Advertisement

Congenital lobar emphysema case report: A frequently misdiagnosed disease and therapeutic challenges, Jimma University Medical Center, Southwest Ethiopia

Case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2834-5126/081

Congenital lobar emphysema case report: A frequently misdiagnosed disease and therapeutic challenges, Jimma University Medical Center, Southwest Ethiopia

  • Mohammed Beshir *

*Corresponding Author: Mohammed Beshir., Department of Paediatrics, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.

Citation: Mohammed Beshir, (2024), Congenital lobar emphysema case report: A frequently misdiagnosed disease and therapeutic challenges, Jimma University Medical Center, Southwest Ethiopia, Clinical Trials and Clinical Research,3(6); DOI:10.31579/2834-5126/081

Copyright: © 2024, Mohammed Beshir. This is an open access article distributed under the creative commons’ attribution license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: 04 October 2024 | Accepted: 01 November 2024 | Published: 15 November 2024

Keywords: congenital lobar emphysema; congenital cystic lung lesions; recurrent pneumonia; lobectomy

Abstract

Introduction and importance: Congenital Lobar Emphysema is a rare cystic lesion of the lung which may be misdiagnosed and managed as pneumonia or pneumothorax. 

Case presentation: We presented a case of a congenital cystic lung malformation; the case demonstrated a 7-month-old infant boy who presented with persistent wheeze and respiratory distress. He was initially diagnosed as recurrent pneumonia, recurrent wheezing disorder and was given unnecessary IV antibiotic treatment, Salbutamol, steroid in another hospital without improvement. Subsequently, the diagnosis of congenital lobar emphysema was made on the basis of the clinical and radiologic features. The condition wasn’t detected before birth. He underwent a successful conservative treatment.

Clinical discussion: Congenital Lobar Emphysema poses a challenge in diagnosis. It may mimic other causes of respiratory distress. 

Conclusion: Congenital Lobar Emphysema requires a high index of clinical and radiological suspicion to make an early diagnosis so that timely treatment will be offered.

Introduction

Congenital lobar emphysema is a pulmonary malformation characterized by progressive distension of one, sometimes several, lobes of the lung, compression, and collapse of the remaining lung parenchyma, and mediastinal shift to the opposite side [1]. About 50% of cases have no identified etiology. Partial or complete obstruction of the lobar bronchus is likely to be the cause. Many extrinsic or intrinsic phenomena have been described: bronchomalacia, flange, stenosis, vascular compression, and bronchogenic cyst. The lung parenchyma is normal [3]. It is diagnosed in most cases after birth but prenatal diagnosis is possible. Cardiovascular abnormalities are associated in 10 - 15% of cases [1] [3]. Congenital lobar emphysema is a rare bronchopulmonary malformation with a prevalence of 1 in 20,000 to 30,000 [1]. It is an important cause of respiratory distress in the neonatal period [2] [4]. It remains a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge in developing countries because of the low level of technical facilities [5]. We report a clinical case of congenital lobar emphysema in a 7-month-old infant diagnosed and treated in the pediatric department of Jimma University Medical Center, Southwest Ethiopia.

Case presentation

This is a 7-month old male infant presented with fast breathing and non-whooping non barking cough of 3 days’ duration. Associated with grunting, low grade intermittent fever, decreased breast feeding, and vomiting of ingested matter 2-3x per day of same duration. presented to our pediatrics emergency ward with progressively increasing respiratory distress for seven days and had worsened two days ago. The child was treated in another hospital and was referred to us. Since the age of 4 months he has similar episodes of illness multiple times for which he has been treated both at Limu genet hospital and private clinics with salbutamol puff, different Iv and PO medications and with some improvement in between the episodes. Otherwise: No history of abnormal body movement, No history chocking episodes. No history of Diaphoresis or interruption during breastfeeding. No family history of asthma, allergy or atopy. No history of contact with chronic cougher or TB diagnosed patient. 

