Advertisement

Anxiety Levels among Healthcare Professionals during Covid-19 Pandemic: A Multifactorial Study

Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.37579/2834-5142/029

Anxiety Levels among Healthcare Professionals during Covid-19 Pandemic: A Multifactorial Study

  • Arif Malik 1*
  • Muhammad Mansoor Hafeez 1*
  • Sulayman Waquar 1
  • Muhammad Asim Rana 2
  • Rabail Alam 1

1Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology (IMBB), The University of Lahore, Lahore-Pakistan.

2Intensive Care Unit, Bahria International Hospital Lahore-Pakistan.

*Corresponding Author: Muhammad Mansoor Hafeez and Arif Malik, Director Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology (IMBB), The University of Lahore, Lahore-Pakistan.

Citation: Arif Malik, Muhammad M. Hafeez, Sulayman Waquar, Muhammad A. Rana, Rabail Alam, (2024). Anxiety Levels among Healthcare Professionals during Covid-19 Pandemic: A Multifactorial Study, International Journal of Clinical Nephrology. 3(6); DOI:10.37579/2834-5142/029

Copyright: © 2024, Muhammad Mansoor Hafeez and Arif Malik. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Received: 04 November 2024 | Accepted: 20 November 2024 | Published: 30 November 2024

Keywords: anxiety; COVID-19; GAD-7 scoring system; healthcare professionals; psychological stress

Abstract

The current study focuses on psychological stress level among doctors, estimated by calculating anxiety score. For the assessment of anxiety levels, the GAD-7 scale was used. Chi-Square test and odd ratios were calculated among the exposed and not exposed groups involved in the management of COVID-19 patients. Results revealed increased anxiety levels in the exposed group. Besides, the availability of personal protective equipment’s and stress from the family to quit the job were the substantial contributing factors that increased anxiety. Based on the results, it is proposed that the concern administrative authorities should consider these findings to facilitate medical healthcare professionals.

Introduction

Anxiety has been identified as one of the top-ranked mental issues among health care professionals that can dynamically influence individual performances. Different external factors like working hours at the hospital, personal relationships, financial problems and certain other extraneous factors including medical illness of family members can contribute to elevated stress levels (Koay et al., 2020). It is pertinent to mention here that anxiety and depression levels generally prevailing among the population worldwide (Fonagy et al., 2016). Such non-communicable disorders could potentially lead to disability (Murray et al., 1996). More specifically, in developing countries like Pakistan, psychiatric disorders in combination with numerous infectious diseases and malnutrition can further aggravate the problem. On a gender basis, women are more prone to this disorder compared with male counterparts (Mirza et al., 2004). Keeping in view the available literature, the present study investigated anxiety levels among healthcare professionals during COVID-19 pandemic that added extra stress among the medical community, especially frontline healthcare professionals. So far, the COVID-19 infection has caused casualties including 278 doctors that were confirmed but more than reported deaths of doctors are expected (Ing et al., 2020). The novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19 or 2019-nCoV) was first identified in December 2019 in China and the infection spread to 167 countries within a few months. Apart from the rapid rise in death tolls, COVID-19 infection rates caused added stress among the general population that ultimately affected front line doctors working in hospitals (Montemurro et al., 2020). World Health Organization (WHO) declared it as a pandemic/global emergency in March 2020 due to an increasing number of cases and deaths around the globe. According to WHO, there were 3.7 million confirmed cases with a death toll of 1 million (WHO COVID-19 Dashboard., 2020). Outbreaks of COVID-19 have imposed critical impacts on the mental health and anxiety-related concerns among healthcare professionals (Ahmed et al., 2020).

It should be noted that a large number of doctors and nurses have got infected and even lost their lives in this pandemic. Major existing issues were due to increased workload and intermittent lack of protective equipment (Magnani et al., 2020). Researchers integrated a significant impact of the pandemic with psychological and emotional behaviors of healthcare professionals (Spinelli et al., 2020). Unfortunately, the major focus of allied healthcare professionals was to identify and to elucidate the pathophysiology of COVID-19 diseases. Somehow, the mental health condition of those who were actively involved in treating a mass of the population was neglected or very little focused. It this extremely unavoidable situation, a very important aspect of anxiety levels among health professionals therefore remained unnoticed. In the present study, we investigated the prevalence of anxiety levels and associated contributing factors among health care physicians during COVID-19 pandemic.

Materials and Methods

Experiment details:

A total of 156 doctors were recruited to study the mental stress and anxiety levels during a cross-sectional comparative study from April to June (2020). They were further divided into two groups. Participants of group A were never directly exposed while those of group B were exposed to the treatment of COVID-19 patients.

Assessment Questionnaire and GAD-7 Scoring

Questionnaires were distributed among the participants from both groups. Responses were collected from different hospitals of Lahore (31.5204° N; 74.3587° E) Punjab, Pakistan. Doctors having already some mental illness or on anti-psychotics were excluded from the study. For the assessment of anxiety GAD-7 scoring system was used and outcomes were assessed (Spitzer et al., 2006). Scores obtained in between 0-21 was encoded as follows: Scores of 5-9 for mild anxiety, 10-14 moderate anxiety, and ≥ 15 severe anxieties. Apart from the GAD-7 scoring two other factors a) Family stress to quit the job, b) Lack of adequate supply of personal protective equipment’s (PPE’s) were also assessed which were specifically relevant to group B.

Statistical Analyses

The data were statistically analyzed with the help of a Chi-square test using SPSS software (version 20). In addition, the p-values of less than 95 % confidence index (p<0>

Results

Anxiety levels among doctors

The study assessed different variables in the identification of anxiety levels within the doctors. Male to female ratio in group A was 36:25, whereas, in group B, it was 64:31. Chi- square analysis depicted no significant difference in anxiety levels of two groups based on gender (p=0.187). By contrast, significantly increased levels of anxiety were recorded among members of group B (p=0.005) that are directly in contact with COVID-19 patients (Table-1).

 

Doctors

Totalp-value
GroupAGroup B

Gender

Male

36 (36.0%)

64 (64.0%)

100 (100.0%)

0.187

Female

25 (44.6%)

31 (55.4%)

56 (100.0%)

 

 

Anxiety Score

No Anxiety

38 (52.8%)

34 (47.2%)

72 (100.0%)

 

 

0.005

Mild Anxiety

6 (20.0%)

24 (80.0%)

30 (100.0%)

Moderate Anxiety

13 (37.1%)

22 (62.9%)

35 (100.0%)

Severe Anxiety

4 (21.1%)

15 (78.9%)

19(100.0%)

Table-1: Changes in Anxiety Levels in Doctors Calculated by Using GAD-7 scoring.

Odds ratios were calculated by 2×2 cross-tabulation that explained the risks of anxiety in doctors were almost three times (OR=2.96) greater in Group B compared to Group A. Factors contributing to Aggravation of Anxiety Levels Doctors included in the study further were inquired about the factors that contributed to the aggravation of their anxiety levels. Of these, two major contributing factors included stress from the family to quit the job and the availability of proper personal protective equipment’s (PPE’s). The findings indicated that there are 4.92 times and 1.80 times greater risk of anxiety in those who were facing stress because of inadequate supply of PPEs and from their families respectively (Table-2).

Doctors

Anxiety

TotalOdd Ratio (95% CI)

Yes

No

Exposure

Yes

61 (64%)

34 (36%)

95

2.96

(1.52-5.77)

No

23 (38%)

38 (62%)

61

Lack of PPE

Yes

28 (85%)

5 (15%)

33

4.92

(1.68-14.41)

No

33 (37%)

29 (53%)

62

Family Stress

Yes

17 (74%)

6 (26%)

23

1.8

(0.63-5.12)

No

44 (61%)

28 (39%)

72

Table 2: Factors involved in the aggravation of anxiety levels among doctors.

Discussion

The COVID-19 is the most devastating and challenging public health crises since the influenza pandemic in 1918. Global statistics show millions of cases and about half of million deaths by May 2020 (WHO, 2020). Our results indicated that professionals engaged in the treatment of COVID-19 patients were significantly influenced by anxiety. In agreement with our findings, it has been indicated that linear spread of the virus has undeniable effects over the population worldwide but doctors and nurses who are in direct contact with the affected individuals deal with constant stress and fear that drives them into an anxious state of mind (Shah et al., 2020). Significant efforts had been made worldwide in ruling out anxiety and anxiety-related issues from the health care professionals (Van Bavel et al., 2020). Fear of being a vector in affecting others i.e., (family, friends, relatives, neighbours etc.) due to the inadequate PPEs and appropriate preventive measures is an important social aspect that augments anxiety (Bauchner et al., 2020; Lam et al., 2020). The current study also investigated the involvement of family members and other associated factors to study changes in the magnitude of anxiety levels. Our results revealed that the lack of PPEs, and stress from family to quit the job considerably increased the levels of anxiety among the healthcare professionals. Thus, it is the need of the hour that administrative departments and governing authorities should take positive steps in ruling out the concerns of anxiety and fears with which healthcare professionals and continuously engaged.

Conclusions

From the results, it is evident that levels of anxiety among health care professionals are directly associated with i) direct exposure to COVID-19 infected patients ii) family support and iii) personal protective equipment (PPEs). It is, therefore, concluded that everyone has to play his role to cope with the situation like a pandemic. Modifiable aggravating factors for anxiety levels like proper provision of PPEs can be easily managed with the cooperation of hospital management and administrative officials, it may eradicate the fears of healthcare professionals to work in such a pandemic situation. Similarly, family support is also linked with the anxiety free and well protected environment of hospitals.

References

Clinical Trials and Clinical Research: I am delighted to provide a testimonial for the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and the exceptional quality of the journal for my article entitled “Effect of Traditional Moxibustion in Assisting the Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients.” The peer review process for my article was rigorous and thorough, ensuring that only high-quality research is published in the journal. The reviewers provided valuable feedback and constructive criticism that greatly improved the clarity and scientific rigor of my study. Their expertise and attention to detail helped me refine my research methodology and strengthen the overall impact of my findings. I would also like to express my gratitude for the exceptional support I received from the editorial office throughout the publication process. The editorial team was prompt, professional, and highly responsive to all my queries and concerns. Their guidance and assistance were instrumental in navigating the submission and revision process, making it a seamless and efficient experience. Furthermore, I am impressed by the outstanding quality of the journal itself. The journal’s commitment to publishing cutting-edge research in the field of stroke rehabilitation is evident in the diverse range of articles it features. The journal consistently upholds rigorous scientific standards, ensuring that only the most impactful and innovative studies are published. This commitment to excellence has undoubtedly contributed to the journal’s reputation as a leading platform for stroke rehabilitation research. In conclusion, I am extremely satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the overall quality of the journal for my article. I wholeheartedly recommend this journal to researchers and clinicians interested in stroke rehabilitation and related fields. The journal’s dedication to scientific rigor, coupled with the exceptional support provided by the editorial office, makes it an invaluable platform for disseminating research and advancing the field.

img

Dr Shiming Tang

Clinical Reviews and Case Reports, The comment form the peer-review were satisfactory. I will cements on the quality of the journal when I receive my hardback copy

img

Hameed khan