Advertisement

Low Delta Blood Urea Nitrogen and Poor Postnatal Growth in Extremely Low Gestational Age Newborn (ELGAN) Infants

Case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2834-5029/007

Low Delta Blood Urea Nitrogen and Poor Postnatal Growth in Extremely Low Gestational Age Newborn (ELGAN) Infants

  • Shabih Manzar *

* Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Ochsner LSU Health, Shreveport, LA, USA

*Corresponding Author: Shabih Manzar, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Department of Pediatrics, 1501 Kings Highway, Shreveport, LA 71103, USA

Citation: Manzar S. (2022) Low Delta Blood Urea Nitrogen and Poor Postnatal Growth in Extremely Low Gestational Age Newborn (ELGAN) Infants. International Journal of Biomed Research. 1(2): DOI: 10.31579/2834-5029/007

Copyright: © 2022, Shabih Manzar, This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: 15 November 2022 | Accepted: 30 November 2022 | Published: 09 December 2022

Keywords: blood urea nitrogen; gestational age; weight

Abstract

Blood urea nitrogen (BUN) concentrations have shown to be associated with post-natal growth. [1] Protein intake affects the BUN levels in preterm infants. Protein intake affects the BUN levels in preterm infants. 

Introduction:

In extremely low gestational age newborns (ELGANs), the higher limit of BUN is 21 mg/dL, and the reference range for these preterm infants is 3-21 mg/dL (1.1–7.5 mmol/L). [3] In a recent study, Thanh et al [4] showed higher BUN as a marker of better postnatal growth. They described significantly higher BUN levels in the high protein formula group than in the control group. To look at the levels of difference in BUN level (delta BUN) and postnatal growth in ELGANs, we performed this study.

We selected four ELGANs ranging from 23-25 weeks of gestation and study their BUN levels with postnatal growth. We calculated the delta BUN (the difference in the BUN level from birth to the day of assessment). The cases are briefly described below. The summary of the findings is displayed n Table 1. 

To monitor their growth, we use the formulae as described earlier (Table 2). [5,6]

Average weight = Current weight + Previous weight / 2 

50% Weight difference = 50% weight at current weight - 50% weight at previous weight

Z-Score: From electronic chart or https://peditools.org/fenton2013/

Table 2: Calculation of GV, WGR and Delta Z [5,6]

Case 1:

Preterm infant, gestational age 25 3/7 weeks. The pregnancy was complicated by no prenatal care, uncontrolled hypertension, and vaginal bleeding. The Apgar score was 3, 6, 7 at 1, 5, and 10 minutes. The infant was intubated in the delivery room. On admission to the NICU, umbilical venous and arterial catheters were inserted. The infant was placed on a high-frequency oscillator ventilator and was started on total parental nutrition. Serum electrolytes were monitored daily while on TPN, and then on enteral feeds as needed. On the day of analysis, the infant was 20 days old.

Case 2:

Preterm infant, gestational age 24 5/7 weeks. The pregnancy was complicated by concern for placental abruption. The infant was intubated in the delivery room. On admission to the NICU, umbilical venous and arterial catheters were inserted. The infant was placed on a high-frequency oscillator ventilator and was started on total parental nutrition. Serum electrolytes were monitored daily while on TPN, and then on enteral feeds as needed. On the day of analysis, the infant was 26 days old.

case 3:

Preterm infant, gestational age 23 1/7 weeks. The mother did not receive any steroids. The Apgar score was 0, 6, 7 at 1, 5, and 10 minutes. The infant was intubated in the delivery room. On admission to the NICU, umbilical venous and arterial catheters were inserted. The infant was placed on a high-frequency oscillator ventilator and was started on total parental nutrition. Serum electrolytes were monitored daily while on TPN, and then on enteral feeds as needed. On the day of analysis, the infant was 32 days old.

Case 4:

Preterm infant, gestational age 24 2/7 weeks. The pregnancy was complicated by premature prolonged rupture of the membrane. The Apgar score was 2, and 7, at 1 and 5 minutes. The infant was intubated in the delivery room. On admission to the NICU, umbilical venous and arterial catheters were inserted. The infant was placed on a high-frequency oscillator ventilator and was started on total parental nutrition. Serum electrolytes were monitored daily while on TPN, and then on enteral feeds as needed. On the day of analysis, the infant was 50 days old.

Discussion

We were able to demonstrate a low delta BUN level in a small group of ELGANs. All infants had poor postnatal growth. The growth velocity rate of less than 10 g/kg/day as observed in all the cases (Table 1) was inadequate. Further, all ELGANs had a low weight gain ratio (WGR). A WGR closer to 1 indicates adequate growth. Similarly, the delta z- score remained negative in all the cases (Table 1). We did not look at the daily protein intake and calories of the individual cases.  We are planning a prospective study to look at all the nutritional details in correlation to delta BUN. 

Author Contribution:

Conceptualized and wrote the manuscript.

Financial Disclosure Statement:

No funding to disclose.

Competing Interests Statement:

No competing interests to declare. 

References

Clinical Trials and Clinical Research: I am delighted to provide a testimonial for the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and the exceptional quality of the journal for my article entitled “Effect of Traditional Moxibustion in Assisting the Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients.” The peer review process for my article was rigorous and thorough, ensuring that only high-quality research is published in the journal. The reviewers provided valuable feedback and constructive criticism that greatly improved the clarity and scientific rigor of my study. Their expertise and attention to detail helped me refine my research methodology and strengthen the overall impact of my findings. I would also like to express my gratitude for the exceptional support I received from the editorial office throughout the publication process. The editorial team was prompt, professional, and highly responsive to all my queries and concerns. Their guidance and assistance were instrumental in navigating the submission and revision process, making it a seamless and efficient experience. Furthermore, I am impressed by the outstanding quality of the journal itself. The journal’s commitment to publishing cutting-edge research in the field of stroke rehabilitation is evident in the diverse range of articles it features. The journal consistently upholds rigorous scientific standards, ensuring that only the most impactful and innovative studies are published. This commitment to excellence has undoubtedly contributed to the journal’s reputation as a leading platform for stroke rehabilitation research. In conclusion, I am extremely satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the overall quality of the journal for my article. I wholeheartedly recommend this journal to researchers and clinicians interested in stroke rehabilitation and related fields. The journal’s dedication to scientific rigor, coupled with the exceptional support provided by the editorial office, makes it an invaluable platform for disseminating research and advancing the field.

img

Dr Shiming Tang

Clinical Reviews and Case Reports, The comment form the peer-review were satisfactory. I will cements on the quality of the journal when I receive my hardback copy

img

Hameed khan