Advertisement

Manuscript Preparation

Preparing the Manuscript

Title Page

The title page of the manuscript should contain short yet descriptive title of the manuscript (Should not exceed 15 words), list of authors with their highest academic degrees and affiliations (address of the University where the research was conducted), details of the corresponding authors including name and complete address with telephone, fax numbers and e-mail address, word count, number of tables and figures, sources of support, any disclaimers and conflict of interest declaration.

Abstract

The original research articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses and case reports require structured abstracts. The abstract should provide the context or background for the study and should state the study's purpose, basic procedures, main findings, and principal conclusions. It should highlight novel and significant aspects of the study or observations, note important limitations. Authors need to ensure that abstract should accurately reflect the content and should not be same as introduction and others sections. Authors need to provide the clinical trials registration numbers (for clinical trials) at the end of the abstract.

Keywords

Three to six words which explain the research briefly and have direct connection with the script can be used as keywords

Abbreviations

All the abbreviations which are used in the article should be listed here.

Introduction

Introduction should provide the context or background for the study and state the purpose or research objectives, hypothesis of the study or the observation. The content in the introduction should be cited properly using the latest references. Avoid providing unrelated and unlimited information.

Methods

An elaborated description containing design, various protocols, techniques, instruments used for the experimental conduct and proof in support of proposed hypothesis or theory should be covered. This category should rationally explain why and how the specified experimental approaches are adopted. This section should exclusively cover experimental details that were listed in the protocol before starting the experiments, all information obtained during the study should be provided in the Results section. Standard protocols should be credited with appropriate citations.

Results

A logical sequence for the presentation of results (text, tables, and figures) should be followed in the order of significance. The most important findings should be prioritized. Detailed representation of primary and secondary outcomes identified in the methods section is highly suggested. The results should be presented in tables and figures at the places of demand to improve the accessibility of the data. Do not repeat all the data in the tables or figures in the text.

Discussion

A clear linking of the main findings with the purpose of the study should be explicitly discussed in this section. A logical conclusion, interpretation and data generation from the experimental study should be the aim of this section. For experimental studies, it is useful to begin the discussion by briefly summarizing the main findings, then explore possible mechanisms or explanations for these findings, compare and contrast the results with other relevant studies, state the limitations of the study, and explore the implications of the findings for future research and for clinical practice.

Acknowledgements

This contains the details of financial and moral support to the authors, grants, funding agencies, partners, collaborations, etc.

References

References of the articles, books, conferences, blogs, website, should be distinctly distinguished. The reference should contain names of the authors, title of the reference article/book, name of the journal/publisher, year of publication, volume number/edition and page number. References are numbered consecutively in the order in which they are first cited in the text.

References should follow the standards summarized in the APA Citation Guide
https://guides.libraries.psu.edu/apaquickguide/intext

Journal References

Derwing, T. M., Rossiter, M. J., & Munro, M. J. (2002). Teaching native speakers to listen to foreign-accented speech. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 23(4), 245-259.

Tables/Figures

Tables should be uploaded at the end of the document after the “References section”. Tables should have a short descriptive title, should be numbered in Arabic numerals, and cited in the text. Symbols and abbreviations represented in the table should be explained in footnotes, below the table. For ex: The results from the In-Vitro dissolution testing are presented in Table 1. Figures should be uploaded at the end of the document after the “Tables”. A suitable title and short explanation should be provided in figure legends. Figures should be numbered in Arabic numerals and cited in the text. Good quality image should be provided.

Plagiarism Detection

ClinicSearch is a member of CrossCheck by CrossRef and iThenticate. iThenticate is a plagiarism screening service that verifies the originality of content submitted before publication. iThenticate checks submissions against millions of published research papers, and billions of web content. Authors, researchers and freelancers can also use iThenticate to screen their work before submission by visiting www.ithenticate.com.

Clinical Trials and Clinical Research: I am delighted to provide a testimonial for the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and the exceptional quality of the journal for my article entitled “Effect of Traditional Moxibustion in Assisting the Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients.” The peer review process for my article was rigorous and thorough, ensuring that only high-quality research is published in the journal. The reviewers provided valuable feedback and constructive criticism that greatly improved the clarity and scientific rigor of my study. Their expertise and attention to detail helped me refine my research methodology and strengthen the overall impact of my findings. I would also like to express my gratitude for the exceptional support I received from the editorial office throughout the publication process. The editorial team was prompt, professional, and highly responsive to all my queries and concerns. Their guidance and assistance were instrumental in navigating the submission and revision process, making it a seamless and efficient experience. Furthermore, I am impressed by the outstanding quality of the journal itself. The journal’s commitment to publishing cutting-edge research in the field of stroke rehabilitation is evident in the diverse range of articles it features. The journal consistently upholds rigorous scientific standards, ensuring that only the most impactful and innovative studies are published. This commitment to excellence has undoubtedly contributed to the journal’s reputation as a leading platform for stroke rehabilitation research. In conclusion, I am extremely satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the overall quality of the journal for my article. I wholeheartedly recommend this journal to researchers and clinicians interested in stroke rehabilitation and related fields. The journal’s dedication to scientific rigor, coupled with the exceptional support provided by the editorial office, makes it an invaluable platform for disseminating research and advancing the field.

img

Dr Shiming Tang

Clinical Reviews and Case Reports, The comment form the peer-review were satisfactory. I will cements on the quality of the journal when I receive my hardback copy

img

Hameed khan