Advertisement

Carcinogenicity, Mutagenicity and Cardiovascular risk: In silico evaluation of a novel COVID-19 therapy

opinion | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2834-5177/022

Carcinogenicity, Mutagenicity and Cardiovascular risk: In silico evaluation of a novel COVID-19 therapy

  • Jessica Telma Ciecilinksy 1
  • Yara Maria da Silva Pires 2*

¹ University of Contest ado. Pharmacy Department. Marfa, Santa Catarina, Brazil.

² Pharmaceutical Sciences Department. Federal University of Parana. Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil. 

*Corresponding Author: Yara Maria da Silva Pires, Department of Mathematics and Informatics, School

Citation: Jessica T. Ciecilinksy., Yara Maria da Silva Pires (2023), Carcinogenicity, Mutagenicity and Cardiovascular risk: In silico evaluation of a novel COVID-19 Therapy, International Journal of Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2(3); DOI:10.31579/2834-5177/022

Copyright: © 2023, Yara Maria da Silva Pires. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: 16 March 2023 | Accepted: 28 March 2023 | Published: 11 April 2023

Keywords: anti-sars-cov-2 therapy; pharmaceutical chemistry; toxicology; bioinformatics

Abstract

Introduction

The global pandemic of COVID-19, a highly contagious viral illness, is a major public health concern. Currently, the research community is seeking effective and safe pharmacotherapies. Paxlovid (Pox) is a combination of Nirmatrelvir (NR), a protease inhibitor, and Ritonavir (RT), which provides pharmacokinetic benefits. Due to the recent approval of Px, there is limited data regarding its safety and toxicological profile [1-3]. Thus, the objective of this paper is to evaluate the carcinogenic, mutagenic, and cardiovascular profiles of NR and RT by in silico prediction.

Materials and Methods: The toxic parameters were evaluated through PreADME software; AMES test and Rodent carcinogenicity assay. The positive results were confirmed by a Micronucleus assay.

Results and Discussion:

The predictions concerning the toxicological endpoints reveal that NR/RT can inhibit hERG, a potassium ion channel involved in normal cardiac repolarization activity of the heart. The drug-induced blockade of hERG function causes the long QT syndrome, which can result in arrhythmia and death. Although they did not cause mutation, these structures were classified as "ambiguous molecules" in the hERG adherence test. There is an uncertainty in ligand binding patterns within the central cavity of the canal and it must be further analyzed. The risk of channel inhibition creates a concomitant risk of cardiovascular side effects and sudden death [4,5].

In the Ames test, NR and RT were found to be non-mutagenic. NR has carcinogenic potential, while Rt has been shown not to be carcinogenic in mice. However, the use of Ritonavir is associated with hepatotoxicity and there is no specific antidote in case of overdose. In addition, Px can cause metabolic induction, increasing the risks of developing serious and potentially fatal adverse drug-related effects. [4] 

Conclusion:

Both drugs may be associated with the increased risk of cardiovascular complications. Regarding mutagenicity, Px is relatively safe, considering the NR results. Patients in use of NR/RT should be monitored for drug toxicity and interactions. An interprofessional healthcare team can minimize the risk of harm and improve the patient's safety. 

Thus, the development of bioinformatics techniques provides advances in several procedures for evaluating compounds and new drugs, ensuring the rational and respectful use of laboratory animals.

References

Clinical Trials and Clinical Research: I am delighted to provide a testimonial for the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and the exceptional quality of the journal for my article entitled “Effect of Traditional Moxibustion in Assisting the Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients.” The peer review process for my article was rigorous and thorough, ensuring that only high-quality research is published in the journal. The reviewers provided valuable feedback and constructive criticism that greatly improved the clarity and scientific rigor of my study. Their expertise and attention to detail helped me refine my research methodology and strengthen the overall impact of my findings. I would also like to express my gratitude for the exceptional support I received from the editorial office throughout the publication process. The editorial team was prompt, professional, and highly responsive to all my queries and concerns. Their guidance and assistance were instrumental in navigating the submission and revision process, making it a seamless and efficient experience. Furthermore, I am impressed by the outstanding quality of the journal itself. The journal’s commitment to publishing cutting-edge research in the field of stroke rehabilitation is evident in the diverse range of articles it features. The journal consistently upholds rigorous scientific standards, ensuring that only the most impactful and innovative studies are published. This commitment to excellence has undoubtedly contributed to the journal’s reputation as a leading platform for stroke rehabilitation research. In conclusion, I am extremely satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the overall quality of the journal for my article. I wholeheartedly recommend this journal to researchers and clinicians interested in stroke rehabilitation and related fields. The journal’s dedication to scientific rigor, coupled with the exceptional support provided by the editorial office, makes it an invaluable platform for disseminating research and advancing the field.

img

Dr Shiming Tang

Clinical Reviews and Case Reports, The comment form the peer-review were satisfactory. I will cements on the quality of the journal when I receive my hardback copy

img

Hameed khan