Advertisement

Desmoid tumour Treatment Outcome: A single institution experience

Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2834-8486/003

Desmoid tumour Treatment Outcome: A single institution experience

  • Mohamed Hegazy *

Section of Radiation Oncology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

*Corresponding Author: Section of Radiation Oncology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Citation: Hegazy M. (2022). Desmoid tumour Treatment Outcome: A single institution experience. Biomedical and Clinical Research. 1(1); DOI:10.31579/2834-8486/003

Copyright: © 2022 Mohamed Hegazy, This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: 15 October 2022 | Accepted: 19 October 2022 | Published: 30 September 2022

Keywords: desmoid tumour; surgical margin; radiotherapy

Abstract

Desmoid tumour (DT) is a rare locally aggressive disease with tendency for local recurrence and the peak incidence age of 30-40 years.

DT prognostic factors are still conflicting like surgical margin, disease location, age and gender. 

The various treatment options including surgery, radiotherapy and systemic agents are generally offered according to the disease presenting symptoms and progressiveness.

Introduction

Desmoid tumour (DT) is a rare locally aggressive disease with tendency for local recurrence [1] and the peak incidence age of 30-40 years [2]

DT prognostic factors are still conflicting like surgical margin [3,4,5-10], disease location [3,5,9,11], age and gender [5,8,12,13]. 

The various treatment options including surgery, radiotherapy and systemic agents are generally offered according to the disease presenting symptoms and progressiveness [14-20].     

Complete surgical resection without causing significant morbidity can be challenging. The administration of adjuvant radiotherapy may improve local control but can cause side effects like fibrosis and wound healing problems [3, 4, 21, 22], rarely there is concerns about development of radiation induced second malignancies.

The aim of this work is to present our experience using multidisciplinary team to reach the best treatment outcome for this locally aggressive disease and report the long-term outcomes of treatment. 

Patients and Methods

The medicalrecords of total of 72 consecutive patients diagnosed with DT over a period of 10 years between January 2009 and December 2018 were reviewed at RadiationOncology section, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre (KFSH&RC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. All the patients had biopsy proven DT at our institution in addition to baseline and periodic follow up CT and/or MRI scans. 

Radiotherapy was delivered as definitive, preoperative or postoperative treatment. Radiation doses were 50 - 66 Gy in 2 Gy per fraction as preoperative, postoperative and definitive radiotherapy. Radiation energy was 4-6MeV delivered by either3D-Conformal Radiation Therapy, Tomotherapy or Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy techniques. Surgery was either wide local excision or intralesional debulking. 

Statistical analysis

Continuous data were checked for normality by using Shapiro Walk test. Kruskal Wallis H test was used to compare more than two groups of non-normally distributed data. Percent of categorical variables were compared using Pearson’s Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test when was appropriate. Stratification of Recurrence Free Survival was done according intention to treat (ITT). These time-to-event distributions were estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier plot, and compared using two-sided exact log-rank test. All tests were two sided. All statistics were performed using SPSS 22.0 for windows (IBM Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and Med Calc 13 for windows (Med Calc Software bvba, Ostend, Belgium).

Results

Table 1: Basic characteristics and outcome of 69 patients with desmoid tumor.

Patient characteristics

Two patients opted to undergo observation only and 1 patient opted to receive systemic treatment with Sorafenib who were excluded from the study. Therefore, total of 69 patients were evaluated (Table 1).

The median age of patient was 27 years (range 15-66) and approximately two-thirds were females. The majority were younger patients aged less than 30 years (n=43, 62 Percentage). 

Tumour characteristics

The median size was 7 cm (range, 3-25cm) and nearly two third of the patients had tumours larger than 5 cm. The most common site was trunk (n=21, 30 Percentage), followed by lower limbs (n=18, 26 Percentage), pelvis (n=15, 22 Percentage), and upper limbs (n=15, 22 Percentage). 

Treatment characteristics

Twenty four patients were treated with definitive radiotherapy, 15 patients by surgical resection alone and 30 patients by combination of both surgery and radiotherapy (12 cases had preoperative and 18 cases had postoperative irradiation). 

The surgical margin was positive in 30 patients out of total of 45 cases who had surgery (67 Percentage).  Radiation was given to total of 54 cases with doses of 50 Gy in 25 fractions delivered in 39 cases (72 Percentage) and 60- 66 Gy in 15 cases (28 Percentage) (Table 2).

Response to treatment

The median follow up was 5.5 years (range 1- 10yrs). The local control in patients who had radiotherapy (n=54 pts) as part of their treatment was 89 Percentage. The patients who had surgery (n=45 pts) as a part of the treatment had local control of 87 Percentage (Table 2).

