Advertisement

Giant Cell Tumor of the Flexor Sheath of the Index Finger: A Case Report

case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/DOI: 10.31579/ 2834-8532/058

Giant Cell Tumor of the Flexor Sheath of the Index Finger: A Case Report

  • Youssef EL HASSNAOUI 1*
  • Abdelaziz EL Ansari 1
  • TARIK Mekdad 1
  • Mohamed Tazi 1
  • Hamza Madani 1
  • Issam Boulazaib 1
  • Hicham AIT BENALI 1
  • Mohammed. Shimi 1

1 Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery Department, Mohammed VI University Hospital Center Tangier, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Abdelmalek Essaadi University, Tangier, 90000, Morocco.

*Corresponding Author: Youssef EL HASSNAOUI, Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery Department, Mohammed VI University Hospital Center Tangier, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Abdelmalek Essaadi University, Tangier, 90000, Morocco.

Citation: Youssef EL HASSNAOUI, Abdelaziz EL Ansari, TARIK Mekdad, Mohamed Tazi, Hamza Madani, Issam Boulazaib, Hicham AIT BENALI, Mohammed. Shimi, (2025), Giant Cell Tumor of the Flexor Sheath of the Index Finger: A Case Report, Clinical Genetic Research; 4(4): DOI: 10.31579/ 2834-8532/058

Copyright: © 2025 Youssef EL HASSNAOUI, this is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Received: 01 August 2025 | Accepted: 14 August 2025 | Published: 25 August 2025

Keywords: giant cell tumor; tendon sheath; flexor tendon; index finger; hand surgery

Abstract

Giant cell tumors (GCTs) of the tendon sheath are common benign neoplasms of the hand, arising from the synovial lining of tendon sheaths. We report the case of a 41-year-old man who presented with a painless mass on the right index finger, progressively enlarging over four years. Ultrasound examination revealed a well-circumscribed lesion consistent with a GCT. The patient underwent complete surgical excision without complications. At six-month follow-up, there was no evidence of recurrence. This case highlights the importance of early diagnosis and meticulous surgical management of this pathology.

Introduction

Giant cell tumors (GCTs) of the tendon sheath, also known as localized nodulartenosynovitis, are the second most common benign tumors of the hand, following synovial cysts [1]. They typically arise slowly from the synovial lining of tendon sheaths and show a predilection for the palmar surface of the fingers [2]. Their progression is usually insidious, and they commonly present as a firm, painless, subcutaneous mass. Because they remain asymptomatic for an extended period, diagnosis is often delayed.

The diagnosis is primarily based on imaging studies, particularly ultrasound andmagnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which allow for accurate assessment of the lesion’s characteristics and anatomical location. Definitive confirmation relies on histopathological analysis, which establishes the benign nature and histological subtype of the tumor [3,4].

Clinical Observation

A 41-year-old patient, with no previous medical history of note, presented with a painless mass on the right hand, which had been evolving for about four years. Clinical examination revealed a firm swelling, mobile in relation to the superficial and deep planes, measuring 2 cm in its long axis. It is located opposite the metacarpophalangeal joint (MCP) of the second finger (index). The patient was apyretic and in good general condition. Finger mobility was preserved, with no pain or limitations. No local inflammatory signs or vascular nerve damage were observed (Figure 1).

An initial ultrasound of the soft tissue revealed a subcutaneous formation over the MCP joint of the 2nd finger, extending to the proximal interphalangeal joint. The lesion appeared oval, well-limited, lobulated, hypoechoic and heterogeneous, with no Doppler uptake. It measured approximately 38 × 17 mm, noted that the flexor tendon was displaced in depth with no sign of rupture suggesting GCT.

A biopsy-exeresis was performed under locoregional anaesthesia (plexus block), using a palmar approach centred on the swelling via a zigzag incision. This allowed complete marginal removal of the tumour with release of the flexor tendon (Figure 2), followed by histological examination confirming a GCT with no sign of malignancy.

A follow-up MRI at 3 months post-op revealed inflammatory changes at the surgical site, with no evidence of tumor recurrence (Figure 3). At six-month follow-up, no recurrence was noted and finger function was normal.

Discussion

Tendon sheath GCTs are the second most common benign tumour of the hand, after synovial cysts [1]. They are localized benign proliferations, often regarded as a localized form of pigmented villonodular synovitis, due to their histopathological similarity [5].

They occur preferentially in women, between the ages of 30 and 50, with a predilection for the palmar surface of the 2nd and 3rd fingers [6]. Although the digital location is the most common, involvement of the foot, ankle and deeper joints has also been described [7].

Clinically, these tumors appear as firm, painless, well- limited subcutaneous masses. Their slow evolution often contributes to a delay in diagnosis. Depending on their location, they can restrict tendon mobility, although this is often preserved. Differential diagnoses include synovial cysts, lipomas, schwannomas or localized villonodular synovitis [4,8].

Ultrasound, the first-line examination for any digital soft tissue mass, generally shows a well-limited hypoechoic mass, sometimes lobulated, with little or no Doppler vascularization. It can be used to assess the relationship with the tendons, which are often repressed but intact, thus guiding the diagnosis and management of GCT [3].

MRI is the examination of choice for assessing lesion characteristics and their relationship to adjacent anatomical structures. GCTs classically present as well-circumscribed masses, in T1 and T2 hyposignal, with moderate post- gadolinium enhancement, related with the richness of histiocytic cells and hemosiderin deposits [9,10].

Histologically, they combine mononucleated cells, multinucleated osteoclastic giant cells, foamy macrophages, hemosiderin deposits and sometimes dense fibrous stroma [3,11]. Vascularization may be marked, sometimes explaining recurrence despite apparent complete excision. The absence of cellular atypia and abundant mitoses differentiates them from malignant tumors [5].

The gold standard of treatment remains complete surgical excision, often performed under a magnifying glass or operating microscope, to remove the entire tumour and reduce the risk of recurrence [12]. The risk of recurrence varies from series to series, ranging from 4% to 44%, and depends on location, tumour size and completeness of excision [2,6]. Proximity to neurovascular or articular structures sometimes complicates complete removal. Regular post-operative follow-up is essential to detect any recurrence. In our case, complete removal resulted in a favorable evolution without recurrence at six months. However, regular follow-up is essential, particularly in the first few years after surgery.

Conclusion

Giant cell tumors of the tendon sheath are common benign lesions of the hand, characterized by a notable potential for local recurrence. Their management relies on high- resolution imaging, an accurate histopathological diagnosis, and complete surgical excision, which remains the only truly effective strategy to minimize the risk of recurrence.

Rigorous postoperative follow-up is essential to detect any recurrence at an early stage and to adjust treatment accordingly.

References

Clinical Trials and Clinical Research: I am delighted to provide a testimonial for the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and the exceptional quality of the journal for my article entitled “Effect of Traditional Moxibustion in Assisting the Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients.” The peer review process for my article was rigorous and thorough, ensuring that only high-quality research is published in the journal. The reviewers provided valuable feedback and constructive criticism that greatly improved the clarity and scientific rigor of my study. Their expertise and attention to detail helped me refine my research methodology and strengthen the overall impact of my findings. I would also like to express my gratitude for the exceptional support I received from the editorial office throughout the publication process. The editorial team was prompt, professional, and highly responsive to all my queries and concerns. Their guidance and assistance were instrumental in navigating the submission and revision process, making it a seamless and efficient experience. Furthermore, I am impressed by the outstanding quality of the journal itself. The journal’s commitment to publishing cutting-edge research in the field of stroke rehabilitation is evident in the diverse range of articles it features. The journal consistently upholds rigorous scientific standards, ensuring that only the most impactful and innovative studies are published. This commitment to excellence has undoubtedly contributed to the journal’s reputation as a leading platform for stroke rehabilitation research. In conclusion, I am extremely satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the overall quality of the journal for my article. I wholeheartedly recommend this journal to researchers and clinicians interested in stroke rehabilitation and related fields. The journal’s dedication to scientific rigor, coupled with the exceptional support provided by the editorial office, makes it an invaluable platform for disseminating research and advancing the field.

img

Dr Shiming Tang

Clinical Reviews and Case Reports, The comment form the peer-review were satisfactory. I will cements on the quality of the journal when I receive my hardback copy

img

Hameed khan