Review | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2834-5126/114
A Seroprevalence Study of Varicella Zoster Virus Among Healthcare Workers in A Tertiary Care Setting
1Department of Virology, Medical Research Institute, Colombo 08, Sri Lanka.
2Postgraduate Institute of Medicine, University of Colombo, Sri Lanka.
3Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Engineering, University of Moratuwa.
*Corresponding Author: J.I Abeynayake, Department of Virology, Medical Research Institute, Colombo 08, Sri Lanka.
Citation: C.S.Botenne, S.De Silva, D.R.T. Jayasundara, B.Samaraweera, J.I Abeynayake, (2025), A Seroprevalence Study of Varicella Zoster Virus Among Healthcare Workers in A Tertiary Care Setting, Clinical Trials and Clinical Research,4(5); DOI:10.31579/2834-5126/114
Copyright: © 2025, J.I Abeynayake. This is an open access article distributed under the creative commons’ attribution license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 25 September 2025 | Accepted: 01 October 2025 | Published: 15 October 2025
Keywords: cyclin e; cell cycle; cancer; targeted therapy; disease
Abstract
Cyclin E is a vital regulator in the cell cycle, primarily governing the transition from the G1 phase to the S phase. By partnering with cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs), it orchestrates a series of phosphorylation events that drive cell cycle progression. However, dysregulation of Cyclin E expression and activity is frequently observed in various pathological conditions, especially cancers, contributing to uncontrolled cell proliferation and tumorigenesis. This review comprehensively summarizes the structural features, biological functions, roles in disease development, and current therapeutic approaches related to Cyclin E. Gaining in-depth insights into Cyclin E’s mechanisms can offer a solid theoretical foundation for the development of more effective and targeted therapeutic strategies.
Abbreviations
ACIP- Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices β- Beta Coefficient
CDC- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention CI-Confidence Interval
DF- Degree of Freedom
ELISA- Enzyme Linked Immunosorbant Assay EXP(B)- Odds Ratio
HCW- Health Care Worker ICU- Intensive Care Units IgG- Immunoglobulin G IQR- Inter Quartile Range IU- International Units
LRH- Lady Ridgeway Hospital
MMWR- Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report NHSL- National Hospital of Sri Lanka
OR-Odds ratio p- Probability
PBU- Premature Baby Care Units RR- Relative Risk
SE-Standard Error
SD- Standard Deviation
SJGH-Sri Jayewardenapura General Hospital SOP- Standard Operating Procedure
VZV-Varicella Zoster Virus
Highlights
- Seroprevalence of Varicella Zoster among study participants was 66.8%
- Seropositivity is significantly associated with age.
- Past history of infection or vaccination increases the likelihood of being seropositive.
Introduction
The cell cycle is a highly coordinated process that ensures proper cell growth, division, and maintenance of tissue homeostasis. Cyclin E, as a key member of the cyclin family, plays a pivotal role in regulating the critical transition from the G1 phase to the S phase, where DNA replication occurs. Upon binding to its cognate cyclin-dependent kinases, mainly CDK2, Cyclin E forms active kinase complexes that phosphorylate numerous downstream targets. In normal cells, the expression and activity of Cyclin E are tightly regulated by a variety of internal and external signals. Nevertheless, in pathological states, particularly in cancers, the delicate balance of Cyclin E regulation is disrupted, leading to abnormal cell cycle progression and contributing significantly to disease development. Exploring the functions, mechanisms, and therapeutic implications of Cyclin E is of great significance for understanding disease pathogenesis and formulating innovative treatment strategies.
2. Structure of Cyclin E
2.1 Domain structure
Cyclin E possesses a characteristic structural architecture. It contains a conserved cyclin box, which is approximately 100 amino acids long and serves as the binding site for CDK2. The cyclin box folds into an α-helical structure that precisely fits into the corresponding groove on CDK2, enabling the formation of the Cyclin E-CDK2 complex. In addition to the cyclin box, Cyclin E has an N-terminal region and a C-terminal region. The N-terminal region often contains regulatory motifs that can be modified by phosphorylation, acetylation, or other post-translational modifications, which in turn affect the stability and activity of Cyclin E. The C-terminal region may participate in protein-protein interactions, influencing the subcellular localization and functional regulation of the Cyclin E-CDK2 complex [1].
2.2 Structural insights from crystallography
X-ray crystallography and cryo-electron microscopy studies have provided detailed structural information about the Cyclin E-CDK2 complex. These structural analyses have revealed the precise molecular interactions between Cyclin E and CDK2 during complex formation. They show how Cyclin E binding induces conformational changes in CDK2, exposing the active site and enhancing its kinase activity. The structural insights also help in understanding the interactions between the Cyclin E-CDK2 complex and its substrates, laying a foundation for the rational design of small molecule inhibitors that can disrupt the complex or inhibit its kinase activity [2].
3. Biological functions of Cyclin E
3.1 Regulation of the cell cycle
The primary function of Cyclin E is to drive cells from the G1 phase into the S phase. As cells approach the G1/S transition, the expression of Cyclin E gradually increases. The newly synthesized Cyclin E binds to CDK2, forming the active Cyclin E-CDK2 complex. This complex phosphorylates key substrates, such as the retinoblastoma protein (Rb). Phosphorylation of Rb leads to the release of the transcription factor E2F, which then activates the transcription of genes required for DNA replication, including those encoding DNA polymerases, helicases, and other replication factors. Cyclin E also plays a role in coordinating the assembly of the pre-replication complex, ensuring the accurate initiation of DNA replication. Moreover, it can integrate various extracellular and intracellular signals, such as growth factor signaling and DNA damage responses, to finely tune the G1/S transition [3].
3.2 Non-cell cycle functions
Beyond its role in cell cycle regulation, Cyclin E has been reported to have non-cell cycle functions. It can participate in the regulation of gene transcription. The Cyclin E-CDK2 complex can phosphorylate transcription factors other than Rb, influencing the expression of genes involved in cell metabolism, angiogenesis, and cell adhesion. In addition, Cyclin E has been implicated in the regulation of centrosome duplication. Centrosomes are essential for proper spindle formation and chromosome segregation during cell division. Dysregulation of Cyclin E can lead to abnormal centrosome duplication, which may contribute to genomic instability [4].
4. Cyclin E in diseases
4.1 Cancers
Dysregulation of Cyclin E is a common occurrence in many types of cancers. Overexpression of Cyclin E is frequently observed in breast cancer, lung cancer, and ovarian cancer. In breast cancer, high levels of Cyclin E are associated with tumor progression, poor prognosis, and resistance to chemotherapy. Amplification of the CCNE1 gene, which encodes Cyclin E1, can lead to excessive production of Cyclin E, resulting in hyperactivation of the Cyclin E-CDK2 complex. This hyperactivity promotes continuous cell cycle progression, bypassing normal growth control mechanisms and driving tumor cell proliferation. Moreover, abnormal Cyclin E expression can contribute to cancer cell invasion and metastasis by modulating the expression of genes related to cell motility and extracellular matrix remodeling [5].
4.2 Other diseases
Cyclin E is also involved in non-cancerous diseases. In neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer's disease, abnormal regulation of Cyclin E has been reported. In neurons, dysregulated Cyclin E expression may disrupt normal cell cycle processes, leading to neuronal apoptosis and cognitive decline. In cardiovascular diseases, Cyclin E plays a role in the regulation of vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation. Dysregulation of Cyclin E can contribute to the abnormal proliferation of smooth muscle cells in the arterial wall, which is an important process in the development of atherosclerosis [6].
5. Therapeutic strategies targeting Cyclin E
5.1 Small molecule inhibitors
Small molecule inhibitors targeting the Cyclin E-CDK2 axis have become a focus of drug development. Some inhibitors are designed to bind to the ATP-binding pocket of CDK2, preventing the phosphorylation of downstream substrates and blocking cell cycle progression at the G1/S transition. For example, flavopiridol, an early CDK inhibitor with activity against multiple CDKs including CDK2 associated with Cyclin E, has shown potential in preclinical studies. However, its clinical application has been limited by toxicity and issues related to selectivity. Currently, more selective small molecule inhibitors of Cyclin E-CDK2 are being developed, aiming to specifically target the abnormal activity of this complex in cancer cells while minimizing effects on normal cells [7].
5.2 Antibody-based therapies
Antibody-based approaches targeting Cyclin E are emerging as potential therapeutic strategies. Monoclonal antibodies can be engineered to specifically bind to Cyclin E, blocking its interaction with CDK2 or promoting its degradation. These antibodies can also be conjugated with cytotoxic payloads to directly kill cells with dysregulated Cyclin E expression. Although still in the preclinical and early clinical development stages, antibody-based therapies offer the advantage of high specificity, potentially providing more targeted treatment compared to small molecule inhibitors [8].
5.3 Combination therapies
Combination therapies that combine Cyclin E-CDK2 inhibitors with other anti-cancer agents or treatment modalities are being actively explored. For instance, combining CDK2 inhibitors with DNA-damaging chemotherapy drugs may enhance the sensitivity of cancer cells to treatment by disrupting the cell cycle and interfering with DNA repair mechanisms. Additionally, combining Cyclin E-targeted therapies with immunotherapies may modulate the tumor microenvironment and enhance anti-tumor immune responses. In non-cancer diseases, combination therapies involving Cyclin E regulation along with other disease-specific treatments may also offer more effective therapeutic options [9].
6. Challenges and future directions
Despite the progress in Cyclin E-targeted therapy, several challenges remain. One major challenge is the development of resistance to inhibitors in cancer cells. Resistance mechanisms may include upregulation of alternative cyclin-CDK complexes, mutations in CDKs or associated regulatory proteins, and activation of compensatory signaling pathways. Understanding these resistance mechanisms and developing strategies to overcome them are crucial for improving treatment efficacy. Another challenge is the potential off-target effects of small molecule inhibitors, which may affect normal cells with high proliferative activity. Developing more selective and less toxic inhibitors is an important goal. In the future, further research on the non-cell cycle functions of Cyclin E may uncover new therapeutic targets and strategies. The application of advanced technologies, such as artificial intelligence in drug design and high-throughput screening, may accelerate the discovery of novel Cyclin E-targeted drugs and combination therapies.