Surgery alone group

The patients who had surgery (n=15) alone had no recurrence. 

Radiotherapy alone group

The local control in patients who had definite radiotherapy (n=24) was 100 Percentage with partial response in 18 pts (75 Percentage) and stable disease in 6 pts (25 Percentage). All the patients who had definite radiotherapy had size greater than 5cm.

Combined Surgery and radiotherapy group

All the patients who had combined surgery and radiotherapy (either pre or post-operative) had positive margins. The local control in patients with positive surgical margin (n=30 pts) and radiotherapy was 80 Percentage (n=6 patients developed recurrence). All the recurrences happened in the lower radiotherapy dose of 50 Gy and those who had post operative radiotherapy. There was no recurrence in the higher radiotherapy dose of 60 Gy (p= 0.05) and those who had pre operative radiotherapy (p=0.05). The patients group treated with surgery plus radiotherapy most of the recurrence was in patients with tumour size less than 5 cm (5 out of total of 6 recurrent patients). There was no recurrence in the patients with trunk site and all the recurrences happened in the extremities group. All the recurrences were in the less than 30 years group (Table 2).

Table 2: Comparison between the studied groups regarding basic characteristics and outcome. RFS recurrence free survival, ‡ Chi-square test; Ÿ Kruskal Wallis H test; † Log-rank test; p-value less than0.05 is significant. 

Survival and long term side effects

The 3yrs, 5yrs and 7yrs recurrence free survival in patients who had both surgery and radiotherapy was 96.4 Percentage, 81.4 Percentage and 77.4 Percentage respectively. There was no grade 3 or 4 acute or late toxicity in all the groups of patients. There was no incidence of second malignancy in this cohort of patients at median follow up of 5.5 years (Figure 1).

Figure 1: Kaplan Meier plot shows comparison between the studied groups regarding Recurrence Free Survival.

Discussion

Desmoid tumour is benign tumour of connective tissue but with high chances of local recurrence. Surgery is the main treatment modality of therapy if it can be done with acceptable morbidity. Radiotherapy is given in locally advanced inoperable tumours as definitive therapy or in combination with surgery in high risk tumours. The radiation dose used is 50-66 Gy depending on the tolerance dose to the surrounding organs of risk. The clinical course can be variable and rarely may undergo spontaneous regression. Therefore, close observation to monitor the rate of growth is a reasonable option if patient is minimally symptomatic or even when the surgical margins are positive when reresection is possible without significant morbidity.

In our cohort regarding to gender and age, females have aggressive disease similar to studies reported by [5, 8, 12 & 13] while age 30 years or less has poor prognosis as in series by [5, 8& 12] while aggressive in age more than 30 years in series by Rock et al [11] and less than 32 years by Sorensen et al [13].

In our study regarding to site, the extremities have a worse disease while the trunk has a more favorable outcome similar to Ballo et al [3], Broekhoven et al [8], Huang [9] and Rock et al [11] while non-significant in Merchant et al [5].

References

Clinical Trials and Clinical Research: I am delighted to provide a testimonial for the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and the exceptional quality of the journal for my article entitled “Effect of Traditional Moxibustion in Assisting the Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients.” The peer review process for my article was rigorous and thorough, ensuring that only high-quality research is published in the journal. The reviewers provided valuable feedback and constructive criticism that greatly improved the clarity and scientific rigor of my study. Their expertise and attention to detail helped me refine my research methodology and strengthen the overall impact of my findings. I would also like to express my gratitude for the exceptional support I received from the editorial office throughout the publication process. The editorial team was prompt, professional, and highly responsive to all my queries and concerns. Their guidance and assistance were instrumental in navigating the submission and revision process, making it a seamless and efficient experience. Furthermore, I am impressed by the outstanding quality of the journal itself. The journal’s commitment to publishing cutting-edge research in the field of stroke rehabilitation is evident in the diverse range of articles it features. The journal consistently upholds rigorous scientific standards, ensuring that only the most impactful and innovative studies are published. This commitment to excellence has undoubtedly contributed to the journal’s reputation as a leading platform for stroke rehabilitation research. In conclusion, I am extremely satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the overall quality of the journal for my article. I wholeheartedly recommend this journal to researchers and clinicians interested in stroke rehabilitation and related fields. The journal’s dedication to scientific rigor, coupled with the exceptional support provided by the editorial office, makes it an invaluable platform for disseminating research and advancing the field.

img

Dr Shiming Tang

Clinical Reviews and Case Reports, The comment form the peer-review were satisfactory. I will cements on the quality of the journal when I receive my hardback copy

img

Hameed khan