Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2835-9232/036
Isolation, Identification and Characterization of Salmonella Shigella Species Obtained from Cattle Dung and Meat Slabs
- J. Omololu-Aso 1*
- I. Abiona 1
- O.O. Omololu 2
- O. Adesunloro 1
- E. G. Bello 1
- A. A. Oluyombo 3
- E. R. Oladimeji 3
- B. F Ajao 4
1 Department of Microbiology, Obafemi Awolowo University Ile-Ife, Osun State, Nigeria.
2 Department of Obstetrics Gyneacology, University College Hospital, Orita-mefa Ibadan, Oyo State Nigeria
3Department of Animal Nutrition Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Ogun State, Nigeria
4 Benjamin Carson School of Medicine, Babcock University, Ogun State.
*Corresponding Author: J. Omololu-Aso
Citation: J. Omololu-Aso, (2023), Isolation, Identification and Characterization of Salmonella Shigella Species Obtained from Cattle Dung and Meat Slabs, International Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2(4); DOI: 10.31579/2835-9232/036
Copyright: © 2023, J. Omololu-Aso. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 01 August 2023 | Accepted: 09 August 2023 | Published: 24 August 2023
Keywords: salmonella; shigella; infections; antibiotic resistant; antibiotics
Abstract
Globally, Salmonellosis and Shigellosis continues to be major health problem. They also contribute to negative economic impacts due to the cost of surveillance investigation, treatment and prevention of illnesses.
A total of 67 samples were obtained from different abattoirs in all the four local government areas in Ile-Ife (Ife South, Ife East, Ife central and Ife West). Samples collected from the different abattoirs include; table swab and swab of freshly killed cow faecal dung. The samples were transported into the microbiological laboratory and cultured on pre-enrichment media, after which they were incubated at 370C for 18-24 hours. Colonies were identified by basic identification techniques; and susceptibility profile was evaluated on Muller-Hinton agar using agar diffusion method.
Of the 67 samples collected, the total Gram-negative bacteria isolated was 66, the predominant was Shigella spp. (45.45%) followed by Salmonella spp. (31.82%) and Escherichia coli (22.73%). The Salmonella/Shigella isolates were highly resistant to gentamycin (86.67% and 100% respectively), while the isolates were 100% susceptible to Streptomycin, Pefloxacin and Ciprofloxacin.
Therefore, it can be inferred that Streptomycin, Pefloxacin and Ciprofloxacin antibiotic therapeutic agents will be effective in the treatment of cattle infections caused by Salmonella and Shigella species.
Introduction
Food-borne pathogens are the leading cause of illness and death in developing countries, costing billions of dollars in medical care with social costs. Contaminated raw meat is one of the main sources of food-borne illnesses. The risk of the transmission of zoonotic infections is also associated with contaminated meat (WHO, 2006). During the slaughtering operations performed in slaughter places with inadequate sanitation and unskilled staff, contamination frequently occurs from dirt, unclean water, and intestinal contents or from dirty knives, hands or clothing of butcher (WHO, 2006). These factors all leads to infection of meat, bacterial multiplication and possible toxin production. Lack of basic facilities, cross-contamination by insects, flies and numerous other unhygienic factors contribute to the danger of consumer infection (WHO, 2013). There is strong evidence that in many developing countries conditions of slaughter houses and current meat handling practices contribute greatly to the spread of zoonotic diseases. Similarly, lack of ante-mortem, postmortem examination cannot identify the diseased animals so that zoonotic diseases transmit easily by handling raw meat, blood and eating diseased meat (WHO, 1984). WHO estimates that cysticercosis affects some 50 million people worldwide and 1in endemic areas, causes some 50000 deaths?
