Short Communication | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2834-5126/141
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (Ards) In Pregnancy — A Mini-Review Article
- Nini Navakumar *
- Nina Navakumar
- Deepak Paul
Sree Gokulam Medical College Hospital, Trivandrum KIMSHEALTH, Trivandrum Kerala, India.
*Corresponding Author: Nini Navakumar., Sree Gokulam Medical College Hospital, Trivandrum KIMSHEALTH, Trivandrum Kerala, India.
Citation: Nini Navakumar, Nina Navakumar, Deepak Paul, (2026), Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (Ards) In Pregnancy — A Mini-Review Article, Clinical Trials and Clinical Research,5(2); DOI:10.31579/2834-5126/141
Copyright: © 2026, Nini Navakumar. This is an open access article distributed under the creative commons’ attribution license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 24 February 2026 | Accepted: 19 March 2026 | Published: 23 March 2026
Keywords: agenda; covid-19; police; perception; security
Abstract
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) during pregnancy is rare but associated with significant maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality. Management follows the general principles of ARDS but requires adaptations for pregnancy physiology, fetal monitoring, and delivery planning. This review synthesizes current understanding based on the 2024 Global Definition of ARDS, the Global Library of Women’s Medicine (GLOWM), Critical Care in Obstetrics (Dharani K., Wiley), and Fishman’s Pulmonary Diseases & Disorders, with recent evidence and guidelines [1–4].
1.Introduction & Epidemiology
ARDS is an acute inflammatory lung injury characterized by non-cardiogenic pulmonary edema, hypoxemia, and decreased lung compliance [2]. In pregnancy, both obstetric and non-obstetric causes contribute—sepsis, pneumonia, aspiration, transfusion-related injury, pre-eclampsia, or amniotic fluid embolism [3]. Incidence estimates range from 0.05–0.3 % of pregnancies, but ARDS remains a major reason for obstetric ICU admission. Physiological changes in pregnancy—reduced functional residual capacity, increased O₂ consumption, and hypercoagulability—reduce respiratory reserve and complicate treatment [4, 5].
2. Definition — 2024 Global Definition of ARDS and its Application in Pregnancy
The 2024 Global Definition of ARDS, jointly proposed by ATS/ESICM, expands upon the Berlin 2012 definition [1]. It recognises patients on various forms of respiratory support—mechanical ventilation (MV), non-invasive ventilation (NIV), CPAP, or high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO ≥ 30 L min⁻¹)—as eligible for diagnosis.
Diagnostic criteria:
Timing: Within 1 week of a known insult or new/worsening respiratory symptoms.
Imaging: Bilateral opacities on chest X-ray, CT, or lung ultrasound not explained by effusion, collapse, or nodules.
Origin of oedema: Respiratory failure not fully explained by cardiac failure or fluid overload (supported by echocardiography).
Oxygenation:
PaO₂/FiO₂ ⋜ 300 mmHg or SpO₂/FiO₂ ⋜ 315 (if SpO₂ ⋜ 97 %), while on MV, NIV/CPAP (PEEP ⋝ 5 cmH₂O) or HFNO ⋝ 30 L min⁻¹.
Severity: Mild (200 < PaO₂/FiO₂ ⋜ 300), Moderate (100 < PaO₂/FiO₂ ⋜ 200), Severe (PaO₂/FiO₂ ⋜ 100).
This update supports earlier recognition of ARDS in pregnant patients who have not yet required intubation, encouraging timely intervention and use of bedside lung ultrasound as a valid diagnostic tool in obstetric units [1, 4].
3. Pathophysiology & Pregnancy-specific Considerations
Pregnancy elevates the diaphragm, reduces functional residual capacity, and induces baseline respiratory alkalosis. Oxygen consumption rises by 20–30 %, and desaturation occurs more rapidly during apnea [2, 5]. Increased cardiac output and plasma volume complicate fluid balance, while a hypercoagulable state heightens thrombotic risk—key for ECMO planning. Clinicians must balance lung protection with uteroplacental perfusion.
4. Diagnosis & Initial Assessment
Diagnosis applies the global definition criteria using imaging and oxygenation indices. Echocardiography differentiates cardiogenic from non-cardiogenic edema. Investigations include cultures, viral PCRs, and inflammatory markers to identify underlying causes. Continuous cardiotocography is recommended for viable gestations. GLOWM underscores the importance of early obstetric–critical-care collaboration to optimise maternal–fetal outcomes [3].
