especially, superior mesenteric vein, portal vein and splenic vein possibly get thrombosed due to release of proteolytic enzymes from the inflamed pancreas. As the splenic vein lies immediately adjacent to the pancreas, it is the most commonly affected vein. Thromboses of distant veins are postulated to be due to inflammatory vasculitis and hypercoagulable states8,9. Venous thrombosis may also occur due to extrinsic compression by the edematous gland or pseudocyst. Pseudocysts of the caudal pancreas are complicated by splenic vein obstruction in nearly 30% of cases. Intimal injury and venous thrombosis can occur especially when SVT is due to acute pancreatitis or recurrent episodes of pancreatitis. In either the intrinsic or extrinsic mechanisms stasis of blood flow occurs and eventually leads to thrombosis. 

The European Network for Vascular Disorders of the Liver (EN-Vie) recommends the utilization of anticoagulation early in patients with acute SVT in non-cirrhotic, non-malignant patients. The rate of recanalization is higher if anticoagulants are started earlier. But the use of anticoagulants in this scenario. poses challenge as these patients are at increased risk of hemorrhage because of pseudo-aneurysms and the need for surgical interventions for management of pancreatic necrosis and abscess10 Ascites and SVT were identified as factors predictive of worse evolution.11

Mortality associated with acute SMV thrombosis in the general population is high, at 20-50%,12 depending on the grade of obstruction, the collateral vascularization, comorbidities, and delay in diagnosis and treatment. In the present case SMV thrombosis did not appear in itself to be an indication for anticoagulation therapy. According to a study by Gonzelez et al [13] anticoagulation could be administered if there is evidence of progression of PV thrombosis, ascites or SMV thrombosis. The controversy regarding the anticoagulant therapy is persistent and guidelines need to be frames in this regard to make the therapeutic decisions simpler.

Our patient did not have any known inherited prothrombotic state or pseudocyst compressing the veins which were found thrombosed. Hence, the most probable reason for thrombosis in our patient was systemic inflammation. These venous thromboses are known to respond to anticoagulation [14,15]. Our patient responded to anticoagulation as well with partial resolution of thrombosis.

To conclude, thrombosis of splanchnic vascular bed can occur in pancreatitis. This can be effectively treated with anticoagulation and hence, mortality related to complication such as pulmonary embolism can be prevented.

Conclusion:

Splanchnic vein thrombosis is a relatively uncommon observation in patients with acute, chronic or recurrent pancreatitis. Control of the underlying disease may be the first choice for treatment of this kind of PVT The association with portal, splenic and mesenteric vein is rare. Recanalization is observed in almost a third of patients, irrespectively of whether or not they receive systemic anticoagulation, and this may reflect the resolution of the pancreatitis itself. As the venous thrombi could lead to fatal complications, early diagnosis and timely management would prevent hazardous outcomes.

Conflict of interest:

None declared

References

Clinical Trials and Clinical Research: I am delighted to provide a testimonial for the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and the exceptional quality of the journal for my article entitled “Effect of Traditional Moxibustion in Assisting the Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients.” The peer review process for my article was rigorous and thorough, ensuring that only high-quality research is published in the journal. The reviewers provided valuable feedback and constructive criticism that greatly improved the clarity and scientific rigor of my study. Their expertise and attention to detail helped me refine my research methodology and strengthen the overall impact of my findings. I would also like to express my gratitude for the exceptional support I received from the editorial office throughout the publication process. The editorial team was prompt, professional, and highly responsive to all my queries and concerns. Their guidance and assistance were instrumental in navigating the submission and revision process, making it a seamless and efficient experience. Furthermore, I am impressed by the outstanding quality of the journal itself. The journal’s commitment to publishing cutting-edge research in the field of stroke rehabilitation is evident in the diverse range of articles it features. The journal consistently upholds rigorous scientific standards, ensuring that only the most impactful and innovative studies are published. This commitment to excellence has undoubtedly contributed to the journal’s reputation as a leading platform for stroke rehabilitation research. In conclusion, I am extremely satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the overall quality of the journal for my article. I wholeheartedly recommend this journal to researchers and clinicians interested in stroke rehabilitation and related fields. The journal’s dedication to scientific rigor, coupled with the exceptional support provided by the editorial office, makes it an invaluable platform for disseminating research and advancing the field.

img

Dr Shiming Tang

Clinical Reviews and Case Reports, The comment form the peer-review were satisfactory. I will cements on the quality of the journal when I receive my hardback copy

img

Hameed khan