Salmonellaare the leading cause of bacteremia, 28.5% with Salmonella typhi accounting for 20.9% and non-typhi Salmonella 7.6% (Obaro, 2011). Infections due to Salmonella serotypes continue to be a major health problem (Salehi et al., 2005). Worldwide incidence of shigellosis is estimated to be 164.7 million cases per year of which 163.2 million were in developing countries, where 1.1 million deaths occurred. About 60% of all episodes and 61% of all deaths attributable to shigellosis involved cattle and children below five years. The incidence in developing countries may be 20 times greater than that in developed countries (Jaya et al., 2013). Estimated 30% incidences of these infections are caused by S. dysenteriae with case fatality rates reaching 30% (Jaya et al., 2013).
Salmonellosis is one of the most common and widely distributed food-borne diseases. It constitutes a major public health burden and represents a significant cost in many countries (WHO, 2013). Most Salmonella infections in cattle are subclinical, and shedding of the organism can occur for extended periods. Salmonella can also persist in the farm environment (Huston et al., 2002). Shigella species are highly infective, particularly S. dysenteriae considered the most virulent, and can produce a potent cytotoxin known as ―Shiga toxin‖. Shigella dysenteriae type 1 causes severe and sometimes fatal disease. Shigella species have been recently identified to be the most frequently identified agent of laboratory-acquired infections because of their high virulence and low infectious dose (Peng et al., 2011).
These infections are prevalent in developing countries where lack of clean water supply, lack of proper sewage disposal system and flies aggravate the spread of the diseases (Kasper et al., 2005). Epidemiological surveillance is an essential component in controlling Salmonella and Shigella infections (Sharma et al., 2005). Antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella and Shigella are emerging global challenges, especially in developing countries where there is an increased misuse of antimicrobial agents in humans and animals (Kasper et al., 2005). In most developing countries, laboratory investigations of Shigella and Salmonella are diagnostic challenges due to lack of adequate facilities that enable culture and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (Collee et al., 1999).
In this study, we isolated, identified and characterized Salmonella Shigella species obtained from cattle dung and meat slabs Contaminants, Ile-Ife, Osun State.
Materials And Methods

Map Of Osun State Indicating the Study Area
Sample Collection
A total of 67 samples were collected from meat slabs and dung of freshly killed cows using sterile swab sticks and sterile plastic containers. 17 samples were collected from Ife Central L.G.A, 20 from Ife East L.G.A, 15 from Ife North L.G.A, and 15 from Ife South L.G.A. The samples were transported to the Microbiology Laboratory of Obafemi Awolowo University, IleIfe within an hour of collection for bacteriological analysis. The samples were examined immediately upon arrival at the laboratory.
Bacterial isolation, identification and characterisation.
The different bacterial cultures were purified using streak plate method on nutrient agar medium. Using sterilized inoculating loop, a colony was picked up from the spread plate and the loop was dragged over the surface of another plate in a zigzag motion. The loop was sterilized over the flame, the plate was turned 90% and the loop was dragged over the area streaked before in similar manner. The loop was sterilized again, and the same streaking process was repeated. All the plates were incubated at 370C for 24 hours. The heaviest growth was seen in the first sector, and the isolated colonies were in the third sector. This method was repeated several times until purified colony were obtained. The purified bacterial cultures were maintained over Nutrient agar slant. Gram staining, morphological identification, catalase and coagulase tests, sugar fermentation analysis and antimicrobial susceptibility trends of the isolate were conducted.
Results
A total of thirty (30) Shigella isolates and twenty-one (21) Salmonella isolates were isolated from sixty-seven (67) samples
obtained from the abattoir (i.e., dung of freshly killed cow, meat slabs and meat vendor aprons).
Biochemical Characterization of Salmonella spp.