5. Management Principles in Pregnancy
Management integrates supportive care, ventilatory protection, and cause-specific therapy [6–8].
Oxygenation: Maintain maternal SpO₂ ⋝ 94 % to preserve fetal oxygenation.
Fluids: Employ a conservative post-resuscitation approach to reduce pulmonary edema.
Ventilation: Use tidal volume 4–8 mL kg⁻¹ PBW and plateau pressure ⋜ 30 cm H₂O. Permissive hypercapnia is restricted because fetal CO₂ retention can cause acidosis [5].
Prone positioning: Increasing evidence supports prone positioning in moderate-to-severe ARDS during pregnancy when abdominal pressure is carefully off-loaded [7].
Corticosteroids: Administer for inflammatory etiologies (e.g., COVID-19) and for fetal lung maturation when preterm delivery is expected [6].
Pharmacotherapy: Choose antibiotics, antivirals, and immunomodulators considering fetal safety.
6. Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO)
ECMO is the rescue option for refractory hypoxemia. The ELSO registry (2023) reports favorable maternal survival when managed in experienced centers [6]. Pregnancy-specific challenges include anticoagulation, uteroplacental perfusion, and timing of delivery. Both GLOWM and Dharani K. stress multidisciplinary planning—critical care, obstetrics, anesthesia, perfusion, and neonatology—with continuous fetal monitoring [3, 4, 6].
7. Timing of Delivery & Obstetric Considerations
Delivery decisions must be individualized. Although delivery may improve lung mechanics, it does not always improve oxygenation [3, 4]. Indications include obstetric emergencies (non-reassuring fetal status, hemorrhage) or refractory maternal hypoxemia despite maximal support. Cesarean section under critical conditions carries high risk; planned delivery should involve optimization and team readiness for ECMO backup.
8. Maternal & Fetal Outcomes
Advances in ventilatory support and ECMO have improved maternal survival, yet preterm birth and neonatal morbidity remain frequent [6, 9]. Viral pneumonia (influenza, SARS-CoV-2) remains the dominant cause in recent years. Preventive strategies—vaccination, infection control, and antenatal screening—are vital. Survivors should undergo long-term pulmonary follow-up similar to non-pregnant ARDS survivors [2, 10].
9. Evidence Gaps & Research Directions
Pregnancy-specific randomized data are lacking. Research priorities include defining optimal maternal PaCO₂/SpO₂ targets, evaluating proning safety by gestational age, and developing ECMO anticoagulation protocols. Prospective registries integrating maternal and neonatal outcomes are critical [4, 6].
10. Conclusion
ARDS in pregnancy demands prompt recognition and coordinated multidisciplinary management. The 2024 Global Definition enhances diagnostic inclusivity by incorporating HFNO, NIV, and SpO₂-based criteria, facilitating earlier detection in pregnant women. Lung-protective ventilation, conservative fluids, and cause-specific therapy remain central. Prone positioning and ECMO are feasible in expert hands, and individualized delivery timing is crucial. Collaboration between obstetric, critical-care, and neonatal teams is the cornerstone of improved outcomes [1–6].
References
- Global Definition of ARDS (2024). ATS/ESICM Consensus.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Fishman AP et al. (2023). Pulmonary Diseases & Disorders, 6th ed. McGraw-Hill.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - GLOWM. (2023). Acute Lung Injury and ARDS During Pregnancy. Global Library of Women’s Medicine.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Dharani K. (2021). Critical Care in Obstetrics: ARDS in Pregnancy. Wiley Online Library; 2022.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Pandya ST et al. acute respiratory distress syndrome in Pregnancy. J Obstet Anaesth Crit Care.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - (2023). ELSO Guidelines for ECMO in Pregnancy. Extracorporeal Life Support Organization.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - (2013). PROSEVA Study Group. Prone Positioning in Severe ARDS. N Engl J Med.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Lapinsky SE. (2023). Mechanical Ventilation and ARDS in Pregnancy. Chest.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Watts A. (2022). ARDS in Pregnancy: Current Perspectives. Obstetric Medicine.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Lim MJ et al. (2023). Pregnancy and Severe ARDS with COVID-19. Int J Obstet Anesth.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - (2012). Berlin Definition of ARDS. Am J Respir Crit Care Med.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Swenson KE et al. (2021). Pathophysiology and Management of ARDS. Curr Opin Crit Care.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
Clinic