Case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2835-7957/040
Significance of Molecular Markers and Deletion of 1p/19q In Oligodendroglioma Patients by Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization Technique: An Institutional Study
1 Cytogenetic Laboratory, Cancer Biology Department, The Gujarat Cancer, and Research Institute, Asarwa, Ahmedabad-380016, India
2 Professor & Head Onco Pathology Department, The Gujarat Cancer, and Research Institute, Asarwa, Ahmedabad-380016, India.
3 M.Sc. Cancer Biology Student, Cytogenetic Laboratory, Cancer Biology Department, The Gujarat Cancer, and Research Institute, Asarwa, Ahmedabad-380016, India.
*Corresponding Author: Pina J. Trivedi, Cytogenetic Laboratory, Cancer Biology Department, The Gujarat Cancer, and Research Institute, Asarwa, Ahmedabad-380016, India.
Citation: Nidhi Mandaliya., Pina Trivedi, Dharmesh M. Patel, Mahnaz Kazi, Priti Trivedi, et al, (2023), Significance Of Molecular Markers and Deletion Of 1p/19q In Oligodendroglioma Patients by Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization Technique: An Institutional Study, Clinical Reviews and Case Reports, 2(5); DOI:10.31579/2835-7957/040
Copyright: © 2023, Pina J. Trivedi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 16 August 2023 | Accepted: 30 August 2023 | Published: 06 September 2023
Keywords: electric shock; hemoptysis; pulmoner injury
Abstract
Background: 1p/19q loss is caused by a non-balanced translocation t (1;19) (q10; p10), which causes one of the derived chromosomes to be lost. Since 1p/19q deletion is almost exclusively found in glial tumors with Oligodendroglial morphology up to 90% of oligodendrogliomas and up to 50% of oligoastrocytomas, with the exception of pediatric cases, where this mutation is uncommon. It is thus a particularly useful genetic marker. IDH status has major prognostic implications for patients with diffuse gliomas and was suggested to be a better predictive factor for benefit to chemotherapy in the Radiation therapy oncology group trial on adjuvant Procarbazine, Lomustine, and Vincristine (PCV) chemotherapy in anaplastic Oligodendroglial tumors.
Materials and Method: In present study, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) blocks of 25 Glioma patients enrolled for study of 1p/19q codeletion. Signal pattern for FISH results is OOGG for normal & OOG for deletion. Orange signal was tagged for target and green signal tagged for control. Statistical analysis was performed by SPSS software and p valve ≤ 0.05 was considered as significant.
Results: In present study, 19(76%) patients had 1p/19q co-deletion, 2(8%) normal, 4(16%) had partial deletion of 1p or 19q. Results were correlated with variables and found that 1p deletion status shows significant with IDH, 19q deletion status shows significant with tumor type & tumor grade and co-deletion of 1p/19q shows significant with tumor type, tumor grade, P53 status.
Conclusion: As compare to 19q deletion, 1p is frequently shows deletion and ratio of 1p deletion is more compared to 19q deletion. These findings suggest that genetic alterations involving 1p and 19q may be important in glioma development and progression and may be associated with other molecular markers such as IDH and p53. The significance of 1p deletion with IDH status and 19q deletion with glioma type grade status may indicate potential interactions or pathways involved in glioma tumorigenesis. The significant association of 1p/19q co-deletion with type of glioma, grade of glioma, Ki67 expression, and p53 status may suggest that 1p/19q co-deletion could be a useful biomarker in predicting the behavior and prognosis of gliomas. FISH is powerful tool to analyses cytogenetic abnormality in patients with 1p/19q co-deletion
Introduction
Gliomas are the most common type of brain tumor. The category of gliomas includes three main types: Astrocytomas, Ependymomas and Oligodendrogliomas (Mónica L. Mendonça et al; 2023). Of all reported cases, 1.25% were women and 1.81% were men with gliomas worldwide (Hyuna Sung et al; 2021). In India, the frequency of different types of gliomas in descending order were diffuse astrocytomas (22.8%), pilocytic astrocytomas (6.3%), and oligodendrogliomas (4.5%). Anaplastic astrocytomas accounted for 7.0% and oligoastrocytomas accounted for 4.8% of all gliomas in 2021 (Suyash Singh et al; in 2021). Our hospital reported a total of 279 glioma cases in 2021, including 174 males and 105 females. Over the past two decades, there has been a significant increase in the number of glioma cases detected, largely due to improved diagnostic techniques (Szymon Grochans et al;2022). The order of occurrence of gliomas is as follows: Frontal, Temporal, Parietal, Occipital lobes and other structures. (Farina Hanif et al; 2017, Andrew Bohn; 2018). Tumors with lower grades and slower growth rates usually have a longer median survival time than their more aggressive and faster-growing counterparts (https://www.aaroncohen-gadol.com). The following molecular markers such as IDH, MGMT promoter methylation, CIC, FUBP 1, EGRF, ATRX, and 1p/19q co-deletion status are commonly involved in tumorigenesis of gliomas. (M B Pinkham et al; 2015, Elie Massaad et al; 2022)
1p19q co-deletion is thought to be an early oncogenic event as it is present throughout the tumor at initial resection and remains unchanged between initial diagnosis and recurrence (Sebastian Brandner et al; 2022). 1p/19q loss is caused by an unbalanced translocation t(1;19)(q13;25), which causes one of the derived chromosomes to be lost. This genetic alteration is commonly found in oligodendrogliomas, a type of brain tumor that arises from the oligodendrocytes, the cells responsible for producing the protective myelin sheath around nerve fibers (Pinkham et al; 2015). The reasons why 1p19q co-deletion is associated with improved outcomes remain unclear, but may be related to a process of oncogenesis that allows functioning apoptotic pathways to persist or to the loss of gene products that drive treatment resistance or confer tumor suppression (Sebastian Brandner et al; 2022). It is known that co-deletion of chromosome arms 1p and 19q defines a subset of patients with better prognosis, probably due to higher sensitivity to genotoxic stress. Patients with 1p/19q co-deleted oligodendrogliomas have demonstrated better response rates to chemotherapy regimens, such as the combination of procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine (PCV) (Martin J van den Bent et al; 2013). Because of the strong association between loss of 1p/19q alleles and favorable patient outcome, 1p/19q status is routinely investigated in pure and mixed Oligodendroglial tumors. The most common method for determining 1p/19q status is Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization (FISH), which allows detection of 1p/19q allele loss on paraffin-embedded tissue samples and matching of cell shape with genetic alterations (Senetta Rebecca, et al; 2013). FISH was selected for the present studies because of its considerably higher resolution compared with CGH analysis and its higher sensitivity compared with Loss of Heterozygosity analysis. Our aim was to investigate 1p/19q co-deletion in glioma patients using the FISH technique & correlation of markers with disease subtypes.
Figure 1: Represents the signal patterns of 1p and 19q. 2(A) 2 Green 2 Orange signals shows 1p normal 2(B) 2 Green 1 Orange signals shows 1p deletion 2(C) 2 Green 2 Orange signals shows 19q normal 2(D) 2 Green 1 Orange signals shows 19q deletion
Material and method
Patients and tissue samples
A total of 25 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor tissue samples from gliomas were included in the current retrospective study conducted at the Gujarat Cancer & Research Institute. Age, sex, tumor type, tumor grade, microscopic examination, MRI examination, and Immuno Histo Chemistry reports were taken from the patient records maintained in the medical department of the institute. These 25 cases were initially diagnosed as: 15 Oligo dendroglioma, 6 Anapestic oligo dendroglioma, 3 Astro cytoma, and 1 Glioblastoma. Study was approved by Institutional Review committee.
FISH technique
FISH was performed to detect 1p/19q codeletion using Zytovision 1p/19q fluorescent probe kit. The FISH technique was performed using the ZytoLight SPEC 1p36/1q25 dual color probe where orange fluorochrome specific for 1p36 and green fluorochrome specific for 1q25.3 region. In ZytoLight SPEC 19q13/19p13 dual color Probe mixture orange
fluorochrome specific for the region 19q13.32-q13.33 and green fluorochrome specific for 19p13.3 region.
For FISH formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor tissue was sectioned to produce 3–4 μm thick slices. Then, pretreatment was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions by ZytoVision FISH kit. After pretreatment Dual-color FISH was performed on all samples using commercially available dual color probes and following standard methods suggested by the manufacturer’s protocol. Then slides were captured under the OLYMPUS BX 61 fluorescent microscope (OLYMPUS BX61, Japan), & image analysis in ISIS software.
FISH interpretation
The assessment and interpretation of the FISH results were conducted according to the College of American Pathologists (CAP) criteriaJ (Rebecca Senetta et al 2013). For each case, 100 neoplastic nuclei are counted, and the ratios of 1p36/1q25 and 19q13/19p13 was recorded. Results are reported as the ratio of total number of red to green signals for each probe set (1p36:1q25 and 19q13.3: 19p13 signals) which was shown in table 1.
Signal ratios | Interpretation |
<0> | Deletion |
0.8–0.89 | Rescore sample |
0.9–1.29 | Normal |
>1.3 | Gain |
Table :1 FISH signal ratio and interpretation of 1p/19q co deletion results
Statistical analyses
The statistical package for the social sciences (SPSS) was used for data management and calculation of mean and median to describe quantitative data. Multiple comparisons between 1p/19q co-deletion and various categorical data were analyzed by Chi square test. Differences were considered statically significant when the ‘p’ value was less than 0.05.
Results
Clinical data
In the present study total 25 patients included. There were only 14(56%) males and 11(44%) females with a mean age of 43 years. Patients were divided into younger age groups (≤43 years) and older age groups (>43 years) based on the median age. Accordingly, 11 patients (44%) were in the older age group and 14 patients (54%) were in the younger age group. The tumor's location in the brain was chosen for statistical analysis as being in a lobe. In term of tumor location 2(8%) patients had tumor at the Temporal ,5(20%) Parietal, 11(44%) Frontal, 5(20%) Fronto Parietal,1(2%) Fronto Temporal,1(2%) Temporol Parietal. Out of those 25 patients 9 (36%) patients had left sided tumor & 12(48%) patients had right sided tumor whereas the data of 4 patient about tumor site was not obtained.
Histological data
According to the 2016 WHO criteria for glioma, the patients' grade was determined. 3 (12%) patients had Astrocytoma, 21 (84%) had Oligodendroglioma, 1 (4%), Glioblastoma found were studied under a microscope. In the case of tumor Grade 13(52%) patients had Grade II, 9(36%) had Grade III, 3(12%) Grade IV.
Immunohistochemistry (IHC)
In case of IHC examination for all 25 patients IDH, ATRX, P53 and Ki67 which is molecular markers of Glioma tumors were reported by Department of Immunohematology laboratory at GCRI. Immuno Histochemistry data were correlated with 1p/19q deletion status. Form all 25 patients 23(92%) IDH positive, 1(4%) wildtype & 1(4%) equivocal patients were found. For ATRX 23(92%) retained, 1(4%) Focal & in 1 patient data is not obtained. 7(28%) patients were p53 positive and 18 (68%) patients were wild type enrolled in the study. For Ki67 the Median was 10 and the range was 1- 75% for all 25 patients. Out of that 14(56%) had High proliferation 8(32%) were had Low proliferation and in 3 patients’ data was not obtained.
Out of 19 patients, 1p deletion found in 3 patients & only 19q deletion found in 1 patient and 2 patients do not have deletion.
As shown in Table 2, 1p deletion was significantly associated with wildtype IDH (100%) as compared to IDH positive (91%) and IDH equivocal cases (0%, χ2 =7.70, r = -0.43, p =0.03). The association of 1p deletion was not significant with other clinicopathological parameters. Further, 19q deletion was significantly higher in patients with oligodendroglioma (90%) as compared to those with astrocytoma (33%) and glioblastoma (0%, χ2= 9.79, r = -0.58, p=0.002). Additionally, 19q deletion was significantly present in grade II tumors (92%) followed by grade III tumors (77%) and grade IV tumors (33%, χ2 = 5.34, r = -0.43, p=0.03). Moreover, a trend towards significant association of 19q deletion was observed IDH positive (95%) and p53 wildtype gene (89%) as compared to their respective counterparts (χ2= 4.34, r= -0.35, p=0.08). No other significant associations of 19q deletion were observed with rest of the clinicopathological parameters.
Variables | Total patients (%) (n=25) | 1p status | 19q status | ||||
1p Deletion (n=22) (88%) | 1p not deleted (n=3) | Statistical Values | 19q Deletion (n=20) (80%) | 19q not deleted (n=5) | Statistical Values | ||
Age (Range: 17-60) (year) | |||||||
≤43 | 14 | 12 (86) | 2(14) | χ2= 0.15 r= 0.07 p = 0.70 | 12 (86) | 2(14) | χ2 = 0.64 r = -0.16 p=0.44 |
≥43 | 11 | 10 (90) | 1 (10) | 8 (73) | 3 (27) | ||
Gender | |||||||
Male | 14 | 11(79) | 3 (21) | χ2=2.67 r=0.32 p=0.11 | 11 (79) | 3 (21) | χ2 = 0.04 r = 0.04 p =0.84 |
Female | 11 | 11(100) | 0 | 9 (81) | 2 (19) | ||
Type of Glioma | |||||||
Astrocytoma | 3 | 1 (33) | 2 (67) | χ2 =9.87 r = -0.31 p =0.12 | 1 (33) | 2 (67) | χ2= 9.79 r = -0.58 p =0.002 |
Oligodendroglioma | 21 | 20 (95) | 1 (5) | 19 (90) | 2 (10) | ||
Glioblastoma | 1 | 1 (100) | 0 | 0 | 1(100) | ||
Tumor Grade | |||||||
Grade II | 13 | 12 (92) | 1 (8) | χ2 =1.52 r =-0.21 p =0.30 | 12 (92) | 1 (08) | χ2 = 5.34 r = -0.43 p =0.03 |
Grade III | 9 | 8 (89) | 1 (11) | 7 (77) | 2 (23) | ||
Grade IV | 3 | 2 (66) | 1 (34) | 1 (33) | 2 (67) | ||
Laterality | |||||||
Left | 9 | 9 (100) | 0 | χ2 =2.94 r =0.37 p =0.09 | 9 (100) | 0 | χ2 = 0.13 r = -0.07 p =0.73 |
Right | 12 | 12 (100) | 0 | 11 (91) | 1 (09) | ||
Not Obtained | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Tumor Location | |||||||
Temporal | 2 | 2 (100) | 0 | χ2 =1.92 r =0.12 p =0.55 | 2 (100) | 0 | χ2 = 1.36 r = 0.01 p =0.93 |
Parietal | 5 | 4 (80) | 1 (20) | 4 (80) | 1 (20) | ||
Frontal | 11 | 9 (82) | 2 (18) | 8 (73) | 3 (27) | ||
Fronto Parietal | 5 | 5 (100) | 0 | 4 (80) | 1 (20) | ||
Fronto Temporal | 1 | 1 (100) | 0 | 1 (100) | 0 | ||
Temporol Parietal | 1 | 1 (100) | 0 | 1 (100) | 0 | ||
IDH | |||||||
Positive | 23 | 21 (91) | 2 (8) | χ2 =7.70 r = -0.43 p =0.03 | 20 (95) | 1 (05) | χ2= 4.34 r= -0.35 p=0.08 |
Wildtype | 1 | 1 (100) | 0 | 0 | 1 (100) | ||
Equivocal | 1 | 0 | 1(100) | 0 | 1 (100) | ||
ATRX | |||||||
Retained | 23 | 20 (86) | 2 (14) | χ2 =0.14 r =0.07 p =0.71 | 18 (78) | 5 (22) | χ2= 0.27 r= 0.10 p=0.61 |
Focal | 1 | 1 (100) | 0 | 1 (100) | 0 | ||
P53 | |||||||
Wildtype | 18 | 17 (94) | 1 (16) | χ2=2.52 r = -0.31 p = 0.12 | 16 (89) | 2 (11) | χ2=3.17 r = 0.35 p =0.08 |
Positive | 7 | 5 (71) | 2 (29) | 4 (57) | 3 (43) |
Table 2: Correlation of Clinical, Histological and Molecular data with 1p deletion status and 19q deletion status.
Additionally, correlation of 1p/19q co-deletion with the clinicopathological parameters revealed that 1p/19q co-deletion was significantly higher in oligodendroglioma patients (90%) than the other subtypes (χ2 = 15.3, r = -0.70, p = 0.0003). Also, co-deletion was significantly higher in grade II (92%) tumors as compared to grade III (78%0) and grade IV tumors (0%, χ2 = 11.4, r = -0.59, p = 0.002). Further, 1p/19q co-deletion was significantly associated with wildtype p53 (89%) as compared to positive p53 (43%, χ2 = 5.86, r = -0.48, p = 0.014). No other significant association was observed with rest of the clinicopathological parameters (Table 3).
Variables | Total patients (n=25) (%) | 1p/19q Co-deletion (n=19) (76%) | 1p/19q Not Co-deleted (n=6) |
|
Age (Range: 17-60) (year) | ||||
≤43 | 14 | 11 (71) | 3 (29) | χ2 = 0.11 r = 0.06 p = 0.74 |
≥43 | 11 | 8 (72) | 3 (28) | |
Gender | ||||
Male | 14 | 10 (71) | 4 (29) | χ2 = 0.36 r = 0.12 p = 0.56 |
Female | 11 | 9 (81) | 2 (19) | |
Type of Glioma | ||||
Astrocytoma | 3 | 0 | 3 (100) | χ2 = 15.3 r = -0.70 p = 0.0003 |
Oligodendroglioma | 21 | 19 (90) | 2 (10) | |
Glioblastoma | 1 | 0 | 1 (100) | |
Tumor Grade | ||||
Grade II | 13 | 12 (92) | 1 (08) | χ2 = 11.4 r = -0.59 p = 0.002 |
Grade III | 9 | 7 (78) | 2 (22) | |
Grade IV | 3 | 0 | 3(100) | |
Laterality | ||||
Left | 9 | 9 (100) | 0 | χ2 = 0.10 r = 2.23 p = 0.76 |
Right | 12 | 10 (83) | 2 (17) | |
Not Obtained | 4 | 0 | 0 | |
Tumor Location | ||||
Temporal | 2 | 2 (100) | 0 | χ2 = 2.23 r = 0.02 p = 0.92 |
Parietal | 5 | 4 (80) | 1 (20) | |
Frontal | 11 | 7 (64) | 4 (36) | |
Fronto Parietal | 5 | 4 (80) | 1 (20) | |
Fronto Temporal | 1 | 1 (100) | 0 | |
Temporol Parietal | 1 | 1 (100) | 0 | |
IDH | ||||
Positive | 23 | 18 (78) | 5 (22) | χ2 = 0.354 r = -0.33 p = 0.106 |
Wildtype | 1 | 1 (100) | 0 | |
Equivocal | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
ATRX | ||||
Retained | 23 | 17 (74) | 6 (26) | χ2 = 0.34 r = 0.120 p = 0.57 |
Focal | 1 | 1 (100) | 0 | |
P53 | ||||
Wildtype | 18 | 16 (89) | 2 (11) | χ2 = 5.86 r = -0.48 p = 0.014 |
Positive | 3 (43) | 4 (57) |
Table 3: Correlation of Clinical, Histological and Molecular data with 1p/19q co-deletion status.