Sample code | Biochemical tests |
|
| |||||||
Catalase | Citrate | Urease | Indole | Gram staining | Triple Sugar Ion |
| ||||
Glucose | Sucrose | Lactose | H2S | Gas | ||||||
Kc4 | + | + | - | - | - | + | - | - | + | - |
Mc22 | + | + | - | - | - | + | - | - | + | + |
Ac4 | + | + | - | - | - | + | - | - | - | - |
Ac2 | + | - | - | - | - | + | + | + | + | - |
Hc2 | + | + | - | - | - | + | - | - | + | - |
Hc4 | + | + | - | - | - | + | - | - | - | - |
Gc4 | + | + | - | - | - | + | - | - | + | - |
Ic2 | + | + | - | - | - | + | - | - | + | - |
Ic4 | + | + | - | - | - | + | - | - | + | - |
Jc2 | + | + | - | - | - | + | - | - | + | - |
Hb | + | + | - | - | - | + | - | - | + | - |
Fb2 | + | + | - | - | - | + | - | - | + | - |
Fb3 | + | + | - | - | - | + | - | - | + | - |
Gb1 | + | + | - | - | - | + | - | - | + | - |
Ga | + | + | - | - | - | + | - | - | - | - |
Ia1 | + | + | - | - | - | + | - | - | + | - |
Ia2 | + | + | - | - | - | + | - | - | + | + |
Ma | + | + | - | - | - | + | - | - | - | + |
Fa | + | + | - | - | - | + | - | - | + | + |
Ea2 | + | + | - | - | - | + | - | - | + | - |
Ea1 | + | + | - | - | - | + | - | - | + | - |
Biochemical Characterization of Shigella spp.
Sample code | Biochemical tests |
|
| |||||||
Catalase | Citrate | Urease | Indole | Gram staining | Triple Sugar Ion |
| ||||
Glucose | Sucrose | Lactose | H2S | Gas | ||||||
Lc41 | + | + | - | - | - | + | - | - | - | - |
Lc42 | + | + | - | - | - | + | - | - | + | - |
Mc21 | + | + | - | - | - | + | - | - | + | - |
Fc2 | + | + | - | - | - | + | - | - | + | - |
Fc4 | + | + | - | - | - | + | - | - | - | - |
Nc2 | + | + | - | - | - | + | - | - | + | - |
Nc4 | + | + | - | - | - | + | + | + | + | - |
Ib | + | + | - | - | - | + | - | - | - | - |
Cb3 | + | + | - | - | - | + | - | - | - | + |
Fb1 | + | + | - | - | - | + | - | - | + | - |
Bb | + | + | - | - | - | + | - | - | + | - |
Gb4 | + | + | - | - | - | + | - | - | + | - |
Cb1 | + | + | - | - | - | + | - | - | + | - |
Cb2 | + | + | - | - | - | + | - | - | + | - |
Kb | + | + | - | - | - | + | - | - | + | - |
Ha | + | + | - | - | - | + | - | - | + | - |
La | + | + | - | - | - | + | - | - | - | - |
Na | - | + | - | - | - | + | - | - | - | + |
Ba | + | + | - | - | - | + | - | - | - | - |
Aa2 | + | + | - | - | - | + | - | - | + | + |
Gb3 | + | + | - | - | - | + | - | - | - | - |
Aa4 | + | + | - | - | - | + | - | - | + | - |
Antibiotic Susceptibility index of Salmonella
Antibiotics | Total isolates | Susceptible n (%) | Intermediate n (%) | Resistant n (%) | Total n (%) |
Chloranphenicol | 15 | 14(93.33) | 1(6.67) | 0(0) | 15(100) |
Ciprofloxacin | 15 | 15(100) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 15(100) |
Amoxicillin | 15 | 10(66.67) | 1(6.67) | 4(26.67) | 15(100) |
Augmentin | 15 | 9(60) | 2(13.33) | 4(26.67) | 15(100) |
Gentamycin | 15 | 2(13.33) | 0(0) | 13(86.67) | 15(100) |
Pefloxacin | 15 | 15(100) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 15(100) |
Streptomycin | 15 | 15(100) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 15(100) |
Antibiotic Susceptibility Index of Shigella
Antibiotics | Total isolates | Susceptible n (%) | Intermediate n (%) | Resistant n (%) | Total n (%) |
Chloranphenicol | 19 | 17(89.47) | 2(10.53) | 0(0) | 19(100) |
Ciprofloxacin | 19 | 19(100) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 19(100) |
Amoxicillin | 19 | 14(73.68) | 3(15.79) | 2(10.53) | 19(100) |
Augmentin | 19 | 14(73.68) | 3(15.79) | 2(10.53) | 19(100) |
Gentamycin | 19 | 0(0) | 0(0) | 19(100) | 19(100) |
Pefloxacin | 19 | 19(100) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 19(100) |
Streptomycin | 19 | 19(100) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 19(100) |
Discussion