References
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2024) About Chickenpox.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Laing, K.J., Ouwendijk, W.J., Koelle, D.M. and Verjans, G.M. (2018) Immunobiology of varicella-zoster virus infection. The Journal of infectious diseases 218(suppl_2), pp. S68-S74.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2024) Clinical Features of Chickenpox (Varicella).
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2011) Immunization of health-care personnel: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). Recommendations and reports: Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports 60(RR-7), pp.1-45
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, (2007) Prevention of varicella: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 56(4), pp.1-40.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Munasingha, H.M., Amarasinghe, A., Malavige, N.G. and Sathiakumar, N. (2018) Seroprevalence of varicella zoster virus in Colombo district, Sri Lanka. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine 11(1), p.53.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Premathilake, I.P., Aluthbaduge, P., Senanayake, C.P., Jayalatharachchi, R., Gamage, S. et al. (2019) Susceptibility for varicella and factors associated with immunity among pregnant women in a tertiary care hospital in Sri Lanka-a cross-sectional study. BioMed Central infectious diseases 19(1), pp.1-6
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Shah, S., Singhal, T., Naik, R. and Thakkar, P. (2018) High prevalence of varicella seronegativity in nurses at a tertiary care private hospital in Mumbai, India. Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology 36(2), pp.294-295
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Bollaerts, K., Riera-Montes, M., Heininger, U., Hens, N., Souverain, A., et al. (2017) A systematic review of varicella seroprevalence in European countries before universal childhood immunization: deriving incidence from seroprevalence data. Epidemiology & Infection 145(13), pp.2666-2677.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Goh, A.E.N., Choi, E.H., Chokephaibulkit, K., Choudhury, J., Kuter, B., et al. (2019). Burden of varicella in the Asia Pacific region: a systematic literature review. Expert review of vaccines 18(5), pp.475-493
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Hamborsky, J., Kroger, A. and Wolfe, C. eds. (2015) Epidemiology and prevention of 41 vaccine-preventable diseases: the Pink Book: Course Textbook.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Seward, J.F. and Marin, M. (2014) Varicella disease burden and varicella vaccines. Proceedings of the WHO SAGE Meeting.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Al-Kindi, N., Al-Maskari, Z., Al-Kindi, H. and Al-Jardani, A. (2017) Serostatus of Measles, Mumps, Rubella and Varicella in Healthcare Workers in Oman. Global Journal of Immunology and Allergic Diseases 5, pp.1-5.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Zanella, B., Bechini, A., Bonito, B., Del Riccio, M., Ninci, A., Tiscione, E., Working Group DHS, Working Group AOUMeyer, Working Group AUSLTC, Bonanni, P. and Boccalini, S., (2021). A Study of Varicella Seroprevalence in a Pediatric and Adolescent Population in Florence (Italy). Natural Infection and VaccinationAcquired Immunization. Vaccines 9(2), p.152
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Gabutti, G., Grassi, T., Bagordo, F., Savio, M., Rota, M.C., et al. (2023) Sero Epidemiological Study of Varicella in the Italian General Population. Vaccines, 11(2), p.306.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Yun, J.H., Lee, E., Choi, J.H., Ki, H.K. and Park, J. (2022) Seroprevalence of Varicella-Zoster Virus and Measles among Healthcare Workers in a Tertiary Medical Center in Korea. Vaccines 10(11), p.1956.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Wu, M.F., Yang, Y.W., Lin, W.Y., Chang, C.Y., Soon, M.S. and Liu, C.E. (2012) Varicella zoster virus infection among healthcare workers in Taiwan: seroprevalence and predictive value of history of varicella infection. Journal of Hospital Infection 80(2), pp.162-167.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2021) About the Varicella Vaccine.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Kuter, B.A.R.B.A.R.A., Matthews, H.O.L.L.Y., Shinefield, H.E.N.R.Y., Black, S., Dennehy, P., Watson, B.A.R.B.A.R.A., et al. (2004) Ten-year follow-up of healthy children who received one or two injections of varicella vaccine. The Pediatric infectious disease journal 23(2), pp.132-137.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Amanna, I.J., Carlson, N.E. and Slifka, M.K. (2007) Duration of humoral immunity to common viral and vaccine antigens. New England Journal of Medicine 357(19), pp.1903-1915
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Duncan, J.R., Witkop, C.T., Webber, B.J. and Costello,A.A. (2017) Varicella seroepidemiology in United States air force recruits: A retrospective cohort study comparing immunogenicity of varicella vaccination and natural infection. Vaccine 35(18), pp.2351-2357.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar