Advertisement

Aldosterone Synthase Inhibitors for Treatment of Hypertension and Chronic Kidney Disease

Review Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2834-8761/047

Aldosterone Synthase Inhibitors for Treatment of Hypertension and Chronic Kidney Disease

  • Nasser Mikhail *

Endocrinology Division1, Endocrinology Division, Olive View-UCLA Medical Center, David-Geffen UCLA Medical School, CA, USA

*Corresponding Author: Nasser Mikhail, Endocrinology Division1, Endocrinology Division, Olive View-UCLA Medical Center, David-Geffen UCLA Medical School, CA, USA

Citation: Aldosterone Synthase Inhibitors for Treatment of Hypertension and Chronic Kidney Disease, Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, 3(1) DOI:10.31579/2834-8761/047

Copyright: © 2024, Nasser Mikhail. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: 18 January 2024 | Accepted: 29 January 2024 | Published: 02 February 2024

Keywords: aldosterone synthase; hyperkalemia; hypertension; chronic kidney disease; albuminuria

Abstract

Aldosterone excess is known to worsen hypertension and kidney function. Three selective aldosterone synthase inhibitors (ASIs) were evaluated in 3 phase 2 trials. In the first study, the ASI baxdrostat 2 mg orally once daily decreased systolic blood pressure (SBP) by 11.0 mmHg compared with placebo after 12 weeks in patients with treatment-resistant hypertension. In the second study including patients with uncontrolled hypertension, placebo-corrected reduction in SBP with lorundrostat 50 mg once daily was 9.6 mmHg after 8 weeks. Patients receiving thiazides and those with body mass index (BMI) > 30 kg/m2 had the optimum blood pressure (BP) response to lorundrostat, whereas plasma renin activity (PRA) did not affect the its antihypertensive potency. In the third trial including patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), the ASI BI 690517 (10 mg once daily) decreased urinary albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) by 39% after 14 weeks compared with 3% reduction with placebo. Reduction in UACR was generally similar in presence or absence of concomitant treatment with empagliflozin. The 3 ASIs mildly decreased (by <15%) estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) compared with placebo. The most common adverse effects of ASIs were hyperkalemia occurring in 2.9% and 7.9% among patients randomized to baxdrostat and lorundrostat, respectively versus none in the placebo groups. In patients with CKD, frequency of hyperkalemia was higher: 14.2% and 6.0% with BI 690517 and placebo, respectively. Adrenal insufficiency was reported in 1.3% of patients randomized to BI 690517 versus 1.0% with placebo. Preliminary data suggest that selective ASIs are effective in lowering BP in patients with resistant and uncontrolled hypertension and decreasing albuminuria in CKD. Phase 3 clinical trials should be conducted to assess long-term efficacy and safety of ASIs in a wide spectrum of patients with uncontrolled BP and CKD.

Introduction

Aldosterone excess causes hypertension through it salt-retaining effect [1]. In addition, accumulating evidence suggests that aldosterone has deleterious effects on the cardiorenal system by promoting inflammation, vascular stiffness, and thrombosis resulting in coronary artery disease, heart failure, and progression of kidney disease [1]. Furthermore, aldosterone may compromise renal function by causing tubulointerstitial inflammation and fibrosis and damage of podocytes [1]. Verma et al [2] have shown that higher circulating aldosterone levels among patients with CKD were independently associated with increased risk for kidney disease progression (defined as the composite of 50

Conclusions and future directions

Preliminary results suggest that the 3 ASIs bedrest, lorundrostat and BI 690517 are effective in lowering BP. FurthermoreBI 690517 decreases albuminuria in patients with CKD. Hyperkalemia represents their major limitation. Well-designed long-term trials should examine the effects of ASIs for treatment of hypertension and CKD in patients with different races and with a broad spectrum of BP, kidney function, and BMI. These trials should have CV events and mortality as primary outcome. In addition, head-to-head trials comparing safety and efficacy of ASIs with the non-steroidal aldosterone receptor blocker finerenone should be performed. This comparison will clarify whether inhibition of aldosterone synthesis or blocking its receptors is the ideal approach to target aldosterone. Trials designed to evaluate baxdrostat as treatment for patients with primary hyperaldosteronism and those with uncontrolled hypertension and CKD are underway [9]. Standardization of the proper methodology of BP measurement is crucial in future trials to validate comparison between different ASIs [10]. 

Conflict of interest

The author does not have any conflict of interest to declare. 

 

Baxdrostat [6]

Lorundrostat [7]

BI 690517 [8]

Design

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, phase 2 trial

Randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging, multicenter in the USA, phase 2 trial 

Randomized, placebo-controlled, multinational, phase 2 trial 

Disease 

Treatment-resistant hypertension defined as seated BP ≥130/80 mmHg on ≥3 medications including a diuretic 

Uncontrolled hypertension defined as automated office SBP ≥130 mmHg

CKD with eGFR 30 to < 90>

Patients’ characteristics

N=275, mean age 62 years, 55% men, 70% Whites, 28% Blacks, 38% with type 2 diabetes

Cohort 1 with PRA ≤1.0 ng/ml/h (n= 163), cohort 2 PRA > 1.0 ng/ml/h (n=37). Mean age 65.7 years, 40% men, 36% Blacks, 48% Hispanics, 40% with type 2 diabetes 

n= 586, mean age 63.8 years, 67% men, 58% Whites, mean eGFR 51.9 ml/min/1.73 m2, median UACR 426 mg/g, 71% with type 2 diabetes

Mean SBP at baseline 

148 mmHg

142 mmHg (cohort 1), 139.1 mmHg (cohort 2)

134 mmHg

Intervention 

Baxdrostat 0.5 mg (n=69), 1 mg (n=70), 2 mg (n=67) and placebo (n=69)

Lorundrostat 12.5 mg, 50 mg, or 100 mg once daily, 12.5 mg or 25 mg bid

Empagliflozin vs placebo in the run-in phase followed by another randomization to BI 690517 at doses of 3, 10, 20 mg vs placebo

Primary outcome

Change in SBP from baseline to week 12

Change in office SBP from baseline to week 8

Change in UACR from second randomization (start of BI 690517) to week 14 

Follow-up

12 weeks 

8 weeks

Run-in phase: randomization to empagliflozin for 8 weeks, phase 2: randomization to BI 690517 in doses 3,10,20 mg/d or placebo for 14 weeks, then 4 weeks wash-out

Effect of ASI on primary outcome

Difference between baxdrostat 2 mg and placebo -11.0 mmHg (95% CI, -16.4 to -5.5; P <0 P=0.003)>

Difference from placebo in SBP with 100 mg: -7.8 mmHg (90% CI, -14.1 to -1.5; P=0.04), with 50 mg: -9.6 mmHg (90% CI, -15.8 to -3.4; P=0.01).   Reductions in SBP with other doses vs placebo were not significant.

Placebo-corrected reductions in UACR were -20% (95% CI, -39 to 3), -37% (95% CI, -52 to -18), and -35% (95% CI, -51 to -14) with BI 690517 3mg, 10 mg., and 20 mg, respectively. 

Proportions of subjects with any adverse effects

48-52% versus 41% with placebo

43-57% versus 40% with placebo

61-62% versus 54% with placebo

Frequency of hyperkalemia (K 5.6-5.9 mmol/L)

6/205 (2.9%) with baxdrostat vs none with placebo

13/164 (7.9%) vs none with placebo

62/436 (14.2%) vs 9/147 (6%) with placebo 

Frequency of serum K ≥ 6.0 mmol/L

5/205 (2.4%) with baxdrostat vs none with placebo

6/164 (3.6%) vs none with placebo

6/436 (1.3%) vs 1/147 (0.6%) with placebo 

Incidence of adrenal insufficiency

None

None

7/436 (1.3%) vs 1/147 (0.6%) with placebo

Hypotension 

1 severe case at day 64 who discontinued baxdrostat

2/110 (1.8%) vs none with placebo

7/436 (1.6%) vs 1/147 (0.6%) with placebo

Comments 

Baxdrostat 2 mg decreased DBP by -5.2 mmHg versus placebo

Better SBP response in patients taking thiazides and with BMI > 30 kg/m2, and less SBP response in African Americans

Placebo-corrected decrease in SBP was -7 to -8 mmHg with BI 690517 + empagliflozin vs -4 to -6 mmHg with BI 690517 without empagliflozin 

Table 1. Overview of trials of aldosterone synthase inhibitors

Abbreviations: SBP: systolic blood pressure, CKD: chronic kidney disease, eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate, UACR; urine albumin to creatinine ratio, ACEI: angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, ARB: angiotensin receptor blocker, PRA: plasma renin activity. DBP: diastolic blood pressure, SBP: systolic blood pressure. BMI: body mass index. 

References

Clinical Trials and Clinical Research: I am delighted to provide a testimonial for the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and the exceptional quality of the journal for my article entitled “Effect of Traditional Moxibustion in Assisting the Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients.” The peer review process for my article was rigorous and thorough, ensuring that only high-quality research is published in the journal. The reviewers provided valuable feedback and constructive criticism that greatly improved the clarity and scientific rigor of my study. Their expertise and attention to detail helped me refine my research methodology and strengthen the overall impact of my findings. I would also like to express my gratitude for the exceptional support I received from the editorial office throughout the publication process. The editorial team was prompt, professional, and highly responsive to all my queries and concerns. Their guidance and assistance were instrumental in navigating the submission and revision process, making it a seamless and efficient experience. Furthermore, I am impressed by the outstanding quality of the journal itself. The journal’s commitment to publishing cutting-edge research in the field of stroke rehabilitation is evident in the diverse range of articles it features. The journal consistently upholds rigorous scientific standards, ensuring that only the most impactful and innovative studies are published. This commitment to excellence has undoubtedly contributed to the journal’s reputation as a leading platform for stroke rehabilitation research. In conclusion, I am extremely satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the overall quality of the journal for my article. I wholeheartedly recommend this journal to researchers and clinicians interested in stroke rehabilitation and related fields. The journal’s dedication to scientific rigor, coupled with the exceptional support provided by the editorial office, makes it an invaluable platform for disseminating research and advancing the field.

img

Dr Shiming Tang

Clinical Reviews and Case Reports, The comment form the peer-review were satisfactory. I will cements on the quality of the journal when I receive my hardback copy

img

Hameed khan