It has been established that contaminated food is the main source of transmission for many pathogenic bacteria. It is the major cause of enteric diseases in developing countries. Several studies have demonstrated that meat handlers harbour microorganisms especially bacteria asymptomatically (Senthilkumar et al., 2005; Archana et al., 2013). Meat handlers with poor personal hygiene and inadequate knowledge working in establishments like abattoir could be potential sources of infections of many enteropathogenic bacteria (Akagha et al., 2015). Likewise, meat handlers who harbour pathogenic bacteria may contaminate foods with their fingers/aprons during food processing, and finally to infection of consumers (Elhadi, 2014). In this study, cow dung and meat slab culture from meat vendors were investigated for the presence of food-borne Gram-negative bacteria. The result showed positive for public health important bacteria such as Salmonella and Shigella species. Presence of these public health important bacteria from food vendors may pose significant risk on the consumers.
S. typhi is one of the principal causes of food and water borne gastroenteritis in human. The WHO had estimated that 16 million new cases of typhoid fever are recorded annually worldwide. Salmonellosis and shigellosis remain a major public health problem across the globe
(WHO, 2003; Tsen et al., 2000). Similarly, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that 48 million cases of food-borne illnesses occur in the United States annually. Many of these illnesses are caused by Salmonella spp. and E. coli. The situation is worsened by the production of toxins by E. Coli (Archana et al., 2013; Saleh et al., 2009; Pui et al., 2011).
The high isolation rate of Shigella as compared to salmonella among the bacterial isolates points to the fact that the sanitary practices among the meat vendors are not satisfactory. This is because Shigella organisms do not have any natural reservoirs in animals and can only spread from person to person (Dagnew et al., 2013). In addition, Salmonella species which are flora of intestinal tract of animals and humans, expectedly would have recorded a higher carriage among food handlers.
The antibiotic sensitivity profiles of the bacterial isolates are presented in Table 4.4.1 and 4.4.2. This study shows that all the isolates had strains that were susceptible to Streptomycin, Pefloxacin and Ciprofloxacin. Thus Streptomycin, Pefloxacin and Ciprofloxacin are the most active of all the evaluated antibiotics. The Salmonella/Shigella isolates were highly resistant to gentamycin (86.67% and 100% respectively), while the isolates were 100% susceptible to Streptomycin, Pefloxacin and Ciprofloxacin, which is in agreement with the report of Omololu-Aso et al., (2017) on Salmonellosis and Shigellosis Associated with Cattle Dung Contaminant from Indigenous Abattoirs, Osun State, Nigeria. In their study, they found out that streptomycin and
ciprofloxacin antibiotic therapeutic agents will be effective in the treatment of cattle infections caused by Salmonella and Shigella species.
It can therefore be inferred that Streptomycin, Pefloxacin and Ciprofloxacin antibiotic therapeutic agents will be effective in the treatment of cattle infections caused by Salmonella and Shigella species, which is in variance with the work of Niyogi (Niyogi et al., 2010) on changing pattern of serotypes on antimicrobial susceptibility of Shigella sp. isolated from children in Calcutta.
The multi-antibiotic resistance profile of the isolated bacteria is suggestive that they can overcome the likely sanitary norms practiced by the vendors and might originate from the vendors body as frequent antibiotic use might favor development of resistance in bacteria Eruteya et al., 2012.
Conclusion And Recommendation
Isolation of multi-drug resistant public health important bacteria, Salmonella and Shigella from cow dung and meat slabs poses significant risk on the consumers. There is thus, urgent need for applying proper hygienic practices among the food vendors. The use disposable covers for meat slabs is highly recommended as these will restrict transfer and the spread of food borne pathogens.
References
- Akagha TN, Gugu TH, Enemor EC, Ejikeugwu PC, Ugwu BC and Ugwu MC. (2015). Prevalence and Antibiogram of Salmonella species and Staphylococcus aureus in Retail meats sold in Awka metropolis, Southeast Nigeria. International Journal of Biological & Pharmaceutical Research, 6(12): 924-929.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Archana Iyer, Taha Kumosani, Soonham Yaghmoor, Elie Barbour, Esam Azhar, Steve Harakeh. (2013). Escherichia coli and Salmonella spp. in meat in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Journal of Infection in Developing Countries, 7(11): 812-818.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Archana Iyer, Taha Kumosani, Soonham Yaghmoor, Elie Barbour, Esam Azhar, Steve Harakeh. (2013). Escherichia coli and Salmonella spp. in meat in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Journal of Infection in Developing Countries, 7(11): 812-818.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Collee, J.G., and Frazer, A.G. (1999). Tests for identification of bacteria. Practical Medical Microbiology,131-140.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Dagnew, M., Tiruneh, M., Moges, F., and Gizachew, M. (2013). Bacterial Profile and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Pattern among Food Handlers at Gondar University, Cafeteria, Northwest Ethiopia. Journal of Infectious Disease and Therapy, 1(2):1-6.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Elhadi, N. (2014). Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella spp. in raw retail frozen imported freshwater fish to eastern province of Saudi Arabia. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine, 4(3): 234-238.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Huston, C.L., Wittum, T.E., Love, B.C., and Keen, J.E. (2002). Prevalence of fecal shedding of Salmonella spp. in dairy herds. Journal of Animal Veterinary Medicine Association, 220(5): 645-649.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Kasper, D.L., Fauci, A.S., Longo, D.L., Braunwald, E., Hauser, S.L., and Jameson, J.L. Eds. (2005). Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine. New York, The McGraw-Hill
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Obaro, S. (2011). Invasive Salmonellosis in central Nigeria.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Peng, J., Yang, J., and Jin, Q. (2011). An integrated approach for finding overlooked genes in Shigella. PLoS One, 6(4)
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Pui, C.F., Wong, W.C., Chai, L.C., Tunung, R., Jeyaletchumi, P., Noor-Hidayah, M.S., Ubong, A., Farinazleen, M.G., Cheah, Y.K., Son, R. (2011). Salmonella: A foodborne pathogen. International Food Research Journal, 18(2): 465-473.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Salehi, T.Z., Mahzounieh, M., and Saeedzadeh, A. (2005). Detection of InVA gene in isolated Salmonella from Broilers by PCR method. International Journal of Poultry Science, 4(8): 557-559.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Senthilkumar, B., and Prabakaran, G. (2005). Multidrug resistant Salmonella typhi in Asymptomatic Typhoid carriers among food handlers in Namakkal district, Tamil Nadu. Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology, 23(2): 92-94.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Sharma, R., Sharma, C.L., and Kapoor, B. (2005). Antibacterial resistance: Current problems and possible solutions. Indian Journal of Medical Science, 59, 120-129.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Tsen, H.Y., Hu, H.H., Lin, J.S., Huang, C.H., and Wang, T.K. (2000). Analysis of the Salmonella typhimurium isolates from food-poisoning cases by molecular subtyping methods. Food Microbiology, 17(2): 143-152.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - WHO (1983)? Manual for laboratory investigation of acute enteric infections. World Health Organization, Geneva.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - WHO (2013) Salmonella (non-typhoidal) fact sheet N°139.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - World Health Organization. (2006). The Control of Neglected Zoonotic Diseases; A route to poverty alleviation: report of a joint WHO/DFID-AHP meeting, 20 and 21 September 2005, WHO Headquarters, Geneva, with the participation of FAO and OIE.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar