Advertisement

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (Ards) In Pregnancy — A Mini-Review Article

Short Communication | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2834-5126/141

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (Ards) In Pregnancy — A Mini-Review Article

  • Nini Navakumar *
  • Nina Navakumar
  • Deepak Paul

Sree Gokulam Medical College Hospital, Trivandrum KIMSHEALTH, Trivandrum Kerala, India.

*Corresponding Author: Nini Navakumar., Sree Gokulam Medical College Hospital, Trivandrum KIMSHEALTH, Trivandrum Kerala, India.

Citation: Nini Navakumar, Nina Navakumar, Deepak Paul, (2026), Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (Ards) In Pregnancy — A Mini-Review Article, Clinical Trials and Clinical Research,5(2); DOI:10.31579/2834-5126/141

Copyright: © 2026, Nini Navakumar. This is an open access article distributed under the creative commons’ attribution license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: 24 February 2026 | Accepted: 19 March 2026 | Published: 23 March 2026

Keywords: agenda; covid-19; police; perception; security

Abstract

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) during pregnancy is rare but associated with significant maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality. Management follows the general principles of ARDS but requires adaptations for pregnancy physiology, fetal monitoring, and delivery planning. This review synthesizes current understanding based on the 2024 Global Definition of ARDS, the Global Library of Women’s Medicine (GLOWM), Critical Care in Obstetrics (Dharani K., Wiley), and Fishman’s Pulmonary Diseases & Disorders, with recent evidence and guidelines [1–4].

1.Introduction & Epidemiology

ARDS is an acute inflammatory lung injury characterized by non-cardiogenic pulmonary edema, hypoxemia, and decreased lung compliance [2]. In pregnancy, both obstetric and non-obstetric causes contribute—sepsis, pneumonia, aspiration, transfusion-related injury, pre-eclampsia, or amniotic fluid embolism [3]. Incidence estimates range from 0.05–0.3 % of pregnancies, but ARDS remains a major reason for obstetric ICU admission. Physiological changes in pregnancy—reduced functional residual capacity, increased O₂ consumption, and hypercoagulability—reduce respiratory reserve and complicate treatment [4, 5].

2. Definition — 2024 Global Definition of ARDS and its Application in Pregnancy

The 2024 Global Definition of ARDS, jointly proposed by ATS/ESICM, expands upon the Berlin 2012 definition [1]. It recognises patients on various forms of respiratory support—mechanical ventilation (MV), non-invasive ventilation (NIV), CPAP, or high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO ≥ 30 L min⁻¹)—as eligible for diagnosis.

Diagnostic criteria:

Timing: Within 1 week of a known insult or new/worsening respiratory symptoms.

Imaging: Bilateral opacities on chest X-ray, CT, or lung ultrasound not explained by effusion, collapse, or nodules.

Origin of oedema: Respiratory failure not fully explained by cardiac failure or fluid overload (supported by echocardiography).

Oxygenation:

PaO₂/FiO₂ 300 mmHg or SpO₂/FiO₂ 315 (if SpO₂ 97 %), while on MV, NIV/CPAP (PEEP 5 cmH₂O) or HFNO 30 L min⁻¹.

Severity: Mild (200 < PaO₂/FiO₂ 300), Moderate (100 < PaO₂/FiO₂ 200), Severe (PaO₂/FiO₂ 100).

This update supports earlier recognition of ARDS in pregnant patients who have not yet required intubation, encouraging timely intervention and use of bedside lung ultrasound as a valid diagnostic tool in obstetric units [1, 4].

3. Pathophysiology & Pregnancy-specific Considerations

Pregnancy elevates the diaphragm, reduces functional residual capacity, and induces baseline respiratory alkalosis. Oxygen consumption rises by 20–30 %, and desaturation occurs more rapidly during apnea [2, 5]. Increased cardiac output and plasma volume complicate fluid balance, while a hypercoagulable state heightens thrombotic risk—key for ECMO planning. Clinicians must balance lung protection with uteroplacental perfusion.

4. Diagnosis & Initial Assessment

Diagnosis applies the global definition criteria using imaging and oxygenation indices. Echocardiography differentiates cardiogenic from non-cardiogenic edema. Investigations include cultures, viral PCRs, and inflammatory markers to identify underlying causes. Continuous cardiotocography is recommended for viable gestations. GLOWM underscores the importance of early obstetric–critical-care collaboration to optimise maternal–fetal outcomes [3].

5. Management Principles in Pregnancy

Management integrates supportive care, ventilatory protection, and cause-specific therapy [6–8].

Oxygenation: Maintain maternal SpO₂ 94 % to preserve fetal oxygenation.

Fluids: Employ a conservative post-resuscitation approach to reduce pulmonary edema.

Ventilation: Use tidal volume 4–8 mL kg⁻¹ PBW and plateau pressure 30 cm H₂O. Permissive hypercapnia is restricted because fetal CO₂ retention can cause acidosis [5].

Prone positioning: Increasing evidence supports prone positioning in moderate-to-severe ARDS during pregnancy when abdominal pressure is carefully off-loaded [7].

Corticosteroids: Administer for inflammatory etiologies (e.g., COVID-19) and for fetal lung maturation when preterm delivery is expected [6].

Pharmacotherapy: Choose antibiotics, antivirals, and immunomodulators considering fetal safety.

6. Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO)

ECMO is the rescue option for refractory hypoxemia. The ELSO registry (2023) reports favorable maternal survival when managed in experienced centers [6]. Pregnancy-specific challenges include anticoagulation, uteroplacental perfusion, and timing of delivery. Both GLOWM and Dharani K. stress multidisciplinary planning—critical care, obstetrics, anesthesia, perfusion, and neonatology—with continuous fetal monitoring [3, 4, 6].

7. Timing of Delivery & Obstetric Considerations

Delivery decisions must be individualized. Although delivery may improve lung mechanics, it does not always improve oxygenation [3, 4]. Indications include obstetric emergencies (non-reassuring fetal status, hemorrhage) or refractory maternal hypoxemia despite maximal support. Cesarean section under critical conditions carries high risk; planned delivery should involve optimization and team readiness for ECMO backup.

8. Maternal & Fetal Outcomes

Advances in ventilatory support and ECMO have improved maternal survival, yet preterm birth and neonatal morbidity remain frequent [6, 9]. Viral pneumonia (influenza, SARS-CoV-2) remains the dominant cause in recent years. Preventive strategies—vaccination, infection control, and antenatal screening—are vital. Survivors should undergo long-term pulmonary follow-up similar to non-pregnant ARDS survivors [2, 10].

9. Evidence Gaps & Research Directions

Pregnancy-specific randomized data are lacking. Research priorities include defining optimal maternal PaCO₂/SpO₂ targets, evaluating proning safety by gestational age, and developing ECMO anticoagulation protocols. Prospective registries integrating maternal and neonatal outcomes are critical [4, 6].

10. Conclusion

ARDS in pregnancy demands prompt recognition and coordinated multidisciplinary management. The 2024 Global Definition enhances diagnostic inclusivity by incorporating HFNO, NIV, and SpO₂-based criteria, facilitating earlier detection in pregnant women. Lung-protective ventilation, conservative fluids, and cause-specific therapy remain central. Prone positioning and ECMO are feasible in expert hands, and individualized delivery timing is crucial. Collaboration between obstetric, critical-care, and neonatal teams is the cornerstone of improved outcomes [1–6].

References

Clinical Trials and Clinical Research: I am delighted to provide a testimonial for the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and the exceptional quality of the journal for my article entitled “Effect of Traditional Moxibustion in Assisting the Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients.” The peer review process for my article was rigorous and thorough, ensuring that only high-quality research is published in the journal. The reviewers provided valuable feedback and constructive criticism that greatly improved the clarity and scientific rigor of my study. Their expertise and attention to detail helped me refine my research methodology and strengthen the overall impact of my findings. I would also like to express my gratitude for the exceptional support I received from the editorial office throughout the publication process. The editorial team was prompt, professional, and highly responsive to all my queries and concerns. Their guidance and assistance were instrumental in navigating the submission and revision process, making it a seamless and efficient experience. Furthermore, I am impressed by the outstanding quality of the journal itself. The journal’s commitment to publishing cutting-edge research in the field of stroke rehabilitation is evident in the diverse range of articles it features. The journal consistently upholds rigorous scientific standards, ensuring that only the most impactful and innovative studies are published. This commitment to excellence has undoubtedly contributed to the journal’s reputation as a leading platform for stroke rehabilitation research. In conclusion, I am extremely satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the overall quality of the journal for my article. I wholeheartedly recommend this journal to researchers and clinicians interested in stroke rehabilitation and related fields. The journal’s dedication to scientific rigor, coupled with the exceptional support provided by the editorial office, makes it an invaluable platform for disseminating research and advancing the field.

img

Dr Shiming Tang

Clinical Reviews and Case Reports, The comment form the peer-review were satisfactory. I will cements on the quality of the journal when I receive my hardback copy

img

Hameed khan