Discussion
The majority of primary CNS tumours fall under the category of gliomas, which includes several clinically and genetically different subtypes. The most frequent kind, diffuse gliomas, which comprise oligodendrogliomas (WHO grades II and III) and astrocytomas (WHO grades II–IV), are distinguished by their extensive infiltrative features. The identification of 1p/19q codeletion can help refine the classification and grading of oligodendrogliomas. The World Health Organization (WHO) classification system incorporates 1p/19q codeletion status as a key criterion in distinguishing different grades of oligodendrogliomas. Accurate classification is essential for appropriate patient management, including surgical strategies and adjuvant therapies[Sebastian Brandne et al 2022]. In present study 14(56%) males and 11(44%) females with a mean age of 43 years. Patients were divided into younger age groups (≤43 years) and older age groups (>43 years) based on the mean age. Glioma slight male predominance, reported from 1.1 -2, as low as 0.92 male to female ratio in one study. The results were comparable with Jun-Jie Qin et al in 2015 mean age (45 years), Kavita S Reddy et al in 2008 (51.5 years) & Senetta Rebecca et al in 2013 (50 years). In the current study, the presence of 1p/19q codeletion was found to be significant in patients diagnosed with Oligodendroglioma and Anaplastic Oligodendroglioma, with a frequency of 76%. This observation is consistent with previous studies conducted by Vandita Y Singh et al (2014) with a frequency of 61%, Elie Massaad (2022) with a frequency of 100%, Reifenberger J et al (1994) with frequencies ranging from 67% to 81%, and J S Smith et al (1999) with a frequency of 64%. Consequently, these findings support the categorization of Oligodendroglioma tumors as a distinct entity. Out of total 25 cases 19 case have codeletion, 2 case have no-deletion & 4 cases have partial deletion, which accounts for 16% of the cases with partial deletion, with some showing only 1p deletion (16%) and others only 19q deletion (4%). Similar findings were reported by Senetta Rebecca et al (2013), who observed 18.18% and 13.6% of cases with 1p and 19q deletions, respectively and by Zixi Yang et al (2021), who found 4.9% of cases with 1p deletion and 3.9% with 19q deletion. In our current study we observed a significant correlation between the grade of glioma and the presence of 1p/19q codeletion (P<0 p=0.01). p=0.01). xss=removed>
References
- Medonça ML, Coletti R, Gonçalves CS, Martins EP, Costa BM. (2023). Updating TCGA glioma classification through integration of molecular profiling data following the 2016 and 2021 WHO guidelines. bioRxiv. 2023:2023-02.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I. et al. (2021). Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians;71(3):209-249.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Singh S, Deora H, Neyaz A, Das KK, Mehrotra A. et al. (2021). Trends in clinico-epidemiology profile of surgically operated glioma patients in a tertiary care center over 12 years—through the looking glass!. Egyptian Journal of Neurosurgery. 2021 Dec;36(1):1-8.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Grochans S, Cybulska AM, Simińska D, Korbecki J, Kojder K. et al. (2022). Epidemiology of Glioblastoma Multiforme–Literature Review. Cancers.14(10):2412.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Bohn A, Braley A, Rodriguez de la Vega P, Zevallos JC. (2018). The association between race and survival in glioblastoma patients in the US: A retrospective cohort study. PloS one;13(6):e0198581.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Hanif F, Muzaffar K, Perveen K, Malhi SM, Simjee SU. (2017). Glioblastoma multiforme: a review of its epidemiology and pathogenesis through clinical presentation and treatment. Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention: APJCP. 18(1):3.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Louis DN, Perry A, Wesseling P, Brat DJ, Cree IA et al. (2021). The 2021 WHO classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary. Neuro-oncology.;23(8):1231-1251.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Massaad E, Tabbarah A, Barmada M, Rbeiz J, Nasser S. et al. (2022).FISH analyses for 1p and 19q status on gliomas: Reporting an 8 years' experience from a tertiary care center in the Middle East. Annals of Diagnostic Pathology. 57:151899.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Pinkham MB, Telford N, Whitfield GA, Colaco RJ, O'Neill F.et al. (2015). FISHing tips: what every clinician should know about 1p19q analysis in gliomas using fluorescence in situ hybridisation. Clinical Oncology;27(8):445-453.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Brandner S, McAleenan A, Jones HE, Kernohan A, Robinson T. (2022). Diagnostic accuracy of 1p/19q codeletion tests in oligodendroglioma: A comprehensive meta‐analysis based on a Cochrane systematic review. Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology. ;48(4): e12790.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Van den Bent, M.J., Brandes, A.A., Taphoorn, M.J., Kros, J.M., Kouwenhoven, M.C., et al. (2013). Adjuvant procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine chemotherapy in newly diagnosed anaplastic oligodendroglioma: long-term follow-up of EORTC brain tumor group study 26951. Journal of clinical oncology, 31(3), pp.344-350.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Senetta R, Cantogno LV, Chiusa L, Castellano I, Gugliotta P. et al. (2013). A “weighted” fluorescence in situ hybridization strengthens the favorable prognostic value of 1p/19q codeletion in pure and mixed oligodendroglial tumors. Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology. ;72(5):432-441.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Reddy KS. (2008). Assessment of 1p/19q deletions by fluorescence in situ hybridization in gliomas. Cancer genetics and cytogenetics.184(2):77-86.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Qin JJ, Liu ZX, Wang JM, Du J, Xu L.et al. (2015). Prognostic factors influencing clinical outcomes of malignant glioblastoma multiforme: clinical, immunophenotypic, and fluorescence in situ hybridization findings for 1p19q in 816 chinese cases. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention.16(3):971-977.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Little RB, Madden MH, Thompson RC, Olson JJ, LaRocca RV et al. (2013). Anthropometric factors in relation to risk of glioma. Cancer Causes & Control. 1025-1031.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Singh VY, Chacko G, Chacko AG, Rajshekhar V. (2014). Fluorescence in situ hybridization for 1p, 19q status in a cohort of glial neoplasms. Neurology India.;62(1):32.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Reifenberger J, Reifenberger G, Liu L, James CD, Wechsler W. (1994). Molecular genetic analysis of oligodendroglial tumors shows preferential allelic deletions on 19q and 1p. The American journal of pathology.145(5):1175.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Smith JS, Alderete B, Minn Y, Borell TJ, Perry A. et al. (1999). Localization of common deletion regions on 1p and 19q in human gliomas and their association with histological subtype. Oncogene.18(28):4144-4152.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Fallon KB, Palmer CA, Roth KA, Nabors LB, Wang W. et al. (2004). Prognostic value of 1p, 19q, 9p, 10q, and EGFR-FISH analyses in recurrent oligodendrogliomas. Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology.63(4):314-322.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - ng Z, Ling F, Ruan S, Hu J, Tang M. (2021). Clinical and prognostic implications of 1p/19q, IDH, BRAF, MGMT promoter, and TERT promoter alterations, and expression of Ki-67 and p53 in human gliomas. Cancer Management and Research:8755-8765.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Santosh V, Rao S. (2022). A review of adult-type diffuse gliomas in the WHO CNS5 classification with special reference to Astrocytoma, IDH-mutant and Oligodendroglioma, IDH-mutant and 1p/19q codeleted. Indian Journal of Pathology and Microbiology. 65(5):14.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Hu WM, Wang F, Xi SY, Zhang X, Lai JP. (2020). Practice of the new integrated molecular diagnostics in gliomas: experiences and new findings in a single Chinese center. Journal of Cancer.11(6):1371.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Cahill DP, Louis DN, Cairncross JG. (2015). Molecular background of oligodendroglioma: 1p/19q, IDH, TERT, CIC and FUBP1. CNS oncology;4(5):287-294.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Lin AL, Liu J, Evans J, Leuthardt EC, Rich KM. (2014). Codeletions at 1p and 19q predict a lower risk of pseudoprogression in oligodendrogliomas and mixed oligoastrocytomas. Neuro-oncology. 16(1):123-130.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Branzoli F, Pontoizeau C, Tchara L, Di Stefano AL, Kamoun A. et al. (2019). Cystathionine as a marker for 1p/19q codeleted gliomas by in vivo magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Neuro-oncology.21(6):765-774.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Durand, Karine S., Angélique Guillaudeau, Nicolas Weinbreck, Rafaël DeArmas, Sandrine Robert et al. (2010).
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Sebastian Brandner, Alexandra McAleenan, Hayley E. Jones, Ashleigh Kernohan, Tomos Robinson, Lena Schmidt, Sarah Dawson Claire Kelly, et al Diagnostic accuracy of 1p/19q codeletion tests in oligodendroglioma: A comprehensive meta-analysis based on a Cochrane systematic review
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar