Advertisement

Electrocardiographic Criteria for Diagnosis of Acute Myocardial Infarction in Patients with Left Bundle Branch Block

Letter to Editor | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2834-796X/061

Electrocardiographic Criteria for Diagnosis of Acute Myocardial Infarction in Patients with Left Bundle Branch Block

  • Mohammed Habib

Head of Cardiology Department, Alshifa Hospital, Gaza, Palestine

*Corresponding Author: Mohammed Habib, Head of Cardiology Department, Alshifa Hospital, Gaza, Palestine.

Citation: Mohammed Habib, (2024), Electrocardiographic Criteria for Diagnosis of Acute Myocardial Infarction in Patients with Left Bundle Branch Block, International Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine, 3(3); DOI:10.31579/2834-796X/061

Copyright: © 2024, Mohammed Habib. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: 10 April 2024 | Accepted: 17 April 2024 | Published: 02 May 2024

Keywords: amı; lbbb; ecg

Abstract

In patients with normal heart and normal conduction system, the initial depolarized segment in ventricle is interventricular septum which begins with septal fascicle of the left bundle branch from left side and direction to right side followed by a simultaneous depolarization of the remaining ventricular free walls from endocardium to pericardium via the right and left bundle branches. But among patients with   left bundle branch block (LBBB), the initial septal activation is changing direction and become from right to left then the left ventricular activation is delayed, ST segment and T wave abnormalities occur, and septal Q waves indicative of an MI are absent in this condition. About 0.5 percent of patients with acute myocardial infarction had left bundle-branch block.

Because this changes the patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) and acute myocardial infarction (MI) is challenge to the clinician. The diagnosis of MI with electrocardiogram (ECG) is so difficult in the setting of LBBB because of the characteristic ECG changes caused by altered interventricular septal and left ventricle free wall depolarization. Here we review the ECG diagnostic criteria included all criteria until now and short summary of patient with acute MI and LBBB condition. 

Diagnostic criteria

The Sgarbossa criteria (1)

The Sgarbossa  criteria is the most  oldest criteria  for the diagnosis of MI in the presence of LBBB. The Sgarbossa criteria were first introduced in 1996 to improve the diagnostic accuracy for acute MI in the presence of LBBB. The confirm diagnosis of MI must be need at least 3 or more points from the following criteria. Figure 1

  1. ST-elevation of ≥1 mm and concordant with the QRS complex  (5 points)
  2. ST-segment depression ≥1 mm in lead V1-3 (3 points)
  3. ST elevation ≥5 mm and discordant with the QRS complex  (2 points)

The specificity of 98%, but poorer sensitivity of 20%. The third criteria have only 2 point so that no add any significant value as it alone does not confirm diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction.

Figure 1: Sgarbossa criteria for myocardial infarction

Modified Sgarbossa ( Smith-Sgarbossa)  Criteria (2) 

Because of the third criteria of Sagarbossa have only 2 point and does not confirm diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. The modified Sgarbossa 

criteria was used to modified and support the third criteria by calculation the ratio of ST segment elevation to the depth S wave. The discordant ST/S ratio  ≥ 0.25 mm in any lead suggested acute MI. Figure 2

Figure 2: Modified Sgarbossa Criteria for myocardial infarction

The Barcelona Criteria (3)

Barcelona Criteria contains of 3 criteria, As with the prior Sgarbossa criteria , criteria 1 is the same. Criteria 2 is expanded to all leads (but in Sgarbossa just in V1-3). Criteria 3 is specific for the Barcelona criteria and suggested that discordance deviation of ≥ 1mm in any lead with a dominant R or S wave ≤ 6 mm. 

  1. ST deviation ≥1 mm  concordant with QRS  complex in any  lead;
  2. Concordant with QRS complex and ST depression ≥1 mm
  3. Concordant with QRS complex and ST elevation ≥1 mm
  4. Discordant ST deviation ≥ 1mm with QRS complex in any lead where the R or S is ≤ 6 mm.

For example, in aVR lead, with an S wave of 5 mm, with discordant elevation of 1mm this would meet criteria. Figure 3

Figure 3: aVR lead ST elevation  ≥1 mm discordant with QRS complex, and (S) wave  voltage ≤ 6 mm.

Summary of electrocardiographic criteria;

This is simple 6 steps for diagnosis patient with LBBB and suspected acute MI. Figure 4

  1. Confirm diagnosis of LBBB. If yes go to 2nd step
  2. Calculate ST segment deviation ≥ 1 mm in any lead If yes go to 3nd  step
  3. Concordant or Discordant with QRS complex?
  4. If concordant and ≥ 1 mm ST segment deviation in any lead; Acute MI
  5. If discordant in any lead with R or S is ≤ 6 mm; Acute MI
  6. If discordant in any lead with R or S is  6 mm; calculate the ratio of ST segment elevation to the depth S wave. If  ≥ 25%; Acute MI

Figure 4: Summary of   electrocardiographic criteria; ECG; Electrocardiogram, MI; myocardial infraction

References

Clinical Trials and Clinical Research: I am delighted to provide a testimonial for the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and the exceptional quality of the journal for my article entitled “Effect of Traditional Moxibustion in Assisting the Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients.” The peer review process for my article was rigorous and thorough, ensuring that only high-quality research is published in the journal. The reviewers provided valuable feedback and constructive criticism that greatly improved the clarity and scientific rigor of my study. Their expertise and attention to detail helped me refine my research methodology and strengthen the overall impact of my findings. I would also like to express my gratitude for the exceptional support I received from the editorial office throughout the publication process. The editorial team was prompt, professional, and highly responsive to all my queries and concerns. Their guidance and assistance were instrumental in navigating the submission and revision process, making it a seamless and efficient experience. Furthermore, I am impressed by the outstanding quality of the journal itself. The journal’s commitment to publishing cutting-edge research in the field of stroke rehabilitation is evident in the diverse range of articles it features. The journal consistently upholds rigorous scientific standards, ensuring that only the most impactful and innovative studies are published. This commitment to excellence has undoubtedly contributed to the journal’s reputation as a leading platform for stroke rehabilitation research. In conclusion, I am extremely satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the overall quality of the journal for my article. I wholeheartedly recommend this journal to researchers and clinicians interested in stroke rehabilitation and related fields. The journal’s dedication to scientific rigor, coupled with the exceptional support provided by the editorial office, makes it an invaluable platform for disseminating research and advancing the field.

img

Dr Shiming Tang

Clinical Reviews and Case Reports, The comment form the peer-review were satisfactory. I will cements on the quality of the journal when I receive my hardback copy

img

Hameed khan