Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2834-5177/044
Dual Cannabis-Methamphetamine Use Doubles Bipolar Disorder Risk After Psychosis: A 25-Year Inpatient Cohort Study from Iran
- Zeinab Khodaparast 1
- Peyman Saeedi 23
- Kobra Hosseini 23
- Haniyeh Rashidi 2
- Mahin Seifialan 23
- Mahya Dorri 4
- Farzaneh Mirsharifi 5
- Elham Molaei Birgani 2
- Hadith Rastad 5*
1Psychiatry Department, Kazae43Avosh Cognitive Behaviour Sciences and Addiction Research Center, Shafa educational - remedial Hospital, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.
2Clinical Research and Development Center of the Kamali Hospital, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran.
3Cardiovascular Research Center, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran.
4Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
*Corresponding Author: Hadith Rastad, Department of Medical Laboratory Techniques, Eldivan Vocational School of Health Services, Çankırı Karatekin University, Çankırı, Turkey.
Citation: Zeinab Khodaparast, Peyman Saeedi, Kobra Hosseini, Haniyeh Rashidi, Mahin Seifialan, et al, (2025), Dual Cannabis-Methamphetamine Use Doubles Bipolar Disorder Risk After Psychosis: A 25-Year Inpatient Cohort Study from Iran, International Journal of Clinical Infectious Diseases, 4(4); DOI:10.31579/2834-5177/044
Copyright: © 2025, Hadith Rastad. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 05 August 2025 | Accepted: 18 August 2025 | Published: 29 August 2025
Keywords: substance-induced psychosis (sip);schizophrenia; bipolar disorder; methamphetamine; cannabis
Abstract
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to estimate transition rates from substance-induced psychosis (SIP) to schizophrenia or bipolar disorder, evaluate the risk associated with dual use of methamphetamine and cannabis, and identify predictors of chronicity among Iranian men.
Methods: A 25-year retrospective cohort study (1999–2024) was conducted using clinical data from Shafa Hospital, a tertiary psychiatric referral center in Guilan Province, Iran. The study included 258 male inpatients aged ≥17 years with SIP attributed to cannabis and/or methamphetamine use. Patients with a history of schizophrenia or bipolar disorder were excluded. Outcomes were validated using DSM-V criteria, and Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazards models were employed for analysis.
Results: Over a median follow-up of 33 months, 37.6% of participants transitioned to schizophrenia (25.2%) or bipolar disorder (12.4%). The median time to conversion was shorter for bipolar disorder (13.4 months) compared to schizophrenia (26.6 months). Dual cannabis- methamphetamine use significantly increased the risk of bipolar disorder (p=0.008). Familial psychiatric history doubled the risk of schizophrenia (HR=4.29, 95% CI: 2.48–7.41) and tripled the risk of bipolar disorder (HR=3.89, 95% CI: 1.87–8.11). Recurrent hospitalizations were associated with increased risks for both schizophrenia (HR=1.34) and bipolar disorder (HR=2.64). The cumulative incidence of schizophrenia rose linearly to 67.6% at 10 years.
Conclusion: SIP poses a significant risk for the development of schizophrenia or bipolar disorder, particularly in cases involving dual-substance use, younger age, familial psychiatric history, and frequent hospitalizations. The findings underscore the need for targeted surveillance, early intervention, and long-term, risk-stratified care models in regions with rising methamphetamine use to reduce SIP-related morbidity
Introduction
Substance use disorders are an expanding global public health problem, and psychoactive substances contribute significantly to morbidity and mortality worldwide (1-3). In Iran, substance use is disproportionately represented by gender with 24.1% of men having used compared to 2.2% of women(4). Among the severe abstinence complications from substance abuse, Substance- Induced Psychosis (SIP)—an acute psychotic disorder brought on by exposure to drugs—is under criticism regarding its potential transition into chronic psychiatric disease (5-7). While SIP disappears with drug discontinuation, the latest evidence presents that most of the patients progress into chronic psychiatric illnesses like schizophrenia and bipolar illness, challenging the long- established contention of SIP being a self-limited benign sickness(5, 8, 9).
Such individuals are often lost to follow-up and are not usually part of studies (6, 10). Recent literature on SIP transitions is limited and geographically skewed, with most studies being conducted in Europe and North America (6, 11). There remain critical gaps, most prominently in dual substance synergism and regional variation in substance profiles, and considerable controversy for transition rate from SIP to schizophrenia or bipolar disorder and risk factors (6, 12, 13). Methamphetamine trafficking has risen in the Middle East (14), and use of cannabis is on the rise globally (2, 15), but the combined neuropsychiatric hazard of concurrent use of multiple substances by mass numbers of drug users (9), remains underinvestigated. Also, while transition into schizophrenia has been well studied, progression into bipolar disorder is not as well researched, although it is clearly clinically significant (9, 11). Understanding of the process and the factors of risk would be crucial to prevention interventions and managements (6, 10, 12, 13). This retrospective cohort study bridges these gaps by investigating the incidence and predictors of SIP progression to schizophrenia or bipolar disorder in an underrepresented group: Iranian men.
Based on 25 years of clinical data from a tertiary psychiatric referral center, we aim to (1) quantify transition rates to schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, (2) evaluate the synergistic risk of concurrent cannabis and methamphetamine use, and (3) identify demographic, family, and clinical risk factors. By focusing on a high-risk population in a region with increasing methamphetamine trafficking, this study provides new information on long-term SIP outcomes, and establishes an evidence base for the creation of targeted early intervention programs in resource-limited environments.
Methods:
Study Design and Setting:
This retrospective cohort study analyzed clinical data of male patients admitted to the Emergency Department (ED) of Shafa Health Center, a tertiary psychiatric referral hospital in Rasht, Iran. Data were retrieved in April 2024 for a period of 25 years (1999–2024). The study contrasted the frequency of occurrence and predictors of conversion from substance-induced psychosis (SIP) to schizophrenia or bipolar disorder, as characterized based on DSM-V criteria (5).
Participants
Patients who were included were male patients aged ≥17 years who had a history of one or more Emergency Department (ED) admissions for SIP due to use of cannabis and/or methamphetamine, with the following complete medical records: medical histories, psychiatric assessments, and discharge summaries. Those with existing diagnoses of schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or schizoaffective disorder before the onset of SIP were excluded. 258 patients were found eligible.
Variables and Measurements:
The study collected information in four main domains: demographic factors (age of initial SIP admission, marital status, employment, education), substance use patterns (primary substances: cannabis-only, methamphetamine-only, or dual; polysubstance history with alcohol and opium), clinical factors (family psychiatric disorder history, history of head trauma, personality disorders), and outcomes (conversion to schizophrenia or bipolar disorder confirmed by two psychiatric assessments).
Dates of both subsequent SIP diagnosis and subsequent psychiatric outcome were recorded to track progression times. Admission patterns were tracked, readmissions two or more ED visits for SIP- related symptoms that occurred at least one week apart. Statistical Analysis
All analysis was performed with R statistical software (version 4.4.2).
Descriptive statistics summarized continuous variables as medians with interquartile ranges (IQRs) and categorical variables as frequencies and percentages. Group differences were established using Mann-Whitney U tests for continuous measures and chi-square or Fisher's exact tests for categorical measures. Patients with missing data were removed to minimize bias. Statistical significance was a two-tailed P value < 0>
The study was approved by the Shafa Educational & Remedial Center Ethics Committee. The Research and Ethics Committee of Alborz University of Medical Sciences (ABZUMS) reviewed and approved the study proposal and waived the requirement for informed consent. All data were anonymized prior to analysis to preserve patient confidentiality.
Result:
This study examined the conversion rates and predictors to schizophrenia or bipolar disorder following SIP after cannabis and/or methamphetamine dependence in 258 inpatient men followed up for a median of 33.3 months (IQR: 17.9-60.9). (Table
Participants were 31.0 years (IQR: 25.0–36.0) with age ≤25 years in 27.5% (n=68). Educationally, 5.4% (n=14) had academic degrees. Admission diagnoses were dual-substance-induced psychosis (55.8%, n=144), methamphetamine-induced psychosis (32.9%, n=85), and cannabis-induced psychosis (11.2%, n=29). In follow-up, 97 patients (incidence risk: 37.60%, 95% CI:31.67- 43.82%) developed schizophrenia or bipolar disorder. Of the transitioned, 65 had schizophrenia (incidence risk: 25.19%, 95% CI:20.02-30.95%), and 32 bipolar disorder (incidence risk: 12.40%, 95% CI:8.64-17.06%). We compared affected participants with their counterparts, no transition group (N=161). The median time from first SIP episode to transition was 20.7 months (IQR: 9.6 - 48.7) that was significantly less in the subjects with family history of psychiatric disorder (13.0 vs. 31.2; P value = 0.019). The median time from first SIP episode to schizophrenia was 26.6 months (IQR: 11.5 – 53.6) (Figure 1), and to bipolar disorder was 13.4 months (IQR: 7.4 – 33.3). (figure.2)
The cumulative incidence (Supplementary Table.1) of schizophrenia increased steadily during follow-up from 15.5% at 2 years to 67.6% at 10 years.
