Short Communication | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2835-8325/120
DMSO as an anticancer agent
- Yuri Pivovarenko *
Research and Training Center ‘Physical and Chemical Materials Science’ Under Kyiv Taras Shevchenko University and NAS of Ukraine, Kiev, Ukraine
*Corresponding Author: Yuri Pivovarenko. Research and Training Center ‘Physical and Chemical Materials Science’ Under Kyiv Taras Shevchenko University and NAS of Ukraine, Kiev, Ukraine.
Citation: Yuri Pivovarenko, (2024), DMSO as an anticancer agent, Clinical research and Clinical reports 5(3): DOI: 10.31579/2835-8325/120
Copyright: © 2024, Yuri Pivovarenko. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 14 October 2024 | Accepted: 26 October 2024 | Published: 11 November 2024
Keywords: cancer; dimethyl sulfoxide; DMSO
Abstract
It has been previously shown that positive electrification of the human internal environment contributes to its excessive hydration and, consequently, to the development of cancer. This alone allows understanding why DMSO, which binds water protons and removes them from the human body, is an effective anti-cancer agent. At the same time, other properties of DMSO may also contribute to its anti-cancer activity. Thus, it may be quite important that DMSO is able to remove HO radicals from 8-HO-Guanines, which are characteristic of cancer cell DNA, thereby converting them into unoxidized Guanines, which are characteristic of healthy cell DNA. Taking all this into account, it is appropriate to consider DMSO as an anticancer agent that can act at both the physicochemical and genetic levels. Therefore, specific examples of the use of DMSO in anticancer therapy deserve attention.
References
- McIntyre G.I. (2006). Cell hydration as the primary factor in carcinogenesis: A unifying concept. Medical Hypotheses. 66(3), 518-526.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - McIntyre G.I. (2007). Increased cell hydration promotes both tumor growth and metastasis: a biochemical mechanism consistent with genetic signatures. Medical Hypotheses. 69(5), 1127-1130.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Pivovarenko Y. (2018). ±Water: demonstration of water properties, depending on its electrical potential. World Journal of Applied Physics. 3(1), 13-18.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Pivovarenko Y. (2021). Electrified water as a regulator of cell proliferation. Journal of Oncology Research. 3 (1), 1-10.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Pivovarenko Y. (2023). Positively charged water as a tumor growth stimulator. Biomedical Sciences. 9(3), 64-72.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Pivovarenko Y. (2023). Again, about the ability of positively charged water to promote cell division. International Journal of Clinical Case Reports. 2(1), 1-9.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Pivovarenko Y. (2023). Catalytic properties of positively charged water promoting tumor growth. Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics, 7(5).
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Nekrasov B.V. (1974). Basics of General Chemistry, 1. Moscow: Chemistry. In Russian.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Saenger W. (1984) Principles of Nucleic Acid Structure. New York: Springer Verlag.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Eberhardt M.K. and Colina R. (1988). The reaction of OH radicals with dimethyl sulfoxide. A comparative study of Fenton’s reagent and the radiolysis of aqueous dimethyl sulfoxide solutions. The Journal of Organic Chemistry. 53, 1071-1074.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Babbs C.F. and Griffin D.W. (1989). Scatchard analysis of methane sulfinic acid production from dimethyl sulfoxide: a method to quantify hydroxyl radical formation in physiological systems. Free Radical Biology & Medicine. 6, 493-503.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Ozawa T. (1997). Oxidative damage and fragmentation of mitochondrial DNA in cellular apoptosis. Bioscience Reports. 17(3), 237-250.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Jadhav B., Garg P., van Vugt J.J.F.A. et al. (2024). A phenome-wide association study of methylated GC-rich repeats identifies a GCC repeat expansion in AFF3 associated with intellectual disability. Nature Genetics. 56, 2322-2332.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Vandiver A.R., Idrizi A., Rizzardi L. et al. (2016). DNA methylation is stable during replication and cell cycle arrest. Scientific Reports. 5.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Greer E.L. and Shi Y. (2012). Histone methylation: a dynamic mark in health, disease and inheritance. Nature Reviews Genetics. 13, 343-357.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Nishiyama A. and Nakanishi M. (2021). Navigating the DNA methylation landscape of cancer. Trends in Genetics. 37(11), 1012-1027.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Hergalant S., Chloé Saurel C., Divoux M. et al. (2022). Correlation between DNA methylation and cell proliferation Identifies new candidate predictive markers in meningioma. Cancers (Basel). 14(24).
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Chen Y., Ren B., Yang J. et al. (2020). The role of histone methylation in the development of digestive cancers: a potential direction for cancer management. Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy. 5(1).
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Yang Y., Zhang M. and Wang Y. (2022). The roles of histone modifications in tumorigenesis and associated inhibitors in cancer therapy. Journal of the National Cancer Center. 2(4), 277-290.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - O'Neill T. (2011). The brain in a new vision. National Geographic (Russia). 94, 60. In Russian.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Hoang B.X., Nan B., Fang W.H. et al. (2023). The rationality of implementation of dimethyl sulfoxide as differentiation-inducing agent in cancer therapy. Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis. 3, 1-8.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Farrow W. (2010). Phlebolymphedema – a common underdiagnosed and undertreated problem in the wound care clinic. Journal of the American College of Clinical Wound Specialists. 2(1), 14-23.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Breslin J.W., Yang Y., Scallan J.P. et al. (2019). Lymphatic vessel network structure and physiology. Comprehensive Physiology. 9(1), 207-299.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Pivovarenko Y. (2020). The use of electromagnetic forces of the Earth in manual and physio-therapy. Journal of Human Physiology. 2(1), 10-15.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Spinal nerve section of Encyclopedia Britannica.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Pivovarenko Y. (2017). The electric potential of the tissue fluids of living organisms as a possible epigenetic factor. Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering. 2(3), 159-164.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Wang C.C, Lin S.Y., Lai Y.H. et al. (2012). Dimethyl sulfoxide promotes the multiple functions of the tumor suppressor HLJ1 through activator Protein-1 activation in NSCLC cells. Plos One.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Osman A.M.M., Alqahtani A.A., Damanhouri Z.A. et al. (2015). Dimethyl sulfoxide exacerbates cisplatin-induced cytotoxicity in Ehrlich ascites carcinoma cells. Cancer Cell International. 15.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Villarroel A., Duff A. and Tang Hu T. (2020). DMSO inhibits human cancer cells and downregulates the expression of cdk2 and cyclin A. The FASEB Journal Pharmacology. 34(1).
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Sangweni N.F., Dludla P.V., Chellan N. et al. (2021). The implication of low dose dimethyl sulfoxide on mitochondrial function and oxidative damage in cultured cardiac and cancer cells. Molecules. 26(23).
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar