Advertisement

The aetiology and pathophysiology of anaphylaxis.!

Short Communication | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2834-5010/016

The aetiology and pathophysiology of anaphylaxis.!

  • Hilary Denis Solomons *

P.O.Box 64203, Highlands North, 2037. South Africa. 

*Corresponding Author: H.D.Solomons, P.O.Box 64203, Highlands North, 2037. South Africa.

Citation: Hilary Denis Solomons., (2024). The aetiology and pathophysiology of anaphylaxis.! International Journal of Clinical Therapeutics. 3(4); DOI: 10.31579/2834-5010/016

Copyright: © 2024, Hilary Denis Solomons. Nguyen., this is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: 03 May 2024 | Accepted: 20 June 2024 | Published: 25 July 2024

Keywords: cardiac; lungs; cells; allergy

Abstract

The eosinophil count  in helminthic  infestations is  usually  higher than in allergic  diatheses. The dorsal horn cell in  the  spinal cord  have  pruritic receptors  that  cause itching  and  react to  histamine  and tryptase release  from  the mast  cells .

Introduction

There Appears To Be A Complex Relationship Between Eosinopls, Mast Cells (Tissue basophils) and dorsal horn receptor pruritus cells  in  the aetiology  of  anaphylactic or  anaphylactoid reactions . The most important cell is the mast cell as this cell releases histamine and tryptase which causes bronchospasm and ultimately  results  in anaphylaxis. But most  people  with allergic  diatheses  have  a high eosinophil  count . This usually  matches  the ig e level. Eosinophils release  eosinophil  chemotactic factor  and eosinophil cationic  protein. The eosinophil count  in helminthic  infestations is  usually  higher than in allergic  diatheses . The dorsal horn cell in  the  spinal cord  have  pruritic receptors  that  cause itching  and  react to  histamine  and tryptase release  from  the mast  cells . So there  is a  complex  relationship between  eosinophils , mast  cells and dorsal horn pruritic receptor  cells. Chemotactic  factors such  as  hymenoptera stings  ,peanut  allergy and  other  allergens initiate  a cascade  of events  that result  ultimately in the  demise of the patient  unless  adrenalin in the  form of epiject  is  given.. Antihistamines and steroids  may also  be of some  help . Severe asthma  is  a  type  of anaphylactic  reaction and  here the bronchospasm  must be broken. The same  complex relationship between  the mast  cell, the  eosinophil and  the dorsal horn  pruritic  receptor cell applies . There is  a complex  feedback mechanism that  down regulates  and controls  the  intricate events  that  lead to  anaphylaxis and  ultimately death  !  Post mortem histology on patients  who  have died  of  anaphylaxis show marked bronchospasm,pulmonary oedema  and  severe congestive  cardiac  failure with high eosinophil counts in the congested lungs .often this  is  found after ingestion  of  shellfish ,gluten ,pork  etc.. The adrenalin  can  be given intramuscularly  if necessary  and theopyllin  derivatives may be  of some  value ..leukotrienes have  been implicated  as  has compliment  and properdin !.

References

Clinical Trials and Clinical Research: I am delighted to provide a testimonial for the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and the exceptional quality of the journal for my article entitled “Effect of Traditional Moxibustion in Assisting the Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients.” The peer review process for my article was rigorous and thorough, ensuring that only high-quality research is published in the journal. The reviewers provided valuable feedback and constructive criticism that greatly improved the clarity and scientific rigor of my study. Their expertise and attention to detail helped me refine my research methodology and strengthen the overall impact of my findings. I would also like to express my gratitude for the exceptional support I received from the editorial office throughout the publication process. The editorial team was prompt, professional, and highly responsive to all my queries and concerns. Their guidance and assistance were instrumental in navigating the submission and revision process, making it a seamless and efficient experience. Furthermore, I am impressed by the outstanding quality of the journal itself. The journal’s commitment to publishing cutting-edge research in the field of stroke rehabilitation is evident in the diverse range of articles it features. The journal consistently upholds rigorous scientific standards, ensuring that only the most impactful and innovative studies are published. This commitment to excellence has undoubtedly contributed to the journal’s reputation as a leading platform for stroke rehabilitation research. In conclusion, I am extremely satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the overall quality of the journal for my article. I wholeheartedly recommend this journal to researchers and clinicians interested in stroke rehabilitation and related fields. The journal’s dedication to scientific rigor, coupled with the exceptional support provided by the editorial office, makes it an invaluable platform for disseminating research and advancing the field.

img

Dr Shiming Tang

Clinical Reviews and Case Reports, The comment form the peer-review were satisfactory. I will cements on the quality of the journal when I receive my hardback copy

img

Hameed khan