Advertisement

Bılateral Renal-Perırenal Lymphangıomatosıs: Ct and Mrı Fındıngs

Case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/Bılateral Renal-Perırenal Lymphangıomatosıs: Ct an

Bılateral Renal-Perırenal Lymphangıomatosıs: Ct and Mrı Fındıngs

  • Hasan Aydin *
  • Yasin Ozdemir

Hasan Aydin, SB. Ankara Oncology Res. Hospital Radiology Department.

*Corresponding Author: Hasan Aydin, SB. Ankara Oncology Res. Hospital Radiology Department.

Citation: Yasin Ozdemir, Hasan Aydin, (2024), Bılateral Renal-Perırenal Lymphangıomatosıs: Ct and Mrı Fındıngs, International Journal of clinical and Medical Case Reports, 3(1); Doi:10.31579/2834-8664/038

Copyright: © 2024, Hasan Aydin. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Received: 03 January 2024 | Accepted: 18 January 2024 | Published: 26 January 2024

Keywords: renal-lymphangioma-ct-mrı

Abstract

Renal lymphangiectasia is a rare, benign developmental disease of the kidney characterized by abnormal enlargement of the intrarenal and/or perirenal lymphatics. 

Diagnosis of Lymphangiomatosis can be done by CT and MRI. 

Here, We report a case of bilateral intrarenal and perirenal lymphantiectasia with CT and MRI findings.

Introduction

Renal lymphangiectasia is a rare, benign developmental disease of the kidney characterized by abnormal enlargement of the intrarenal and/or perirenal lymphatics. This condition, often asymptomatic, can be congenital or acquired, it may be due to renal failure and/or hypertension in undiagnosed patients[1] Diagnosis of Lymphangiomatosis can be done by cross-sectional imaging methods, Computerized Tomography(CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)  without any need for an invasive procedure[2]. In this case, we presented the CT and MRI findings of the patient who was diagnosed with bilateral intrarenal and perirenal lymphantiectasia.

Case Report

57-year-old male patient was under follow-up due to a previous colon tumor and surgery. In his routine Contrast-enhanced Abdominopelvic CT: Multiple bilateral perirenal and intramedullary cysts were observed. The cysts did not compress the renal cortex, surrounded the cortex and perirenal fatty tissue, were in conglomerated appereance and showed a hypodense surrounding feature with an average density of 8.5 HU. Bilateral kidney sizes and parenchymal thicknesses were in normal range, bilateral corticomedullary separations in both kidneys were clearly performed (Figure.1)

Figure 1: a-b: Renal and perirenal Lymphangiomas in the axial and coronal contrast enhanced CT

Dynamic abdominal MRI was requested from the patient in order to exclude possible cystic metastases of colon tumor. Lesions were diagnosed as "renal lymphangiomatosis in MRI those were hyperintense on T2W images, without any diffusion restrictions on DW images, and without any enhancement in the postcontrast acquisitions. There was a discrete connection between the intrarenal and perirenal lymphangiomas which was thought to be a lymphatic drainage and leakage (Figure .2)

Figure 2a-d: Bilateral hyperintense Lymphangiomas in axial and Coronal T2W images. 

These renal and perirenal Lymphangiomas do not enhance in contrast enhanced axial MRI and do not show any diffusion restrictions on ADC mapping.

In the routine follow-ups: There was no increase in the size, amount and dimensions of the renal-perirenal cysts. 

Discussion

Renal and perirenal lymphangiectasias are rare diseases of kidneys with dilatation of the renal lymphatics, seen in both children and adults. They can be unilateral and/or bilateral, occur equally in both sexes, are also known as renal lymphangiomatosis, renal lymphangiomas and renal hygromas [1-3]. Since these lympangiectasias were manifested by perirenal, intrarenal and parapelvic cystic structures due to the dilatation of lymphatic vessels, it should be considered in the differential diagnosis of renal pathologies such as hydronephrosis, medullary lipomatosis and other cystic renal diseases particularly with the autosomal recessive polycystic kidney diseases of childhood [1,4,5].

Renal lymphangiectasias are known to be congenital and benign, hereditary cases have also been reported although they were mostly sporadic[4-6]. USG, CT and MRI have typical imaging appearances and have a great role in the diagnosis of Lympangiomatosis. On CT, typical findings are: The cysts located in perirenal and/or parapelvic region with fluid density, with or without any septa, without any compression towards the renal parenchyma, with prominent conglomerating features and without any contrast enhancement. On MRI, the appearance of cysts that appear hypointense on T1W and hyperintense on T2W sequences, are typical[4,6,7].

In most of the cases, no treatment is required, follow-up of lymphangiomas is sufficient. Percutaneous aspiration and nephrectomy can be applied in complicated patients[3,8].

In our case, there was no familial history without any clinical complaints. The diagnosis was made by contrast-enhanced 

abdominal CT and with dynamic abdominal MRI. Any invasive procedures like biopsy, fluid aspiration and cytology were not required in the diagnosis due to the typical imaging findings which were mainly included in the diagnosis of renal lymphangiectasias.

References

Clinical Trials and Clinical Research: I am delighted to provide a testimonial for the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and the exceptional quality of the journal for my article entitled “Effect of Traditional Moxibustion in Assisting the Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients.” The peer review process for my article was rigorous and thorough, ensuring that only high-quality research is published in the journal. The reviewers provided valuable feedback and constructive criticism that greatly improved the clarity and scientific rigor of my study. Their expertise and attention to detail helped me refine my research methodology and strengthen the overall impact of my findings. I would also like to express my gratitude for the exceptional support I received from the editorial office throughout the publication process. The editorial team was prompt, professional, and highly responsive to all my queries and concerns. Their guidance and assistance were instrumental in navigating the submission and revision process, making it a seamless and efficient experience. Furthermore, I am impressed by the outstanding quality of the journal itself. The journal’s commitment to publishing cutting-edge research in the field of stroke rehabilitation is evident in the diverse range of articles it features. The journal consistently upholds rigorous scientific standards, ensuring that only the most impactful and innovative studies are published. This commitment to excellence has undoubtedly contributed to the journal’s reputation as a leading platform for stroke rehabilitation research. In conclusion, I am extremely satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the overall quality of the journal for my article. I wholeheartedly recommend this journal to researchers and clinicians interested in stroke rehabilitation and related fields. The journal’s dedication to scientific rigor, coupled with the exceptional support provided by the editorial office, makes it an invaluable platform for disseminating research and advancing the field.

img

Dr Shiming Tang

Clinical Reviews and Case Reports, The comment form the peer-review were satisfactory. I will cements on the quality of the journal when I receive my hardback copy

img

Hameed khan