On the other hand, cumulative incidence for bipolar disorder plateaued at 27.7?ter Year 6. Cumulative incidence of transition rates (bipolar disorder or schizophrenia) rose from 22.9% at 2 years to 86.7% at 10 years, crossing 50% in Year 5 and 90% in Year 14. Furthermore, the cumulative incidence of schizophrenia transitions remained consistently higher than bipolar disorder with a difference in cumulative hazards at Year 10 of 40.1% (67.6% vs. 27.7%). (Figure.3). Cumulative incidence for conversion from SIP to schizophrenia and/or bipolar disorder Younger age of first SIP admission (≤25 years) was associated with higher rates of conversion to bipolar disorder (27.1% vs 13.8% in older patients; P value = 0.046), but for conversion to schizophrenia it did not reach significancy.
Family history of psychiatric disorders raised the risk of transition to bipolar disorder (28.4% vs. 9.2%; P value = 0.001), and family history of mood disorders (29.5% vs. 11.1%; P value = 0.007) and substance abuse disorders (32.5% vs. 12.4% P value = 0.007) were also true.
These three associations were statistically not significant for transition to schizophrenia.
Further, family history of schizophrenia demonstrated correlation with both conditions: schizophrenia (64.3% vs. 23.7%; P value < 0 xss=removed xss=removed> 0.05).
Unadjusted Hazard Ratios for Transition :
In univariable Cox regression analysis, the subjects with early age at first SIP admission (≤25 years) were 2.13 times more likely to develop into bipolar disorder (HR = 2.13, 95% CI: 1.05– 4.31).
Increased risk for bipolar disorder was observed with familial psychiatric disorder threefold (HR = 3.89, 95% CI: 1.87–8.11), particularly family history of mood disorder (HR = 3.21, 95% CI:
1.52–6.78), and substance use disorder (HR = 3.67, 95% CI: 1.79–7.50). (Table 2) While dual use of drugs (methamphetamine and marijuana) served as the reference category, use of only methamphetamine was associated with reduced risk of bipolar disorder compared to the reference category (HR = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.16–0.96).
Each additional readmission for SIP raised the risk of bipolar disorder by 164% (HR = 2.64, 95% CI: 1.63–4.27). Family psychiatric history slightly increased the risk for schizophrenia (HR = 1.67, 95% CI: 1.00–2.78), but schizophrenia family history doubled the hazard (HR = 4.29, 95% CI: 2.48–7.41), although less than 25 years was not a predictor for schizophrenia. Each SIP readmission increasingly elevated the risk for schizophrenia by 34% (HR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.18– 1.52). Cannabis use alone lowered overall transition risk compared with dual use (HR = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.15–0.93) All statistically significant correlations were still substantial in age-adjusted bivariable Cox regression analyses, except two associations: (1) between psychiatric disorder family history and conversion to schizophrenia, and (2) between methamphetamine-only use and conversion to bipolar disorder.
Hazard ratios for the transition
Discussion:
This 258 Iranian male inpatient retrospective cohort study of substance-induced psychosis (SIP) due to cannabis and/or methamphetamine identified a 37.6% transition rate to schizophrenia (25.2%) or bipolar disorder (12.4%) over a median follow-up of 33 months.
Key predictors included family history of schizophrenia and multiple SIP readmissions for schizophrenia; early age at first SIP admission (≤25 years), family histories of psychiatric-, mood-, and substance use disorders, dual cannabis-methamphetamine use, and multiple SIP readmissions for bipolar disorder.
These findings are in contrast to the perception of SIP as a transient condition and suggest its value as a marker of high risk of chronic mental illness.
The rate of transition of schizophrenia (25.2%) is in line with meta-analytic returns (22–28%) but greater than lower rates reported in some European research (6–17%) (6, 9, 11, 16–18). These discrepancies could be explained by regional differences in drug profiles, follow-up times, and study designs. Our inpatient sample, which consists of severe cases, also could overestimate transition rates compared with population registries.
For bipolar disorder, the 12.4% transition rate exceeds prior estimates (4.5–8.4%) (9, 11), potentially due to our focus on dual cannabis-methamphetamine use, which elevated bipolar disorder risk to 24.3%. Cumulative incidence of schizophrenia rose steadily from 15.5% at 2 years to 67.6% at 10 years, but the levelled off at 27.7% for bipolar disorder after Year 6. This reflects distinct disease processes and suggests that follow-up for at least many years, particularly among those at highest risk such as dual-substance users or psychiatrically ill parents, is paramount. The increasing trend of chronic incidence of schizophrenia aligns with studies of Norwegian (9) and Danish cohorts (11). Methamphetamine and cannabis were similarly high-risk drugs, with comorbid consumption increasing susceptibility to bipolar disorder. This concurred with existing research linking cannabis-induced psychosis with a higher incidence of schizophrenia transition (34–47.4%) and amphetamines with an elevated risk of psychosis (22–30%) (6, 9, 11, 17, 18, 20). What this study reveals is the need for classification of substances at a fine-grained level in order to assess risk profiles, as many studies aggregate different drug combinations and reduce specificity (6, 9, 18, 20). Younger age (≤25 years) predicted bipolar disorder transitions (HR = 2.13), contrary to studies linking youth to risk for schizophrenia (9, 11, 16–18, 20). Adolescence and early adulthood are critical stages of brain development, and drug exposure during this stage may disrupt neurodevelopmental processes, particularly exposing younger individuals to risk for bipolar disorder pathways (22–26).
Family history of schizophrenia increased the risk of schizophrenia fourfold (HR = 4.29), while family history of mood and substance use disorders predicted bipolar disorder outcomes independently. These findings align with genetic liability models and reinforce the value of family history as a crucial screening tool (17). Kendler et al. (2019) demonstrated that familial psychosis liability predicts conversion, hence making family history a significant screening tool (17).
Repeated SIP readmissions also predicted schizophrenia (HR = 1.34) and bipolar disorder (HR = 2.64), highlighting shortcomings in post-discharge care. The dose-response relationship between readmission frequency and diagnostic progression underlies systemic interventions to prevent recurrent psychosis and emergency department utilization (11, 27–29).
Median transition times were shorter for bipolar disorder (13.4 months) than for schizophrenia (26.6 months), in contrast to some European research (9, 11). This suggests population-specific progression patterns, perhaps based on substance profiles or healthcare access.
SIP may take place in drug-abuse-prone patients with elevated familial risk for drug abuse and intermediate risk for psychosis. Repeated SIP admissions may signify substance-induced recurrences or incipient, unsuspected phases of schizophrenia, challenging the classical discrimination between substance-induced and primary psychiatric disorders (6, 12, 17, 30).
Strengths include well-defined cohort, high-resolution substance classification, and long follow- up. Limitations include single-center recruitment, cohort of males only, use of clinical charts, and irregular follow-up periods. Absence of frequency and dosage data rules out dose-response analyses (6, 10).
Clinically, the implications of these findings highlight risk stratification, early extended follow- up, drug-specific treatments, enhanced post-discharge care, and family-oriented psychoeducation. The inclusion of SIP patients within early multimodal psychosis treatment pathways and maximizing personalized treatments can prevent long-term morbidity (6, 10, 17, 19, 29).
In summary, this research calls attention to the high risk of chronic mental disease after SIP, with 37.6?veloping schizophrenia or bipolar disorder. Dual-substance use, family psychiatric history, and multiple admissions were the critical predictors. The findings contradict the view of SIP as a fleeting phenomenon and underline the importance of early, holistic treatment to forestall long-term morbidity
Funding
No funding was received for this study. The authors declare no financial or material support from any organization.
Competing interests
All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial or non-financial interest in the subject matter discussed in this manuscript.
Acknowledgements:
The authors acknowledge the Clinical Research Development Center of Kamali and Rajaee Hospitals (Alborz University of Medical Sciences) for administrative and technical support.
Authors' information:
Not applicable.
Clinical trial number:
Not applicable. This is not a clinical trial.
References
- Lo TW, Yeung JWK, Tam CHL. 2020; Substance Abuse and Public Health: A Multilevel Perspective and Multiple Responses. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 17(7).
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Hjorthøj C, Larsen MO, Starzer MSK, Nordentoft M. 2021 Annual incidence of cannabis-induced psychosis, other substance-induced psychoses and dually diagnosed schizophrenia and cannabis use disorder in Denmark from 1994 to 2016. Psychol Med.;51(4):617-22.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. HHS, SAMHSA Release 2022 National Survey on Drug Use and Health Data. 2023. Available from: https://www.hhs.gov/about/news/2023/11/13/hhs-samhsa- release-2022-national-survey-drug-use-health-data.html
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Moradinazar M, Najafi F, Jalilian F, Pasdar Y, Hamzeh B, Shakiba E, et al 2020;. Prevalence of drug use, alcohol consumption, cigarette smoking, and measures of socioeconomic-related inequalities of drug use among Iranian people: findings from a national survey. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 15(1):39.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 5th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association;.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Murrie B, Lappin J, Large M, Sara G. 2020; Transition of Substance-Induced, Brief, and Atypical Psychoses to Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Schizophr Bull. 46(3):505-16.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Mousavi SB, Higgs P, Piri N, Sadri E, Pourghasem M, Jafarzadeh Fakhari S, et al 2021. Prevalence of Substance Use among Psychotic Patients and Determining Its Strongest Predictor. Iran J Psychiatry.;16(2):124- 30.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Hjorthøj C, Arnfred B, Behrendt S, Møller SB, Nordentoft M 2021; . Substance-induced psychosis as a risk factor for unipolar depression or anxiety disorders: A nationwide register-based prospective cohort study. J Affect Disord. 295:960-6.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Starzer MSK, Nordentoft M, Hjorthøj C. 2018; Rates and Predictors of Conversion to Schizophrenia or Bipolar Disorder Following Substance-Induced Psychosis. Am J Psychiatry. 175(4):343-50.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Ghose S. Substance-Induced Psychosis: 2018; An Indicator of Development of Primary Psychosis? Am J Psychiatry. 175(4):303-4.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Rognli EB, Heiberg IH, Jacobsen BK, Høye A, Bramness JG. . 2023; Transition From Substance-Induced Psychosis to Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorder or Bipolar Disorder. Am J Psychiatry180(6):437-44.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Vassos E2023. What is the Link Between Substance-Induced Psychosis and Primary Psychotic Disorders? Am J Psychiatry.;180(6):404-6.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Bramness JG, Hjorthøj C, Niemelä S, Taipale H, Rognli EB. Discussing the concept of substance-induced psychosis (SIP). Psychol Med. 2024:1-5.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. World Drug Report 2023. United Nations publication; 2023.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Fiorentini A, Cantù F, Crisanti C, Cereda G, Oldani L, Brambilla P. . 2021; Substance-Induced Psychoses: An Updated Literature Review. Front Psychiatry12:694863.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Chen WL, Hsieh CH, Chang HT, Hung CC, Chan CH 2015. The epidemiology and progression time from transient to permanent psychiatric disorders of substance-induced psychosis in Taiwan. Addict Behav.;47:1-4.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Kendler KS, Ohlsson H, Sundquist J, Sundquist K. 2019; Prediction of Onset of Substance-Induced Psychotic Disorder and Its Progression to Schizophrenia in a Swedish National Sample. Am J Psychiatry. 176(9):711-9.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Alderson HL, Semple DM, Blayney C, Queirazza F, Chekuri V, 2017; Lawrie SM. Risk of transition to schizophrenia following first admission with substance-induced psychotic disorder: a population-based longitudinal cohort study. Psychol Med. 47(14):2548-2555.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Hensel JM, Chartier MJ, Ekuma O, MacWilliam L, Mota N, Tachere RO, et al. 2019;. Risk and associated factors for a future schizophrenia diagnosis after an index diagnosis of unspecified psychotic disorder: A population-based study. J Psychiatr Res114:105-112.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Niemi-Pynttäri JA, Sund R, Putkonen H, Vorma H, Wahlbeck K, Pirkola SP. 2013Substance-induced psychoses converting into schizophrenia: a register-based study of 18,478 Finnish inpatient cases. J Clin Psychiatry.;74(1):e94-9.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Daldegan-Bueno D, Maia LO, Glass M, Jutras-Aswad D, Fischer B2022. Co-exposure of cannabinoids with amphetamines and biological, behavioural and health outcomes: a scoping review of animal and human studies. Psychopharmacology (Berl).;239(5):1211-1230.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar -
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
Clinic