Advertisement

Evaluating the Impact of Culturally Targeted Stroke Prevention Programs

Review Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2835-8295/125

Evaluating the Impact of Culturally Targeted Stroke Prevention Programs

  • Vivian Liang
  • Garrett Chin
  • James Keane
  • Leonard B. Goldstein

Assistant Vice President for Clinical Education Development, A.T. Still University. 

*Corresponding Author: 10.31579/2835-8295/125

Citation: Vivian Liang, Garrett Chin, James Keane, Leonard B. Goldstein, (2025), Evaluating the Impact of Culturally Targeted Stroke Prevention Programs, International Journal of Clinical Reports and Studies, 4(4); DOI:10.31579/2835-8295/125

Copyright: © 2025, Leonard B. Goldstein. This is an open-access artic le distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Received: 06 May 2025 | Accepted: 18 June 2025 | Published: 04 July 2025

Keywords: acutest elevation myocardial infarction; cardiogenic shock; percutaneous coronary intervention; double culprit vessel occlusion

Abstract

Stroke remains a leading cause of disability and death in the United States, disproportionately affecting Black, Latinx, and Asian or Pacific Islander populations. Atrial Fibrillation (AF), a prevalent arrhythmia, further elevates stroke risk. This article reviews the impact of culturally tailored prevention programs on health equity, particularly in underserved populations. Evidence from studies highlights the effectiveness of culturally specific education in improving stroke awareness, prevention behaviors, and emergency response in minority communities. Programs that integrate cultural beliefs and address systemic barriers show promise in reducing stroke-related disparities. However, challenges in sustaining long-term behavior change and addressing healthcare access persist. Future research should focus on refining these programs, fostering trust between patients and providers, and overcoming systemic obstacles to improve stroke outcomes for all populations. 

Introduction

Stroke is a leading cause of serious long-term disability and death in the United States [1, 2].  Black and Latinx populations are disproportionately affected by stroke and are likely to experience gaps in health care. Black, Latinx, and Asian or Pacific Islander individuals lag and suffer more from adverse stroke-related outcomes compared to Caucasians, including higher rates of recurrent stroke [3, 4] Black Americans are currently at the highest risk of mortality, with Latinx men projected to have the highest increase in stroke mortality rates by 2030 [5]. Atrial Fibrillation (AF) is the prevailing cardiac arrhythmia in clinical practice, afflicting a current global population of 335 million people, resulting in an overall prevalence rate of 2.9%.  This burden of AF is underscored by its well-established role as a risk factor for ischemic stroke [6,7]. This article will examine the impact of culturally targeted stroke prevention programs, and how we may achieve health equity in the prevention of ischemic stroke for all populations.

Discussion:

Results from various studies highlight the critical role of culturally tailored programs in addressing stroke disparities among minority populations. The “South Asian Health Awareness About Stroke” (SAHAS) program, which provided culturally appropriate stroke education in South Asians in New Jersey, demonstrated a modest but significant improvement in stroke knowledge. This finding supports the notion that culturally targeted interventions can improve stroke awareness and outcomes in high-risk populations, especially when the content is tailored to address cultural practices and beliefs (8). Singh et al.’s systematic review of community-based culturally tailored education programs for Black communities demonstrated that such programs could significantly improve health outcomes related to stroke, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and hypertension. The review emphasized the need for interventions that address cultural and systemic barriers, illustrating the importance of culturally informed models of care in reducing stroke risk [9].  The “Worth the Walk” intervention for Latino, Korean, Chinese, and White seniors, as described by Menkin et al., showed that culturally tailored interventions could enhance physical activity and stroke preparedness. While the program was successful in increasing daily steps and improving stroke knowledge, it highlighted challenges in sustaining long-term behavior change, particularly in the absence of continued intervention [10]. A study evaluating the effectiveness of two 12-minute culturally tailored stroke films found that these narrative-based interventions increased participants’ intent to call 911 during a stroke event. These findings suggest that culturally relevant media can be a powerful tool in promoting timely stroke response and improving stroke outcomes in Black and Hispanic communities [11].  Choi et al.’s focus group study on developing a stroke prevention walking program for Korean immigrant seniors found that incorporating cultural beliefs, such as the concept of “Hwa” (bottled anger), into stroke education could enhance the program’s effectiveness. The study emphasized that addressing fatalistic attitudes and culturally specific barriers is crucial to designing successful interventions [12]. Levine et al.’s examination of various stroke prevention and treatment interventions concluded that culturally targeted programs addressing hypertension, diabetes, and stroke awareness have the potential to reduce racial and ethnic disparities in stroke outcomes. However, the effectiveness of these programs is often limited by systemic issues such as access to care and healthcare provider biases [13]. A recent study by Shankar et al. compared the experiences of white and minority stroke patients and providers at MedStar Georgetown University Hospital. The study expanded upon significant disparities in patient-provider communication and perceived support. The comparison identified minorities feeling less understood and supported than whites. This difference underscores the vital importance of culturally tailored interventions in closing the communication gap and harmonizing the concerns of patients and providers, especially within minority communities [14]. The results suggest that culturally tailored programs work by addressing specific cultural beliefs, values, and barriers that may hinder stroke prevention efforts in minority populations. For instance, the inclusion of culturally relevant content in the SAHAS program improved stroke awareness by making the information more relatable and actionable for South Asian participants. Similarly, the narrative-based media interventions for Black and Hispanic populations improved emergency response behaviors by presenting stroke education in a culturally resonant format. The strengths of the reviewed studies lie in their focus on culturally targeted interventions, which are critical for addressing health disparities. These programs demonstrate the potential to improve stroke knowledge, preventive behaviors, and emergency response in high-risk populations. Furthermore, culturally tailored interventions are essential for addressing specific beliefs, barriers, and facilitators unique to each community. However, several limitations exist across the studies. For example, the sustainability of behavior changes induced by short-term interventions, such as the walking programs and media interventions, remain uncertain. Additionally, the variability in program designs and outcomes makes it challenging to compare their effectiveness. More research is needed to explore the long-term impact of culturally tailored interventions and to identify the most effective strategies for diverse populations.  The findings of the reviewed studies are consistent with broader research on health disparities and culturally tailored interventions. Studies have shown that culturally sensitive health education can reduce disparities in chronic disease outcomes. However, the research also highlights the persistent challenges of achieving long-term behavior change and addressing systemic barriers to care.  Several confounding factors may influence the results of the studies. Socioeconomic status, language barriers, and access to healthcare were common challenges across the programs. These factors, which are often intertwined with race and ethnicity, may have limited the effectiveness of some interventions. Furthermore, variations in program delivery and participant engagement may have contributed to differences in outcomes. 

Conclusion:

Culturally targeted stroke prevention programs have the potential to reduce health disparities and promote health equity, particularly in high-risk populations such as Black, Latinx, and Asian communities. These programs are most effective when they address cultural beliefs, barriers, and facilitators unique to each community, and when they incorporate culturally relevant education and behavioral interventions. However, the sustainability of behavior changes and the long-term impact of these programs remain as areas for further research. Future studies should focus on developing and evaluating long-term culturally tailored interventions, with an emphasis on addressing systemic barriers to care and fostering trust between healthcare providers and minority patients. By continuing to refine and expand culturally sensitive stroke prevention programs, we can work towards achieving health equity and reducing the burden of stroke across all populations.

References

Clinical Trials and Clinical Research: I am delighted to provide a testimonial for the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and the exceptional quality of the journal for my article entitled “Effect of Traditional Moxibustion in Assisting the Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients.” The peer review process for my article was rigorous and thorough, ensuring that only high-quality research is published in the journal. The reviewers provided valuable feedback and constructive criticism that greatly improved the clarity and scientific rigor of my study. Their expertise and attention to detail helped me refine my research methodology and strengthen the overall impact of my findings. I would also like to express my gratitude for the exceptional support I received from the editorial office throughout the publication process. The editorial team was prompt, professional, and highly responsive to all my queries and concerns. Their guidance and assistance were instrumental in navigating the submission and revision process, making it a seamless and efficient experience. Furthermore, I am impressed by the outstanding quality of the journal itself. The journal’s commitment to publishing cutting-edge research in the field of stroke rehabilitation is evident in the diverse range of articles it features. The journal consistently upholds rigorous scientific standards, ensuring that only the most impactful and innovative studies are published. This commitment to excellence has undoubtedly contributed to the journal’s reputation as a leading platform for stroke rehabilitation research. In conclusion, I am extremely satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the overall quality of the journal for my article. I wholeheartedly recommend this journal to researchers and clinicians interested in stroke rehabilitation and related fields. The journal’s dedication to scientific rigor, coupled with the exceptional support provided by the editorial office, makes it an invaluable platform for disseminating research and advancing the field.

img

Dr Shiming Tang

Clinical Reviews and Case Reports, The comment form the peer-review were satisfactory. I will cements on the quality of the journal when I receive my hardback copy

img

Hameed khan