He was born to a 24 years old para I mother after 9 months of amenorrhea and mother had regular ANC follow at health center. Antenatal history of mother was uneventful. Post-natal period was unremarkable. Mother had several antenatally ultrasound scans but no lung pathology was detected or reported.  He is the 1st child for the family. They live in a house of 4rooms with functional window with separate kitchen. He was on exclusive breast feeding for the 1st 6months then started complementary feeding with gruel made of different cereals. He exposed to sunshine at age of 1 month for 20mints without ointment. He vaccinated for his age.

The initial physical examination revealed Acutely Sick Looking in respiratory distress. 

His Vital sign: PR=170 RR=50(L) Tº=36.5 RBS=158mg/dl SpO2=85% RA 94%INO2, no anthropometry derangement, WT = 10kg Lt = 72cm MUAC=15cm      INDEX =Normal, on respiratory system Nasal flaring, Labored type of breathing, Intercostal and subcostal retractions, Trachea is central, Diffuse wheeze all over the lung, Coarse crepitation right 1/3 of lung field. Other organ systems examination appeared normal. With diagnosis of 

Impending respiratory failure 2ndry to severe pneumonia + 1st episode of wheeze the infant ABCD was secured, started on Ceftazidime 50mg/kg/dose, 500mg iv TID

Vancomycin 15mg/kg/dose, 150mg iv TID in 50ml NS over 1hour 

Hydrocortisone 4mg/kg/dose, 40mg iv QID

Salbutamol 6puff every 20 min for 1st 1hour, then every 1hour for next 4hours

EBM 150kcal/kg/day, 90ml every 1hour via NG-Tube.

The investigations done 

CBC mild anemia, ESR 30 mm/HR, gene expert not detected, HIV Status negative, B/F negative, X-ray of chest revealed perihilar and right lower lung zone airspace opacity with air bronchogram suggestive of Pneumonia, Echocardiography and abdominal ultrasound revealed normal findings.

Figure 1: There are perihilar and right lower lung zone airspace opacity with air bronchogram.

Salbutamol Challenge Follow up chart at emergency OPD.

The child had no fever, saturation on intranasal oxygen from 92 to 95, RR from 32 to 44, the wheeze persisted with poor response.

The infant Progress note on after three days

P = A 7month old infant kept with the diagnosis of Impending respiratory failure 2ndry to severe pneumonia + 1st episode of wheeze after he presented with fast breathing and grunting of 3days duration, cough and LGIF of 1week duration.

S=cough, fast breathing, 

O=GA: ASL(RD)

Vital sign: RR 44, PR  120 Temp 37.6 

R/S: mild IC/SC retraction and scattered wheezing 

Assessment=Severe pneumonia + 1st episode of wheeze(treated)

Plan: INO2

Ceftazidime 50mg/kg/dose, 500mg iv TID

Vancomycin 15mg/kg/dose, 150mg iv TID in 50ml NS over 1hour

Salbutamol 6puff QID 

EBM 150kcal/kg/day, 90ml every 1hour via NG-Tube

Follow vital sign strictly 

Progress note on after 15 ward stay

Subjectively: weak voice, muffled voice change, labored type of breathing and low grade intermittent fever. He has also associated vomiting and regurgitation 

Objectively: G/A: ASL (RD)

Vital sign: PR=128 RR=46(L) Tº=36.8 RBS=158mg/dl SpO2=80%INO2

R/S: labored breathing IC/SC retraction and diffuse wheeze all over lung fields

N/S: irritable 

Assessment: Severe pneumonia(treated) +? GERD + R/o laryngeal web +? Fungal sepsis

Plan: INO2 + Omeprazole 1mg/kg, 5mg iv BID

Fluconazole 4mg/kg/day 40mg po daily

CBC has leukocytosis 33,000 (ANC 28850,) his Hct 30, MCV 55, platelet count normal, ESR 50, blood culture no organism isolated, 

Chest CT scan revealed Bilateral ground glass opacity likely >bronchopneumonia

Naso-laryngo-trachea-bronchoscopy. Result > Normal

Progress note on after 25 ward stay

Subjectively: high grade fever fast breathing and grunting 

Objectively: GA: ASL(RD)

Vital sign: PR=168 RR=68 Tº=38.3SPO2=94%INO2 RBS 153mg/dl

Anthropometry: WT=9.7 LT=72cm MAUC=15cm WFL >median 

R/S: IC/SC retraction. Diffuse wheeze and crepitation on bilateral lung fields 

N/S: Alert 

Assessment: Recurrent wheeze +? fungal sepsis + HAI (chest focus) 

His Ward Progress note after 1 month, still the infant has respiratory distress,

P = Recurrent wheeze +? Fungal sepsis + HAI + R/o ILD

S = Fast breathing intermittent cough 

= GA: ASL(RD)

V/S: PR=114 RR=48 Tº=36.5 SPO2=95% RBS 124mg/dl

HEENT: PC&NIS

RSP: mild IC/SC retraction scattered wheeze over posterior lung fields and fine crepitation over posterior bilateral chest 

N/S: Alert 

Plan: to do blood culture, urine culture, Repeat CXR, Chest CT scan, Organ function test normal, serum electrolyte normal.

Repeat Chest x-ray: Revealed Right lower lung zone nodular opacity. Conclusion > pneumonia

Work up for TB, gene expert not detected

Put on INO2(1L/min)

Ceftriaxone 250mg iv BID

Gentamycin 50mg iv daily 

Fluconazole 50mg po daily

Hydrocortisone 40mg iv QID 

Salbutamol 6puff QID 

Mgso4 50mg/kg, 500mg iv over 1hr with 100ml NS

EBM 150kcal/kg/day, 90ml every 1hour 

With these treatments the infant improved with RR 38, temp 37, PR 120 SPO2 with room air 92 and scattered wheeze on chest examination. discharged with

Omeprazole 10mg po daily for 1week

Beclomethasone 2puff BID for 2weeks

Prednisolone 10mg po daily for 5days

Salbutamol puff prn

Appointment after 2weeks at chest clinic follow up

Before the follow the infant developed distress after 1-week discharge and at OPD

had fast breathing and HGIF of 1-day duration. Associated with non-whooping, non-barking type of cough. He has also skin rash that started from the face progressed to involve the whole body associated with reddish discoloration of eye of 4 days’ duration.

Objectively: G/A: ASL (in respiratory distress)

V/S: PR=158 RR=89 Tº=38.5 Spo2=85%RA, 95%INO2

WT=9kg LT=74cm MUAC=15cmWFL b/n1&-2,

WFA b/n 0&2, LFA b/n 1&2:  INDEX: Normal

HEENT: Pink conjunctiva and NIS, Wet buccal mucosa & tongue. 

Reddish eyes and whitish mucosal oral lesions 

LGS: No LAP

R/S: IC/SC retraction, coarse crepitation over right posterior 2/3 of lung fields and diffuse wheeze all over lung

CVS: S1 and S2 well heard. No murmur or gallop

ABD: Full and moves with respiration

No organomegaly

IGS/MSK: Maculopapular rash over whole body 

N/S: Alert

Assessment: Complicated measles (severe pneumonia) + Recurrent wheeze + Oral thrush

Plan:

Put on INO2, Isolation room, Salbutamol 6puff every 20 min for 1st 1hour, then every 1hour for next 4hours, Hydrocortisone 4mg/kg, 36mg iv QID, Ceftriaxone 50mg/kg/dose, 250mg iv BID, Pcm 15mg/kg 125mg suppository QID, Miconazole jel apply BID, Vitamin A 100k IU D1 D2 & d14 

Follow vital sign closely

Had RR range 42 to 53, temp one record of HGF, still had respiratory distress.

Chest x-ray: 

Right lower lung zone nodular opacity. Conclusion > pneumonia

Chest CT scan: revealed

Bilateral ground glass opacity likely >bronchopneumonia

Bedside Echo: No structural lesion, no vegetation

ABD U/S: Unremarkable 

Peripheral morphology microcytic, hypochromic anemia, no blast cell seen, the finding suggests Iron deficiency anemia.

After 1 week ward stay of our medical center still the infant had respiratory distress and refractory wheeze, we decide to refer the infant to black lion for further work up and pediatric pulmonologist evaluation. The infant referred with oxygen with referral diagnosis of Persistent wheezing disorder 2ry to r/o Structural lung lesion role out Primary immunodeficiency. At Addis Ababa black lion hospital, the infant Kept at PEOPD for 1weeks then he has been admitted to ward for two weeks. During his stay he was on supportive treatment and further work up was done.

Contrast Enhanced Chest CT Scan: (figure 2)

No strong evidence of infectious process, no sign of interstitial lung disease, no bronchial thickening of bronchiectasis seen, no evidence of mediastinal or hilar lymphadenopathy, no evidence of pleural or pericardial effusion, no evidence of intraluminal obstructive lesion, no sequestration, no CPAM or bronchogenic cyst, heart shows normal size and shape.

Right upper lobe anterior and apical segment hyperinflation + collapsed right upper lobe posterior segment and bibasilar medial segment could suggest Congenital Lobar Over inflation

Immunology assay: 

IgA: 33 (N)

IgG: 1233 (N) 

IgM: 299 (high)

IgM: 299 (N)

Figure 2: Right upper lobe anterior and apical segment hyperinflation + collapsed right upper lobe posterior segment and bibasilar medial segment could suggest Congenital Lobar Over inflation.
Figure 3: Right upper lobe anterior and apical segment hyperinflation + collapsed right upper lobe posterior segment and bibasilar medial segment could suggest Congenital Lobar Over inflation.

After 3 weeks ward stay the infant Discharged with: Amoxicillin syrup 125mg/5ml, 5ml po BID for 1month Salbutamol puff, Beclometasone puff, Eleron iron drop. Currently he is a 1 year and 5-month old age in good health condition and recovering well. He can walk, say baba, mama, and play with his peers. Has no anthropometry derangement, has regular follow up at the hospital. On follow-up, he continues to feed well and is thriving nicely with appropriate growth for age.

3. Discussion

CLE is a rare malformation of lung development; its estimated incidence is approximately 1/20,000–1/30,000. It often occurs in the neonatal period with hyperinflation of one or more pulmonary lobes. The left upper lobe is the most frequently involved lobe [5]. In our case, the affected lobe was the right upper lobe. The etiologies of CLE are either intrinsic included bronchomalacia and mucosal plugging or they are extrinsic included vascular malformation, tumors and cysts, the factors that leading to a subtotal closure of the bronchus and valve effect with air trapping in the affected lobe [6]. The spectrum of clinical symptoms of CLE is broad ranging from very mild symptoms to acute respiratory distress syndrome and depending upon: the age of the patient; size and location of the anomaly; and associated malformations. Symptoms can start at birth in 25% of cases, within the first month of life in 50% of cases or sporadically after 6 months of age [7]. In our case the patient presented with respiratory distress, recurrent chest infection the symptoms started within the first month of life. CLE may be misdiagnosed as pneumothorax and in such cases insertion of an intercostal drainage tube may be done. On the other hand, like our case many children may be misdiagnosed as pneumonia, wheezing disorder leading to unnecessary antibiotic treatment and loss of valuable time in diagnosis. A retrospective analysis was done on forty patients with cystic lung lesions. The final diagnosis was CCAM in 19 patients, CLE in 11 patients, and bronchogenic cysts and pulmonary sequestration in 5 patients each. Of these, 20% had received a course of prior antitubercular therapy and 30% had an intercostal drain inserted [8]. Prabhu SM et al. reviewed 54 children operated 

for congenital cystic lung lesion, 15 children (27%) with an inadvertent chest tube insertion preoperatively based on plain radiograph findings. The patients comprising 10 cases of CCAM and 5 cases of CLE. CCAM was misdiagnosed as complicated pneumatocele and pneumothorax, while CLE was misdiagnosed as tension pneumothorax. They concluded that chest tube insertion in congenital cystic malformations increases the rate of associated complications, and chest CT has a definite role in early diagnosis and deciding appropriate management in these cases [9]. In a 30-year case series in two university hospitals, 20 children with CLE underwent surgery. One patient with severe respiratory distress was misdiagnosed with hypertensive pneumothorax and underwent chest tube drainage [10]. Ten children with CLE were reviewed in order to emphasize the importance of differential diagnosis with pneumothorax. In this series, three patients were mistakenly diagnosed as pneumothorax and intercostal drains were inserted in the emergency department [9]. In our case, the child was being treated for pneumonia without improvement until the right diagnosis was established, and he received the appropriate treatment. The prenatal diagnosis of CLE is established through the ultrasound scan or MRI. With these investigations CLE can be differentiated from other congenital lung lesions. Postnatal diagnoses are made directly after birth in approximately 25–50% of all cases. Where the diagnostic tools are chest X-ray and CT scan. Echocardiography is essential to exclude cardiac anomalies [8]. In our case, the condition wasn’t detected before birth. The diagnosis of CLE was made after birth on the basis of the clinical symptoms and radiologic features, and was confirmed with histologic examination. Echocardiography was normal. Cardiac anomalies occurring in 14–20% of the patients with CLE. Other systems anomalies (renal anomalies, musculoskeletal anomalies, gastrointestinal tract, and others) and syndromes (Williams–Beuren syndrome, Miller–Dieker syndrome, Niemann–Pick disease, Fanconi aplastic anemia). may accompany CLE rarely [7]. In our case, there wasn’t any other systems malformations or accompanied syndromes. Management of patients with CLE consists of dealing with the underlying mechanism. Those with minor symptoms may be treated expectantly like our case whereas those who more severely affected will require lobectomy, which is often curative and it allows the surrounding compressed lung to expand [6]. In our case the decision of conservative treatment was made after a case discussion with pediatric pulmonologist and thoracic surgeon.

Take home massage

Common manifestation of rare diseases should also be considered in patients presented with persistent respiratory distress. Since the diagnosis of CLE is cannot be easily made, high index of suspicion is very important in diagnosing it. Care full investigation including imaging and interpretation is very important to reach at diagnosis.CLE is manageable and has good prognosis, so once the diagnosis is made, early consultation is necessary. In case of dilemma in reaching to diagnosis, early referral is very important. 

Declaration of Patient Consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Acknowledgement Special thanks to Dr rahel, argaw. pediatric pulmonologist, black lion hospital for the infant management.

References

Clinical Trials and Clinical Research: I am delighted to provide a testimonial for the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and the exceptional quality of the journal for my article entitled “Effect of Traditional Moxibustion in Assisting the Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients.” The peer review process for my article was rigorous and thorough, ensuring that only high-quality research is published in the journal. The reviewers provided valuable feedback and constructive criticism that greatly improved the clarity and scientific rigor of my study. Their expertise and attention to detail helped me refine my research methodology and strengthen the overall impact of my findings. I would also like to express my gratitude for the exceptional support I received from the editorial office throughout the publication process. The editorial team was prompt, professional, and highly responsive to all my queries and concerns. Their guidance and assistance were instrumental in navigating the submission and revision process, making it a seamless and efficient experience. Furthermore, I am impressed by the outstanding quality of the journal itself. The journal’s commitment to publishing cutting-edge research in the field of stroke rehabilitation is evident in the diverse range of articles it features. The journal consistently upholds rigorous scientific standards, ensuring that only the most impactful and innovative studies are published. This commitment to excellence has undoubtedly contributed to the journal’s reputation as a leading platform for stroke rehabilitation research. In conclusion, I am extremely satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the overall quality of the journal for my article. I wholeheartedly recommend this journal to researchers and clinicians interested in stroke rehabilitation and related fields. The journal’s dedication to scientific rigor, coupled with the exceptional support provided by the editorial office, makes it an invaluable platform for disseminating research and advancing the field.

img

Dr Shiming Tang

Clinical Reviews and Case Reports, The comment form the peer-review were satisfactory. I will cements on the quality of the journal when I receive my hardback copy

img

Hameed khan